Canada: Cannabis, Canada, And New Dilemmas Presented For U.S. Entry

"You're not getting into the United States today..." "I can ban you for life, if I want to..." "I don't care what your lawyer said, I decide who is admitted to the United States of America" 

-Unofficial anecdotal declarations credited to U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers.

Canada is preparing for big changes next month when adult recreational cannabis will become legal nation-wide.  What won't change, however, is the cannabis policy of Canada's biggest neighbor, trading partner, and closest ally, The United States of America (U.S.).  Under U.S. Federal law, cannabis use and possession is illegal and is considered a Schedule 1 controlled substance offense under the US Controlled Substances Act of 1970[i]. Under U.S. Immigration law, anyone who has violated a law or regulation of a U.S. state, U.S. federal law, or the law of foreign country relating to a controlled substance is inadmissible to the U.S. per Title 8 of the United States Code (USC) § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II).

One consistency that will remain is that admissibility to the U.S. is always determined by the discretion of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers.  While Canada's new laws regarding cannabis shift the means by which an individual can be determined inadmissible to the U.S., the beacon throughout is the reviewing officer.  This is not a new phenomenon, as U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) have always been empowered by the mission: to detect and prevent the illegal entry of aliens into the United States.[ii]  We highlight that the discretionary authority has been reinforced by the specific Executive Order of January 25, 2017, which further empowered officers of both U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and CBP.  This Executive Order strengthened the independent authority of the officers at the border, and that increased authority applies directly to this discussion of Canada's legalization of cannabis consumption and association.    

With that aspect in focus, the understanding of the changes presented by Canada's legalization of cannabis is more appropriately discussed.  The authoritative declarations provided atop illustrate that a CBP officer's authority still holds court.  Most importantly, we must recognize that this tumultuous issue continues to come into focus, legally and administratively, for both countries.  As a result, we can't offer a magical legal solution or regulatory loopholes, instead we must apply and modify the previous approaches with the only predictable consistency being the overarching authority of the reviewing officer.  The following are the new and old issues that the forthcoming legalization present along with potential solutions and strategies.

Criminal Charges Related to Cannabis Before Canadian Legalization

  There is no change to U.S. immigration policy as it relates to the above-referenced 8 USC § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) and under the Immigration and National Act (INA) §212(a)(2)(A)(i)(II):

any alien convicted of, or who admits having committed, or who admits committing acts which constitute the essential elements of...a violation of (or a conspiracy or attempt to violate) any law or regulation of a State, the United States, or a foreign country relating to a controlled substance...is inadmissible.

Previous criminal convictions or charges related to cannabis render a person inadmissible to the U.S., irrespective of the Canadian cannabis laws at the time of proposed entry to the U.S.  As discussed supra, if there is a historical finding of guilt, which involves any admission or any legal penalty related to a controlled substance charge, during the time cannabis was illegal in Canada, the individual would be inadmissible.  Canada and the U.S. share extensive criminal records information. Therefore, previous convictions may be accessed by both Canadian and U.S. officials at any time. Note that pardons and records suspensions are not recognized by U.S. authorities.  Therefore, a conviction for which a pardon has been granted in Canada would still render a person inadmissible to the U.S.  Dismissed or diverted charges may also have US immigration consequences.

The aspect to be explored, however, is admission of usage after legalization on October 17, 2018.  In that instance, the core of the above-quoted standard of violating a law or regulation would no longer be applicable, as there would no longer be a foreign law to break in this instance.  Since the admission of legal use of cannabis is not a crime in Canada, the above standards are not met, and the applicant would not be criminally inadmissible.  Alongside the statutory discussion, we can also find support for that conclusion as it relates to admission of usage through Matter of K.[iii] which requires that an admission of a criminal act adhere to three requirements:

  • Conduct must constitute the elements of the crime;
  • Must be provided with the definition and essential elements of the offense prior to admission, i.e. knowledge it was a crime, and;
  • Admission must be voluntary

In the instance of cannabis use being legal in Canada, the necessary elements for admission are not applicable.  Inadmissibility due to a criminal violation would not apply without a qualified and acknowledged violation by the border applicant.  So if it is no longer a criminal issue, how would an individual be deemed inadmissible?  The next sections present alternative means available to CBP to render an applicant inadmissible.  

Substance Abuse, Mental Health, and Referral to a Panel Physician

Following the legalization of cannabis in Canada, and a lack of any possible criminal charges related to cannabis consumption in Canada, CBP also reserves the right to ask questions related to use of cannabis in exploring the potential that the application maintains a dependency on cannabis or any other drug or alcohol.  CBP is permitted to make an assessment based upon an applicant acknowledging previous use of drugs or clear evidence of dependency on drugs or alcohol.  The general rubric for this inquiry falls under health concerns, either that the individual has compromised their mental health as a result of usage or has an addiction to drugs.  Both, under INA § 212(a)(1)(A)(iii) and INA § 212(a)(1)(A)(iv), respectively.

We propose that without a qualified criminal conviction, CBP will be prone to exercise this option and make it an issue of health rather than criminality.  In common circumstances, as it is a health issue, the applicant is denied entry and told to visit a panel physician.  CBP designates the panel physicians and the evaluation must be conducted by these authorized panel physicians.  The panel physician also commonly refers patients out to other physicians, with all costs borne by the applicant.  Once this is completed, the applicant has it forwarded to CBP, and they may again apply for admission.   The cost, time, and effort are obviously the CBP's most effective means to at least delay, if not ultimately deny entry.  Ability to enter the U.S. would be determined by the assessment of the panel physician, i.e. the applicant does or does not demonstrate a dependency on cannabis or mental health issues associated with admitted cannabis usage.

Working, Investing, and Business Dealing with the Cannabis Industry

This should be considered the most predatory and most damning aspect of the legalization of the cannabis industry in Canada.  There is a distinct difference between possession/usage and the much more serious assessment as a trafficker of drugs.  Inadmissibility based on a CBP officer concluding the applicant is a trafficker of illegal drugs is far more severe and does not require or involve consumption of cannabis.

The imminent legalization of the cannabis in Canada has prompted heavy investment from the Canadian business community in the cannabis industry.    Unfortunately, legalization does not relieve the potential inadmissibility to the U.S. for Canadians involved and working in the cannabis industry.  This may also apply to applicants who have invested in the industry or work with companies in the cannabis industry.  All of these association could be potential grounds for an assessment that the applicant is inadmissible to the U.S. because they have been deemed a trafficker of illegal drugs.

INA § 212(A)(2)(C) and its discussion of trafficking is best described in the Department of State's interpretation of the INA through Chapter 9 of the Foreign Affairs Manual FAM § 302.4-3.  It explains:

Any alien who the consular officer or DHS knows or has reason to believe is or has been an illicit trafficker in any controlled substance or in any listed chemicals as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802), or is or has been a knowing aider, abettor, assister, conspirator, or colluder with others, in the illicit trafficking in any controlled or listed substance or chemicals, or endeavored to do so is ineligible under INA 212(a)(2)(C)(i)... if you have "reason to believe" that the alien is or has been engaged in trafficking, the standard of proof is met and you should make a finding of ineligibility. 

"Reason to believe" might be established by a conviction, an admission, a long record of arrests with an unexplained failure to prosecute by the local government, or several reliable and corroborative reports.  The essence of the standard is that the consular officer must have more than a mere suspicion; there must exist a probability, supported by evidence that the alien is or has been engaged in trafficking.  You are required to assess independently evidence relating to a finding of ineligibility...this evidence might include conclusions of other evaluators.  Such conclusions, no matter how trustworthy, cannot alone support a finding of inadmissibility; however, they might be relevant to forming an overall "reason to believe."

The vulnerability is clear. Any association with the burgeoning cannabis industry could be grounds to find a "reason to believe."  Moreover, this potentially affects family members as well, spouse, son, or daughter, who receive financial or any other benefit from a deemed "illicit trafficker"[i] can also be deemed inadmissible.

The resources that a CBP officer may use to determine a "reason to believe," are the common online outlets available to the general public. Internet search results, social media profiles such as LinkedIn, company websites and biographies of applicants for admission to the US can be examined by CBP and can lead to a finding of inadmissibility if the information leads the officer to believe the traveler has been involved in the furtherance of the cannabis industry.

In addition, U.S. border officers have the authority to search an individual's personal belongings, including electronic and mobile devices, per CBP Directive No. 3340-049A. They can request passwords and review the content of the electronic devices. The broad discretion to interpret information contained on devices may be used as evidence that a person intends to commit a criminal act, including the use, production or distribution of cannabis. Materials on personal electronic devices such as photos, company documents, pitch decks, etc. can be used to affirm a person's involvement in the cannabis industry. A CBP officer may enter in key word searches in a person's mobile device or laptop computer that reveals a reasonable association with the cannabis industry. The key point is to remember that only a "reason to believe" is needed to make such an assertion.

Approaches and Strategies

As demonstrated in the above discussion, Canada's imminent legalization of cannabis will create significant challenges to Canadians traveling to the U.S., with some of those challenges already realized.  Our suggested approaches and strategies per the introductory discussion that the reviewing officer's discretion is the ultimate determining factor for entry to the U.S.  An officer has the capacity to both initiate the discussion of cannabis and the applicant's involvement, as well as ignore it completely.  That is why the proposal of solutions and strategies has to be firmly focused on the interaction between the officer and applicant.

First and foremost, an applicant should never lie in any circumstance.  The applicant is under a strict obligation to tell the truth, and any misrepresentation may bear worse consequences.  The second factor to be mindful of is to answer the questions asked and be direct in response.  There is no need for disclosures that aren't relevant to answering the questions asked by the officer.

Also, an important distinction is to know what visitors are permitted to do within the U.S.  Visitor for Pleasure is relatively straightforward, it is for vacationing in the U.S.  Comparatively, permissible U.S. Business Visitor activities involve conferences, industry events, business meeting etc.  An applicant should be able to identify the specifics related to their Business Visitor entry, and if the association with the cannabis industry is identified, it is important to discuss the matter in the terms relevant to applicant's actual association.  If an applicant can discuss the matter with the officer and identify the purpose for entry is not to facilitate any type of international drug trafficking, despite involvement in some capacity in Canada, that may allow the officer to make a favorable conclusion that they are not involved in trafficking drugs.  The volatility and nebulous nature of these matters make hard fast rules and conclusions impossible, and as a result, so much of this is determined by the interaction between officer and applicant.  This allows the applicant to present their activities and background in as positive a light as possible.

Speaking to the purpose of entry, those entering under work authorized classifications would be under more scrutiny to analyze whether their proposed work in the U.S. involves the cannabis industry in any manner.  Cross-border work or involvement in U.S.-based cannabis operations, potentially in states where consumption is legal, would be a difficult situation from any standpoint. We cannot offer any qualified suggestions in that circumstance, as this would involve the clear definition of trafficking, as it would involve working in the cannabis industry across international borders.

Those are the nuanced aspects, but as discussed, one area that is not nuanced is any violation committed prior to the legalization of cannabis. If the applicant has been deemed inadmissible due to a prior criminal record for a cannabis offence, a waiver application is a possible solution, though such an application can take up to six to twelve months to adjudicate.  As discussed supra, subsequent to the legalization the basis for denying entry will shift from criminal inadmissibility to medical inadmissibility.  Any admission by an applicant of cannabis use, could lead to a denial of entry due to a "reasonable suspicion by the officer" that the applicant may have an addiction to drugs or alcohol.  That situation would require clearance from a panel physician in order to gain entry.

The basic reminders, obviously, are never travel with cannabis, cannabis paraphernalia, medical marijuana health cards, etc. Also take steps to minimize an online presence associated with cannabis and do not travel with mobile or electronic devices that contain sensitive information that may reveal an association with the cannabis industry.   One standard to keep in mind for electronic devices is to keep them offline, in "airplane mode," when approaching the border.  Per CBP Directive No. 3340-049A, an officer is not permitted to update and pull materials from the web on the actual device.

As discussed, this is an area that is developing, and leading up to October 17, 2018 there will be further developments, and further anecdotes from the border.  Subsequent to legalization, we can expect even more incidents and stories, both real and hyperbolic, but the focus for any applicant is their circumstances and their individual dealing with the officer before them at the border.   

Authorities from the U.S. and Canada are currently working together to reach some sort of resolution that would prevent many Canadians from becoming inadmissible to the US for activities that are or will be legal in Canada.  We are confident that the sheer volume of travel between the U.S. and Canada, and the realities of the differing cannabis policies will ultimately bring some modification to hard stances and the dire warnings from U.S. officials that currently fill newspaper headlines.   However, for the time being, all travelers should be aware of the cross border consequences of their involvement with cannabis.

Footnotes

1 Title 21 United States Code (USC) § 812(c)

1 https://www.cbp.gov/faqs/what-border-patrol-and-what-its-mission

1 7I&N Dec. 594, 598 (BIA 1957)

1 INA 212(a)(2)(C)(ii). 


Sign up for our e-Alerts


The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions