Canada: Appeal Court Overturns Trial Decision In Berendsen, Confirming Foreseeability Required For Historic Contamination Lawsuit

In its much anticipated decision in Berendsen v. Ontario, the Ontario Court of Appeal has granted the province's appeal from a trial decision awarding the plaintiff $2.4M in damages and prejudgment interest for historic property contamination. Reversing the trial judgment in three significant areas – causation, standard of care (foreseeability) and negligent inspection/failure to order remediation – the decision has important implications for contaminated site litigation everywhere. Most importantly, it effectively confirms the "state of the art" defence and demands that courts assess "standard of care" based upon actual evidence proving what was foreseeable at the point in time contamination is discharged or deposited, rather than what may be foreseeable today.


The Berendsen case concerns ultra-trace levels of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and other chemicals allegedly emanating from asphalt road waste buried on a dairy farm some 40 years ago. The Ontario Ministry of Transportation (MTO) deposited the waste there in the mid-1960s, with the consent of a previous owner, as was the common practice. The most recent owners of the farm, the plaintiffs, alleged that the ultra-trace levels of PAH contaminated their well water and made it "unpalatable" to their dairy cows, reducing their water intake, decreasing milk production and doubling the cull rate of the herd.

The Ontario Ministry of Environment (MOE) started supplying clean trucked water to the farm in response to the plaintiffs complaint. However, after inspecting the plaintiffs' well water and determining that the levels of contamination were below the Ontario Drinking Water Objectives for human consumption, the MOE stopped trucking water and refused to take further administrative action (i.e., refused to order MTO to remediate).

The trial judge found that the ultra-trace levels of PAH were causing damage to the farmer and that it should have been reasonably foreseeable to the MTO 40 years ago that this would happen eventually.

The Court of Appeal reversed the trial decision in three key areas: causation, foreseeability and negligent inspection/failure to order remediation.


The Court of Appeal qualified its ruling on causation, stating that because it found in favour of the defendant (Ontario) on the standard of care (foreseeability) issue, "it is not necessary to decide whether to set aside [the trial judge's] causation finding." Nonetheless, the court devoted thirteen pages of its thirty-two-page decision on an obiter critique of the causation findings of the trial judge.

Some of the key observations made by the court included:

  1. the trial judge's wholesale rejection of the defence experts and wholesale acceptance of the plaintiffs' expert "raises concern about the objectivity of the trial judge's assessment ... of the expert evidence";
  2. the fact that the plaintiffs' expert evidence at best established harmful chemicals in the closer, older well and did not explain why the cattle refused to drink from the newer well; and
  3. the fact that the plaintiffs' expert evidence completely failed to address how contaminants could have travelled 400 feet to the new well and penetrated its "sound and impenetrable" newer casings.

In the court's view, the above difficulties

...suggest an unexplained reason, unrelated to the chemicals in the buried waste, for the cows' unwillingness to drink the Berendsens' well water.

Standard of Care

On this key aspect of its decision, the Court of Appeal reiterated the Supreme Court's test for standard of care in Resurfice Corp. v. Hanke:

Liability for negligence requires breach of a duty of care arising from a reasonably foreseeable risk of harm to one person, created by the act of omission of another.

The court concluded that "it is evident that foreseeability of harm is a crucial component of a breach of the standard of care."Applying the foreseeability requirement to the case at bar, the court observed that:

[t]o succeed in showing a breach of the standard of care in this case, the Berendsens had to show that, back in the 1960s when Ontario deposited asphalt and concrete waste on the dairy farm, harm to the cattle from this buried waste material was a reasonably foreseeable risk.

In a nutshell, the Court of Appeal agreed with the defendant that

the trial judge erred in law because there was no evidence to support her conclusion [that] MTO knew or ought to have known the quantity of the fill and the location to which it decided to dump the roadbed waste, could potentially result in toxicity to the natural water supply on the farm.

The Court of Appeal noted that no evidence was cited by the trial judge to support this conclusion, whereas extensive evidence was cited by the trial judge for the rest of her decision. As a result, the Court of Appeal held that the trial judge's "finding on foreseeability of harm is stated baldly without any supporting evidence." What was completely missing from the plaintiffs' case and "what was needed was evidence of foreseeability of harm."

Most telling, the Court noted that there was "considerable evidence going the other way –suggesting that harm to the Berendsens' well water and to its herd from the deposit of waste materials was not foreseeable in the 1960s." This included:

  • In the 1960s, the deposit of waste material was not regulated. No industry or governmental standards existed. Indeed, the evidence suggests that what occurred on this farm was a fairly common practice at the time;
  • Guidelines now exist on how close asphalt waste can be placed to wells – a minimum of 100 metres away. These guidelines, however, came into effect in the late 1980s. No guidelines existed in the 1960s;
  • The field of toxicity did not even begin to develop until the 1970s;
  • No evidence was led that in the 1960s soil geologists understood chemicals in buried waste material could migrate to well water 60 feet away;
  • No evidence was led that in the 1960s veterinarians understood water fit for human consumption could nonetheless cause harm to cattle;
  • The plaintiffs' experts could not point to a single scientific study showing that people or animals had been harmed by the level of chemicals in the Berendsens' well water. Both experts considered this case to be "unique."

In the result, the Court of Appeal concluded:

In the present case, I am not persuaded there is any evidence that the harm occurring to the Berendsens was reasonably foreseeable when Ontario deposited waste material on the dairy farm... Although this result may seem harsh in the light of what we now know about the environment, it is inappropriate to use our current knowledge to measure conduct occurring more than 30 years ago.

Negligent Inspection/Failure to Order Remediation

The trial judge found that MOE's investigation of the plaintiffs' well water was done negligently, but then went on to conclude that the defendant had a correlative duty to "eliminate the continuing harmful effects of the buried waste materials."

The Court of Appeal accepted that the Crown had made a policy decision to investigate and therefore assumed a duty of care to carry out that investigation properly. The defendant did admit that the investigation was done negligently. Nevertheless, the Court of Appeal agreed with the defendant that the breach of a duty to investigate in no way implies a breach of a duty to remediate. The court cited several reasons for this conclusion.

First, MOE's negligent investigation was causally irrelevant since the findings of the investigation (that contamination in the well water was below the Ontario Drinking Water Objectives) were ultimately justified and confirmed by the plaintiffs' own expert. Although Ontario

...undoubtedly had the discretionary power to [order remediation] ... it made a deliberate decision not to exercise that power, and it did so for a legitimate reason: the water met existing standards.

In this and other passages, the Court of Appeal appears to have said that, to the extent that there can be any inquiry into the reasonableness of a government's exercise of a discretionary order power in a civil action, the fact that contamination levels meet government standards is sufficient to render reasonable a government decision to take no action.

Second, and perhaps most importantly, the Court of Appeal's decision underscores that the power of the Director of MOE to order an environmental clean up under Ontario's environmental laws "is discretionary, not mandatory" and therefore imposes no duty of care on the government to order remediation. Distinguishing the decision in Heighington v. Ontario (1989), 69 O.R. (2d) 484, which decision was relied on by the trial judge, the court observed:

... the 1937 Public Health Act that governed the dispute in Heighington imposed a duty on the Department of Health to take necessary measures to abate conditions injurious or dangerous to health; neither the Ontario Water Resources Act nor the Environmental Protection Act imposed a duty to remove the waste material or improve the Berendsens' well water.


In this important decision, the Ontario Court of Appeal has effectively restored the law relating to the standard of care in historic contamination cases. For the standard of care to have been breached, there must be compelling evidence that it was reasonably foreseeable, at the time of the alleged wrongful conduct in question, that the discharge/deposit of the contamination would cause the type of harm for which damages are claimed.

The Court's decision also confirms the discretionary nature of environmental remediation orders in Ontario. Hopefully, this decision will foreclose any suggestion of expanded government liability for discretionary decisions not to issue such an order.

Jack Coop is a partner in the Litigation Department in the firm's Toronto office. The focus of his practice is environmental litigation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:
  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.
  • Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.
    If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here
    If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here

    Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

    Use of

    You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


    Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

    The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


    Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

    • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
    • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
    • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

    Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

    Information Collection and Use

    We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

    We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

    Mondaq News Alerts

    In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


    A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

    Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

    Log Files

    We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


    This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

    Surveys & Contests

    From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


    If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


    From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

    *** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


    This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

    Correcting/Updating Personal Information

    If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

    Notification of Changes

    If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

    How to contact Mondaq

    You can contact us with comments or queries at

    If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.

    By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions