Canada: Making The Grade: Court Review Of University Decision-Making

Last Updated: October 2 2018
Article by Jonathan Coady and Justin Milne

INTRODUCTION

Universities have a variety of internal procedures that permit students to challenge a number of academic decisions. For example, there are often procedures allowing students to appeal grades or to challenge other decisions such as being expelled.1

However, these decisions are not necessarily final. Students who exhaust the appeal procedures established by a university may generally apply to a superior court for judicial review. This article will summarize how courts assess these types of academic decisions and outline what courts expect from universities in order to uphold their decisions. In other words, this legal cheat sheet is intended to help universities make the grade in a courtroom.

DISTINCTION BETWEEN ACADEMIC ISSUES AND OTHER LEGAL ISSUES

At the outset, it is important to note that courts treat academic issues differently from other legal issues that may arise within universities. For example, students who have a pure academic dispute are generally required to exhaust the internal procedure before initiating a court proceeding. On the other hand, matters of a general legal nature – such as an allegation that a university was negligent and caused harm to a student – are permitted to proceed immediately to court.

While this distinction appears to be clear at face value, it is often more obscure in practice. For example, consider the circumstances of a student who alleges that their course failure was caused by negligent instruction by the university. Is this an academic issue or a legal one? Most recently, this question has been resolved by examining the remedy being sought by the student. If the student wishes to have a grade of "fail" changed to a "pass," then the decision is purely academic in nature and ought to go through the internal procedure at the university. However, if the student is seeking monetary compensation for lost opportunities, the issue is a legal one and the student may immediately start a legal proceeding in negligence.2 Courts will generally not entertain claims for monetary compensation when the claim is, in substance, an attempt to reverse a grading decision by the university.

DEFERENCE WILL GENERALLY BE EXTENDED TO THE UNIVERSITY'S DECISION

The distinction between academic disputes and other legal issues also has an impact on the role of the court in the proceeding. If the claim is a legal one, then the court will make its own factual findings and reach its own legal conclusions. However, if the dispute is purely academic in nature, the role of the court will be to "review" the decision made by the university. The court does not consider the matter afresh and make its own findings. Rather, the court extends a considerable amount of deference or respect to the internal decision-makers at the university.

This deference to university decision-making is appropriate because, when students enroll at a university, "it is understood that the student agrees to be subject to the institution's discretion in resolving academic matters, including the assessment of the quality of the student's work."3 And, in the academic context, that discretion has been recognized as being broad.4 After all, provincial legislatures generally grant responsibility over academic policies, including the authority to "render a final decision on academic appeals," to the governing bodies of universities – and not to the courts.5

Courts have also accepted that universities have particular expertise over academic matters. This expertise also engenders respect from the court.6 For example, in a decision concerning whether it was reasonable for a university to transfer a PhD student to another program because the faculty did not have the expertise to supervise the project in question, the court stated it was "simply not equipped" to determine the issue.7

When the relative expertise of universities in academic matters is considered together with the autonomy granted to universities by legislatures, courts are generally reluctant to interfere in academic affairs.8 In fact, there are a number of cases where courts have said that an academic decision can only be reviewed to ensure that the university followed a fair process.9 Deference will therefore generally be extended to universities in academic matters.

MAKING THE GRADE

Courts typically conduct only a procedural review of academic decisions. The objective of the review process is to ensure that the student has been treated fairly by the university. Judicial review will therefore generally focus on the requirements of procedural fairness. Understanding these obligations is therefore essential if a university expects to receive a passing grade from the court.

To start, the requirements of procedural fairness are context-specific. Some cases, such as disciplinary matters that lead to expulsion, attract a high level of fairness.10 Other administrative matters – such as a decision to re-admit a student into a program – attract a lower level of procedural fairness.11 However, no matter the nature of the academic decision at issue, the following basic elements of procedural fairness will ordinarily apply:

Bias: Just as a chemistry student is expected to justify her conclusions by using independent and objective methods, a university is similarly expected to justify its academic decisions in a manner that is free of bias. Internal decision-makers must be impartial in their dealings with a student. This requirement applies to all types of academic decision-making. For example, a professor should not – after a student has appealed their grade – change their reasoning for failing the student.12 This type of conduct suggests that the initial grading decision was arbitrary and not animated by relevant academic considerations.

Reasons: For students, answering the question "why?" is a common and legitimate pursuit at university. Nothing less is expected when a university makes an academic decision about a student. The provision of reasons allows the student – and the reviewing court – to understand the justification for a particular decision.13 In other words, the university, like the student, must show its work. In the absence of reasons, students may feel that a decision was motivated by arbitrariness. Courts too have had difficulty upholding decisions that were made by universities in the absence of reasons.14 However, the content of those reasons may vary in the circumstances. There is a direct relationship between the impact of a decision on the student and the quality of reasons expected from the university. For example, formal written reasons are often necessary in disciplinary matters (i.e. expulsion of a student from the university), but not expected in matters that are administrative in nature (i.e. denying a student re-admission to a program).15

Opportunity to be heard: Universities foster an academic environment that encourages participation by students. Courts require much the same from universities when they make decisions affecting the academic interests of students. They must provide students with an opportunity to participate in the decision-making process and, more specifically, they are required to ensure that students have an opportunity to explain why a particular decision ought to be changed. The form of that opportunity, however, varies depending on the circumstances. For example, an oral hearing is ordinarily required when a student faces expulsion or when credibility will weigh heavily in the final outcome.16 Where the consequences are less severe or credibility is not at issue, a hearing in writing may suffice. For example, if a student has requested re-admission to a program, courts have held that a university can discharge its duty by providing "an opportunity to be heard" in writing only.17

CONCLUSION

A review of the case law demonstrates that courts will generally defer to academic decisions by university decision-makers. Universities are considered to have expertise in such matters and enjoy broad discretion over the academic interests of students. However, the case law also determines that courts will scrutinize the appeal procedures adopted by universities as part of their academic policies. A reviewing court will examine an academic decision to ensure that it was free of bias, that the student had a meaningful opportunity to be heard, and that the university provided reasons to justify its decision. If the court is not satisfied that the procedure used by the university was fair in the circumstances, it may set aside the decision. Keeping these elements of procedural fairness in mind will be essential if universities expect to make the grade on judicial review.

Footnotes

1. For example, the University of Prince Edward Island has the following procedure for appealing a grade: (1) an informal appeal with an instructor; (2) a formal appeal with the departmental Chair; (3) a formal appeal with the faculty Dean; and (4) a formal appeal to the Senate Academic and Discipline Appeals Committee.

2. Jaffer v. York University, 2010 ONCA 654 at para. 26.

3. Ibid. at para. 27.

4. Ibid. at para. 28.

5. See e.g. University Act, R.S.P.E.I. 1988, c. U-4, s. 24.

6. See e.g. Lam v. University of Western Ontario, 2017 ONSC 6933 at paras. 39-47.

7. Ibid. at paras. 42, 44 and 50.

8. Ibid. at para. 31.

9. See Green v. University of Winnipeg, 2015 MBCA 109 at para. 31; Dawson v. University of Toronto, 2007 CanLII 4311 at para. 5 (ONSC); and Fufa v. University of Alberta, 2012 ABQB 594 at para. 24.

10. Khan v. Ottawa (University of), 1997 CanLII 941 (ONCA).

11. See e.g. Green v. University of Winnipeg, 2018 MBQB 4.

12. Al-Bakkal v. De Vries, 2003 MBQB 198 at paras. 36-37.

13. Mohamed v. University of Saskatchewan, 2006 SKQB 23 at para. 44.

14. Zeliony v. Red River College, 2007 MBQB 308 at para. 136 and following.

15. Supra note 11 at paras. 78-82.

16. Supra note 10.

17. Supra note 11 at paras. 51-54.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Jonathan Coady
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions