Canada: Recent Developments In Family Status Accommodation: A Three-Headed Monster Of Approaches?

Last Updated: June 14 2019
Article by Albert Nolette

Recent cases dealing with the protected human rights ground of "family status" provide employers with some additional guidance (and confusion) regarding the scope of their obligations, as courts, arbitrators and tribunals continue to try to balance the childcare obligations of working parents and the legitimate business needs of employers.

In the case of Simpson v. Pranajen Group Ltd. o/a Nimigon Retirement Home, 2019 HRTO 10 ("Simpson"), the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal examined the situation of an employee named Jessica Simpson who was married with two young children, ages 2 and 5. Ms. Simpson's eldest child had autism and it was essential that a caregiver meet this child at the family's home where the school bus delivered him each weekday.1

At one point during her employment, Ms. Simpson's employer began discussing moving her from her usual 7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. day shift to the later afternoon shift of 3:00 p.m. – 11:00 p.m.2 Ms. Simpson wrote to management to explain that she was unable to work the later shift because of her children's schedule, and due to problems she was having finding flexible daycare.3 Soon thereafter, a midnight shift became available which Ms. Simpson expressed interest in, as it would work better for her than the late afternoon shift (3:00 p.m. – 11:00 p.m.) in terms of her family obligations.4 Following a discussion with her manager, she was advised that she would be able to work the midnight shift instead of the late afternoon shift, starting in about 2 months' time.5

However, just over a month later, Ms. Simpson was told that she would not be receiving the midnight shift because she had called in sick without giving sufficient notice. To no avail, Ms. Simpson protested that she could not control or predict when she fell ill. Following her refusal to work the late afternoon shift on Fridays and Saturdays, the company terminated Ms. Simpson's employment citing a number of reasons she did not understand, including: "attendance"; "failure to follow instructions"; "conduct"; "creating disturbance"; "performance"; and "work quality".7

The Ontario Human Rights Tribunal ("Tribunal") concluded that the company's stated reasons for the termination were not based in fact.8 Rather, the Tribunal found "that at least one of the real reasons for the termination, if not the only reason, was [Ms. Simpson's] unavailability for certain shifts caused by her need to provide care to her children."9 The Tribunal also found that the midnight shift could have easily been given to accommodate Ms. Simpson's childcare schedule.

In its analysis, the Tribunal reviewed the Federal Court of Appeal's decision in Canada (Attorney General) v. Johnstone, 2014 FCA 110 ("Johnstone"), a decision we previously reported in Workwise, and a previous Ontario Human Rights Tribunal decision named Misetich v. Value Village Stores Inc., 2016 HRTO 1229 ("Misetich"). These cases highlight a divergence in approaches used by adjudicators in Canada when dealing with family status complaints.

Briefly, on one hand, the Johnstone line of cases (generally considered to be more useful and favourable for employers) requires a complainant to take reasonable "self-accommodation" steps before there is a finding of prima facie discrimination. On the other hand, the approach adopted in the Misetich case (and by the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench10) is arguably somewhat more restrictive, analyzing steps that the complainant has taken to "self-accommodate" only after there is a finding of prima facie discrimination following the traditional three-part test for discrimination set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61 (CanLII). We also note that there exists a third line of case law which was recently espoused by the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Envirocon Environmental Services, ULC v. Suen, 2019 BCCA 46, which follows a previous decision of that court in Campbell River.11 Under this third line of authority, a complainant must meet a significantly more restrictive test in establishing there has been a change in a term or condition of their employment that resulted in a serious interference with a substantial parental or other family duty or obligation.

In our view, employers outside British Columbia should be wary of following the approach from Envirocon and Campbell River, as the Supreme Court of Canada has already signalled in other human-rights related decisions that in assessing whether a prima facie case of discrimination can be established, a complainant need only demonstrate that their protected characteristic was "a factor" in the adverse treatment.  Nonetheless, we expect the Supreme Court of Canada will be called upon to deal with these divergent approaches in the coming years.

Returning to the Simpson case, the Tribunal held that it arrived at the same conclusion regardless of the approach it used: Ms. Simpson had been discriminated against on the basis of her family status. In the circumstances, the Tribunal awarded Ms. Simpson $30,000 in compensation for injury to dignity, feelings and self-respect.

The Simpson case offers a concrete set of facts which may give rise to a finding of discrimination on the basis of family status. This case may be particularly helpful for employers who have around-the-clock shifts.

However, as highlighted by yet another recent case dealing with the protected ground of family status, an employee seeking accommodation for family status will in any event be required to show more than the mere existence of child care costs or child-care responsibilities. In Edmonton (Police Service) v Edmonton Police Association, 2019 CanLII 9456 (AB GAA) the arbitrator took care to specify that the threshold is higher:

The mere fact that one has child-care responsibilities is not sufficient to constitute an obligation for an employer to provide accommodation. There must be something more about the fact of having a family in order to constitute discrimination requiring accommodation. Otherwise, the burden of providing child care would fall on employers in every case. That cannot be the purpose of subsection 7(1) of the Alberta Human Rights Act.

Because the Supreme Court of Canada has yet to weigh in on family status discrimination specifically in light of these various approaches to and clarify which exact legal test is the correct one to follow, employers will want to consider these decisions carefully and ideally seek legal assistance when dealing with employee requests for accommodation based on child-care and similar family-related responsibilities. Field Law's Labour and Employment Group can help employers determine how to deal with such requests.


1 Para 5.

2 Para 8.

3 Para 8.

4 Para 9.

5 Para 9.

6 Para 14.

7 Para 16.

8 Para 22.

9 Para 22.

10 SMS Equipment Inc v Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union, Local 707, 2015 ABQB 162; see also : United Nurses of Alberta v Alberta Health Services, 2019 ABQB 255 (CanLII).

12 Heath Sciences Assoc. of B.C. v. Campbell River and North Island Transition Society, 2004 BCCA 260 (CanLII).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Roper Greyell LLP – Employment and Labour Lawyers
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Roper Greyell LLP – Employment and Labour Lawyers
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions