Canada: Métis Consultation Plays Key Role In Land Use And Natural Resource Development Planning

Métis consultation and accommodation is emerging as an increasingly important aspect of land use and natural resource development planning. Without a solid understanding of who the Métis are, how they are governed and how Métis rights-bearing communities are identified, proponents run the risk of expensive litigation and project delays. Although the duty to consult and accommodate the Métis ultimately rests with the Crown, proponents still have an important role to play. As a standardized process for consulting with the Métis has yet to be developed, project proponents are encouraged to adhere to best practices regarding notification, collaborative information exchange and consideration of Métis concerns.

The Emerging Issue Of Métis Consultation

The controversy surrounding the extent of Métis harvesting rights in Alberta has been pushed to the spotlight as the next phase of R. v. Jones, Bates, and Hirsekorn (Jones) gets set to begin in mid-September 2009. The case involves three Métis harvesters who were charged with hunting without a licence. While not expected to conclude until early 2010, the case is an important one to watch because it raises the constitutional issue of who is considered Métis in Alberta and where Métis can hunt. The Jones case also highlights that while there is a growing recognition of Métis rights under section 35 of the Constitution Act, there remains a lack of understanding of exactly how to identify a Métis rights-bearing community. That deficiency makes it difficult for governments and project proponents to ensure proper consultation.

Who Are The Métis?

The Métis are one of the three distinct Aboriginal peoples of Canada recognized under section 35 of the Constitution Act (Act). Historically, the Métis were born from the marriage of Cree, Ojibwa and Salteaux women, and European fur traders. Over time, the Métis developed their own unique language, culture and political traditions. In 2002, the Métis National Council (MNC) General Assembly adopted a national definition of Métis as follows:

Métis means a person who self-identifies as Métis, is of historic Métis Nation Ancestry, is distinct from other Aboriginal Peoples and is accepted by the Métis Nation.

According to this definition, Métis ancestry is linked to the historic Métis nation who resided in the area of land in west central North America. Furthermore, Métis status is something that is determined by the Métis Nation and not by individual Métis communities.

For purposes of section 35 of the Act, the Supreme Court of Canada stated in its decision in  R. v. Powley, 2003 SCC 43 (Powley) that the term "Métis" does not encompass all individuals with mixed Indian and European heritage: rather, it refers to distinctive peoples who, in addition to their mixed ancestry, developed their own customs, and recognizable group identity separate from their Indian or Inuit and European forebears.

In Powley the court emphasized the importance of having more standardized Métis membership requirements so that legitimate rights-holders can be identified. Otherwise, courts faced with Métis claims would have to ascertain Métis identity on a case-by-case basis. Many of the provincial Métis governing institutions have since established (or are in the process of developing) registry systems with Métis membership requirements consistent with the MNC definition of Métis.

Métis Governance

An important distinction between the Métis and First Nations is that the Métis are not organized as bands under the Indian Act nor have they been granted legal self-governance structures. As a result, Métis often govern themselves via non-profit corporate structures. Despite this difference, these governing institutions are similar in purpose and centralized democratic structure to other governments, and are generally recognized as appropriate consultation partners by the Crown. The Métis self-govern via provincial bodies such as the Métis Nation of Alberta (MNA) which is divided into six regional associations or "Regions." These associations, in turn, are divided into multiple community-level "Locals," each of which is composed of nine or more members. Other Métis provincial bodies also possess this governance structure. Métis governing institutions from Ontario westward come together to form the MNC, which represents Métis nationally and internationally.

Identifying A Métis Rights-Bearing Community

The impetus towards enforcement of Métis rights began with the decision in Powley, in which the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that Métis hunting rights are affirmed and protected under section 35 of the Act. Since Aboriginal rights are communal, to be entitled to constitutionally protected Métis rights, an individual must establish that he belongs to a rights-bearing Métis community entitled to exercise the traditional site-specific practice claimed. The practice in question must have been exercised prior to effective European control and must be continued today.  

In considering the existence of Métis rights, the Court will consider whether the claimant(s) belong(s) to an identifiable Métis community with a sufficient degree of continuity and stability to support a site-specific Aboriginal right. In Powley, a Métis community was defined as a group of Métis with a distinctive collective identity, living together in the same geographic area and sharing a common way of life. A claimant's membership in the relevant contemporary Métis community must be verified by considering three factors as indicia of Métis identity: self-identification, ancestral connection and community acceptance.

The Manitoba Provincial Court decision in R. v. Goodon, 2008 MBPC 59 (Goodon), provides guidance on how a court may apply Powley to identify a Métis rights-bearing community. (For a detailed discussion of the Goodon case, see the  Osler Update of January 14, 2009.)  In Goodon,  the court characterized the site-specific right being asserted by Mr. Goodon as the right to hunt for food in the environs of the Turtle Mountains in southwestern Manitoba. On the evidence before it, the court found that the Turtle Mountains and surrounding area comprise a distinct geographic area that had been used by the Métis of southern Manitoba for certain traditional practices, including hunting, well before effective European control. The court observed that while the Métis community changed and individual members had spread out since the time of European control, the Métis community in Manitoba remains well-organized and vibrant. The court concluded that there remains a contemporary, regional community in southwest Manitoba that continues many of the traditional practices and custom practised by its ancestors. As Mr. Goodon could establish that this modern-day Métis community continued to practice hunting in the area of Turtle Mountains, and that he was an accepted member of this community, the court held that he was entitled to exercise his community's aboriginal right to hunt for food in the area.

Best Practices For Métis Consultation By Proponents

When the Crown is considering projects that may negatively impact on an asserted or proven Aboriginal or treaty right, the duty arises to consult and, depending on the degree of impact, accommodate those Aboriginal interests. The duty to ensure that adequate consultation has taken place ultimately rests with the Crown; but, in many cases, the project proponent must also engage in the consultation process.

The breadth of the Métis community that must be consulted depends on the nature of the proposed project and the reach of its potential adverse effects. The collective nature of Métis rights signals that consultation of nearby individuals or isolated groups without objectively verifiable Métis membership is insufficient. When the potential impact of a project is geographically constrained, it may be acceptable to consult elected representatives in nearby Locals. However, since individual Locals may be part of a larger, regionally widespread Métis rights-bearing community, there are circumstances that would suggest that it is the regional rights-bearing community that should be consulted.

Both the MNC and many provincial governments recommend approaching the affected Region's elected representatives for consultation. In Alberta, the MNA is in the process of creating regional consultation protocols and even an industrial relations unit at the provincial level because, with very large-scale projects, it may become necessary for proponents to consult with the Métis Nation at the provincial or even federal level. The Government of Alberta has yet to develop consultation guidelines specific to the Métis. In the interim, although the Government of Alberta's First Nations Consultation Policy on Land Management and Resource Development is specific to First Nations, the Government of Alberta recommends that proponents engage with Métis communities using the principles outlined in the policy and a "good-neighbour" approach.

Engaging affected Métis communities in a meaningful consultation process early in the project, considering traditional land use in project design and working in good faith with Métis people to minimize adverse effects is the best way for project proponents to ensure successful and timely regulatory approval for natural resource development projects. As the proper process for consulting with the Métis continues to develop and evolve, guidance can be gleaned from a variety of Métis Nation guidelines, protocols and provincial policies, including those of the province of Alberta. Although specific details may vary depending on particular Métis groups or jurisdictions, resource developers are well-advised to take a broad, inclusive approach towards consultation. Recommended best practices include:

  • Notification - Providing notice to Métis communities living in and using the affected area early in project planning can help to avoid regulatory delays.
  • Information exchange – Proponents should ensure that the relevant Métis communities are fully informed about the proposed development. This is also an opportunity to obtain information from the Métis about land and resource use of Métis communities in the project area (i.e., through research reports and land use maps) and gain a better understanding of any concerns. Some funding for participation may be considered.
  • Consideration of Concerns – The information collected from the consultation process should be used to avoid or minimize any adverse impacts from the project on asserted  Métis rights. Accommodation of potential infringements are tailored to each project and can include re-routing of roads, bridges and dams, socio-economic benefits and harvesting compensation. Reporting back to the Métis communities on how their concerns were considered and how provided information was utilized in the decision-making process will improve relationships and help meet regulatory requirements.

Shawn Denstedt is a partner in the firm's Calgary office. Jessica Ng is an associate in the firm's Calgary office. Dana Jevremovic is a summer student in the firm's Calgary office.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions