Canada: Summary Of Actions Against Exxon Mobil For Securities Fraud

Since 2013, investors in Exxon Mobil Corporation ("Exxon") stock have consistently shown an interest in understanding how the effects of climate change will impact their investment. Over the years, in response to these concerns, Exxon released a series of voluntary publications such as their Energy and CarbonManaging the Risks, Energy and Climate,  which described certain actions that Exxon was undertaking and, in 2016, their Outlook for Energy report. In the latter report, Exxon indicated that it used a proxy cost1 in its long-term projections for purposes of business planning, investment decision-making, and financial reporting. As investor concerns grew and became more public in 2015, the Attorney General of New York State ("AG") launched an investigation into the company's disclosures.

On October 24, 2018, the AG filed a lawsuit alleging that Exxon engaged in "a long-standing fraudulent scheme" to defraud investors concerning the company's management of the risks posed to its business by increasingly stringent climate change regulation. The AG alleges that Exxon "lowballed" carbon costs by an aggregate of $30-billion dollars and asks that this amount be disgorged of the company. The AG claims that prior to 2016, Exxon misled investors by not incorporating proxy costs into its business calculations at all. The AG further claims that post-2016, Exxon made representations in various voluntary publications that Exxon released to its shareholders (not mandatory securities disclosures) that a general proxy cost would be applied to all business planning, investment decisions and financial reporting. The AG is seeking damages to be paid to investors and restitution of all funds obtained in connection with or as a result of the alleged fraudulent and deceptive acts.


The state of New York brought their action against Exxon under securities fraud legislation, Executive Law (persistent fraud or legality), "actual fraud" and equitable or, common law fraud. The AG made the following factual allegations and claims:

1. Exxon's fraud regarding its use of a proxy cost in its cost projections.

a. Exxon misrepresented its use of a proxy cost in investment decision-making and business planning.

The AG alleges that Exxon's representations regarding its use of proxy costs were inconsistent with actual practices in a number of ways: 1) Exxon's undisclosed internally applied proxy cost figures were much lower than those set out in the company's public representations; 2) in projects located in developing non-OECD countries, Exxon did not apply any proxy costs to its projected GHG emissions contrary to its representations; and 3) Exxon applied much lower proxy costs than those represented to its projected GHG emissions for Alberta oil sands projects, LNG projects and North American gas assets.

b. Exxon misrepresented its use of a proxy cost in oil and gas reserves and resource-based assessments.

The AG alleges that: Exxon made three distinct representations with regard to applying a proxy cost to its reserves and resource base: 1) it applied a proxy cost to all reserve assessments until 2040 (in Exxon's 2016 Energy and Carbon Summary); 2) a proxy cost was applied as part of its business planning process; and 3) all resource-based assessments were aligned with the PRMS guidelines. PRMS stands for Petroleum Resources Management System, the common industry standard for evaluating reserves and resources. PRMS requires that all evaluations must be based on the estimates of future production. The AG alleges that Exxon represented that its resource-based assessments were aligned with PRMS guidelines and that the publicly disclosed proxy costs were not, in fact, incorporated into those estimates.

c. Exxon misrepresented its use of a proxy cost in evaluations for impairment of long-lived assets.

The AG claims that prior to 2016, Exxon misled investors by not incorporating proxy costs into cost projections for impairment evaluations at all. The AG then alleges that beginning in 2016, Exxon incorporated proxy costs in cost projections for impairment evaluations but applied the proxy costs in a limited and internally inconsistent manner.

An impairment evaluation is the process mandated by accounting rules for determining whether the value of an asset is less than the value listed on a company's balance sheet. The accounting rules are provided for under US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP"). GAAP are accounting standards that companies reporting their financial results in the United States must follow. The AG alleges that Exxon did not follow GAAP protocol when assessing indicators of a potential impairment to long-lived assets even though Exxon had represented in its public filings that it has complied with its obligations under this accounting requirement.

2. Exxon's fraud regarding its use of a proxy cost in its demand and price projections.

The AG alleges that 1) no proxy cost was applied in estimating demand in the transportation sector; and 2) that the projected oil and gas prices that Exxon applied in its economic models were set with little reference to the company's demand analysis.

a. Failure to apply the proxy cost in projecting demand in transportation sector.

The AG cites disclosure materials that make broad, sweeping statements about Exxon's application of a proxy cost. The AG further cites the importance of the transportation sector to the oil and gas business and that despite its importance, and alleges Exxon did not apply the publicly represented proxy cost to demand projections in that sector and never disclosed its failure to do so to investors.

b. Failure to apply proxy cost in projection oil and gas prices.

The AG alleges that Exxon represented that it applied a proxy cost of GHG emissions in estimating future demand for oil and gas and that this representation leads a reasonable investor to conclude that Exxon's oil and gas projections also took into account such proxy costs. The AG claims that because Exxon never told investors that the proxy cost was disconnected from the company's actual business decisions, all public statements touting the proxy cost were materially false and misleading.

3. Exxon's fraud regarding risks to its business posed by the "two-degree" scenario.

In Managing the Risks, in 2014, Exxon stated that it did not believe that governments would impose more stringent climate regulations than would be necessary to achieve a "two-degree" scenario after investors expressed concern that Exxon's oil and gas reserves were vulnerable to becoming stranded under this scenario. Exxon wrote in Managing the Risks, that a two-degree scenario is "highly unlikely" to occur because such a scenario would impose enormous CO2 costs on consumers, and that Exxon therefore does not face a risk of its assets becoming stranded. The AG investigation indicates that it had uncovered correspondence post-publication of the report, between an MIT economist and Exxon wherein the MIT economist warned the company that the numbers reported were extremely high and that if the figure represented undiscounted costs as a percentage of income (which the AG alleges it does), that the analysis was misleading and overstated the costs associated with a two-degree scenario. Exxon is alleged to have disregarded the warning and used the analysis and infographic well into June of 2016.

4. Exxon's fraud caused significant harm.

The AG alleges that Exxon did not incorporate climate change regulatory risk into its business processes in the manner it represented to investors and this failure resulted in the company having a "materially different risk profile" than it would have had if it had actually incorporated climate change regulatory risk using the proxy cost it purported to.

The AG claims that Exxon's investments were riskier than investors were led to believe. Further, the AG claims that Exxon is faced with greater risk associated with the two-degree scenario than it represented to investors. As a result, the AG alleges that Exxon's securities are overvalued, and investors purchased or held Exxon securities at artificially-inflated prices.


Securities laws in Canada and the United States take a similar approach to climate change disclosure and do not prescribe specific disclosure requirements in relation to climate change related information. Rather, the concept of materiality governs an issuer's disclosure decision. In particular, when reporting on environmental matters, issuers are reminded that determining materiality, and, accordingly, whether disclosure is required, does not involve a bright-line quantitative test. It is a dynamic process that depends on the existing market conditions at the time of reporting and all facts available, and the time horizon of a known trend, demand, commitment, event or uncertainty may be relevant to an assessment of materiality as well. When in doubt, issuers should err on the side of materiality. This is particularly true since there is evidence that environmental and social governance matters are becoming an increasingly important part of disclosure to investors, industry groups and non-governmental organizations. In this context, issuers should not rely on boiler-plate risk factors and disclosure and should methodically and carefully consider when climate change related matters may have an impact on their business.

Issuers should remain aware of the civil liability that can arise in connection with secondary market disclosure in non-core documents and oral statements under part 17.01 of the Securities Act (Alberta). It appears that the AG's claims against Exxon are primarily based on Exxon's mandatory disclosure which, in the Canadian context, goes beyond the required level of disclosure in non-core documents and provided disclosure that seemed inconsistent or in contrast to its mandatory disclosures.

Bennett Jones will continue to monitor this case for the publication of a defense by Exxon. To date, no defense has been made public, but Exxon has made public statements asserting that the AG's claims are unfounded. Notwithstanding that the AG's claims may be unfounded, issuers should take care to be consistent in their required disclosure and voluntary disclosure to avoid piquing the interest of regulators. Strategically, issuers are advised to create long-term plans for their climate change disclosure. Issuers should have safeguards in place to ensure that they do not voluntarily disclose information that may contradict or undermine required or other disclosure that is likely to be made in the future.


A proxy cost is a cost that is included in economic projections as a stand-in to account for the likely effects of expected future events.
The two-degree scenario refers to the goal of reducing GHG emissions to limit the increase in global temperature to below two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Jennifer Power
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Sign Up
Gain free access to lawyers expertise from more than 250 countries.
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Newsalert
Select Topics
Select Regions
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions