Canada: Ambassador McCallum's Controversial Comments On The Huawei Extradition Case Resulted In His Termination. But Was He Right?

Last Updated: February 8 2019
Article by Henry Chang

Meng Wanzhou is the Chief Financial Officer for Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. ("Huawei").  She was arrested in Vancouver on December 1, 2018, pursuant to a provisional arrest warrant that was issued under the Extradition Act (the "Act").  The United States has now made a formal request for her extradition. 

On January 22, 2019, John McCallum, Canada's Ambassador to China, told a gathering of Chinese-language journalists in Toronto that he thought Meng Wanzhou had a strong case to fight extradition to the United States.  He also raised several arguments that he thought would support her case. 

During his meeting with Chinese-language journalists, Mr. McCallum specifically referred to the following arguments:

  • Political involvement by the White House in connection with the extradition request;
  • The extraterritorial aspect to her case; and
  • That Canada has not signed onto the same Iran sanctions that Huawei is accused of violating.

As a result of the above comments, John McCallum was forced to resign on January 25, 2019. 

There is no doubt that his comments were politically controversial but were they legally accurate?  To answer this question, we need to examine Canada's extradition laws more closely. 

What Conduct Can Result in Extradition?

Section 3 of the Act provides that a person may be extradited under the Act, in accordance with a relevant extradition agreement.  In other words, the requesting country must have an extradition agreement in place with Canada. 

If an extradition agreement exists, the foreign country may request the extradition of a person (either to prosecute them or to impose an existing sentence) if:

  • The offence for which extradition is requested is punishable by at least two years of imprisonment, by the requesting count
  • The alleged conduct would have been an offence punishable by at least two years of imprisonment, if it had occurred in Canada.

In other words, the conduct upon which the extradition request is based must be considered a crime in both Canada and the requesting country.  This is often referred to as the "dual criminality" requirement.

According to Section 5 of the Act, a person may be extradited:

  • Whether or not the conduct on which the request is based occurred in the territory over which the foreign country has jurisdiction; and
  • Whether or not Canada could exercise jurisdiction in similar circumstances.

Is Meng Wanzhou's Alleged Conduct Considered an Extraditable Offence?

In the present case, the Treaty on Extradition Between the Government of Canada and the Government of the United States of America (the "U.S. Extradition Treaty") provides for the extradition of persons from Canada to the United States.  The schedule to this U.S. Extradition Treaty (the "U.S. Extradition Schedule") lists the offences that can result in extradition. 

According to an affidavit from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, which was submitted in support of Meng Wanzhou's provisional arrest warrant, she misrepresented the true nature of Huawei's relationship to Skycom Tech Co. Ltd. ("Skycom"), a related Hong-Kong company, in order to induce several multinational financial institutions to process more than $100 million worth of Iran-related transactions in violation of U.S. trade sanctions. 

Had the United States merely alleged that Meng Wanzhou violated U.S. trade sanctions, this likely would not have supported an extradition request.  This is because the U.S. Extradition Schedule does not list the violation of trade sanctions as an extraditable offence.  Of course, it appears that the United States is instead alleging that Meng Wanzhou committed bank fraud, albeit for the purpose of circumventing U.S. trade sanctions with Iran. 

The U.S. Extradition Schedule lists the offence of "fraud by a banker, agent, or by a director or officer of any company."  So the offence of fraud could potentially result in extradition under the U.S. Extradition Treaty.  Fraud is also a criminal offence in Canada under Section 380 of the Criminal Code, which would appear to address the dual criminality requirement contained in the Extradition Act. 

Overview of the Canadian Extradition Process

According to Section 14 of the Act, once a provisional arrest has been made, the person will be released if a formal extradition request is not made by the foreign country within 60 days (or the specific period is stated in the relevant extradition agreement, if such a provision exists).  Article 11 of the U.S. Extradition Treaty specifically refers to a period of 45 days. 

After receiving an extradition request from the foreign country, if the Minister of Justice is satisfied that the requirements of Section 3 have been satisfied, he may issue an Authority to Proceed, which authorizes the Attorney General to proceed with the extradition process.  In other words, the Minister of Justice has complete discretion to decide whether an Authority to Proceed should be issued.  However, the decision to issue an Authority to Proceed is normally delegated to government lawyers working in the Ministry of Justice. 

Upon receipt of an Authority to Proceed, a judge will hold an extradition hearing.  In general, the judge must issue an Order of Committal if there is evidence of conduct that, if it occurred in Canada, would justify a committal for trial; this is a relatively low threshold.  However, the person sought for extradition may challenge the proceedings on other grounds, for example, by demonstrating that their extradition would violate the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 

If the judge issues an Order of Committal, the person sought for extradition will have 30 days to appeal the decision to the Court of Appeal.  If the Order of Committal is not appealed, the Minister of Justice may personally (this responsibility may not be delegated) order that the person be surrendered to the foreign country, within the 90-day period following the date of the person's committal to await surrender.  If an appeal is filed, the Surrender Order may be issued within the 45-day period following the decision from the Court of Appeal. 

During the 30-day period following his or her committal, the person sought for extradition may also make submissions to the Minister of Justice on any relevant ground.  According to Section 44 of the Act, the Minister of Justice shall refuse to issue a Surrender Order if he is satisfied that:

  • The surrender would be unjust or oppressive; or
  • The request for extradition is made for the purpose of prosecuting or punishing the person by reason of their race, religion, nationality, ethnic origin, language, colour, political opinion, sex, sexual orientation, age, mental or physical disability, or status.

According to Section 46 of the Act, the Minister shall refuse to issue a Surrender Order if he is satisfied that the conduct in respect of which extradition is sought is a political offense or an offense of a political character. 

According to Section 47 of the Act, the Minister of Justice may also refuse to issue a Surrender Order if he is satisfied that none of the conduct, upon which the extradition request is based, occurred in the territory over which the foreign country has jurisdiction. 

If the Minister of Justice decides not to issue a Surrender Order, the person sought for extradition will be released.  On the other hand, if the Minister of Justice decides to issue a Surrender Order, the person sought for extradition may seek judicial review within 30 days of receiving notice of the decision.  The Court of Appeal for the province in which the person's committal was ordered has exclusive jurisdiction to determine applications for judicial review of the Surrender Order. 

Analysis of John McCallum's Comments

Political Involvement by the Whitehouse

President Trump has publicly stated that he would be willing to "intervene" in Meng Wanzhou's criminal matter if it would help him establish a new trade deal with China. If the criminal allegations made by the United States are in fact politically motivated (i.e., they are being used as a bargaining chip in its trade dispute with China), Meng Wanzhou could actually fight extradition on this basis. For example:

  • The Minister of Justice could refuse to issue an Authority to Proceed, if he believes that the conduct of the United States amounts to an abuse of process.
  • If an Authority to Proceed is issued by the Minister of Justice, the judge could consider this claim during the extradition hearing.
  • If an Order of Committal is issued by a judge, the Minister of Justice may consider this claim when deciding whether to issue a Surrender Order. 

The Extraterritorial Aspect

This apparently refers to the fact that the alleged conduct, upon which the extradition request is based, appears to have occurred outside of U.S. territory. The alleged bank fraud involved multinational financial institutions and the Iran-related transactions involved a Hong-Kong based corporation (Skycom). 

The only potential link to the United States was the fact that Skycom had to repatriate income from Iran through U.S. dollar clearing transactions, which typically pass through the United States.   Of course, the United States frequently applies extraterritorial jurisdiction.  Even a remote nexus to the U.S. will often be cited by the United States, to justify the application of its laws outside its own territory.  In contrast, Canada generally does not attempt to apply its laws outside of Canadian territory. 

In any event, Section 5 of the Act makes clear that extradition may occur even if the conduct upon which the request is based occurred outside of the foreign country's territory.  It is also irrelevant whether Canada could exercise jurisdiction in the same circumstances. 

So arguing that the United States is attempting to extend its laws to conduct that occurred outside of its own territory will not prevent the extradition process from going forward.  However, as confirmed by Section 47 of the Act, the Minister of Justice may refuse to issue a Surrender Order if he is satisfied that none of the conduct, upon which the extradition request is based, occurred in the territory over which the United States has jurisdiction. 

In other words, the extraterritorial application of U.S. laws could be used to support the Minister of Justice's decision to not issue a Surrender Order, once the extradition process reaches this final stage. 

Canada Has Not Signed onto the Same Iran Sanctions

John McCallum suggested that Canada and the United States do not impose the same economic sanctions against Iran.  Although this may be true at the present time, the RCMP affidavit filed in support of Meng Wanzhou's provisional arrest warrant claims that the alleged bank fraud occurred between 2009 and 2014.  So John McCallum's statements on this point appear to be inaccurate, at least in relation to the period in question. 

According to Global Affairs Canada, Canada's recent history of economic sanctions against Iran may be summarized as follows:

  • Between 2006 and 2010, the United Nations Security Council imposed four rounds of sanctions against Iran in response to its nuclear program. Acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations, the Security Council adopted resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007), 1803 (2008) and 1929 (2010) imposing sanctions against Iran in response to the proliferation risks presented by Iran's nuclear program in light of Iran's failure to meet the requirements of the International Atomic Energy Agency and to comply with the provisions of earlier Security Council resolutions. The United States and Canada both implemented the same economic sanctions. 
  • In July 2010, Canada imposed additional sanctions on Iran in close consultation with like-minded partners (including the United States) under the Special Economic Measures Act.  These sanctions were increasingly tightened through amendments made in October 2011, November 2011, January 2012, December 2012 and May 2013 resulting in a broad prohibition on exports and imports to and from Iran and also on financial transactions. 
  • On July 14, 2015, the five permanent members of the UN Security Council (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) plus Germany reached a deal with Iran on its nuclear program, which was known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action ("JCPOA").  In addition to establishing an inspection process, the JCPOA also addressed the removal of UN sanctions against Iran, upon certain conditions being satisfied.  On July 20, 2015, the UN Security Council officially endorsed the JCPOA by passing UN Security Council Resolution 2231
  • On January 16, 2016, following confirmation that Iran had fulfilled the prescribed commitments under the JCPOA, sanctions imposed by the UN, the United States and the European Union against Iran were immediately relaxed.  On February 5, 2016, Canada also relaxed its economic sanctions against Iran, in accordance with UN Security Council Resolution 2231. 

On May 8, 2018, President Trump announced that the United States would withdraw from the JCPOA.  On the same day, the Government of Canada reaffirmed its continued support for the JCPOA.  On November 5, 2018, the United States fully restored the tougher economic sanctions that had been lifted as a result of the JCPOA. 

In summary, Canada's economic sanctions against Iran only began to diverge from those of the United States on November 5, 2018.  During the period when the alleged bank fraud is alleged to have occurred (2009 to 2014), both Canada and the United States imposed the same economic sanctions against Iran. 

Conclusion

It would appear that at least two out of the three arguments that John McCallum raised could theoretically be argued in support of Meng Wanzhou's release, either during her extradition hearing or in submissions to the Minister of Justice.  Nevertheless, he should never have commented on whether those arguments would ultimately be successful.  In doing so, John McCallum created the perception that the extradition process could be affected by political influence. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be ought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Henry Chang
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Sign Up
Gain free access to lawyers expertise from more than 250 countries.
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Industry
Mondaq Newsalert
Select Topics
Select Regions
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions