Canada: Primer On Proposed Amendments To Canada´s Competition Act And Investment Canada Act

As reported in the February 6, 2009 edition of The Competitor, the Canadian government tabled the most significant amendments in over 20 years to Canada's competition and foreign investment regimes, as part of Bill C-10, the Budget Implementation Act, 2009. If enacted in their current form, the proposed amendments to the Competition Act will result in fundamental changes to the way that business operates in Canada, and will provide the Competition Bureau with unprecedented enforcement tools and/or penalties in all areas. Fewer foreign investments in Canada will meet the increased thresholds for Ministerial review and approval under the changed Investment Canada Act, but all such investments will face potential scrutiny under a new "national security" test. The most significant proposed amendments to both these laws are discussed below.

Bill C-10 has received second reading in Parliament and was referred to the Standing Committee on Finance for consideration. Unless dealt with separately from the budgetary aspects of the Bill, the proposed amendments to the Competition Act and the Investment Canada Act could become law as early as April.

Proposed Competition Act Amendments

Two-tracks for dealing with agreements between competitors

  • The amendment of section 45 of the Act will create a "per se" criminal conspiracy offence with respect to agreements or arrangements ("agreements") between competitors (which includes potential competitors) to: fix prices; allocate sales, customers or markets; or fix or control production or supply of a product. A new counterpart civil provision will permit the Commissioner to deal with anti-competitive agreements that are not "hard core" (see below). A defence to criminal prosecution exists if the accused can establish on a balance of probabilities that the alleged conspiracy is "ancillary" to a broader or separate agreement between the same parties that does not itself contravene the provision and is "directly related to, and reasonably necessary" for giving effect to the objective of the broader agreement ("ancillary restraint defence"). The amendments expressly preserve the application of the common law "regulated conduct" doctrine (which exempts actions which are authorized or required pursuant to legislation). Agreements relating solely to exports are still exempt. Penalties under the new offence will more than double from the current maximum 5 years imprisonment and/or C$10 million fine, to a maximum of 14 years and/or C$25 million - still far lower in terms of potential fines than in the US or the EU. The new conspiracy offence would have a delayed effective date of one year after Bill C-10 is enacted, during which time businesses can seek an advisory opinion on the legality of existing or proposed agreements (but may not be granted immunity against violations of the existing law unless they otherwise qualify under the immunity program).
    • In contrast to the current conspiracy provision, which requires the prosecution to establish an "undue" prevention or lessening of competition, the amended offence, albeit narrower in terms of the type of conduct it encompasses, does not on its face require market power or any impact on competition for conviction. Rather, it requires only that the parties to the impugned agreement be competitors or potential competitors, which will necessarily raise issues around the definition of the "market" for the product. In consultations on language similar to that in the proposed Bill, many parties have criticized the ancillary restraint defence as being too narrow and potentially subjecting many widely-accepted agreements (e.g., franchise or exclusive distribution arrangements) to criminal prosecution. We will have to see whether the "rule of reason" analysis followed by US courts will become relevant in Canada, as our courts struggle to interpret the new defence.
  • The "second track" of the new approach to cartels will create a new civilly reviewable matter in respect of existing or proposed agreements between persons, two or more of whom are "competitors", which prevent or lessen competition substantially. The factors to be considered in undertaking this assessment are effectively the same as the existing merger review provisions. On application by the Commissioner of Competition, the Competition Tribunal may prohibit any person, whether or not a party to the agreement, from doing anything under the agreement or, subject to a person's consent, may order the person to take any other action. In terms identical to the existing merger review provisions, an efficiencies defence would apply if the agreement brings about "gains in efficiency that will be greater than, and will offset, the effects of any prevention or lessening of competition" and the efficiency gains would not be attained if a prohibition order were issued. The new "civil conspiracy" provision would have a delayed effective date of one year after Bill C-10 is enacted.
    • In contrast to the proposed per se criminal conspiracy offence, the new civil conspiracy provision applies to agreements between competitors to do anything (not simply to fix prices, for example) but only if the agreement substantially lessens or prevents competition. While the civil conspiracy provision would only apply to agreements between "competitors", the provision, in contrast to the proposed criminal conspiracy offence, omits the requirement that the parties be competitors in respect of the product that is the subject of the agreement. Moreover, empowering the Competition Tribunal to make a prohibition order against a person who is not a party to the agreement potentially raises issues of procedural fairness.

De-criminalized pricing practices

  • De-criminalization of price discrimination, predatory pricing and disproportionate promotional allowances.
    • These "unfair" pricing practices are currently liable to criminal prosecution and punishable by imprisonment for up to 2 years. Stakeholders on all sides have long recognized the criminal sanctions to be inconsistent with modern economics. With the repeal of section 50 of the Competition Act, low prices that undercut the competition or the provision of different prices to different customers could only be sanctioned civilly as part of a "practice of anti-competitive acts" under the abuse of dominance provisions - and only if they substantially lessen or prevent competition. The liberalization of Canada's pricing laws will bring welcome relief to many Canadian businesses and will enhance competition to the extent the old law was chilling pro-competitive price competition.

Price maintenance - replacement of criminal provision with civil provision

  • The existing criminal prohibitions against attempting to induce another person to raise or refrain from lowering their prices, and against discriminating against a customer because of its low pricing policy, are to be replaced by a new civil provision. On application by the Commissioner of Competition or by a private party to whom leave has been granted, the Competition Tribunal may prohibit the conduct or require a person to accept another person as a customer if the conduct has had, is having or is likely to have an "adverse effect on competition in a market."
  • While the amendment effectively limits the provision to resale situations (the previous provision did not), the choice of "adverse effect on competition" as the relevant competitive effects test, which is currently used under the civil "refusal to deal" provision, suggests that a lower impact on competition will be required than is the case in respect of other civil matters (such as abuse of dominance and mergers) where a "substantial" prevention or lessening of competition must be shown. At the same time, the threshold for a private party to obtain leave to bring an application in respect of price maintenance would be lower than in refusal to deal cases, since the proposed amendments require only that the applicant be "directly affected" by the conduct, not that the applicant also be "directly and substantially affected", as in respect of refusal to deal and exclusive dealing cases. That said, civil review is thought by many to be more appropriate than the current criminal prohibition, which currently subjects Canadian businesses to greater restrictions than are imposed on their US counterparts.

Deceptive marketing practices/obstruction of justice

  • Increased penalties for the criminal offences of: misleading advertising, deceptive telemarketing, and deceptive notice of winning a prize (in each case, to a maximum 14 years imprisonment and/or a fine in the discretion of the court); obstruction (to a maximum 10 years imprisonment and/or a fine in the discretion of the court, if convicted on indictment, or if on summary conviction, a maximum of 2 years imprisonment and/or a maximum C$100,000 fine); and failure to comply with search warrants and court orders to provide information (to a maximum 2 years imprisonment and/or a fine in the discretion of the court, if convicted on indictment, or if on summary conviction, a maximum of 2 years imprisonment and/or a C$100,000 fine).

Increased penalties for (non-criminal) misleading advertising

  • Introduction of a restitution remedy in respect of the civilly reviewable practice of making materially false or misleading representations to the public for the purpose of promoting a business interest. Subject to a due diligence defence, restitution, in any manner ordered by a court or the Competition Tribunal, would be capped at the total amount paid for affected products and be payable to persons who purchased the products, "except wholesalers, retailers or other distributors, to the extent that they have resold or distributed the products". A court or the Competition Tribunal may issue an interim injunction prohibiting disposing or dealing with assets so as to frustrate a restitution remedy.
    • As worded, the new restitution remedy has the potential to raise complicated issues regarding, among other things, passing-on (or indirect effects) with respect to the apportionment of overcharges at various levels of the distribution chain. It does not apply to criminal deceptive marketing practices.
  • Increased administrative monetary penalties for all civilly-reviewable deceptive marketing practices (including inaccurate "ordinary price" claims). In the case of individuals, the maximum penalty increases to C$750,000 for a first infraction and C$1 million for each subsequent infraction, with corresponding increases for corporations to C$10 million and C$15 million, respectively.
    • Currently, penalties for individuals are capped at C$50,000 for a first infraction and C$100,000 for each subsequent infraction, while penalties for corporations are limited to C$100,000 and C$200,000 for first and subsequent infractions, respectively.

Fines for abuse of dominance/repeal of "airline" provisions

  • Introduction of "administrative monetary penalties" for abuse of dominance (so-called to negate the constitutional argument that their imposition by the Competition Tribunal pursuant to its civil procedures would amount to the imposition of criminal sanction without due process). Where ordered by the Competition Tribunal, the maximum fine would be C$10 million for a first infraction and C$15 million for each subsequent infraction.
    • Administrative monetary penalties are currently only available under the abuse of dominance provision against domestic airlines, which will be repealed if the Bill is passed. Both their utility and their legality have been questioned by some commentators.

Merger review procedures

  • Increase in the "size-of-transaction" threshold for transactions requiring pre-merger notification. During the year in which Bill C-10 comes into force, the target, together with its affiliates, must either have assets in Canada that exceed C$70 million or annual gross revenues from sales in or from Canada generated from those assets that exceed C$70 million. In the case of corporate amalgamations, the revised C$70 million threshold must be exceeded by each of at least two of the amalgamating corporations, together with its affiliates. The C$70 million threshold will be indexed annually to GDP, unless and until a different amount is prescribed by regulation.
    • The size-of-transaction threshold currently is C$50 million in assets in Canada or annual gross revenues from sales in or from Canada generated from those assets. It is not indexed, nor in the case of corporate amalgamations must it be met be each of two parties to the transaction.
  • Introduction of a US-style two-stage merger review process for transactions subject to pre-merger notification. An initial 30-day waiting period would apply following the submission of certain prescribed information and could be reset for an additional 30 days following compliance with a second request by the Commissioner of Competition for additional information.
    • Currently, parties to a notifiable transaction have the option of submitting either a "short-form" notification, which carries with it a 14-day waiting period, or a "long-form" notification, which carries with it a 42-day waiting period (if a short-form notification is filed, the Commissioner may request a long-form notification during the 14-day waiting period, in which case the 42-day waiting period begins only once the long-form notification is filed). In either case, the waiting period is finite, and cannot be extended. The Commissioner's powers to obtain information beyond that contained in a notification currently are limited to voluntary information requests and court orders.
    • The new procedure will increase the waiting period for all transactions (more than 90% of which are reviewed by the Bureau within 14 days of receipt of a request for an Advance Ruling Certificate (ARC) or similar competitive analysis), to a minimum of 30 days unless terminated earlier by the issuance of an ARC or a no-action letter.
    • For complicated transactions, however, the new provisions will effectively mean there is no determinable end to the waiting period, as it will depend on how long it takes for the parties to comply with the "second request" for additional information that is relevant to the Commissioner's assessment of the proposed transaction. As with the US system, this may provide an incentive for the Commissioner to request as much information as possible within the 30-day initial waiting period, when detailed analysis has typically yet to begin in very complex transactions. It remains to be seen whether this will result in an "everything and the kitchen sink" approach by the Bureau to second requests.
    • In the face of the Federal Court's criticism of the Commissioner for issuing overly broad requests for information in the Labatt/Lakeport case last year, however, it seems that the Government is responding, some would say perversely, by removing the express provision for judicial oversight of the process.
  • Introduction of injunctive relief to enforce compliance with waiting periods. If a person has completed or is likely to complete a proposed transaction before expiry of the applicable waiting period, a court or the Competition Tribunal, on application by the Commissioner of Competition, could issue an interim injunction prohibiting implementation of the transaction or requiring its dissolution and, in the case of a completed transaction, could impose administrative monetary penalties of up to C$10,000 for each day of non-compliance with the waiting period.
    • Failure to comply with the statutory waiting period is currently a criminal offence punishable by a maximum fine of C$50,000.
  • Decrease to one year the period of time within which the Commissioner of Competition may challenge a merger following its substantial completion.
    • Currently, the Commissioner may bring an application to the Competition Tribunal challenging a merger within 3 years of its substantial completion.

Proposed Investment Canada Act amendments

Bill C-10 also proposes significant amendments to the review of foreign investments under Canada's Investment Canada Act:

  • Increase in the minimum threshold for Ministerial review and approval of direct acquisitions of control of Canadian businesses by WTO-member based investors. The threshold would be C$600 million in the "enterprise value" of the assets of the Canadian business for investments made within two years after the federal Cabinet proclaims the thresholds in force, C$800 million for the subsequent two years, C$1 billion for the subsequent year and the portion of the year thereafter that ends on December 31, and thereafter indexed to GDP.
    • The threshold for review of direct acquisitions by WTO investors in 2009 is C$312 million and this amount is indexed annually to GDP.
    • Indirect investments by WTO investors will remain exempt from review, unless they fall within certain "sensitive" sectors, the scope of which is to be narrowed to only "cultural businesses", see below.
  • Elimination of the lower C$5 million review threshold for direct acquisitions (and the C$50 million threshold for review of indirect acquisitions of control) of Canadian businesses engaged in the "sensitive sector" activities of financial services, transportation services and uranium production, leaving only "cultural businesses" subject to this threshold and to review and approval by the Minister of Canadian Heritage.
  • Creation of a "national security" test for every establishment or acquisition of control of a Canadian business, regardless of the value of its assets, which the Minister of Industry has "reasonable grounds" to believe "could be injurious to national security". Ultimately, if the Minister of Industry, after consultation with the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness and representations from the investor, is satisfied that the investment would be "injurious to national security", the federal Cabinet may "take any measures" it "considers advisable to protect national security", including ordering the investment not to be implemented or to be implemented subject to conditions or written undertakings, and if the investment has been implemented, requiring divestiture of the Canadian business.
    • "National security" is not defined in Bill C-10, nor do the amendments specify factors that are to be considered in determining whether an investment is "injurious" to national security. Time periods for the national security review provisions would be prescribed by regulation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.