Canada: The IP Year 2008 In Review: Copyrights (Part 3 of 3)

1. The IP Year In Review: Patents - Part 1

2. The IP Year In Review: Trademarks - Part 2





Canadian Website Operator Seeks Copyright Ruling

Charles Todd

SOCAN Tariff 24 – Ringtones

Aidan O'neill

Copyright Board Decision On Tariffs 22.B To 22.G (Music Over The Internet)

Jay Kerr-Wilson

Commercial Radio Redux

Aidan O'neill

Proposed Amendments To The Copyright Act

Jay Kerr-Wilson

Who Says Canada's Lax On Enforcement! Access Copyright v. U-Compute

Charles Lupien

Get To Know Your Neighbours – The Neighbouring Rights Collective Of Canada

May Cheng


Canadian Website Operator Seeks Copyright Ruling. The owner of a popular BitTorrent indexing website has applied to the British Columbia Supreme Court, seeking an Order that his website located at {} does not infringe Canadian copyright law. The website at issue searches the Internet locating and indexing BitTorrent files, a technology commonly used to quickly transfer large media files that are often protected by copyright. Last May, the website's owner received a letter from the Canadian Recording Industry Association ("CRIA") claiming that posting these links to copyrighted materials was a violation of the Copyright Act. Instead of waiting for CRIA to attempt to enforce that claim, the website owner applied to the Court seeking a declaration that the site does not violate any copyright laws.

The website owner's position is that is merely an indexer, much like Google or Yahoo, since it only provides links to media files and does not provide the files themselves, or any software for creating or using them. He also claims that has a policy similar to that of video-sharing website YouTube, of removing links to copyrighted materials upon receiving a complaint from the copyright owner. Conversely, CRIA claims that the website is responsible for "causing, authorizing, and contributing to a staggering amount of illegal music uploading, downloading and file sharing."

The outcome of this case could have serious implications for search engines and other websites that provide links to online digital content. If the outcome is not favourable for, the Court could be placing a number of the Internet's biggest players on the wrong side of Copyright law.

Socan Tariff 24 – Ringtones. In January, the Federal Court of Appeal upheld a decision of the Copyright Board which ruled that the transmission of musical ringtones by wireless telephone companies to their customers was a "communication to the public by telecommunication", within the meaning of the Copyright Act.1 In September, an application for leave to appeal was denied by the Supreme Court of Canada. The underlying question in this proceeding was whether the Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada ("SOCAN") is entitled to collect royalties for the transmission of musical ringtones to cell phone users under its proposed SOCAN Tariff 24.

In seeking judicial review of the Copyright Board's tariff decision, representatives of the Canadian cellular phone industry attempted to convince the Court that the transmission of a ringtone to a cell phone was not a "communication". The applicants argued that a "communication" requires a transmission heard or perceived by a recipient simultaneously with the transmission. The Federal Court of Appeal, however, found that this was too narrow an interpretation of the word "communication" and held that the transmission of a musical ringtone to a cell phone was a communication "whether the owner of the cell phone accesses it immediately or at some later time." In the case of downloading ringtones, the communication would occur once the transmission had been received.

In the alternative, the applicants argued that because cell phone customers receive ringtones individually on a one-on-one basis, the transmission of the ringtones constitutes a private communication. In rejecting this argument, the Federal Court of Appeal agreed with the Copyright Board that the repeated transmission of identical ringtones to different users was a "communication to the public". The Court found that it made no difference whether the transmission occurred simultaneously to all customers who had requested it, or if it was done on a one-on-one basis at different times.

The result of this decision is that a series of unique transmissions to individuals who, together comprise a group that could be said to constitute the public, is a "communication to the public" for the purpose of the Copyright Act.

Copyright Board Decision On Tariffs 22.B To 22.G (Music Over The Internet). On October 24, 2008, the Copyright Board of Canada released its decision regarding the royalties to be paid for the use of musical works on the Internet.2 The Board certified six tariffs (Tariffs 22.B to 22.G) requiring the payment of royalties to SOCAN, the collective society that administers the right to communicate musical works to the public by telecommunication.

The Copyright Board adopted a "user-based" approach that set rates for six different classes of users transmitting music using the Internet. These include: commercial radio stations; commercial and specialty television broadcasters, pay audio services and satellite radio services; the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and educational broadcasters; non-commercial and campus radio stations; audio websites; and game sites. The tariffs apply for the period January 1, 1996 to December 31, 2006.

The royalty rates range from a high of 12.35 per cent of Internet revenues for pay audio services, to a low of 0.8 per cent of revenues for game sites. As a result of the Copyright Board's new "user-based" approach, websites that do not fall under one of the six categories are not required to pay any royalties for the use of music for the period January 1, 1996 to December 31, 2006. This includes popular sites such as FacebookTM and YouTubeTM.

Commercial Radio Redux. Earlier this year the Copyright Board released its re-determination of the amount of royalties that commercial radio stations are required to pay SOCAN and the Neighbouring Rights Collective of Canada ("NRCC").3

In its 2005 decision, the Board had increased the rate payable to SOCAN from 3.2% of total advertising revenues, which had applied since 1978, to 4.4% of all advertising revenues in excess of $1.25 million. The Board decided to raise the existing rate because it found that the rate had historically undervalued the contribution of SOCAN music to the revenues of commercial radio stations and did not reflect the efficiencies gained by stations through their use of music.

On judicial review of the Board's decision, the Canadian Association of Broadcasters ("CAB") argued that the Board's reasons did not provide an adequate explanation for the amount of the royalty increase. In a unanimous decision, the Federal Court of Appeal agreed, finding that the Board's reasons were inadequate.

In the re-hearing the only two issues addressed by the Board were the precise amount by which the royalty rates should be increased to account for the historical undervaluation of music, and the efficiencies achieved by radio stations through the use of music. The Board held the new hearing to consider the economic evidence filed by the parties relating to the value of music to Canadian commercial radio stations. Even though new evidence was presented, the Board came to the same conclusion and repeated its belief that the value of music to radio stations had increased significantly over time.

As a result of these proceedings the Board, in its tariff decisions, must now provide adequate reasons explaining how it arrives at specific royalty rates. In the recent SOCAN Tariffs 22.B to 22G decision, discussed above, the Board invoked this rule to justify why it could not set a tariff for social networking and video sharing websites such as Facebook, MySpace and YouTube.

Proposed Amendments To The Copyright Act. On June 12, 2008, the Conservative Government introduced sweeping new amendments to Canada's Copyright Act, designed to update the law to reflect the development of digital technologies and in particular, the Internet. Bill C-61, An Act to Amend the Copyright Act, died on the Order Paper when Parliament was dissolved and a federal election was called on September 7, 2008.4

This is the second time in the last three years that copyright amendments have failed to be passed as the result of an election. The previous Liberal minority government introduced similar legislation in June 2005, but the legislation died when that Government fell later that year.

During its election campaign, the Conservative party promised to reintroduce the copyright amendments if re-elected. While the timing of the new copyright Bill has not yet been announced by the returning Conservative government, it is possible that any reintroduced legislation will be similar to those introduced previously.

The issues the proposed amendments will address, include:

  • "digital locks" or technological protection measures that record companies, movie studios, software companies and other content distributors use to protect the creative works;
  • New exclusive rights for performers and record companies, including the right to make sound recordings available on the Internet;
  • New "personal use" exceptions to allow individuals to record television programs, make digital copies of music, and move content from one format to another without infringing copyright;
  • Limits to the amount of damages that can be awarded against an individual who infringes copyright for private use;
  • Clarification on the role of Internet Services Providers (ISPs) with respect to copyright infringement by exempting ISPs from copyright liability, but requiring them to forward notices of alleged copyright infringement to subscribers and to retain the records necessary to determine the subscribers' identity;
  • New exceptions for the educational use of material accessed from the Internet.

Who Says Canada's Lax On Enforcement! Access Copyright V. U-Compute. The decision in The Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency ("Access Copyright") v. U-Compute and Riaz A. Lari5 marks the end of a long legal saga between the copyright protection agency Access Copyright and the individual Riaz A. Lari who, for close to 10 years, was alleged to have operated a business of copying academic textbooks. The ruling in this case is notable because it imposes the most severe and rare sanction for copyright infringement: imprisonment.

Since 1999, Lari had run a business called U-Compute, located next to Concordia University. In addition to supplying computer equipment, the business offered textbook copying services to the students. In order to accelerate the copying process, Lari had created a database of the digitized pages of several of the volumes most in demand which he then printed using commercial photocopiers.

In 1999, Access Copyright initiated legal proceedings against U-Compute to force it to cease its illegal copying activities. On November 5, 1999, Lari agreed to cease the illegal copying, but resumed its activities several months later. Access Copyright then decided to take more serious measures by requesting an injunction from the Federal Court. The Federal Court ruled in favour of the Access Copyright and enjoined U-Compute and Lari to sell, distribute or advertise for sale the unauthorised textbook copies.

Despite the Federal Court ruling, Lari continued to operate his business which led to contempt proceedings and an Order for payment of a $2,500 fine with an additional $10,000 imposed for costs. As this still did not stop Lari, Access Copyright then obtained a subsequent order for payment of a $5,000 fine as well as legal costs. still the activities continued. In 2003, Access Copyright decided to change tactics, and an Anton Piller Order, which was soon expanded to cover additional locations. This Order led to the discovery of even more of Lari's operation.

Despite all of these proceedings, Lari continued to copy and sell pirated textbooks. Access Copyright therefore filed a motion for contempt of Court. In light of Lari's complete failure to comply with various Orders, the Federal Court sentenced him to six months' imprisonment, suspended on condition that he complete 400 hours of community service within a specified time limit. Of the 400 hours necessary to avoid imprisonment, Lari succeeded in completing only 64. This year, as a result of his actions, a warrant was issued to have Lari arrested and incarcerated for six months.

While this may seem extreme, it is a useful illustration of the capabilities of the Canadian judicial system to put a definitive end to copyright infringement and ensuring compliance with the Court orders issued by its judges.

Get To Know Your Neighbours – The Neighbouring Rights Collective Of Canada. Most retailers and businesses that use sound recordings for ambient music are aware of the requirement to pay royalties to SOCAN. However, since 2005, the Neighbouring Rights Collective of Canada ("NRCC") has been getting tariffs granted to it with retroactive effect to January 1, 2003. Due to the fact that NRCC has not been established for as long and has not been as high profile as SOCAN, many businesses remain unaware that they owe significant sums to this collective, in addition to the fees they have already paid to SOCAN.

What is the difference between SOCAN and NRCC? SOCAN and its predecessors have been representing the rights of musical composers and music publishers in Canada as a copyright collective since 1925, ensuring that artists and publishers are paid royalties, by collecting copyright licensing fees from individuals, businesses and organizations that play, broadcast or transmit music to the public, whether in public venues, on television or by telecommunication. On the other hand, NRCC was created in 1997, to represent the interests of musical performers and makers of published sound recordings embodying musical works and performers' performances of such works on behalf of five member collectives. NRCC is primarily engaged in the collection of licensing fees to pay royalties to the member collectives for the benefit of their constituent members.

Some of NRCC's most recent tariffs include Tariff No. 1.A, issued on February 23, 2008.6 This tariff grants both NRCC and SOCAN the right to collect royalties for the years 2003-2007, to be paid each month by commercial radio stations for their respective repertoires of music.

Another tariff that many businesses are currently not aware of, but are likely going to be within the next year or so, is Tariff No. 3, issued on October 20, 2006.7 This is an NRCC music supply and background music tariff for published sound recordings of musical works for the years 2003 to 2009. NRCC is aggressively seeking to collect the royalties owed under this tariff from all establishments that use background music in Canada. Tariff No. 3 is not only applicable to music played within an establishment, it also applies to music played when a customer is on "hold" on the telephone.

Tariff No. 3 is subject to some rather complex calculations, and a few exceptions. Depending on how the music is supplied, royalties may be based on a percentage of ticket sales, admissions or attendance, if these can be easily ascertained, or the royalty may be a multiplier based on square footage of the area to which the public has access, multiplied by the number of days of operation during which the music was played. These royalties based on square footage can result in a significant figure for big box stores and warehouse operations playing radio broadcasts in their stores, particularly as the levy is retroactive to 2003.8

Co-Editors: Mark D. Penner and Leanne Shaughnessy. Any questions or comments regarding this publication as well as requests for reproductions should be directed to the editors.


1 2008 FCA 6




5 2007 FCA 127




The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.