Canada: An Arbitration Gone Bad - Not Arbitration Gone Bad

Last Updated: March 4 2009
Article by Barry Leon and Raegan Kennedy

Originally published in the February 2009 edition of Commercial Litigation Review.

Periodically, a litigator or a corporate counsel will complain about a bad experience in arbitration, and go on to say that as a result he or she will no longer agree to arbitration. In effect, that person has concluded that the entire process of arbitration is flawed – that it has "gone bad."

When we hear someone react that way, we question whether the person should be concluding that arbitration as a process is flawed. Rather, it may be that the particular arbitration was flawed.

And if that is a reasonable possibility, it seems to us that the litigator or corporate counsel should be trying to determine why that arbitration went badly.

We ask – or are at least tempted to ask – two questions:

Question 1: Have you ever a bad experience with court litigation?

Anyone who has been involved periodically in litigation has almost certainly had at least one bad experience and we would venture, probably more than one bad experience.

So we wonder why one (and it is often just one) bad experience with arbitration should cause anyone to decide to avoid a very effective means of resolving disputes and, in some situations, perhaps the only viable means. This is particularly difficult to understand because it often seems that the decision to avoid arbitration is taken with very limited analysis of what went wrong in the particular arbitration, and why it went wrong.

Question 2: Did you do an autopsy on the arbitration to determine what went wrong
and why it went wrong?

It is unlikely, we would wager, that the complaining counsel did a comprehensive autopsy on the arbitration, analyzing it from the process of negotiating the clause through the provisions agreed to in the clause, assessing each major choice that was made or agreed to.

To provide some assistance to those who might wish to perform an autopsy on an arbitration that has gone bad, we offer this Arbitration Autopsy Checklist.

ARBITRATION AUTOPSY CHECKLIST

This Arbitration Autopsy Checklist will help litigators and corporate counsel determine what went wrong with an arbitration, and why.

While focusing on international arbitration, this checklist is – with limited modification – suitable for use in debriefing on a domestic commercial arbitration.

Before the Dispute Arose

Did you have a reasonable understanding, in advance, of what arbitration is?

A slide down a slippery slope will begin if the person instructing on or negotiating the dispute resolution provisions in a contract does not appreciate what arbitration is, its main features and how it differs from court litigation, domestically and internationally. A general understanding of arbitration should be acquired before a person becomes involved in the negotiation, not by learning on the job.

Before you became involved in the negotiation of the dispute resolution provisions, did you have reasonable familiarity with

  • the benefits and disadvantages of arbitration generally?
  • the benefits and disadvantages of arbitration in the relevant/available jurisdiction(s)?
  • the benefits and disadvantages of comparable court litigation in the relevant/available jurisdiction(s)?

Was consideration of appropriate dispute resolution provisions for the transaction left until the 11th hour (or later)?

It is legendary that those negotiating dispute resolution provisions for a transaction leave it until almost the very end of the negotiation. To get the best outcome, allocating some time earlier to consider potential disputes and appropriate dispute resolution provisions is advantageous.

Before negotiating the dispute resolution provisions, did you consider

  • the types of disputes that would be most likely to arise?
  • whether your client would be likely to claim or defend in those types of disputes?
  • which dispute resolution process(es) would most likely fit your client's interests and objectives?

And if arbitration was selected, did you consider

  • the appropriate seat of arbitration (also known as the "place" of the arbitration, which is the legal location of the arbitration)?
  • the appropriate number of arbitrators (one or three) for the arbitral tribunal?
  • specifying or not specifying particular qualifications for the arbitral tribunal?
  • the advantages and disadvantages of administered and ad hoc arbitration in the particular circumstances?
  • whether well-intentioned provisions to ensure speed or a specific process are suitable for all types of disputes that might arise?
  • whether the arbitration clause might not be workable or not work well (referred to as a pathological or dysfunctional arbitration clause), and the resulting consequences?

During the negotiation of the arbitration clause, did you get experienced advice on what the clause should contain?

There is no substitute for experience and knowledgeable advice on arbitration and arbitration clauses. Because arbitration's key feature is "party autonomy," a party has the opportunity to get the opposite party to agree to almost every aspect of what goes into the arbitration clause.

Therefore, it is important that those not experienced in arbitration involve counsel who has extensive knowledge and experience in arbitration. Although the use of arbitration is growing in most jurisdictions, there are a relatively limited number of lawyers in most law firms and corporate law departments who are reasonably familiar with domestic and international commercial arbitration.

For the negotiation of the arbitration clause, did you

  • involve counsel with knowledge of and experience in arbitration in the applicable jurisdiction(s)?

Did you agree to an arbitration clause that is pathological?

The negotiator may agree to aspects of the arbitration clause that will result in problems down the road. Parties will often use a boilerplate clause or a clause that is a compromise between their positions, without considering the workability of the clause for all reasonably possible disputes.

Did the arbitration clause negotiated in your agreement

  • clearly state that disputes "shall be" referred to arbitration?
  • clearly describe the types of disputes to be covered (and/or not covered) by the arbitration clause?
  • correctly identify the specific arbitral institution to administer the arbitration?
  • identify an arbitral institution with the competence and neutrality to administer the arbitration?
  • identify an arbitral institution with a fee structure that was acceptable to your client and suitable for all reasonably possible disputes?
  • provide efficient procedures to be used for the arbitration?
  • permit appropriate discretion and flexibility for the arbitral tribunal to conduct the arbitration effectively and efficiently in light of the actual dispute and circumstances that might arise?
  • have regard for "proportionality" – i.e., the complexity of the arbitration procedures compared with the size and complexity of all reasonably possible disputes?
  • specify a set of arbitration rules that were existing, effective and appropriate for the circumstances?
  • identify a seat of the arbitration that was neutral and in all other respects appropriate?
  • specify the number of arbitrators?
  • adopt an arbitrator-appointment procedure that was not overly complex?
  • specify arbitrator qualifications that were truly important for the circumstances and not so specific as to unduly limit the available pool of arbitrators?
  • specify the language of the arbitration?

After the Dispute Arose

Did you choose your arbitration counsel wisely?

If the chosen arbitration counsel does not understand arbitration, it is less likely that the potential benefits of arbitration will be attained or the party's case advanced effectively.

The chosen counsel need not necessarily be from the seat of arbitration but should be well-suited for international arbitration through training, experience and advocacy style.

Was the chosen arbitration counsel

  • experienced in international commercial arbitration?
  • open to working with processes that differ from that counsel's domestic court system?
  • able to examine witnesses and make submissions in a style that fits with the expectations of international arbitration?
  • not unnecessarily expensive?
  • willing to work with corporate counsel and the corporation in an effective, efficient and coordinated way?

Did corporate counsel stay involved?

Arbitration counsel needs the involvement of corporate counsel – for direction; for insight into the corporation's objectives, concerns, priorities, and so forth; and to ensure the appropriate involvement and availability of senior management and others in the business.

Did corporate counsel responsible for the management of the case

  • stay appropriately involved with the case throughout?
  • provide the appropriate direction and insight to arbitration counsel?
  • ensure the availability of the necessary people from the corporation?
  • not inappropriately interfere with arbitration counsel's role as advocate in the case?

Was arbitration counsel adequately informed?

When arbitration counsel is retained, it is necessary that he or she be adequately informed about the corporation and the dispute.

Was arbitration counsel required or at least encouraged to

  • become familiar with the corporation and its business?
  • pursue the arbitration in a manner consistent with the corporation's objectives and an agreed strategy?

And was arbitration counsel given sufficient access to corporate information to adequately prepare for the arbitration and present the case at the hearing?

Was there coordination between corporate counsel and arbitration counsel?

To maximize the benefits of arbitration, corporate counsel and arbitration counsel need to coordinate their efforts to maximize efficiency and minimize costs.

Was arbitration counsel required to or at least encouraged to

  • work effectively, efficiently and in a coordinated way with corporate counsel and the corporation?

Did you choose your arbitral tribunal wisely?

It is important that the decision maker be knowledgeable about arbitration, have case-management skills and the ability to conduct a fair and efficient hearing, and have at least basic familiarity with the subject matter/business that is at issue and/or the area of law.

Too often the choice of arbitrator is based on a lack of due diligence, a failure to consider some important factors, undeserved reputations, or inappropriate or wrongly weighted considerations. For example, undue weight may be given to the arbitrator's nationality and legal culture (civil law or common law), with unjustified speculation on how the arbitrator will handle particular legal or procedural issues in the arbitration.

In some cases, the arbitrator chosen will be well-known and perhaps very good but too busy with other cases to be able to deal with the arbitration expeditiously. Parties may also have chosen a retired judge who has never transitioned from being a judge to being an arbitrator1 or a lawyer unfamiliar with arbitration, both of whom are inclined to establish procedures that mirror local procedures for court litigation.

Was the arbitrator you chose

  • familiar/experienced with arbitration?
  • sufficiently knowledgeable about the subject matter/business and/or legal issues involved in the dispute?
  • skilled in case management, particularly if the chair of a three-member tribunal or the sole arbitrator?
  • skilled in conducting a fair and efficient hearing?
  • as good an arbitrator as his or her reputation suggested?
  • sufficiently available so that the arbitration was not delayed by his or her unreasonable unavailability?
  • willing to intervene when parties could not agree on procedural issues and issue procedural orders when needed?
  • fair and of sound judgment?
  • impartial and independent of the parties?
  • compatible with other members of a three-member tribunal?
  • chosen with sufficient "due diligence" – e.g., was information obtained about the arbitrator from persons with experience with that arbitrator and from reading the arbitrator's published decisions, articles and other public documents?
  • fluent in the language of the arbitration?
  • not unnecessarily expensive?

Did you seek or agree to the appropriate arbitration procedures?

The party autonomy and flexibility offered by arbitration mean that wise decisions need to be made on procedure so that the arbitration proceeds efficiently while allowing adequate time for counsel and the tribunal to do things with appropriate thoroughness. Many pitfalls can be encountered by those who lack reasonable knowledge and experience regarding the options or are unwilling to agree to sensible procedures.

Did the procedures agreed to in the arbitration clause and/or at the beginning of the arbitration (with or without involvement of the arbitral tribunal)

  • set time limits that were unrealistic, and thus unworkable?
  • set out procedures that were too expedited?
  • grant the arbitral tribunal enough flexibility to create or adapt procedures in a manner appropriate for the specific case?
  • provide for mediation prior to or in the course of the arbitration?
  • provide incentives to encourage settlement such as sealed settlement offers (and in appropriate cases, "baseball" [final offer selection] arbitration)?
  • account for differences in geography, time zones and/or languages of the parties?
  • adopt the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Commercial Arbitration? 2
  • provide for appropriate and proportional pre-hearing proceedings (pleadings; document discovery/disclosure/production; examinations for discovery/depositions)?
  • include appropriate innovative hearing procedures such as panels of experts, written evidence-in-chief (direct evidence), time limits and/or page limits, and equal sharing of available hearing time?

Did you pursue inefficient and ineffective tactics?

Sometimes a party and its counsel will pursue tactics that are unlikely to succeed and/or will not serve the party's main interest in the arbitration or frustrate the arbitration process.

Did you pursue inefficient or ineffective tactics such as unreasonably

  • challenging an arbitrator (or two arbitrators)?
  • challenging the arbitrability of the subject matter in court?
  • challenging the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal in court?
  • failing to trust the arbitral tribunal on case management and procedural matters?
  • acting aggressively with the opposite side or before the arbitral tribunal?
  • refusing or failing to cooperate on procedural matters?

Or did you pursue inefficient or ineffective tactics such as

  • failing to listen to express and implicit signals from the arbitral tribunal?
  • forgetting that the "hearing" starts with the first contact with the arbitral tribunal and continues with each subsequent letter, submission and other interaction?
  • failing to treat the arbitrators with respect?

Conclusion

By undertaking a comprehensive autopsy on an arbitration that has not been a happy experience, litigators and corporate counsel will gain a good understanding of the reasons for the outcome and what to do differently when drafting arbitration clauses and managing or conducting arbitrations in the future.

Barry Leon (bleon@torys.com) practises international and domestic commercial arbitration, litigation and mediation at Torys LLP (www.torys.com). He also serves as an arbitrator and mediator in international and domestic disputes.

Raegan Kennedy (rkennedy@torys.com) is a corporate and commercial lawyer at Torys LLP who appreciates the importance of dispute resolution clauses.

Footnotes

1.Some former judges have become good arbitrators but others have had a difficult time transitioning from being a judge to being an arbitrator.

2.Online: International Bar Association http://www.ibanet.org/Publications/publications_IBA_guides_and
_free_materials.aspx.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions