Canada: Canadian Implications Of U.S. Climate Change Regulation - U.S. House Passes American Clean Energy And Security Act

While Canadian market participants are understandably focused on our own emerging climate-change regulatory framework, it is important to keep up to date on U.S. developments and their potential implications for our markets and industries. This short article provides a high-level overview of key features of current U.S. federal legislative initiatives and their possible effects north of the border.

Key features of ACES

On June 26, 2009, the American Clean Energy and Security Act (H.R. 2454, the Bill or ACES) was narrowly passed by the U.S. House of Representatives. The passage of the Bill is the first major step in the U.S. towards the institution of federal climate change and greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction legislation. ACES' key policy objectives are set out in its four main titles:

  1. Clean Energy. Establishes a national renewable energy standard and promotes renewable energy, carbon capture and sequestration, and smart grid technology;
  2. Energy Efficiency. Increases energy-efficiency standards in household appliances and various industries and public institutions;
  3. Reducing Global Warming Pollution. Establishes a nationwide cap-and-trade program to reduce GHG emissions; and
  4. Transitioning to a Clean Energy Economy. Supports the transition to a low-carbon, energy-efficient economy for both industry and consumers.

Several features are worth particular mention. The Bill amends the U.S. Clean Air Act to bring GHG emissions from regulated sources to 97% of 2005 levels by 2012, 83% by 2020, 58% by 2030, and 17% by 2050. In connection with its framework for a carbon market, it provides for the trading, banking and borrowing, auctioning, holding and retiring of emissions allowances. The Bill also gives the Commodity Futures Trading Commission jurisdiction over the establishment, operations, and oversight of markets for regulated allowance derivatives.

In order to gain the support needed to pass the Bill in the House, several notable amendments were made:

Credit allocations. The cap-and-trade proposal in the Obama budget called for 100% of emission allowances to be auctioned. ACES falls well short of that target by initially allowing only 15% of allowances to be auctioned, while the other 85% are to be allocated for free to emitters. Refineries secured a larger allocation than was originally intended under the version of the Bill first introduced in the House. These changes are viewed as a necessary compromise designed to gain the support of congressional representatives of industrial and coal-burning states.

Agriculture and forestry. In last-minute negotiations during the drafting of final amendments to ACES, major concessions were secured by the agriculture and forestry lobby. The final version of the Bill effectively excluded these industries from the definition of "capped sectors," while leaving responsibility for developing a program for the generation of offsets in these sectors to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) rather than the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). These changes are significant because it was originally intended that all sectors of the economy would be covered by the cap-and-trade regime, and many suspect that the USDA will be more permissive than the EPA in developing an offset program for agriculture and forestry.

Senate response to the bill

Democratic Party leaders had set an end-of-summer deadline for bringing a climate-change bill to the floor for a vote, but because the Senate has been preoccupied with health care and other initiatives, that deadline has now been pushed back. According to a spokesman, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid "fully expects the Senate to have ample time to consider this comprehensive clean energy and climate legislation before the end of the year." Passage by the end of 2009 would be symbolically significant, as the United Nations is scheduled to hold a global summit in Copenhagen in December on the topic of the next steps on controlling GHG emissions after Kyoto expires in 2012.

Speculation is rampant as to whether the Democratic Party leadership in the Senate can muster the sixty votes needed to avoid a Republican-backed filibuster. With some moderate Democrats joining many Republicans in opposition to the current bill, Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairman Barbara Boxer and Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry have indicated they need time to work out mutually acceptable language. Among the concerns expressed by some senators who are considered swing votes is the prospect of price instability as experienced following the implementation of the European Union Emission Trading System. Senator Boxer is considering a price collar on emission allowance prices to provide greater cost certainty. Arkansas Democrat Blanche Lincoln has described ACES as "deeply flawed," citing its adverse impacts on smaller oil refineries such as those in her state. Ten other Democrats, representing states with significant manufacturing industries, wrote to President Obama to communicate support for inclusion of a "longer-term border adjustment" in climate legislation to ensure that energy-intensive jobs and industries do not leave the U.S. for non-carbon-constrained countries.1 The fact that many of the undecided senators come from coal and manufacturing states (or from Sunbelt states that would experience the sharpest increases in energy costs under the proposed legislation) is an indication of the difficulties that ACES may be facing.

Canadian business under ACES

Canadian businesses will be affected by a U.S. climate-change regulatory regime, no matter what form it eventually takes. Until the Senate passes its own version of the Bill, the nature of its impact will not be understood with any certainty. However, based on the current form of the Bill, it is clear that Canadian businesses will be forced to consider the following issues:


As mentioned above, many senators are insisting that climate-change legislation include a broad carbon tariff that goes beyond ACES' more limited tariff on "carbon-intensive" goods. A carbon tariff would prevent the occurrence of "carbon leakage" as U.S. industries lose competitiveness to jurisdictions that do not price carbon to the same standard. Similarly, the inclusion of subsidies in ACES to offset the cost increases associated with pricing carbon borne by U.S. companies may distort the dynamic of cross-border competition.
Canadian businesses, many of which are reliant on cross-border trade with the U.S., could stand to win or lose - depending on how the Senate crafts its final version of the Bill and how Canadian authorities choose to respond to its impact on trade.

If the Senate passes a version of ACES that does incorporate tariffs, subsidies or other trade barriers, those barriers would certainly be challenged in an international forum such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) or the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). However, the U.S. could potentially assert a right to implement a tariff or subsidy through an exception under GATT or NAFTA. For example, pursuant to Article XX of GATT, WTO members are authorized to adopt measures that are (i) necessary to protect human, animal or plant life or health, (ii) relate to the conservation of exhaustible natural resources, or (iii) secure compliance with national law, so long as such measures are made effective in conjunction with restrictions on domestic production or consumption. These exceptions are subject to the requirement that such measures are not applied in a manner that would constitute a means of arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination between countries where the same conditions prevail, or a disguised restriction on international trade. NAFTA also contains similar provisions that can potentially be used to justify a carbon tariff.

A possible response to an import tariff under U.S. federal cap-and-trade legislation by the Canadian government, apart from a WTO/NAFTA challenge in the short term, would be to implement its own equivalent regime to address climate change. In this event, the Canadian government would become the recipient of the tariff revenue (or equivalent) that would otherwise flow to the U.S. government.

Oil sands

Canada has the second-largest proven oil reserves in the world. Many view the viability of the Alberta oil sands as a major determinant of overall Canadian prosperity. However, the extraction and refining of tar sands is an energy-intensive process that produces substantial amounts of GHGs, and any attempt to curb GHG production will inevitably have a dampening effect on the overall economic activity in the oil sands and Alberta as a whole.

Earlier versions of ACES threatened Alberta oil directly, reflecting sentiments expressed publicly by President Obama that the U.S. would seek to avoid fuels with large associated environmental impacts. Early drafts of ACES provided for a low-carbon fuel standard, similar to that created by Governor Schwarzenegger in California, requiring that annual average lifecycle GHG emissions from transportation fuel not exceed the annual average lifecycle GHG emissions from transportation fuel in 2005. While this proposal would have significantly reduced the viability of Alberta oil as a marketable fuel source in the U.S., it has since been dropped - although a less-targeted carbon tariff on Alberta oil could still emerge in the Senate bill.

Agriculture and forestry

As GHG emissions in the U.S. agriculture and forestry sectors would not be regulated under ACES, there is obviously no significant concern that trade barriers would be erected by the U.S. to compensate for an ACES-related reduction in U.S. competitiveness. It also seems likely that any cap-and-trade regime instituted in Canada would follow the U.S. lead by not regulating these sectors. However, in the event that Canadian officials were to implement a cap-and-trade or other GHG reduction regime that did include agriculture and forestry, concerns over competitiveness would be felt domestically. This could lead Canada to impose its own version of an import tariff designed to prevent carbon leakage from Canada to the U.S. Such a move would undoubtedly subject Canada to attack through the WTO, NAFTA etc., as discussed above, and could create grounds for the imposition of countervailing measures by Canada's trading partners. Canada's regulatory approach on this matter will therefore be critical to the prospects of the domestic agricultural and forestry sectors.

International offsets

ACES would permit capped entities to hold an international emission allowance in lieu of a domestic emission allowance, subject to certain conditions. Were Canada to create a cap-and-trade regime, therefore, Canadian entities would be able to sell or transfer their unused allowances to U.S. entities, including their U.S. subsidiaries and parents. The transferability of allowances provided for in ACES would make Canada/U.S. carbon regulation a cross-border exercise.

The Senate version of the Bill currently provides for the differential treatment of international offsets as compared to offsets generated within the U.S. Each entity subject to an emissions cap may satisfy a percentage of the number of allowances required to be held by holding 1 domestic offset credit or 1.25 international offset credits in lieu of an emission allowance. This differential treatment takes effect in 2018. Until then, domestic and international offsets will be accepted at par.

Whether this is a step to protect the integrity of the cap-and-trade regime from non-compliant offsets or whether it is designed to protect and foster a domestic offset project market in the U.S. is not clear. In either case it is a key regulation that will materially affect the growth of the Canadian offset market. All else being equal, if passed by the Senate such a provision will make it likely that only short-term Canadian projects (i.e. five years or less) that can take advantage of the at-par treatment between 2012 and 2017 will be competitive with U.S. projects, if the offsets generated by them are to be marketed in the U.S.


What should be apparent from the foregoing is that the climate change initiatives in the U.S. need to be carefully followed by the Canadian marketplace, as it is highly likely that U.S. legislation would have significant consequences for Canada.

Stikeman Elliott's Emissions Trading and Climate Change Group is watching the progress of the debate in the U.S. Senate closely in order to help our clients respond effectively to U.S. developments wherever it is advisable to do so.


1. Sens. Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), Russ Feingold (D-WI), Carl Levin (D-MI), Evan Bayh (D-IN), Bob Casey (D-PA), Robert Byrd (D-WV), Arlen Specter (D-PA), John Rockefeller (D-WV), and Al Franken (D-MN).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.