Canada: Energy Update - Oct 2009

Last Updated: October 14 2009

This is a joint publication between our Energy, Regulatory and Energy Litigation Practice Groups

Regulatory Delay And The One Project-One Assessment Proposal

By Marie H. Buchinski, Kelsey J. Drozdowski, and Celeste M. Hutchinson

In Canada, the federal, provincial and territorial governments have assumed a role in the development and operation of various energy projects, particularly those that have the potential to impact the environment. This separation of jurisdiction between the levels of government, arising in part from the division of powers under the Constitution Act, 1867, has demonstrably contributed to regulatory delays regarding project approvals because of the sometimes difficult task of coordinating the review of the project amongst the levels of government, and even within one particular level of government. Delays in the regulatory approval process can have significant and negative impacts upon industrial development in Canada, with impacts reaching far beyond the proponents of the particular project.

Take, for example, the oft-cited Mackenzie Valley Pipeline, the applications for which were filed with regulators in the fall of 2004 and spring of 2005. While the Joint Review Panel conducting the regulatory review of the project concluded its public hearings on November 29, 2007 – close to two years ago – after 115 days of hearings in 26 communities recorded on more than 11,000 pages of transcripts, and more than 5,000 submissions, the Joint Review Panel has not yet issued its final report, which must be submitted to the federal government and to the National Energy Board for their consideration before further regulatory decisions can be made and the project can proceed. This regulatory delay, along with rising costs and more recent concerns regarding demand for natural gas, has put the fate of the pipeline into question.

The impacts do not stop there. Calgary-based MGM Energy Corp. recently announced that it will cancel its Arctic drilling program this winter, resulting in a $10-million penalty to the Inuvialuit Regional Corp. in August 2010. MGM's press release indicates that the cancellation is due to the uncertainty regarding the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline.

In recognition of the difficulties that can arise from such delays in the regulatory process, recent efforts have been aimed at coordinating the federal, provincial and territorial regulatory processes. In January of this year, the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) published Potential Models of a One Project-One Environmental Assessment Approach which identifies four potential models for streamlining the environmental assessment (EA) processes in Canada as identified by the Environmental Assessment Task Group. Three of these models (Joint Process Model; Delegation Model; Substitution Model) focus on achieving a single EA process by, in part, adopting a single set of information requirements. The fourth model – the Coordination (Harmonization) Model – contemplates either separate or combined information sets. All, however, are aimed at achieving a more streamlined regulatory process by creating a single, jointly implemented process, having a single jurisdiction or process to conduct the EA process, or by increasing coordination between EA authorities. While these proposals would not require a transfer in the ultimate, decision-making authority, each of these models would require changes to the current EA processes and to existing legislation, which in itself could involve lengthy processes.

The CCME is not the only impetus for change. Canadian federal, provincial and territorial ministers for the energy and mining industries recently discussed regulatory delays at the 2009 Energy & Mines Ministers Conference held on August 31 and September 1, 2009. There, the Canadian Mineral Industry Federation (CMIF) urged the ministers to take action to sustain Canada's exploration and mining sectors and to encourage economic recovery by undertaking regulatory restructuring. The CMIF identified several concerns with the current process, including duplicative regulatory systems, arguing that ambiguity in this and other areas could have the potential to stifle Canada's status as a destination for capital investment.

The current economic state in Canada and the goal of creating economic stability has created additional pressure upon governments to streamline their regulatory processes. Canada's energy and mines ministers agreed that to maintain prosperity and to fully recover from the current economic situation, Canada must continue to be at the forefront in developing and deploying new technologies, advancing research, and developing solutions to regulatory, social and environmental challenges. The ministers affirmed their commitment to immediate action that would improve Canada's regulatory system through the creation of a "one project-one assessment" approach to EAs that would support the competitiveness and sustained growth of the energy and mining industry.

So, what now? What we do know is that the ministers have agreed to task senior officials to work with their counterparts responsible for EAs and related regulatory approvals on fundamentally improving performance, and to report back to the 2010 conference. We also know that recent publications attempt to address the degree of uncertainty that often arises for projects requiring regulatory approvals, including the Environmental Assessment Scoping Guidance for Energy and Mining Projects (July 24, 2009). This document sets out 42 best management practices aimed at reducing the uncertainty that is attributable to the scoping phase of an EA. It is proposed that these best management practices be applied by decision making authorities and technical expert departments in relation to scoping, process management, relationship management, documentation, policy management and guidance. Of note are recommended best practices #24, #25, and #26 related to the establishment of EA agreements for joint panel reviews with other jurisdictions; the identification of one overall coordinator of the EA process; and encouraging the use of one scoping document for multi-jurisdictional EAs to detail the scope of the project and of the assessment for all of the decision making authorities involved. However, the specific ministerial commitments leave unanswered questions as to how the commitment to immediate action will be implemented.

Combined with existing federal-provincial protocols and existing provisions of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act for governmental cooperation and harmonization respecting EAs, these recent attempts to improve process efficiencies may assist in reaching the ultimate creation of a "one project-one assessment" approach to EAs across Canadian jurisdictions. Considering however the potential fate of the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline and the recent MGM announcement of a $10-million penalty, the question is whether this recent push for regulatory reform will be "too little, too late", at least for some participants in the Canadian economy.

The federal proposal for a "one project-one assessment" approach to EAs is not the only current initiative seeking to streamline regulatory approval processes. The Alberta Environment Ministry is considering an option that would remove certain in-situ oil sands developments from the mandatory list for environmental impact assessments. Rather, a "code of practice" would be developed that industry would agree to abide by, in an effort to create a more efficient and streamlined regulatory process, reducing the potential for lengthy regulatory delays.

Pending implementation of further rationaliz-ation/streamlining initiatives, it will continue to be critical for project proponents to utilize existing EA harmonization tools, and to develop project teams, including legal, that are able to advance projects on a multi-front jurisdictional basis. In other words, to the extent that there is potential for delay, ensure it is not self-inflicted.

The Narrowing Of Non-Operator Set-Off Rights?

By Chris D. Simard

Current financial conditions have renewed industry focus on the various rights of parties in the context of insolvency proceedings and the steps exposed parties might take to mitigate various credit risks. A recent case arising from the SemCAMS insolvency suggests that set-off rights non-operators might have thought they had may be narrower than expected. That finding was based upon a characterization of the operator as a "trustee" of the owners of the plant. As a result, parties to traditional construction, ownership and operation (CO&O) agreements may want to consider taking additional measures to protect themselves from an insolvent operator.


On June, 30, 2009, the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta issued a decision in Re: SemCanada Crude Company, 2009 ABQB 397. On August 19, 2009, the Court of Appeal of Alberta dismissed an application for leave to appeal the decision (2009 ABCA 275). The decision arose in the context of the SemCanada Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) proceedings.

Trilogy Energy L.P. sold gas to SemCAMS ULC pursuant to an Inlet Purchase Agreement. SemCAMS also provided transportation and processing services to Trilogy, in SemCAMS' capacity as operator of a number of gas processing plants. Trilogy was a joint owner in some, but not all, of the plants. There were other joint owners.

SemCAMS became insolvent and obtained Court protection under the CCAA in July 2008. At that time, it owed Trilogy approximately $4 million relating to its purchases under the Inlet Purchase Agreement. Both before and after the commencement of the CCAA proceedings, Trilogy was indebted to SemCAMS under various CO&O and gas processing agreements for gathering, transportation and processing services provided by SemCAMS.

Trilogy wanted to set-off the amount it was owed for the gas purchases against the fees that it owed to SemCAMS.

The Law

Under the CCAA, creditors' set-off rights existing at law, or by virtue of their contracts with the insolvent debtor companies, are generally preserved. In this case, Trilogy argued that it was therefore entitled to set-off the cross-claims by way of contractual, legal or equitable set-off.

The Court's Decision

Prior to determining Trilogy's entitlements to set-off, the Court commented on the nature of the relationship between SemCAMS and other joint owners of the plants. Madam Justice Romaine of the Court of Queen's Bench reviewed the contractual provisions in the CO&O agreements and found that, based on those contractual provisions and also the characteristics of the relationship, SemCAMS was a trustee as operator of the plants. In this regard, Justice Romaine specifically made reference to the Bank of Nova Scotia v. Société Générale (Canada) (1988) 87 A.R. 133 (C.A.) decision. The Court found that, similar to the case of an operator of a well under a CAPL joint operating procedure, SemCAMS was a trustee for its joint owners in the plants.

Contractual Set-Off

In the Inlet Purchase Agreement, the parties had agreed to a very broad set-off clause, which entitled Trilogy to set-off any amounts owing under that agreement against any amounts owing under "any other agreements" between the parties. The Court found that this contractual provision was not broad enough to cover agreements (like the CO&O agreements) in which SemCAMS was contracting as an operator or in trust for other joint owners. Trilogy was therefore not entitled to contractual set-off.

Legal Set-Off

The requirements for legal set-off are that the cross-claims be liquidated debts and that they be mutual (mutuality is said to require claims "between the same parties and in the same right"). Romaine J. found that there was no mutuality in this case, because SemCAMS, in the CO&O and gas processing agreements, was contracting not in its individual capacity, but rather as a trustee for its joint owners. Because SemCAMS and Trilogy were not "liable solely to each other", mutuality was therefore not established.

Equitable Set-Off

There are a number of factors that courts consider in deciding whether to exercise their discretion to grant equitable set-off, but the most important is that the two cross-claims must be "so clearly connected" with each other that it would be "manifestly unjust" to allow one party to enforce payment without taking into consideration the cross-claim. The obligations were not found to meet these requirements. In this case, the obligations between Trilogy and SemCAMS did not arise out of the same contract but, instead, out of 29 different contracts that had been entered into over a period of 10 years. The lack of mutuality between the parties was also a factor that the Court considered in determining that it would not be appropriate to grant equitable set-off.

As noted, the Court of Appeal of Alberta did not grant leave to appeal, so this case will not be reviewed by a full panel of that Court.

The case is a warning to industry participants to be aware of the capacity in which their counterparties are acting, as this may affect their ability to rely on set-off rights that they have agreed to or believe are otherwise available by contract, at law or in equity. This is an especially important consideration in the oil and gas industry, where so much contracting takes place via "trustee-like" or representative parties. Non-operators may want to consider taking additional measures to protect their exposure. These measures might include additional contractual agreements to effect contractual set-off, the taking of security or more sophisticated cash management strategies.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.