Canada: The Fine Line Between "Owner" And "Constructor" - Court Comments On The Legal Role Of An "Owner" On A Construction Project

Last Updated: February 18 2019
Article by Ryan Conlin

The Fine Line Between "Owner" And "Constructor" - Court Comments On The Legal Role Of One of the most complex issues under Ontario OH&S law relates to determining which party on a construction project is the "constructor" within the meaning of the OHSA. A "constructor" undertakes the construction project for an owner (like a general contractor) and may include an owner who undertakes all or part of the project by himself or by more than one employer (remember that phrase, "all or part," because it sets the stage for inadvertent liability).

Constructors are responsible for ensuring overall safety on the project and for making sure that all workers, supervisors and employers comply with their obligations as well.

"Constructor" and "Owner" under the OHSA

There have been many cases over the years where owners of construction projects who have contracted with third party general contractors have been surprised to find themselves treated as the "constructor" by the Ministry of Labour, generally on the basis that the owner had taken steps to "direct" the project. Section 1(3) of the OHSA states that an "owner" does not become responsible as "constructor" for overseeing a project for "quality control" purposes.

The thorny legal question which often arises is where the line is drawn between "quality control" and actually taking over all or part of a project as the "constructor".

There is also the question of to what extent an "owner" is liable for safety on a "project" as an "employer", as an entity can become an "employer" not only by directly employing a worker but also by hiring a subcontractor or independent contractor. It is also common practice for Owners to have workers on the project for quality control purposes.

Under the OHSA, project owners have very limited responsibilities which primarily concern preparing a list of designated substances (such as asbestos) present on site to prospective bidders on project.

Courts Considers Role of Owner under the OHSA

An Ontario Court recently addressed these issues in the context of a recent prosecution, R v City of Greater Sudbury, (unreported, August 31, 2018, Lische J., Ont Ct. Jus.)* The case involved a tragic fatality to a member of the public who was struck and killed by a reversing grader on a municipal road building project. The Municipality contracted the project out to a third-party contractor who signed a detailed contract and agreed to act as the "constructor" for the project. The grader operator (employed by the third-party contractor) was reversing in a live intersection without the assistance of signalers and without the presence of police officers (as required by law).

The Crown charged the third-party contractor as "employer" and the Municipality as "constructor" and "employer" with a number of OHSA violations arising out of the accident. The third- party contractor was found guilty as an "employer" of failing to ensure that the grader operator was assisted by a signaller and was fined $195,000, R v. Interpaving Limited (unreported, March 28, 2018, Buttazzoni J., Ont Ct. Jus.)

The crux of the Crown's case was that it alleged that the Municipality had taken steps beyond that of a prudent owner and had assumed control over the project as the "constructor". The Crown also alleged that the Municipality was liable for OHSA contraventions as an "employer" on the project.

The Crown primarily relied on the following evidence to prove the Municipality was the "constructor":

  • The contract for the project contained provisions which allowed the Municipality to take over the project as "constructor" in certain circumstances (primarily related to breaches by the contractor). The Court held that these contractual provisions did not make the Municipality the "constructor" as there was no evidence the Municipality ever invoked these provisions. The Court determined that an owner reserving the right in a contract to take over a project in specified circumstances does not make an owner the constructor;
  • There was a system in place whereby the contractor would contact the municipality to dispatch paid duty police officers to attend at the project where required, and the costs of the paid duty officers were paid directly by the Municipality to the police service. The evidence at trial was that this system was used on all municipal construction projects and no request from the contractor for police officers was ever denied. The Crown argued that the payment system was an indication of municipal control over the project. The Court rejected this argument and concluded that the payment system was a business decision by the Municipality to avoid the confusion, inefficiencies and payment delays which plagued this process when multiple contractors required paid duty officers on different projects;
  • The Crown argued that municipal quality control inspectors directed work by taking complaints from the members of the public and businesses, issuing instruction forms and contractor appraisal forms to the contractor, sharing a trailer with the contractor, conducting progress meetings on city property and that city employees sometimes took minutes at project meetings. The Court did not accept the Crown's arguments and found that the City Inspectors were on the site for quality control purposes and none of these issues amounted assuming control over the project.
  • The Crown focused on a specific incident which occurred two weeks prior to the accident where a municipal inspector shut down a portion of the project at which the police were not present at a live intersection as required by law. The Crown argued that this was indicia of control. The Court disagreed and found that the municipal inspector contacted a senior representative of the contractor who attended at the site and addressed the issue. The Court specifically found that the municipality should be commended for addressing this issue with the contractor and that finding otherwise would deter the municipality from addressing this issue.
  • The Crown argued that the fact that the Municipality had the contractual power to vary the schedule for the work (i.e. road closings etc.) was an indicia of control over the work. The Court rejected this argument and found that the Municipality controlled this issue from the perspective of the public accessing the roadway and the issue did not relate to workplace safety or controlling the project.
  • The Court also rejected arguments that the Municipality exercised control over sub-contractors and that requiring site specific training designed by the Municipality made the Municipality the "constructor".

Implications for Owners

This case provides helpful judicial comment on the distinction between "quality control" and "directing work" on a project. It is important to appreciate that the Crown has appealed this decision and thus these findings will be soon be considered by a higher Court.

  • Contracts matter: There is no question that the "reality on the ground" will always be the most important factor in determining "constructor" status. A party cannot contract out of the OHSA. However, this case shows that where an owner and contractor agree that the contractor shall assume the statutory obligations of "constructor", it makes little sense to challenge that arrangement, unless it can be established that the reality was quite different or the owner was attempting to evade its statutory duty. The Court's approach is similar to that taken by jurists in other jurisdiction; see, for example, Director of Occupational Health and Safety v. Government of Yukon, William R. Cratty and P.S.Sidhu Trucking Ltd.
  • Owners can Reserve Rights to Take Over: An Owner can insert language into a contract that allows it to assume control of a project and will not be treated as the "constructor" unless these contractual rights are exercised;
  • Owner's Representatives can Address Safety Issues in an Appropriate Manner with the Contractor: An issue which is often challenging for Owners is how to address safety contraventions with the constructor without assuming control over the project. There have been cases where owner's representatives have proceeded to correct contractors on safety issues and even issue discipline to workers on the job. Such actions have led to the owner being the constructor - Imperial Oil Ltd. (Re), [1993] O.O.H.S.A.D. No. 8 (Office of Adjudication). However, the Court in this case made it unequivocally clear that an Owner is entitled to raise safety concerns with management of the constructor and such actions will not make the Owner the "constructor" if the Constructor is the one to solve the issue. The Court specifically commended the Municipality and pointed out the policy issues with fettering an Owner's actions out of fear of being the Constructor;
  • The Focus of the Analysis is on Substantive Issues: The Court made it clear that the focus of the determination should be on who is responsible for safety on the job and controlling the project. Minor details such as sharing trailers with the Constructor, the identity of who took meeting minutes and where meetings took place are not highly relevant to the analysis. However, Owners must keep in mind that this issue is determined keeping in mind all of the facts and that optics should always point towards the reality that the contractor is the "constructor".

Is the Owner Responsible for the Project as "Employer"?

The Crown also charged the Municipality with various contraventions as an "Employer". There was no question that the Municipality had its own employees on the project and it had contracted for the services with the contractor. However, the Court found that to establish the Municipality was the "Employer", the Crown had to prove that the Municipality was in the "sphere of operation" of the project. The Court held that the City had no control over the project and thus could not be treated as an "Employer".

The Court further found that even if the Crown were correct that the City was an "Employer", it had exercised due diligence by hiring a constructor and taking the "hands off" approach the law requires. In our view, the Court correctly found that it would make little sense to make an Owner liable as an "Employer" for a project in a legal context where it must allow the "constructor" to control the project without interference. It is our view that if an Owner were treated as an "Employer", the "Constructor" provisions would have no practical purpose.

Moreover, Owners are typically not experts in the construction techniques, materials and equipment employed on a construction project – which is why they retained a general contractor in the first place. In such circumstances, it would likely endanger workers to make such Owners responsible for worker health and safety on the project (certainly beyond retaining a properly vetted, safe contractor to perform the work).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions