Canada: The Crown Pierces The Corporate Veil: Court Imposes Liability On Individual For Fines Imposed Against A Corporate Defendant

An Ontario Court has revolutionized the law with respect to whether an individual can be held personally liable for fines imposed against the corporation for breaches of regulatory legislation.   

Corporations are Legally Separate Entities

The law in Canada (and across the Western world) considers a corporation to be an artificial legal person that is legally distinct from its shareholders.  Corporate shareholders are not responsible for the debts and liabilities of the corporation, unless there is an explicit legislative section which imposes personal liability on shareholders. 

In the civil context, shareholders have been held liable for the acts of a corporation through the "piercing of the corporate veil" when the shareholders have used the corporation for fraudulent purposes. Courts have held that the corporate veil should only be pierced in rare circumstances, such as where shareholders that are in control of the corporation have expressly directed illegal activity, when the company is incorporated for an illegal purpose, or where it is being used as a shield for illegal conduct. There have been a significant number of civil cases across the country where this issue has been litigated. 

In our experience, regulatory prosecutors in Canada have frequently charged individual representatives of corporations personally for contraventions of legislation.  In the OH&S context, charges against supervisors are routine and prosecutions against corporate directors also occur (although less frequently in our experience).  However, we are not aware of any prior precedent of a regulatory prosecutor convincing a court to make an individual shareholder liable for a fine imposed against a corporation.

The Crown Pierces the Corporate Veil

The very recent decision in R. v. 1137749 Ontario Ltd. (operating as Pro-Teck Electric)  has literally transformed the legal regime in this area by opening the door to imposing liability against individuals for corporate fines.  The case involved a prosecution under the Ontario Electricity Act against a very small electrical company for offences arising out of a tragic fatality (This was not an OHSA prosecution.  The Electricity Act regulates licensed electricians.) The company pleaded guilty to three counts and proceeded to a contested sentencing hearing.

While preparing for the sentencing hearing, the Crown discovered that the sole owner of the company transferred real estate and other corporate property to himself personally.  The Crown argued before the Justice of the Peace at the sentencing hearing that these transfers were done for the sole of purpose of avoiding payment of any fine the Court might impose and thus the owner of the company should be personally liable for the fine.

The Justice of the Peace declined to pierce the corporate veil. She found that since there was no legal authority in the Provincial Offences Act to impose a corporate fine on an individual there was no jurisdiction for the Court to make the owner liable personally. 

The Crown successfully appealed the decision to the Ontario Court of Justice.  The Appeal Court found that even though there was no explicit provision giving the Court the right to pierce the corporate veil, the Court had the "implied" jurisdiction to do so in appropriate cases.  The Court stated:

To put the matter another way, it has been said that a court's power to pierce the corporate veil will be triggered when failing to act, "would be too flagrantly opposed to justice".  It is simply inconceivable that a justice of the peace conducting a provincial offences trial lacks a very specific power (clearly possessed by other courts) that is essential to avoid a "flagrant" circumvention of justice.

Ontario Courts have come to different conclusions about the existence of "implied" powers of the Ontario Court of Justice not set out in legislation. In one recent case, the Ontario Court of Appeal found that the Provincial Offences Court can award costs against the Crown despite the lack of a provision for cost awards in the relevant legislation.

In another case, R. v. Live Nation Canada Inc., a court ruled that the Ontario Court of Justice lost jurisdiction to continue hearing a trial after the presiding Justice was appointed to a higher Court.  The basis for the decision was the lack of a statutory provision to allow the Justice to complete the case even though the evidence in the highly complex and very lengthy trial had been completed and final argument was about to be heard. 

The Justice indicated that he made the decision with "...great regret" and he recognized that there were "...compelling reasons why it would be in the best interests of justice for me to finish this."  The result of this decision was that the charges were dismissed against all defendants because of the unconstitutional delay in the matter proceeding to trial.

In the event the Court of Appeal hears an appeal of the decision in Pro-Teck, the Court will have to assess whether the civil concept of piercing the corporate veil can be readily transferred to the quasi-criminal context.  It is our view that the Appeal Court placed far too much emphasis on the "flagrant" circumvention of justice and took a very broad view of the jurisdiction of the Ontario Court of Justice.  The Live Nation case is but one illustration of the perhaps unfortunate reality that jurisdictional issues can sometimes lead to what may seem like an unfair result. 

We are also of the view that the decision did not give sufficient consideration to the Charter issues which arise from piercing the corporate veil in the regulatory context.  The company owner was not charged with or convicted of any offences.  Imposing a fine on this individual without a trial may very well offend the company owner's Charter right to fundamental justice under Section 7 and violate the cruel and unusual punishment provisions set out in Section 12. 

It is also notable that the Legislature has expressly differentiated between individuals and corporations in terms of the scale of fines which may be imposed.  Individuals face up to $100,000 per offence while corporations face up to $1.5 Million per offence.  Query then, how can it be constitutional for a court to make an individual responsible personally to pay a fine that it would not have had jurisdiction to impose directly?

It is not known whether the Defendant will be seeking permission from the Court of Appeal to pursue this case further.  We anticipate this would be one of the relatively few Provincial Offences cases that the Court of Appeal would be prepared to hear. 

What This Decision Means for Corporate Defendants and Individuals

This case opens the door for the Crown to seek to transfer liability for regulatory fines to individuals in circumstances where the it can be proven that they willfully transferred corporate assets to avoid fine payment.  The evidence seemed clear in Pro-Teck that the company owner did just that.  In other cases, it might be more complex for a Court to determine an individual's intentions, particularly where the corporation is a more complicated entity than the "one-man band" electrical company at issue in Pro-Teck.  

Where the line is drawn between legitimate transactions and behavior which justifies piercing the corporate veil has been well litigated in the civil context, and Courts have emphasized that the corporate veil should only be pierced in clear cases.  However, there are number of considerations that are unique to quasi-criminal situations including the behavior of individuals before charges are laid and the relevance of their subjective knowledge of potential penal consequences to the corporation.

We anticipate this issue will arise most often with smaller, closely held corporations.  These businesses must be particularly aware that their business decisions will now be scrutinized by Crown Prosecutors for any hint that the company was attempting to avoid fine payment.  There is also a live issue of what information (if any) the Crown may be entitled to at the sentencing stage to address this issue.   

It should be noted that this decision does not open the door for the Crown to pursue individuals in all cases where a company is financially unable to pay a fine.  The Court in Pro-Tek made it expressly clear that if no 'improper' transfers had been made, the corporate veil would not have been pierced.  Therefore, companies that legitimately no longer have assets are not subject to this new regime.

However, the devil is in the details.  Take the example of a staffing agency which rents an office, furniture and IT equipment.  If the agency shuts down the day after a workplace accident and carries on business under a new name at a different office without transferring any "assets" (i.e. accounts receivable, cash in the bank etc.) can the Crown attach personal liability to the individuals operating the agency for corporate fines?  At this point, the answer is not clear.

The bottom line is that employers and their counsel must be particularly sensitive to restructuring issues if quasi-criminal litigation is contemplated, to avoid potential liability issues for the directing minds of the corporation.   

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Jeremy Schwartz
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions