Canada: Case Summary: Gharbi v. Summit Acceptance Corp.

Last Updated: July 16 2018
Article by Field LLP


The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench enumerated the factors to consider in determining whether the provision a dealership's loaner vehicle to a customer qualifies as a leased/rented vehicle or a mere courtesy loan for the purposes of determining which insurer (as between the customer's or the dealership's) is the priority loss insurer, under the Miscellaneous Provisions Regulation, Alta.Reg. 120/2001, s. 7.1(2).

Gharbi v. Summit Acceptance Corp., 2018 ABQB 228, per McCarthy, J. [4274]


Gharbi was in a motor vehicle collision while driving a Chevrolet Cruze that had been provided to him by an auto dealership, CMP Automotive, while CMP repaired his vehicle. The issue was as to which of the two potential insurers involved (Gharbi's Auto Insurer or Aviva, as the insurer of the Cruze) was first priority insurer which, in turn, boiled down to whether or not Gharbi's use of the vehicle was a lease or a rental arrangement (governed by the Insurance Act, R.S.A. 200, c. I-3, s. 596 and Miscellaneous Insurance Provisions Regulation, AltaReg 120/2001, section 7.1(2), as opposed to a courtesy loan.

The Cruze was actually owned by Summit Acceptance Corp. CMP Automotive sold vehicles and also did servicing and repair on them. CMP was the General Partner of CMP Automotive Limited Partnership. Summit Acceptance Corp. rented and leased vehicles. It was the General Partner of Summit Acceptance Limited Partnership. CMP, CMP Automotive Limited Partnership, Summit Acceptance Corp. and Summit Acceptance Limited Partnership were all subsidiaries of Kaizen Automotive. These entities operated out of the CMP dealership. Aviva provided auto coverage to both CMP and Summit Acceptance Corp. through a single policy.

To obtain the Cruze, Gharbi signed an "Open Agreement" provided to him by CMP. It identified "Summit Trucks" (a trade name registered to CMP) as the owner of the Cruze, however, CMP did not own the Cruze; Summit Acceptance Corp. did. Under the Open Agreement, Gharbi was responsible for fuel and any physical damage to the vehicle, and his use of the Cruze was limited to a maximum of 200 km per day, only within Alberta on certain types of roads, and only to be driven by Gharbi. Gharbi was responsible for parking and speeding violations. He did not pay anything per se for the use of the Cruze, but left his own vehicle with CMP Automotive for repair. There was no specific return date for the vehicle, although Gharbi eventually had it for 35 days. The Agreement provided that Gharbi would be charged $40 per day but CMP Automotive did not request or collect any payment from him.

CMP was not in the business of providing rental vehicles and did not advertise that it was. CMP paid a daily usage fee for the Cruze to Summit Acceptance which did lease and rent vehicles.

The Agreement identified Gharbi as the "Renter" and the "Nature of Vehicle Usage" as "Daily Rental". Gharbi was not charged for insurance coverage under the Agreement. After using the Cruze for 35 days, CMP issued Gharbi an invoice for the damage to the vehicle from the collision, instructing that he should make his cheque payable to Summit Acceptance. Gharbi paid the invoice.

The Aviva policy issued to CMP and Summit Acceptance provided as follows:

Section VII – Defence and Settlement

The INSURER has a duty and right to defend any CLAIM made against the INSUREDS for which coverage is provided under this policy, except that:

  1. where such CLAIM is for an ODL WRONGFUL ACT; or
  2. where such CLAIM is first brought outside of Canada or the United States;

    it shall be the duty of the INSURED, and not the INSURER, to defend the CLAIM.

    Where it is the duty of the INSURED to defend, the INSUREDS shall not select defence counsel without the INSURER'S written consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. The INSURER shall have the right and shall be given the opportunity to effectively associate with the INSUREDS in the investigation, defence and settlement of any CLAIM for which coverage is provided under this policy. DEFENCE COSTS shall be paid, excess of any applicable deductible, on a current basis.

    In no event shall the INSURED incur any DEFENCE COSTS, settle or offer to settle any CLAIM, assume any contractual obligation or admit any liability without the INSURER'S written consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. The INSURER shall not settle any CLAIM without written consent of the INSUREDS involving the CLAIM.

    The INSURER'S obligation to defend or continue to defend any CLAIM ends once the available limit of liability is exhausted.

    Section VIII – General Conditions

    . . .

    B. Co-operation

    The INSUREDS shall give the INSURER such information and co-operation as it may reasonably require and as shall be in the power of the INSUREDS to provide for the purpose of the investigation, defence and/or settlement of any CLAIM for which coverage is provided under this policy.

    The failure of any INSURED PERSON to provide such information and co-operation shall not impair the rights of any other INSURED PERSON under this policy.

HELD: Motion dismissed, Intact refused intervener status.

The Court held that if the Cruze was determined to have been rented or leased to Gharbi, his own policy would be first loss insurer, with CMP's Summit Acceptances insurer as excess insurer per the Miscellaneous Insurance Provisions Regulation, s. 7.1(2). The Court held that that provision applies where the vehicle in question is a leased or rented vehicle as defined in the Traffic Safety Act and section 187 of the Traffic Safety Act applies:

[11] In a non-rental or non-lease situation, the vehicle owner's policy is the first loss insurer for any liability arising from the ownership, use, or operation of that vehicle: Insurance Act, RSA 2000, c I-3, s 596(1).

[12] Where the vehicle is rented or leased, the driver's policy is the first loss insurer, and the owner's insurance is excess: Miscellaneous Insurance Provisions Regulation, AR 120/2001, s 7.1(2). This is commonly referred to as a "priority flip". Section 7.1(2) is engaged when:

  1. a leased or rented automobile is a motor vehicle as defined in section 1(1)(x) of the Traffic Safety Act; and
  2. section 187 of the Traffic Safety Act applies.

The Court held that section 187 of the Traffic Safety Act applies in that it deemed G to be the agent of the vehicle's owner because he was driving it with the owner's consent at the time. Also, the vehicle met the definition of an automobile.

The Regulation was held not to define "lease" or "rent" but does define the terms "lessee" and "rentee" by their relationship to a "lessor" or "renter". For a period of more than 30 days, the situation is considered to be a lease and, for periods less than that, it is considered to be a rental.

The Court noted the criteria spelled out in section 187 of the Traffic Safety Act to define the term "lessor":

[18] To qualify as a "lessor" pursuant to section 187 of the Traffic Safety Act, CMP must have:

  1. by agreement,
  2. in the ordinary course of its business,
  3. leased or granted exclusive use of a motor vehicle to another person for a term of more than 30 days or otherwise granted exclusive use of a motor vehicle to another person for a period of more than 30 days,
  4. and must not have been in possession of the motor vehicle.

[19] A person can also be a "lessor" if he or she has assigned the agreement to another person. There is no evidence of an assignment in this case.

The Court held that the owner of the Cruze did not qualify as a "lessor" and that the Agreement was not a lease.

  • The first requirement of a lease was met because a written agreement existed between CMP Automotive and Gharbi.
  • The second requirement, that the vehicle was provided "in the ordinary course of [the owner's] business" was held not to have been met. The owner of the vehicle, Summit Acceptance, was in the business of leasing or renting vehicle but was not a signatory to the agreement. CMP Automotive, which was, was not in the business of renting or leasing vehicles. The Court noted that since CMP Automotive paid a daily usage fee to Summit Acceptance Corporation on Gharbi's behalf, this might suggest that CMP understood itself "to have been facilitating an agreement between Summit Acceptance Corp. and Gharbi, to which CMP itself was not a party". Summit Acceptance appeared to be operating under the same understanding, since CMP did not rent or lease vehicles in the ordinary course of its business, the second requirement was not met.
  • The third requirement was held to have been met because Gharbi had the exclusive use of the vehicle for more than 30 days. And the fourth requirement was held to have been met because the owner (Summit Acceptance) was not in possession of the motor vehicle during those 35 days.

The Court held that in the circumstances, Gharbi had been provided the vehicle by way of a courtesy arrangement, as opposed to a lease or rental, and relied on the factors set out in three Ontario cases: ING Halifax v. Guardian Insurance Co. of Canada, 2002CarswellOnt 3805 (Ont.S.C.); Coachman Insurance Company v. Lumbar General Insurance Company, 2011 ONSC 1655; and Baird v. Abouibrahin, 2012 ONSC 859.

  • The Court held that a number of factors tended to suggest that the Open Agreement was a lease: it was in writing; Gharbi was responsible for fuel, physical damage to the vehicle and parking/speeding violations; Gharbi was restricted to how many kilometers he could put on the vehicle per day and where he could drive it; he was held to have provided valuable consideration to obtain possession of the vehicle (by leaving his own for repair with CMP Automotive); he was described in the agreement as a "renter" and the nature of the vehicle usage was specified as "Daily Rental"; and Gharbi was not charged for insurance.
  • However, there were other factors which suggested that the open agreement was a mere courtesy arrangement and not a lease: it specified that Gharbi was to pay $40 a day but this is never requested or collected, CMP Automotive had not reviewed the Agreement with him; and CMP was not in the business of renting vehicles.
  • Court concluded that CMP Automotive could not qualify as a "lessor" since it did not own the vehicle and was not in the business of leasing vehicles. While Summit Acceptance Corp. might have qualified as a lessor, it was held that CMP Automotive had not acted for Summit Acceptance as an agent for an undisclosed principal:

[41] CMP meets three of the four requirements to qualify as a "lessor". Since one of the requirements is not met, CMP was not a lessor in this situation.

[42] The only alternative is that Summit Acceptance Corp. was the lessor. The first requirement is that Summit Acceptance Corp. must have had an agreement with Gharbi. Counsel presented no evidence of such an agreement.

[43] The only other possibility is that CMP acted as agent for Summit Acceptance Corp. in its agreement with Gharbi, where Summit Acceptance Corp. was an undisclosed principal. Again, counsel presented no arguments with respect to this possibility. Based on counsels' submissions, the agreement was strictly between CMP and Gharbi. Even if the other three requirements under section 187 are met, which the evidence suggests is the case, Summit Acceptance Corp. does not meet the definition of "lessor".


[44] Based on the foregoing, neither CMP nor Summit Acceptance Corp. meets the definition of renter or lessor in section 187 of the Traffic Safety Act. It follows that Gharbi was not a rentee or a lessee, and the Cruze was not rented or leased. Section 7.1(2) of the Regulation is therefore not engaged to reverse the priority of insurance providers. Section 596(1) of the Insurance Act applies, and the vehicle owner's policy is the first loss provider. In this case, the vehicle owner is Summit Acceptance Corp., and the first loss insurer is Aviva.

[45] To be clear, had the Open Agreement been between Summit Acceptance Corp. and Gharbi, then this would have been a lease arrangement, and section 7.1(2) would operate to reverse the priority of insurance.


With respect, the Court's conclusion that where a vehicle is leased or rented, that the first loss insurer is the drivers auto insurer is correct but expressed simplistically. Section 7.1(2) of the Miscellaneous Insurance Provisions Regulation sets out six different levels of insurer priority based on two variables (who the lessor/renter of the vehicle is and what kind of an insured the driver is under the various policies that are potentially involved). In this case, there were only two policies involved so this rather simplistic expression of priorities under the Regulation is correct. However, where other insurers may be involved, such as a non-owned auto insurer covering the driver as an employee, etc., the provisions of section 7.1(2) of the Regulation must be consulted.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions