Canada: Wearing A Hijab In Quebec Courtrooms

The Quebec Court of Appeal recently reminded us, in the matter of El-Alloul v. Procureure générale du Québec1, that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the "Charter") protects the right to freedom of religion to the extent that the exercise of that right does not conflict with or harm an overriding public interest, including another Charter-protected right.

It started off as a seemingly mundane case. On February 24, 2015, Ms. El-Alloul appeared before the Court of Québec to recover her motor vehicle, which had been seized when her son was driving it without a licence. However, the judge refused to hear her, as she was wearing a religious head scarf (a hijab) in the courtroom. According to the judge, this was contrary to section 24 of the Regulation of the Court of Québec2 (the "Regulation"), which provides that every person present in the courtroom must be "suitably dressed".

The following month, Ms. El-Alloul filed a petition for declaratory judgment with the Superior Court, requesting a declaration that her right to freedom of religion had been infringed and that she had the right to testify in Court of Québec while wearing a hijab. In order to avoid having her application dismissed on procedural grounds, Ms. El-Alloul also sought a judicial review on a de bene esse basis.

The Superior Court refused to grant the relief she sought, on the grounds that the procedural approach she had chosen was inappropriate, and that the criteria for a declaratory judgment had not been met. Also, in the absence of an actual application for judicial review, the Court considered it impossible to grant the remedy she sought.

Ms. El-Alloul appealed this decision to the Court of Appeal of Québec. In its judgment, the Court took this opportunity to point out some fundamental principles in procedural matters, and certain nuances brought to well-established constitutional principles.

Procedure should be the servant of law

Relying on section 24 of the Charter, the Court of Appeal found that there was no need to deny appellant's declaratory relief. This provision gives courts discretion to grant relief deemed appropriate and just in the circumstances of the infringement of a Charter right, which relief includes a declaratory remedy.

Ms. El-Alloul also sought judicial declarations on the interpretation of section 24 of the Regulation of the Court of Québec concerning the dress code. This provision posed a serious problem for her, as it called into question her right to wear the hijab before the Court of Québec.

The Court of Appeal also indicated that Ms. El-Alloul's proceedings were in part an actual request for judicial review, since it sought to challenge the validity of the trial judge's refusal to hear her case. And since decisions of the Court of Québec can only be challenged through an appeal or judicial review, this explains the hybrid nature of Ms. El-Alloul's proceeding, which raised the possibility of deciding the issues in dispute through judicial review, albeit on a de bene esse basis.

In the opinion of the Court of Appeal, because of the fundamental rights at issue, the Superior Court judge should have taken a flexible approach and allowed the well-established principle of substance over form to prevail.

Where fundamental rights are at issue, the courts have broad discretion to choose the appropriate judicial remedy. The Court of Appeal therefore held that the Superior Court could have rendered a declaratory judgment in this case, as the applicable criteria were met.

Moreover, the Superior Court should also have carried out a judicial review on a de bene esse basis, as Ms. El-Alloul filed the appropriate proceedings within a reasonable period.

The right to testify while wearing a hijab, provided the circumstances allow it

The Court of Appeal confirmed that in Canada, freedom of religion includes the right to entertain such religious beliefs as one chooses, the right to declare religious beliefs openly without fear of hindrance or reprisal, and the right to manifest religious belief through worship and practice, in the absence of coercion or constraint. This fundamental freedom does not disappear when the individual concerned is before the court.

The Court of Appeal pointed out that the courts must accommodate the exercise of the right to freedom of religion in the courtroom, insofar as it does not conflict with or harm an overriding public interest, which was not the case here, according to the Court of Appeal.

Finally, according to the Court, the Regulation of the Court of Québec does not prohibit a litigant from wearing a hijab in a courtroom, as the dress code it imposes does not constitute an overriding public interest sufficient to restrict the right to freedom of religious expression. The Court of Appeal accordingly held that the decision of the Court of Québec was unreasonable and contrary to the Charter, since the judge did not exercise her judicial discretion in a manner consistent with the Charter. Moreover, her decision should have been quashed by the Superior Court.

However, quashing the Court of Québec's decision was not a full and sufficient remedy for Ms. El-Alloul, as the matter could not be sent back to the Court of Québec in order to allow her to pursue her initial proceedings under the Highway Safety Code. Declaratory relief was therefore deemed appropriate by the Court of Appeal.

The Court of Appeal explained that it is neither necessary nor appropriate for a judge to determine the sincerity of the religious convictions of a litigant wearing religious clothing in court, unless the sincerity of that religious practice is truly at issue in the dispute. A judge should only engage in such a determination where he or she has reasonable grounds to believe that the wearing of the religious clothing does not result from a sincerely held religious belief or could conflict with or harm an overriding public interest. In such cases, the judge must apply the analytical framework regarding fundamental rights developed by the Supreme Court.

Ultimately, the Court of Appeal declared that on February 24, 2015, Ms. El-Alloul was entitled to be heard by the Court of Québec wearing a hijab to testify and to make representations with respect to the proceeding she had then initiated. The Court also declared that the dress code provisions in the Regulation of the Court of Québec do not prevent a litigant from wearing a hijab if that practice results from a sincerely-held religious belief and does not conflict with or harm an overriding public interest.

Comments

Section 24(1) of the Charter provides the following:

24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances.

The judgment of the Court of Appeal is highly relevant from a procedural point of view, as it stresses that form must yield to substance where procedure is concerned, and it recognizes the right to obtain a declaratory judgment in a constitutional matter where Ms. El-Alloul had already recovered her motor vehicle, which was the initial purpose of her proceeding before the Court of Québec.

In addition, while this matter is not the first to focus on the wearing of religious clothing before a court in Canada, it is interesting in regards to the nuance brought by the Court of Appeal to Supreme Court case law. As the Court of Appeal indicates in its judgment, the religious neutrality of courtrooms in Quebec (and Canada) does not justify prohibiting a litigant from appearing in court because he or she is expressing a sincerely held religious belief. This position respects the guidance of the Supreme Court to the effect that State neutrality is intended to respect religious differences rather than to deny them, to the extent that such beliefs do not harm overriding public interests.

To summarize, the Regulation of the Court of Québec does not prevent a litigant from wearing a hijab in court because of a sincerely-held religious belief, provided that doing so does not conflict with or harm an overriding public interest (such as a constitutional right of another person). It is thus a question of balance, which the Court must assess on a case-by-case basis.

Footnotes

1. www.canlii.org

2. CQLR, c. C-25.01, r. 9

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Sign Up
Gain free access to lawyers expertise from more than 250 countries.
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Industry
Mondaq Newsalert
Select Topics
Select Regions
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions