Canada: IP Q&A: How To Navigate Canada's Official Marks System

Running parallel to Canada's trade‑mark system is another regime for "official marks". The official mark regime is exclusive to public authorities such as utilities, broadcasters, hospitals and the like that are subject to governmental control and provides rights that, in several respects, exceed those associated with registered trade‑marks. While advantageous for eligible entities, official marks can — and have on a number of occasions — come into conflict with the interests of trade‑mark owners. Here's what you need to know about Canada's official marks system.


Canada's Trade-marks Act (Act) has provided protection to a special category of marks known as "official marks" since the 1930s. Section 9 of the Act, among other things, prohibits the adoption in connection with a business, as a trade‑mark or otherwise, of any mark, badge, crest or emblem consisting of, or so nearly resembling as to be likely to be mistaken for an official mark. It also prohibits others from registering a trade‑mark that could be mistaken for an official mark.

Courts have given little judicial attention to defining the attributes of official marks, but have set aside official marks for various reasons over the years. Courts may be willing to take a stricter view of what constitutes an official mark in future cases; for example, by requiring that a mark be related to a public authority's core mandate before being recognized as an official mark.


Only a Canadian public authority, such as government organizations or agencies at the federal, provincial, or municipal level can obtain from the Registrar of Trade‑marks (Registrar) the publication of an official mark.

To publish notice of an official mark, the Registrar requires the requesting party to file proof that it qualifies as a "public authority in Canada" and to meet a two-part test, showing:

  1. A significant degree of control by the appropriate government over the activities of the requesting party; and
  2. That the activities of the requesting party benefit the public.

The Registrar also requires the requesting party to provide evidence of its adoption and use of its official mark. If these conditions are satisfied, the Registrar will publish notice of the official mark in the Trade-marks Journal, the same publication that contains advertisements of trade‑mark applications for opposition purposes.

If the Registrar is not satisfied that the requesting party is a public authority and thus refuses to publish a section 9 notice, the requesting party may appeal the decision.


The Act offers broad protections to official marks. For example, official marks are not subjected to the examination by the Registrar that trade-mark applications undergo or to third-party opposition proceedings. Furthermore, an official mark notice is perpetual, unlike a trade‑mark registration, which must be renewed every 15 years.

Public authorities are not required to identify goods and services in association with which they have adopted and used their official marks. Although some public authorities voluntarily identify the particular goods and services associated with their official marks, this inclusion does not have any effect on the scope of protection given to the official mark. More particularly, because the Act prohibits the adoption of any mark that too closely resembles an official mark, the inclusion in a section 9 notice of goods and services does not affect the likelihood of a trade‑mark being held to violate section 9 of the Act.

The Registrar has also not imposed any requirement that a public authority identify the date on which it adopted and first used its official mark. An application for a section 9 notice will take precedence over a third party's application to register a similar trade‑mark even though the third party may have adopted and used its trade‑mark before the public authority's adoption and use of its official mark.


Official marks can provide similar protection to, and in some respects greater protection than, registered trade‑marks.

Since official marks need not be limited to particular goods or services, they can be cited against many different trade‑marks that are not used, or intended to be used, in association with similar goods and/or services as the official mark.

And while official mark notices do not prohibit a third party from continuing to make the same use of its trade‑mark as it had made prior to publication of the official mark notice, they do prohibit a third party from expanding its use of a similar trade‑mark to other goods or services. They can also prevent a third party from registering a trade‑mark even though the third party first used its trade‑mark prior to the owner of the official mark having commenced use of its mark.


The Registrar has taken the position that it has no discretion to refuse to give public notice of an official mark on any grounds other than that the requesting party is not a Canadian "public authority" or it has not adopted and used its mark as an official mark for goods or services.

That said, there is case law where a court has noted that the Registrar could always refuse a request to publish a section 9 notice on a matter of "public order". The court cited the following as hypothetical examples of official marks being contrary to public order:

  • An official mark of one provincial government falsely suggesting that seafood products originating in such province were processed and packed in another province
  • An official mark that expressed an obscenity in either of Canada's official languages.

In another case, however, the court deemed that the Registrar has "virtually no discretion to refuse to give notice of the adoption and use of a mark as an official mark, once the body making the request establishes that the statutory criteria have been met".

In light of these rulings, parties seeking to attack an official mark would be well advised to frame their argument in terms of non-compliance with the statutory criteria. However, it's possible that courts will further explore the scope of the exception for marks that are contrary to "public order."


Litigants have tried proceeding by one or more of the following procedures: action (i.e., by filing a statement of claim with the court); appeal under the Act; and judicial review under the Federal Courts Act. The courts have held that third parties do not have a statutory right of appeal to attack official marks because only the Registrar and the public authority are parties to the Registrar's decision. As such, third parties have the option to challenge an official mark by way of action or judicial review.

There are several advantages to proceeding by way of action, such as the ability to obtain discovery and avoid the 30-day time limit associated with judicial review applications.

In view of the 30-day time limit imposed under the Federal Courts Act to seek judicial review, a party that finds itself beyond this time limit might either seek an extension of time or, alternatively, seek a declaration in an action that the official mark owner cannot enforce its rights in the mark.

The Federal Court of Canada has held that an extension of time to file an application for judicial review of the publication of an official mark may be granted where it serves the interests of justice. In one case, it held that a party could challenge an official mark notice some 27 years after publication because the party was unaware of the notice when it was originally published and did not have reason to challenge the notice until it was cited against the party during prosecution of its own trade‑mark application.

Parties seeking to attack official marks under judicial review must prove they are "directly affected" by the matter in respect of which relief is sought.

In cases to date, the Federal Court of Canada has shown a reluctance to deny standing to a party seeking judicial review on the basis that the party is not "directly affected" by the section 9 notice in question. Given the Act's prohibitions regarding the adoption, use and registration of marks that, broadly speaking, conflict with official marks, the court will likely grant standing to any party that can demonstrate that it is currently using, or intends to use, a mark that is similar to an official mark. The court will likely also grant standing to a party that can demonstrate that it represents the interests of a section of the public in ensuring that a particular person does not wrongfully appropriate to itself an official mark.


If, during prosecution of a trade‑mark application, the applicant receives a citation from the Registrar of a third party's official mark, the applicant has several options for responding.

If the applicant can establish that the owner of the cited official mark is no longer in existence, the Registrar will withdraw the citation of the official mark.

If not, the applicant can seek the consent of the relevant public authority to the applicant's registration of its trade‑mark. In many cases, the public authority is primarily interested in protecting itself against third-party use of similar marks in association with competitive goods and services and so will be amenable to providing its consent to the registration of a mark by someone who is not a competitor.

The applicant may also argue that there is not a sufficient degree of resemblance between its trade‑mark and the cited official mark so as to prohibit the registration of the applicant's mark. Given that resemblance is the test under the Act, rather than likelihood of confusion, it will not be possible to overcome through argument the citation of an identical official mark. It is often, however, possible to overcome the citation of a similar, although non-identical, official mark. The Federal Court of Canada has held that the test for resemblance must be determined by considering whether a person, on a first impression, knowing the official mark only and having an imperfect recollection of it, would likely be deceived or confused. The question is whether consumers are likely to be mistaken as between the marks themselves, not whether they are likely to infer a connection between the source of the associated goods or services. An applicant who is responding to the citation of an official mark notice during prosecution of its application will typically explore the foregoing three options before deciding, if none of these options are likely to be successful, to commence legal proceedings to challenge the cited official mark. In circumstances where a trade‑mark owner decides to challenge an official mark through litigation, it will want to consider the various procedural and substantive issues discussed above.

Although there is a significant body of case law that has developed over the years in relation to official marks, it is also very likely that future court decisions will provide greater clarity on issues such as challenges to official marks on grounds other than compliance with the statutory criteria.

For permission to reprint articles, please contact the Blakes Marketing Department.

© 2018 Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
16 Oct 2018, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join Blakes lawyers for our 10th annual overview of recent legal and regulatory developments and practical strategies to navigate the changing regulation of Canada’s payments industry.

26 Oct 2018, Other, Vancouver, Canada

Cybersecurity, including data privacy and security obligations, has become a critical chapter in every company’s risk management playbook.

30 Oct 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Please join us for discussions on recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits as well as employment law issues.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Dickinson Wright PLLC
Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Dickinson Wright PLLC
Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions