Canada: The Rise And Fall Of Canadian Income Trusts

Canadian income trusts flourished in the earlier part of this decade and provided significant tax benefits to their investors, particularly to investors exempt from Canadian income tax and investors not resident in Canada. As a result of Canadian tax changes to impose entity level taxation on Canadian income trusts, these benefits have been eliminated, and it is expected that only a small number of income trusts will exist after the changes are fully effective on January 1, 2011. This article reviews the rise of income trusts in Canada, the Canadian tax changes that are leading to the fall of income trusts, what has happened in the income trust market since the announcement of the rules and alternative structures that may provide tax benefits similar to income trusts.

Canadian Income Trusts

General Description of Income Trusts

The term "income trust" is generally used to refer to a publicly traded trust that is resident in Canada and a "mutual fund trust" for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada). Income trusts are generally classified as business income trusts, royalty trusts or real estate investments trusts ("REITs"). Royalty trusts are income trusts whose principal asset or assets are one or more royalty interests in resource property. REITs are income trusts whose principal activity is the renting, leasing or licensing of real property. The term business income trust is a catch-all term describing all income trusts that are not REITs or royalty trusts.

Typical Income Trust Structures

An important reason for the popularity of income trusts is the tax efficiency they provide. While trusts resident in Canada are generally taxable on their income at the highest marginal federal and provincial tax rates, a mutual fund trust can receive a deduction for income it distributes to its unitholders and so can avoid entity level taxation. Figure 1 depicts two typical business income trust structures.

The Trust-on-Partnership structure is generally more effective than the Trust-on- Corporation structure as it relies on the flow-through nature of partnerships and trusts to avoid entity level taxation. Substantially all of Operating LP's income from the Canadian business is allocated to Income Trust. Income Trust is entitled to deduct in computing its income amounts that are paid or made payable to its beneficiaries as income distributions. Typically, the trust deeds governing income trusts will specifically require the trusts to distribute sufficient income such that the trusts are not themselves subject to any Canadian income tax, although many trusts are revisiting automatic provisions in the face of implementing IFRS, under which such features may be problematic for equity characterization of trust units.

The Trust-on-Corporation structure is used where the business being acquired on creation of the income trust is owned by a corporation and there would be a material tax cost to eliminating the corporation. In these structures, entity level taxation is avoided through debt issued to Income Trust by Opco. Opco will deduct the related interest expense to offset its business income. Income Trust will be required to include the interest expense in income but will deduct distributions it makes to its unitholders. The Trust-on-Corporation structure works quite well where the business is expected to deliver fairly stable or predictable cash flows. Where cash flows fluctuate significantly (as will generally occur in the resource industry) or revenue growth occurs, the Trust-on-Corporation structure is not ideal as interest expense may not fully offset the income of Opco. As a result, royalty trusts generally use a structure such as the one described in Figure 2.

The Royalty Interest held by Income Trust is generally structured as a net profits interest ("NPI") in producing resource assets. The NPI would entitle Income Trust to 99% of Opco's profits from the Resource Property. Opco in computing its income would deduct the payments it makes to Income Trust under the NPI and, accordingly, Opco would only be subject to non-material amounts of Canadian income tax. Income Trust would include in its income the payments received under the NPI but would be entitled to deduct the distributions it makes to its unitholders. Accordingly, provided Income Trust distributes a sufficient amount of income to its unitholders, Income Trust would not be subject to Canadian income tax.

Tax Benefits to Unitholders The flow-through nature of Canadian income trusts provides significant tax benefits to taxexempt investors and non-resident investors. Historically, income trusts also provided significant tax benefits to Canadian taxable investors, as income that is earned through a public corporation has until recently been taxed at materially higher rates than income earned directly by individuals. In part as an initial response to the income trust phenomenon, in 2006 dividend tax rates on "eligible dividends" were lowered which effectively eliminated the tax benefit of income trusts for Canadian taxable investors.

Income trusts provide tax-exempt investors with a much higher net return relative to corporations by eliminating corporate level tax (generally at a rate of 32%). Similarly, nonresidents of Canada generally pay withholding tax at a rate of 15% on income trust distributions, instead of combined Canadian income and non-resident withholding tax of approximately 47% on income earned through dividend-paying corporations. As a result, for every $100 of income earned by an income trust, a tax-exempt investor would net $100 and a non-resident investor would generally net $85, compared to approximately $68 and $58, respectively, for every $100 earned by a public corporation taxable in Ontario.

This tax efficiency requires that the income trust distribute its income on an on-going basis, resulting in a different investment profile than a typical common share investment. As a result, the popularity of income trusts is likely at least partially attributable to the fact that Canada does not have a developed high-yield debt market.

The Rise of Income Trusts

The first income trusts were royalty trusts which date back to 1986. The REIT emerged in the early 1990s, enabling institutional and retail investors to invest in substantial pools of real estate assets on a tax-efficient basis. Business income trusts developed during this period but did not attract much attention until around 2001 when they began to gain momentum as tax-efficient yield investments in an environment of declining interest rates. The tax-efficient distributions of income trusts allowed unitholders to pay a premium to purchase income trust units when compared to shares of corporations, particularly in the low interest rate environment.

At the beginning of 2001 there were 70 income trusts with an aggregate market capitalization of approximately $14 billion. Although the stock market as a whole was going through tough times in 2001 and 2002, the income trust market was booming. In 2002 the initial public offerings of income trusts accounted for 94% (in terms of value) of all initial public offerings on the Toronto Stock Exchange. By the end of 2003 there were a total of 123 income trusts with an aggregate market capitalization of $74 billion. The momentum of income trusts continued to accelerate after 2003 and by October 31, 2006 there were a total of 245 income trusts with an aggregate market capitalization of $210 billion. From the initial focus on level yield income plays, the income trust market had expanded to virtually all types of businesses.

The Perceived Tax Leakage

As the number and scope of income trust conversions increased, the Canadian government became more and more concerned with the tax leakage it perceived from businesses adopting a flow-through trust structure. In September of 2005, the Minister of Finance estimated the federal tax leakage for 2004 at $300 million. In September of 2006, a University of Toronto Professor estimated that the combined federal and provincial tax leakage of businesses utilizing the income trust structure was $700 million annually and, after the completion of the publicly announced proposed trust conversions as of that date, the combined federal and provincial tax leakage would be $1.1 billion annually.

The Canadian Government's Response

For a number of years, the Department of Finance was unsure how to respond to the perceived revenue losses or how to curtail the growing trend of corporations converting to income trusts. In November 2005, they substantially reduced the tax rate on eligible dividends received by Canadian resident individuals from corporations. In the words of the Minister of Finance, this was intended "to make the total tax on dividends received from large Canadian corporations more comparable to the tax paid on distributions of income trusts, and to eliminate the "double taxation" of dividends at the federal level".

However, this legislative change did not address the tax benefits of investing in income trusts for tax-exempt and non-resident investors and, thus, did not stem the income trust conversion tide. From January 2006 to October 2006, corporations (including two large Canadian telecoms - Telus Corporation and BCE Inc.) with an aggregate market capitalization of $70 billion had either converted or announced their intention to convert into income trusts. In addition, there was market speculation that many other large Canadian corporations (including EnCana Corporation) would announce their intention to convert into income trusts. This led to the Department of Finance's announcement on October 31, 2006 (referred to by some as the "Halloween Massacre") of the specified flow-through entity legislation (the "SIFT Legislation") which imposes an entity-level tax on publicly-traded income trusts at a rate comparable to corporate tax rates and taxes investors on income trust distributions in a manner similar to shareholders of a Canadian corporation.

The SIFT Legislation provides existing income trusts and their unitholders with a grandfathering period ending December 31, 2010 under which the pre-SIFT regime applies, provided the income trusts comply with guidelines limiting their growth. While the SIFT Legislation recognized the significance of pooled real estate investment vehicles in Canada by providing an exemption for qualifying REITs (the "REIT Exemption"), the REIT Exemption is very narrow and generally only REITs that earn passive income qualify. REITs that undertake any sort of development activities or have operating components (e.g., hotels, seniors' housing, health care facilities, etc.) will not generally qualify for the REIT Exemption, and the industry continues to grapple with the looming application of these new rules.

At the time the SIFT Legislation was announced, the Department of Finance announced that rules (the "Conversion Rules") would be enacted to allow entities that were affected by the SIFT Legislation to convert into taxable Canadian corporations without any adverse tax consequences to them or their unitholders. The Conversion Rules were subsequently enacted into law on March 12, 2009 and contemplate the conversion of an income trust into a taxable Canadian corporation through either a unit-for-share exchange with a corporate successor (the "Exchange Method") or a distribution of shares of a corporate subsidiary by the income trust to its unitholders on redemption of the trust units (the "Distribution Method"). The Conversion Rules only apply where the transactions occur on or before December 31, 2012. The Exchange Method is described in Figure 3.

The Distribution Method is described in Figure 4.

The Conversion Rules also provide for a tax-deferred wind-up of an income trust after it is taken over by a taxable Canadian corporation, which can allow the purchaser to offer unitholders a rollover on an exchange of income trust units for shares of the purchaser. It also allows the preservation of tax basis where the assets of the income trust have a tax cost greater than their fair market value.

Income Trusts After the Halloween Massacre

In the week following the announcement of the SIFT Legislation, the aggregate market capitalization of the income trust market dropped $27 billion, or 13%. In this environment, many income trusts became prime targets for takeovers. In the one-year period following the announcement of the SIFT Legislation, there were 55 takeovers of income trusts either announced or completed. With the credit markets beginning to tighten at the end of 2007, the pace slowed substantially with only 5 takeovers in the following 18 months.

To date only 25 income trusts have converted to corporations. A few of these conversion transactions have been structured to include loss companies in an effort to allow the successor corporations to continue to distribute cash flows without the incurrence of entity level taxation for a period of time. It is expected that substantially all of the remaining income trusts (other than those that believe that they will qualify for the REIT Exemption) either will be taken over or will convert to corporations prior to January 1, 2011. Although it is possible for income trusts to remain as such past January 1, 2011 and be taxed in a similar manner to corporations, most income trusts will likely determine that their current structures are cumbersome (from both a commercial and tax perspective) and will convert to corporate form prior to such date.

There are currently 32 REITs that trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange. Of these REITs, only 10 have indicated that they believe they currently qualify for the REIT Exemption. Grappling with the narrowness of the REIT Exemption, their disclosure has been along these lines: "[w]hile there can be no assurance in this regard, due to uncertainty surrounding the interpretation of the relevant provisions of the REIT exemption, we expect that we will qualify for the REIT exemption..."

Of the balance of the REITs, 12 have stated that they will restructure their activities in an effort to qualify for the REIT Exemption by 2011, 9 have stated they do not and will not qualify for the REIT Exemption and 1 has stated that it does not currently qualify, and it is not determinable whether it can restructure its activities so that it can qualify, for the REIT Exemption.

Alternative Structures

Naturally other structures will be considered in light of the SIFT Legislation. At the time the SIFT Legislation was announced, the Department of Finance stated "if there should emerge structures or transactions that are clearly devised to frustrate ...[the policy objectives of the SIFT Legislation], any aspect of these measures may be changed accordingly and with immediate effect". While this has so far remained a vague threat, it has influenced thinking about alternatives.

Two principal alternative structures are discussed below. Other structures also are being considered more tentatively as successors to income trusts including, among others, crossborder high-yield common share structures, publicly traded royalty interests and structures utilizing a partnership formed, and with a mind and management, outside Canada to replace the trusts in some of the current income trust models.

REITS – Spinning off Bad Assets and Operations

At least two REITs have stated that they are considering spinning off their non-qualifying activities to a taxable corporation in order to satisfy the REIT Exemption. This would involve transferring non-qualifying operations and assets to a taxable corporation that would lease the real property necessary to operate the business from the REIT. Securities of the corporation and the REIT could trade together (often referred to as "stapled securities"). Assuming the REIT qualifies for the REIT Exemption, this structure would partially maintain the tax efficiencies of the income trust structure, with its benefits depending on the size of the real estate component in the business. Figure 5 provides an example of this structure.

Stapled Debt/Share Structure

As an alternative to the income trust structure, a number of offerings were completed by "stapling" common shares of a public Canadian corporation to high yield subordinated debt of that same issuer. The stapled securities, referred to as income participating securities or income deposit securities, have been generally used in the cross-border context – securities of Canadian corporations carrying on U.S. businesses. The stapled debt/share structure has only been used by one issuer that carries on a Canadian business. To date, these offerings have not generally been successful but with the fall of income trusts, these structures may gain momentum.

The stapled debt/share structure is designed to eliminate or minimize entity level taxation through deductible interest payments to holders of the stapled securities. These structures are essentially the Trust-on-Corporation structure described above, but without the trust. In the case of non-resident investors, Canadian withholding tax on interest has recently been eliminated (except in limited circumstances). Accordingly, in the stapled debt/share structure it is now possible to flow business income to non-resident investors free of any Canadian tax. Figure 6 provides an example of the stapled debt/share structure.

Whether these structures are offside the Department of Finance's warning about substitute structures remains to be seen.


The flow-through nature of income trusts will continue to provide tax exempt and nonresident investors with high-yield tax efficient distributions in the near term. With the SIFT Legislation coming into full effect on January 1, 2011, the search for alternative structures has begun in an effort to fill the hole that will be left in the Canadian capital markets by the disappearance of income trusts. At the same time, REITs are struggling to come to grips with the new regime that they face, and restructuring that may be required as a result.

In general, income trusts will be converting back to corporate form and their highdistribution model is likely to change. Whether or what other alternatives will develop and who they will suit remains to be seen. One of the fall-outs of the demise of the Canadian income trust market could possibly be the development of more of a high-yield debt market in Canada as yield investors look for alternatives. All of these questions will become clearer over the next few years as these changes work through, and as capital markets revive.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.