Canada: The Supreme Court Releases Reasons In The BCE Litigation

Some Comfort, But Unclear Guidance For Canadian Boards
Last Updated: February 4 2009
Article by Jonathan Lampe

The Background

In late-December 2008, the Supreme Court of Canada (the "Court" or the "SCC") released the written reasons for its decision earlier in the year to approve the plan of arrangement by which the proposed acquisition of BCE Inc. ("BCE") was to proceed. For reasons unrelated to the issues that the Court had considered at the hearing of this matter in June, 2008 the proposed acquisition had been terminated just prior to the release of the SCC's reasons.

The reasons set out a flexible blueprint that may help to guide directors in their decision-making process in the context of change of control transactions. Although the Court's decision does not provide boards of directors and their advisors with a clear roadmap to this decision-making or as to the discharge of their fiduciary obligations, its strong affirmation of the "business judgment rule" – the principle that courts should generally defer to, and not second-guess, the reasonable business judgment of boards of directors – should provide comfort for directors.

The Litigation

The crux of the litigation was the opposition by debentureholders of Bell Canada (a whollyowned subsidiary of BCE) to the proposed acquisition of BCE by a group of purchasers including Teachers' Private Capital (the private investment arm of the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan), affiliates of Providence Equity Partners Inc. and Madison Dearborn Partners LLC and Merrill Lynch Global Private Equity. The acquisition, which was to be completed pursuant to a plan of arrangement, had been opposed by the debentureholders because the debt to be incurred to finance the acquisition would reduce the rating and trading value of their bonds.

The debentureholders' core complaint was that their interests had not been fairly and properly considered. Their challenge was made on two bases. The debentureholders claimed that:

  • the proposed acquisition was "oppressive" entitling them to relief under the "oppression remedy" pursuant to the Canada Business Corporations Act (the "CBCA"), and
  • the plan of arrangement should not have been approved by the trial judge as "fair and reasonable", which is a requirement for the implementation of a plan.

In June, the SCC decided that the proposed acquisition was not oppressive of the debentureholders' interests and that the proposed plan of arrangement was fair and reasonable.

The Issues

The Court's reasons focus on four issues:

  • the elements of claims for oppression under the CBCA (which would apply in substance to claims for oppression under the OBCA and other business statutes in Canada as well),
  • the scope of directors' fiduciary duties,
  • the statutory framework for approving plans of arrangement, and what makes an arrangement "fair and reasonable", and
  • the "business judgment rule."

The Oppression Remedy

The "oppression remedy" is a broadly cast statutory remedy under certain Canadian corporate statutes that provides courts with a wide range of remedial powers where a claimant's interests have been oppressed, unfairly prejudiced or unfairly disregarded. The Court set out a two-pronged analysis to establish oppression, involving an assessment of:

  • the "reasonable expectations" of the claimant, and
  • "oppression", "unfair prejudice" or "unfair disregard" of such reasonable expectations, both elements of which must be established by the claimant.

Reasonable Expectations

Because an assessment of a claimant's reasonable expectations is necessarily fact-specific, the SCC did not articulate a rigid rule for defining, or exhaustive list of, reasonable expectations. However, to the Court enumerated several factors that may be relevant in determining whether a stakeholder's expectations are reasonable: general commercial practice, the nature of the corporation, the relationship between the parties, past practice, steps the claimant could have taken to protect itself, representations and agreements by and between the parties and, significantly in the context of the proposed acquisition of BCE, the fair resolution of conflicting interests between corporate stakeholders. Although the debentureholders did not allege that the BCE board had breached its fiduciary duties, the SCC focused on those fiduciary duties in detail (as outlined below) in the context of the oppression remedy on the basis that stakeholders should reasonably expect directors to discharge their fiduciary duties. Oppression, Unfair Prejudice or Unfair Disregard The second prong of the oppression analysis involves consideration of whether, in failing to meet a reasonable expectation, a party's conduct amounts to "oppression", "unfair prejudice" or "unfair disregard". Merely because an expectation is found to be reasonable does not necessarily mean that, if unmet, the expectation will establish a valid oppression claim.

The Debentureholders' Claim

Within this framework, the SCC determined that the debentureholders had a reasonable expectation that the directors would consider their position in making their decisions. However, the Court stated that the debentureholders did not have a reasonable expectation in the circumstances that the board would take steps to ensure that the rating or market value of the debentures would be maintained, and concluded that the debentureholders' interests had been considered, the contractual terms of the debentures would be met, and that the claim for oppression should fail.

Fiduciary Duties

Under applicable corporate law the directors have a duty to act in the best interests of the corporation. How this duty is interpreted and applied generally, and particularly in the context of a change of control transaction, has been the subject of much analysis and commentary. There is a well-known line of American cases that stands for the proposition that, in the context of a change of control transaction, boards of directors have an obligation to maximize shareholder interests (known as the "Revlon duty"). By contrast, the SCC stated that the directors' fiduciary duty is to act in the best interests of the corporation, not primarily in the interests of any one group of stakeholders. In considering what is in the best interests of the corporation, directors may have to consider the interests of a broad array of stakeholders to inform their decisions, including – but not necessarily limited to – shareholders, creditors, employees, consumers, governments and the environment. This is amplified by the Court's statement that the directors are required to act in the best interests of the corporation viewed as a good corporate citizen, implying consideration of the interests of stakeholders beyond just investors. This concept does not provide a clear roadmap as to how to deal with conflicting stakeholder interests. However, as noted below, the Court's endorsement of the "business judgment rule" provides comfort that a determination by the board, based on an independent, considered and fair analysis of the interests of the corporation and its various stakeholders, generally will not be disturbed by the courts.

The Elements of Approving a Plan of Arrangement

The Court's decision also addressed the requirement that a plan arrangement must be "fair and reasonable." The Court stated that to be "fair and reasonable" an arrangement must:

  • have a valid business purpose, and
  • resolve in a fair and balanced way the objections of those whose legal rights are being arranged.

The onus is on the corporation to show the arrangement is fair and reasonable (in contrast to the oppression remedy in which the onus is on the party alleging oppression).

Fair and Balanced Resolution

An analysis of whether an arrangement is a fair and balanced resolution of conflicting interests is a fact-specific exercise. The Court provided a list of factors that might be considered, including:

  • whether a majority of securityholders voted for the arrangement,
  • if no vote has occurred, whether an intelligent and honest business person, as a member of the class concerned and acting in his or her own interest, might reasonably approve the plan,
  • the proportionality of the compromise between various securityholders, the securityholders' positions before and after the arrangement and the impact on various securityholders' legal rights, and
  • the reputation of the directors and advisors who endorse the arrangement, the presence of a fairness opinion and the access of shareholders to dissent and appraisal remedies. Of particular significance in the context of BCE, the Court found that the debentureholders' interests – beyond their legal rights – did not need to be considered by the directors of BCE or the Court in determining whether the arrangement was fair and reasonable. The SCC stated that, in the context of an arrangement, such interests would be considered only in "extraordinary circumstances" (though it did not elaborate on the meaning, or provide any examples of, such circumstances). The "Business Judgment Rule"

In the context of its discussion of each the oppression remedy, fiduciary duties and the plan of arrangement, the Court emphasized that directors are not to be held to a standard of perfection. Boards can therefore take comfort in the Court's clear statements that, so long as the directors' decisions are within the range of reasonable choices and having addressed their minds to the relevant considerations, courts should not secondguess or substitute their views.

The Future

The SCC's decision provides general guidance on certain basic legal principles that are relevant to a range of corporate initiatives and circumstances. However, it leaves unanswered questions as to how conflicting stakeholder interests are to be balanced. Though the endorsement of the "business judgment rule" provides comfort to directors, it remains to be seen how directors will reconcile conflicting interests and define the best interests of the corporation and how courts will respond.

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on in that way. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions