Canada: Case Summary: Scale Estate v The Cooperators General Insurance Company

Last Updated: August 31 2018
Article by Field LLP

INSURANCE ISSUES

When an insurer contemplates settling to its policy limits in an auto case, it must take steps to ensure that all potential claims have been accounted for. Where an insurer, knowing of another claim for the same accident, paid its limits in three actions, it was held liable to pay the other claim in addition to what it had already paid up to the policy limits.

Scale Estate v The Cooperators General Insurance Company,
2018 ONSC 363 per Nightingale, J. [4284]

FACTS AND ISSUES:

On June 25, 2006, Mitchell Emms ("Emms") was the driver of a motor vehicle (the "Emms Vehicle") when he lost control of it and collided with three other vehicles (the "Accident"). Two passengers in the Emms vehicle, Amanda Scale and Chantelle Gail died as a result. Three other passengers in the Emms Vehicle and two occupants of the other vehicles were injured as well. The Estate of Amanda Scale and her relatives sued.

The Emms Vehicle was insured with Cooperators under a standard automobile policy with $1 million in third party liability insurance limits. Three actions were brought, none by the Plaintiffs ("Estate of Scale") with notice against Emms' estate as a result of the Accident.

Cooperators reached out to the Estate of Scale but did not hear back about whether or not they would be bringing an action. It realized that if the other three actions went to judgment, the total would surpass the $1 million policy limits. Cooperators negotiated with the plaintiffs in those three actions and reached a settlement for the policy limits (the "Settlement"). During this time, Cooperators did not conduct a court search to see if any other actions had been started. The Estate of Scale had in fact filed a Statement of Claim and had obtained an Order extending the time for service, but had not yet served it as at the time of the Settlement.

Cooperators attempted to have the order extending service of the Estate of Scale's Statement of Claim set aside, but were unsuccessful. The Estate of Scale eventually obtained a judgment against the Estate of Emms, and the Plaintiffs then brought an action against the insurer pursuant to section 258(1) of the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. I.8 [analogous to s. 579(1) of the Alberta Insurance Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. I-3.] claiming entitlement to have their damages paid under the policy or as a share of the Settlement. Ontario's s. 258(4) [like Alberta's s. 579(4)] provides as follows:

(4) The right of a person who is entitled under subsection (1) to have insurance money applied in or toward the person's judgment or claim is not prejudiced by

  1. an assignment, waiver, surrender, cancellation or discharge of the contract, or of any interest in or of the proceeds of the contract, made by the insured after the event giving rise to the person's claim under the contract,
  2. any act or default of the insured before or after that event in contravention of this Subpart or of the terms of the contract, or
  3. any contravention of the Criminal Code (Canada) or a statute of any province or territory or of any state or the District of Columbia of the United States of America by the owner or driver of the automobile,

and nothing mentioned in clause (a), (b) or (c) is available to the insurer as a defence in an action brought under subsection (1).

Ontario's s. 258(7) – (8) [like Alberta's ss. 579(7) – (8) provides:

(7) When a person has recovered a judgment against the insured and is entitled to maintain an action under subsection (1) and the insurer admits liability to pay the insurance money under the contract, and the insurer considers that

  1. there are or may be other claimants, or
  2. there is no person capable of giving and authorized to give a valid discharge for payment who is willing to do so,

the insurer may apply to the Court ex parte for an order for payment of the money into Court, and the Court may make an order accordingly on any notice it thinks necessary.

(8) The receipt of the proper officer of the Court is a sufficient discharge to the insurer for the insurance money paid into Court under subsection (7), and the insurance money must be dealt with as the Court orders on application of any interested person.

Issue: Did Cooperators have a responsibility to respond to the claims of the Estate of Scale up to the $1 million policy limits, notwithstanding the previous Settlement with the other parties had resulted in a payout to the limits.

HELD: HELD: For the Estate of Scale; The Estate of Scale held entitled to payment up to the policy's limits.

The Court found in favour of the Estate of Scale, noting that the Estate of Scale was entitled to an order requiring that the money payable under the defendant's automobile insurance policy is liable to respond to the judgment by the Estate of Scale against the Estate of Emms up to the $1 million limits of the policy plus costs.

The Court held that the right of the plaintiff to sue a defendant's insurer for payment under the defendant's policy was held to be "a right against the contractual liability as an asset available in effect for execution purposes" and thus "is a charge upon the insurance money" and that distribution of the defendant's policy limits cannot be ascertained until all the eligible claims have been determined: Northern Assurance v. Brown [1956] SCR 658.

  • Furthermore, it was held that "the total claims for different injured parties involved in one accident can sometimes easily exceed the total amount of the defendant's insurance policy limits available" in which case if the insurer settles with some of the claimants, it may be liable because of this section to the other claimants for the amounts of their claims in excess of its policy limits": Brown and Donnelly, Insurance Law in Canada, updated October 2017; Billingsley, General Principles of Canadian Insurance Law, 2d ed., 2014, at page 317.
  • The Court rejected Cooperators' argument that it was entitled to pay out its limits in the other three actions pro rata on the basis that it was not aware of the Estate of Scale's claim in this action:

[42] The defendant's position in this action is that it was entitled to negotiate a settlement of the three actions for those other deceased and injured parties and pay out the total amount of its policy limits of $1 million to them on a pro rata basis plus costs. It states that as no formal claim had been made by the Scale family members for their damages and it was not aware of any action having been commenced by them, it was entitled to settle the other claims on the "first come, first served" basis until the policy limits were paid out without any risk to it of the Scale family members claims also having to be paid against those limits of the policy.

[43] The evidence establishes, as indicated above, that Cooperators knew of the death of the passenger Amanda Scale in the accident from the outset and knew that she had surviving family members who had made a claim for statutory accident benefits. It made no attempt to investigate the matter further and there is no evidence that the settlement of the three other actions at that time was on their understanding that no claims would be advanced by them. The evidence establishes that the initial tentative settlement of the three other claims was actually made within the time frame that the Scale statement of claim was issued and could be served.

[44] In the circumstances, was Cooperators entitled to settle those three actions exhausting its policy limits without risk that it may also have to pay out the additional claims of the Scale family members when they came to fruition?

[45] In my view, Cooperators on the evidence was always aware of the risk of the Scale claims being advanced from the outset which they also would have known at the time of the settlement discussions on November 5, 2008 with the parties in the three other actions. No doubt those plaintiffs were also aware of Amanda Scale's death throughout. Cooperators chose to settle those three actions without requiring any of those plaintiffs to proceed to judgment at which point it could have applied under s. 258(4) of the Insurance Act to have the total proceeds paid into court. The court could then have required the appropriate evidence to determine whether and to what extent any other potential claimants against the policy including the Scale family members should be included for the purpose of this distribution of the total policy limits on a pro rata basis to all of the claimants. Again, Cooperators did not impose a term of the three settlements reached that they were on the basis of the Scales not being entitled to a claim against the policy limits.

[46] The Court asked Cooperators' counsel whether Cooperators would have proceeded in the same fashion as it did if the accident had involved to Cooperators knowledge a catastrophically injured minor passenger who had not yet formally notified the defendant driver or Cooperators of his claims potentially exceeding $10 million instead of the remaining Scale family members' claims. Mr. Rachlin in his usual candour admitted that Cooperators would not likely have settled the three other actions without consideration of that minor's claims being included against the policy limits.

[47] In my view, it should make no difference in the approach Cooperators ought to have taken in this case with respect to the surviving Scale family members.

It was held that the "first past the post" principle does not apply to claims under section 258 of the Ontario Insurance Act:

[48] Cooperators suggests that the common law "first past the post" principle applies to the Scale plaintiffs' claims against its policy. It states that Cooperators is required to settle injured parties claims expeditiously and is entitled to settle and pay those claims as they are made reducing or eliminating the policy limits and its obligations under the policy if it has no knowledge of any further claim and where those settlements are concluded after the Scale family claims limitation period expired and the time under the rules for service of their statement of claim had expired.

[49] I disagree with that submission for the following reasons.

[50] Firstly, Cooperators was aware of the potential claims of the Scale family members from the outset of the accident or shortly thereafter. It did nothing to follow up on that acquired knowledge to ascertain whether in fact those claims were being pursued. The Scale action was commenced within two years of the date of the accident.

[51] The settlements of the three actions were reached without consideration of the potential Scale claims.

[52] Cooperators made no search or inquiries with respect to the potential issuance of the statement of claim of the Scale family members.

[53] As indicated above, Cooperators would not likely have settled those three actions had it known of the potential claim not yet advanced of a catastrophically impaired minor if there had been one. In my view, the Scale Family Law Act claimants should have been treated the same way
.

[54] Secondly, allowing for insurers to pay out competing claims on a "first past the post" basis until their limits are exhausted does not apply in my view to s. 258 of the Insurance Act involving motor vehicle liability policies. S. 258, as indicated above, provides for the statutory claim of entitlement of injured persons against the policy proceeds.
. . .

[59] I accept that at common law and in the context of non-automobile claims, it has been held that the prevailing rule is "first past the post" under which claims may be paid out as soon as they have been determined by settlement or judgment. Hilliker, Liability Insurance Law in Canada page 91. I also agree with the learned author's statement that in the case of automobile claims, however, it has been held that the pro rata approach should generally prevail and that the rule should not be departed from except in special circumstances.

The explanation that has been given for the different treatments of the two types of claims is that under the general insurance legislation, the claimant's right to seek recovery from the insured does not crystallize until judgment whereas under the more specific legislation pertaining to automobile insurance, an injured party has an immediate and actionable interest.

The Court also rejected the insurer's argument that "the Scale family members did not have 'a claim' as defined under s. 258 of the Insurance Act at the time it settled the three other actions".

The Court went on to hold as follows:

[77] Lastly, in balancing the competing claims of the Scale family members and the interests of Cooperators, it must be remembered that s. 258 of the Insurance Act is remedial consumer protection legislation which crystallizes the rights of the Scale family members in the Cooperators policy funds available immediately at the time of the accident. The obligation of Cooperators under the policy is to investigate all of the potential claims against its insured and attempt to resolve them for the purpose of avoiding any potential exposure of its insured claims in excess of the policy limits.

COMMENTARY:

Though this was an Ontario judgment, insurers should be wary of privately settling claims with parties injured or killed in automobile accidents without having first ensured that no other claims have been initiated. Though counsel for the Respondent twice reached out to the Estate of S, the Court still found that the insurer should have been aware that claim could still be brought within the limitation period.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions