Canada: Granting Licenses Without Jeopardizing Your Trade-Mark In Canada

Last Updated: February 13 2009
Article by Jean-Philippe Mikus

Granting licenses has practically become an integral part of using and developing trade-marks. It helps expand a trade-mark's reach to cover a wider range of goods and services while mitigating the financial risks normally associated with this type of expansion; the owner of the trade-mark can rely on the expertise and network of businesses already established in the relevant areas of trade. This way, a company that owns a strong trade-mark in its primary line of business can maximize the financial advantages of its prominence and fame. In the wake of recent Supreme Court of Canada case-law, one might even go so far as to say that the significant use of a trade-mark in association with a diversified range of goods and services is an important factor when claiming broad protection as a famous mark.

Applying this formula in Canada can be dangerous, however, if the requirements imposed by Canadian legislation are ignored. Where there is failure to comply, Canadian courts can declare a trade-mark invalid for loss of distinctiveness, expunge a business's trade-mark registration, or even refuse to register a trade-mark. All this could leave the door wide open to third parties interested in riding on the coattails of a company's fame. Such a calamity is not unheard of even after years of apparent stability. One reason for this is that Canada's Registrar of Trade-Marks accepts for purposes of registration general statements regarding arrangements with licensees. The fact that a trade-mark has been issued a certificate of registration is no guarantee of success in the event the validity of licenses is put into question.

In Canada, the validity of licenses is not tied to their registration in a public register or any other form of disclosure to a public authority. This, however, is a relatively recent development – before 1993, all licenses had to be registered with the Canadian Intellectual Property Office to ensure the trade-mark's validity. License registrations made under that old regime ceased protecting trade-mark owners after this legislative change. An application for registration of a trade-mark must nonetheless specify if the proposed or existing use of the trade-mark is by the applicant or a third party to whom a license is or will be granted. It is not necessary, however, to specify the identity of the licensees.

Section 50 of the Trade-marks Act provides that the use of a trade-mark by a licensee is deemed to have the same effect as the use by the owner of the trade-mark provided that, under the license, the trade-mark owner controls the character or quality of the goods and services at issue. This provision gives little indication of the backdrop against which it is set. Canadian law inherited from British trade-mark law the historical concept that a trade-mark can only be associated with the industry of a single entity. Granting licenses was construed as a misrepresentation to consumers of the origin of the goods, since until then goods had always been manufactured exclusively by the owner of the trade-mark. Such conduct was sanctioned by loss of trade-mark rights.

Section 50 of the Trade-marks Act does not entirely repeal this rule; it merely creates a way for businesses to grant licenses without compromising their trade-marks. That said, entrepreneurs are well advised to tread the path traced by the Trade-marks Act. One of the difficulties confronting businesses operating in Canada is the relative "youth" of this legislative provision. There are still a number of grey zones that should be navigated with caution.

Section 50 of the Trade-marks Act states that the licence must grant control over the character or quality of the goods or services. If the text of the license agreement only governs the appearance of a trade-mark (layout, size, colours, etc.) without dwelling on the quality or character of the goods or services themselves, maintaining rights to the licensed trade-mark could prove more difficult. It would then have to be shown, for instance, that such a provision was an implied term of the agreement.

Standards concerning the quality and character of the goods and services must be set by the owner of the trade-mark for the licensees to comply with. Until now, the courts have not required a very detailed articulation of such standards. In some cases, the fact that a trade-mark holder had to comply with quality standards defined from time to time by the trade-mark owner without more specificity sufficed. Requiring licences to maintain or exceed the character and quality of goods or services already on the market may also be sufficient. Naturally, it is a far more delicate matter to define standards for businesses that venture outside their usual field of activity. The agreement must normally provide means for controlling the character and quality of goods and services. Such provisions can require, for example, that samples be approved prior to production, manufacturing samples be sent on request, or for the inspection of production or distribution facilities.

Courts have not yet clearly ruled on whether trade-mark owners must adduce evidence that they have actually controlled the character and quality of goods and services manufactured under license pursuant to the agreement. However, the mere existence of an adequately drafted license agreement has prevented businesses from losing their trade-marks in the course of administrative proceedings initiated to expunge unused trade-marks. In such a context, trade-mark holders must be able to show use enuring to their benefit by a licensee when they do not use the trade-mark themselves in Canada. The mere existence of a written license often suffices. This can probably be explained by a desire to respect the summary nature of such administrative proceedings by limiting the scope of the evidence adduced. It is uncertain whether such a lax approach would be acceptable in Federal Court proceedings. Businesses would be wise to implement controls and be in a position to document them.

The dangers associated with license grants can even exist within a group of related companies. Courts have already indicated that the mere fact that a trade-mark owner holds directly or indirectly all or a majority of the shares of a company using a trade-mark is not by itself enough to establish sufficient control under section 50 of the Trade-marks Act. No special treatment is given to licenses granted within a corporate group, except where trade-marks relate to pharmaceutical preparations (provided conditions such as indicating the name of the trade-mark owner on the packaging and the name of the distributor holding the license are met).

Care should be taken when drafting and managing license agreements (especially within the same corporate group) as certain provisions can give rise to difficult issues in the event of a dispute with a third party. One classic problem arises from provisions prohibiting the use of trade-marks in a different form or in association with goods or services not identified in the agreement. Any changes made to the trade-mark will usually require such provisions be amended or extended to cover additional goods or services. If the intent to allow the licensee to follow these developments does not correspond to the language of the agreement, anyone who wants to oppose the trade-mark may argue that the licensee acted unlawfully and without any control by the trade-mark owner (and therefore without the protection afforded by section 50 of the Trade-marks Act, exposing the trade-mark to possible impingement claims).

The absence of a written license agreement will not necessarily entail the loss of rights to a trade-mark. A demonstration will need to be made however, that control was indeed exerted by the trade-mark owner, even in the context of summary administrative proceedings. When the general public has easy access to the licensed goods and services, it is often possible to demonstrate such control if the goods and services have been periodically consumed by the officers or employees of the trade-mark owner, even in an informal context. In the contrary situation, it may be difficult to bring such evidence if a structured compliance program was not in place.

One way to help defend an attack on the validity of a registration is to require licensees to affix on the goods, the packaging thereof or even on panels or promotional brochures for services, a notice stating that the trade-mark in question is the property of the registered owner, and that it is used under license. Under section 50 of the Trade-marks Act, the character or quality of the goods or services is then presumed to be under the trade-mark owners' control. Such a notice, in all likelihood, will not make a trade-mark invulnerable to an attack based on a lack of control if actual evidence is brought of the absence of control over the character or quality of the goods and services (or a sufficient level of deficiency of this control), this presumption can be reversed.

A license may not be needed in a number of situations. For example, Canadian courts recognize that the benefit derived from the use of a trade-mark, such as the resale by importers, distributors or retailers, of products acquired from the trade-mark owner automatically enure to the owner. A license does not need to be granted further to Section 50 of the Trade-marks Act. This would normally also be the same for the resale of a service provided by the trade-mark owner. If a distributor or importer modifies the goods or provides additional services (such as repair, installation or configuration services) in connection with the trade-mark, a proper trade-mark license could be useful to counter any future attacks. This would also be the case for services rendered in connection with a trade-mark by the retailers or distributors of the trade-mark owner's goods. The Courts have recognized, however, that the considerable level of control that exists in franchisor-franchisee relations meets the requirements of section 50 of the Trade-marks Act.

Ensuring that the use of your trade-mark in Canada is structured so as to benefit from the protection of section 50 of the Trade-marks Act when necessary is of great strategic importance. Attacks based on the alleged loss of a trade-mark's distinctiveness or the absence of use by the owner of a trade-mark registration because of improper licensing are extremely common in Canada. Countless administrative proceedings are instituted under section 45 of the Trade-marks Act to expunge trade-mark registrations to overcome objections by the Registrar of Trade-Marks based on a confusing trade-mark registration. Furthermore, trade-mark infringement litigation will usually give rise to a counterclaim that the trade-mark and its registrations are invalid. Claim of entitlement to a trade-mark arising through use is also usually contested in infringement proceedings by arguing that the plaintiff cannot benefit from the use made by its licensees.


Failing to put in place adequate corporate policies governing the licensing in Canada can place your business in a compromising position, forcing you to settle at a discount even in cases of blatant misappropriation of your trade-mark's reputation. If the matter goes further, a judgment could forfeit your rights to a trade-mark.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.