Canada: Patent Protection and Financial Institutions — Are Opportunities Passing By?

Last Updated: May 1 2009

Article by Alexandra Daoud , Malcolm McLeod and Mitchell S. Wolfe, Visa

A look at industry shows that Canadian financial institutions are not fully committed to the protection of their innovations and technology through the filing of patent applications. While the powers that be (i.e. the courts and/or the patent office) have not yet decided to what extent software and business methods may constitute patentable subject matter in Canada, American financial institutions appear to have adopted a "better safe than sorry" approach. They have recognized the enormous possibilities afforded for the types of services they offer in pursuing patents in both countries. Recent examples of innovations patented by US businesses include a process for creating a financial plan for funding of college education (US Patent No. 7,158,950), a preferred credit information data collection method (US Patent No. 7,139,734), or a method for facilitating real estate transactions (US Patent No. 7,152,037). These simple methods all fall into the category of software/business method patents.

It should be noted that the threshold for a new system or method to be considered an "invention," and therefore be patentable, is much lower than one might think. Breakthrough inventions such as the telephone and airplane are extremely rare. The vast majority of patentable inventions are minor variations of previous knowledge. The degree of invention ingenuity required is relatively small. A new solution for a technical problem can be patented if that solution was not known or obvious from the prior art at the time of filing a patent application. The legal meaning of "obviousness" differs from the commonly understood one. The courts have determined that a person of skill in the art must have, in light of the prior art as a whole, come directly and without difficulty to the claimed invention. It must be more or less self evident that what is being tried ought to work. (Apotex v. Sanofi, a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada rendered November 6, 2008.)

The US courts have recently confirmed that in order to be patentable, an invention must either be tied to a particular machine or apparatus, or transform a particular article into a state or thing (In re Bilski (Fed. Cir. 2008 - en Banc) rendered October 30, 2008). Within the patent classification system used by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Class 705 is defined as "Data Processing: Financial, Business Practice, Management, or Cost/Price Determination." This is the generic class for inventions having to do with data processing "operations in which there is a change in the data, or for performing calculation operations wherein the apparatus or method is designed for or utilized in the practice, administration, or management of an enterprise, or in the processing of financial data." In this class, one finds many patents owned by financial institutions and directed towards methods and devices used in their day-to-day business operations –– such as US Patent No. 7,072,851, entitled "System and method for administrating a credit card use incentive program by which a credit card holder earns a rebate in the form of an additional payment toward an outstanding loan principal to reduce overall cost of the installment loan," and owned by Bank of America. Another example is one of the very first business method patents obtained in the United States, entitled "Data Processing Methods and Apparatus for Managing Vehicle Financing," and issued as US Patent No. 4,736,294 back in 1988 to Royal Bank of Canada. This patent was obtained for a data processing system that provides information to assist in granting a vehicle loan applicant credit, process the loan and determine at the time of making the loan a residual value of the vehicle at a predetermined option date.

Patents covering computer-implemented methods of doing business are becoming of increasing importance on both sides of the border particularly in the area of litigation. For example Data Treasury Corporation –– an American corporation –– has commenced patent infringement proceedings in the United States and Canada against US financial services companies and Canadian banks in respect of its US and Canadian patents, which purport to cover all forms of image–based cheque clearing and other electronic payment technologies. The Canadian financial services industry has recently moved to a system of electronic cheque imaging clearing to replace traditional paper–based systems. The projecting cost savings would be enormous so the action instituted by Data Treasury is very significant.

Table 1 shows some data with respect to how many patent applications belonging to class 705 have been filed since 1997, and how many have been issued. The numbers have grown from less than 1000 in 1997, to more than 8000 in 2007, with a peak at approximately 8800 in 2001. In fact, the USPTO is having such a hard time keeping up with the large number of filings in this particular class that the waiting period to begin the examination process is anywhere between 60 and 120 months. This clearly shows that filing patent applications in the United States in this particular area is more than just a fad. As these patent applications issue, patent infringement will become a serious concern for anyone looking to do business in the financial sector in the United States.

Recently, concerns have been expressed in the United States as to the patentability of business methods on subject matter grounds. Efforts have been made to convince the US courts, or even Congress, that patent protection should be denied to business related and other methods, at least where such processes may be practiced entirely by human mental action without the involvement of machines or technology. In the most prominent example, the Bilski case, several major financial institutions took the position before the Court that business methods should be considered unpatentable, even where they involve the application of computers or other machines. However, we now know from this decision that the courts have not carved out a business-method exclusion per se, but rather have confirmed that in order to be patentable, any claim must meet the "machine-or-transformation" test. These findings confirm that patents are not to be granted for methods involving only abstract steps, and those which do not produce a physical result. These findings also confirm that certain types of business method patents, namely those that involve the transformation of an article into a state or thing via some form of data processing, are still considered patentable in the United States.

Similar questions have been raised in Canada. A group of Canadian financial institutions has been making representations to the government of Canada that the Canadian Patent Office should not grant patents on business methods (or any other methods) involving abstract or intangible steps or methods which do not produce physical results. However these Canadian financial institutions have not taken a stand against the patentability of all business methods but rather have sought to clarify the scope of such patents when the method appears to involve only abstract steps or does not achieve a physical transformation.

While such concerns should be thoroughly understood by Canadian businesses, whichever side of the border they do business on, they should not unduly influence determinations by Canadian financial institutions whether to seek protection for their innovative business processes or systems by preparing and filing patent applications –– in either Canada or the United States (particularly in the light of the October 30, 2008, decision of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Court in the Bilski case discussed above).

It is apparent that neither the value of patents related to business processes nor the possibilities of obtaining them in the United States has been lost on American financial institutions. For example, Graph 1 illustrates the filing practices of several large American institutions in both the United States and Canada. What stands out from the data, extracted from the Delphion and Canadian Intellectual Property Office databases on July 21, 2008, is that these organizations have recognized the need for protection on both sides of the border, and are taking action accordingly.

The American institutions represented in Graph 1 were selected based on name recognition and relative size of the organization. These include some of the largest and best–known financial institutions in the United States, and they all have anywhere between 4 (Merrill Lynch) and 222 (Accenture) Canadian patents and/or patent applications related to software/business methods. (Note that patent applications that have been filed in the last 18 months are not yet available to the public and therefore do not appear in Graph 1.)

By comparison, Graph 2 shows the filing practices of Canadian financial institutions, also extracted from the Delphion and Canadian Intellectual Property Office databases on July 21, 2008. The contrast is striking. Most of these institutions do not have a single patent or patent application in Canada or in the United States — the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) being the only one with at least one pending patent application on both sides of the border.

The scarcity of patent application filings by Canadian financial institutions may be a product of an absence of functioning patent committees within the institutions. Without such committees, patentability decisions tend to be made by individual profit centers within the organizational structure of a financial institution in accordance with the requirements of that particular profit centre and with little or no consideration for possible revenue to be obtained from licensing third parties or cross-licensing to the general benefit of the financial institution. The best method of ensuring that patents are applied for, obtained, and where possible, licensed for royalties or cross-licensed is to form a patent committee composed of representatives of the various profit centers within the financial institution, with a few representatives knowledgeable in patent matters including licensing, and with a separate budget. In the United States, the separately funded patent committee raising revenue through royalty income to defray the cost of obtaining patent protection is a general practice in many areas.

At the American Express Company, General Counsel Louise Parent recently discussed, in K&L Gates Top Of Mind newsletter, the route Amex® took to develop their keen focus on patent protection. While the general counsel's office is typically geared to protecting the interests of the company, today it is necessary to do more. The Amex legal department determined that it would promote a change in the culture of the organization and it became a group of "patent proselytizers."

Arguably, it is within the mandate of every general counsel that one aspect of protecting the company's interests includes ensuring that their company recognizes and monitors when innovations and creative contributions of employees should be patented, because patentable ideas are in the interest of the company and should be captured, appropriately protected, and added to the corporate treasure.

One way to start the process is education. The general counsel should raise IP awareness of staff and the executive. To do that the legal group has to make patents relevant to their business and offer real examples of possible and even missed opportunities. The value of the effort must be demonstrated to the company. Encouraging creativity and awareness might include rewarding employees who have developed patentable inventions with some form of direct benefit from the licensed patents.

The patent system in Canada makes it easy for financial institutions to be preemptive with respect to software/business method patents where applications have already been filed in the United States. First of all, official fees associated with Canadian patents are relatively low compared with those of other Patent Offices, such as Europe. Simply filing a patent application at the Canadian Intellectual Property Office costs $400 in official fees, in addition to the professional fees involved. From the moment a filing date is obtained in Canada, no further expenses need to be incurred in maintaining an application for a period of five years, except for the annual maintenance fees, which are $100 per year for years two through four, and $200 per year for years five through nine. A request for examination ($800) must be filed before the expiration of the five year period, after which it may take another two or three years before the patent office examines the patent application (depending on the Examiners' backlog).

This period provides the applicant approximately eight years of potential protection at very low cost, while waiting to see if the law will change, or at least be clarified.

Many patent practitioners believe that the Supreme Court of Canada may ultimately take the position that business methods are patentable on the same basis as such methods are patentable in the United States. If that happens, it could open the floodgates for business-related patents. Americans and those select Canadians who act prospectively could be at the front of the pack.

Should the day come when business methods and software are recognized as clearly patentable in Canada, the backlog of patent applications already on file will be examined, and many of them may be granted. Patent holders who, on the basis of current numbers will consist predominantly of American financial institutions, will then have the right to exclude others, including Canadian financial institutions, from providing desirable and innovative financial services in the Canadian marketplace. For those who wish to proceed, the right to exploit methods or technologies patented by others, if available at all, will come at a price, in the form of licensing and/or royalties.

The best method of navigating in an area where one's competitor have patents, is to have your own patents. Otherwise, the possibility of avoiding costly litigation through cross-licensing would not exist. In order words, the best bargaining chip for a potential patent licensee is another equally useful patent license to offer in exchange. With this in mind, Canadian financial institutions should be considering filing applications now as a strategic protective measure. As the Canadian financial institutions have historically been both strong and competitive, there is little doubt that inventive ideas which are patentable exist in the individual Canadian financial institutions. It has now become extremely important to seek patent protection for these ideas in the light of the activities of the US competitors.

Reprinted with permission of the authors and the Association of Corporate Counsel as it originally appeared: "Patent Protection and Financial Institutions - Are Opportunities Passing By?" ACC Docket 27, no. 4 (May 2009): Canadian Briefings,7-11. Copyright © 2009 the Association of Corporate Counsel. All rights reserved. If you are interested in joining ACC, please go to, call 202.293.4103, ext. 360, or email

About Ogilvy Renault

Ogilvy Renault LLP is a full-service law firm with close to 450 lawyers and patent and trade-mark agents practicing in the areas of business, litigation, intellectual property, and employment and labour. Ogilvy Renault has offices in Montréal, Ottawa, Québec, Toronto, and London (England), and serves some of the largest and most successful corporations in Canada and in more than 120 countries worldwide. Find out more at

Ogilvy Renault is the International Legal Alliance's Canadian Gold Award winner for 2008 in M&A and Corporate Finance.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.