Canada: The IP Year 2008 In Review: Copyrights (Part 3 of 3)

Last Updated: January 1 2009
Article by Fasken Martineau's Intellectual Property Group

1. The IP Year In Review: Patents - Part 1

2. The IP Year In Review: Trademarks - Part 2





Canadian Website Operator Seeks Copyright Ruling

Charles Todd

SOCAN Tariff 24 – Ringtones

Aidan O'neill

Copyright Board Decision On Tariffs 22.B To 22.G (Music Over The Internet)

Jay Kerr-Wilson

Commercial Radio Redux

Aidan O'neill

Proposed Amendments To The Copyright Act

Jay Kerr-Wilson

Who Says Canada's Lax On Enforcement! Access Copyright v. U-Compute

Charles Lupien

Get To Know Your Neighbours – The Neighbouring Rights Collective Of Canada

May Cheng


Canadian Website Operator Seeks Copyright Ruling. The owner of a popular BitTorrent indexing website has applied to the British Columbia Supreme Court, seeking an Order that his website located at {} does not infringe Canadian copyright law. The website at issue searches the Internet locating and indexing BitTorrent files, a technology commonly used to quickly transfer large media files that are often protected by copyright. Last May, the website's owner received a letter from the Canadian Recording Industry Association ("CRIA") claiming that posting these links to copyrighted materials was a violation of the Copyright Act. Instead of waiting for CRIA to attempt to enforce that claim, the website owner applied to the Court seeking a declaration that the site does not violate any copyright laws.

The website owner's position is that is merely an indexer, much like Google or Yahoo, since it only provides links to media files and does not provide the files themselves, or any software for creating or using them. He also claims that has a policy similar to that of video-sharing website YouTube, of removing links to copyrighted materials upon receiving a complaint from the copyright owner. Conversely, CRIA claims that the website is responsible for "causing, authorizing, and contributing to a staggering amount of illegal music uploading, downloading and file sharing."

The outcome of this case could have serious implications for search engines and other websites that provide links to online digital content. If the outcome is not favourable for, the Court could be placing a number of the Internet's biggest players on the wrong side of Copyright law.

Socan Tariff 24 – Ringtones. In January, the Federal Court of Appeal upheld a decision of the Copyright Board which ruled that the transmission of musical ringtones by wireless telephone companies to their customers was a "communication to the public by telecommunication", within the meaning of the Copyright Act.1 In September, an application for leave to appeal was denied by the Supreme Court of Canada. The underlying question in this proceeding was whether the Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada ("SOCAN") is entitled to collect royalties for the transmission of musical ringtones to cell phone users under its proposed SOCAN Tariff 24.

In seeking judicial review of the Copyright Board's tariff decision, representatives of the Canadian cellular phone industry attempted to convince the Court that the transmission of a ringtone to a cell phone was not a "communication". The applicants argued that a "communication" requires a transmission heard or perceived by a recipient simultaneously with the transmission. The Federal Court of Appeal, however, found that this was too narrow an interpretation of the word "communication" and held that the transmission of a musical ringtone to a cell phone was a communication "whether the owner of the cell phone accesses it immediately or at some later time." In the case of downloading ringtones, the communication would occur once the transmission had been received.

In the alternative, the applicants argued that because cell phone customers receive ringtones individually on a one-on-one basis, the transmission of the ringtones constitutes a private communication. In rejecting this argument, the Federal Court of Appeal agreed with the Copyright Board that the repeated transmission of identical ringtones to different users was a "communication to the public". The Court found that it made no difference whether the transmission occurred simultaneously to all customers who had requested it, or if it was done on a one-on-one basis at different times.

The result of this decision is that a series of unique transmissions to individuals who, together comprise a group that could be said to constitute the public, is a "communication to the public" for the purpose of the Copyright Act.

Copyright Board Decision On Tariffs 22.B To 22.G (Music Over The Internet). On October 24, 2008, the Copyright Board of Canada released its decision regarding the royalties to be paid for the use of musical works on the Internet.2 The Board certified six tariffs (Tariffs 22.B to 22.G) requiring the payment of royalties to SOCAN, the collective society that administers the right to communicate musical works to the public by telecommunication.

The Copyright Board adopted a "user-based" approach that set rates for six different classes of users transmitting music using the Internet. These include: commercial radio stations; commercial and specialty television broadcasters, pay audio services and satellite radio services; the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and educational broadcasters; non-commercial and campus radio stations; audio websites; and game sites. The tariffs apply for the period January 1, 1996 to December 31, 2006.

The royalty rates range from a high of 12.35 per cent of Internet revenues for pay audio services, to a low of 0.8 per cent of revenues for game sites. As a result of the Copyright Board's new "user-based" approach, websites that do not fall under one of the six categories are not required to pay any royalties for the use of music for the period January 1, 1996 to December 31, 2006. This includes popular sites such as FacebookTM and YouTubeTM.

Commercial Radio Redux. Earlier this year the Copyright Board released its re-determination of the amount of royalties that commercial radio stations are required to pay SOCAN and the Neighbouring Rights Collective of Canada ("NRCC").3

In its 2005 decision, the Board had increased the rate payable to SOCAN from 3.2% of total advertising revenues, which had applied since 1978, to 4.4% of all advertising revenues in excess of $1.25 million. The Board decided to raise the existing rate because it found that the rate had historically undervalued the contribution of SOCAN music to the revenues of commercial radio stations and did not reflect the efficiencies gained by stations through their use of music.

On judicial review of the Board's decision, the Canadian Association of Broadcasters ("CAB") argued that the Board's reasons did not provide an adequate explanation for the amount of the royalty increase. In a unanimous decision, the Federal Court of Appeal agreed, finding that the Board's reasons were inadequate.

In the re-hearing the only two issues addressed by the Board were the precise amount by which the royalty rates should be increased to account for the historical undervaluation of music, and the efficiencies achieved by radio stations through the use of music. The Board held the new hearing to consider the economic evidence filed by the parties relating to the value of music to Canadian commercial radio stations. Even though new evidence was presented, the Board came to the same conclusion and repeated its belief that the value of music to radio stations had increased significantly over time.

As a result of these proceedings the Board, in its tariff decisions, must now provide adequate reasons explaining how it arrives at specific royalty rates. In the recent SOCAN Tariffs 22.B to 22G decision, discussed above, the Board invoked this rule to justify why it could not set a tariff for social networking and video sharing websites such as Facebook, MySpace and YouTube.

Proposed Amendments To The Copyright Act. On June 12, 2008, the Conservative Government introduced sweeping new amendments to Canada's Copyright Act, designed to update the law to reflect the development of digital technologies and in particular, the Internet. Bill C-61, An Act to Amend the Copyright Act, died on the Order Paper when Parliament was dissolved and a federal election was called on September 7, 2008.4

This is the second time in the last three years that copyright amendments have failed to be passed as the result of an election. The previous Liberal minority government introduced similar legislation in June 2005, but the legislation died when that Government fell later that year.

During its election campaign, the Conservative party promised to reintroduce the copyright amendments if re-elected. While the timing of the new copyright Bill has not yet been announced by the returning Conservative government, it is possible that any reintroduced legislation will be similar to those introduced previously.

The issues the proposed amendments will address, include:

  • "digital locks" or technological protection measures that record companies, movie studios, software companies and other content distributors use to protect the creative works;
  • New exclusive rights for performers and record companies, including the right to make sound recordings available on the Internet;
  • New "personal use" exceptions to allow individuals to record television programs, make digital copies of music, and move content from one format to another without infringing copyright;
  • Limits to the amount of damages that can be awarded against an individual who infringes copyright for private use;
  • Clarification on the role of Internet Services Providers (ISPs) with respect to copyright infringement by exempting ISPs from copyright liability, but requiring them to forward notices of alleged copyright infringement to subscribers and to retain the records necessary to determine the subscribers' identity;
  • New exceptions for the educational use of material accessed from the Internet.

Who Says Canada's Lax On Enforcement! Access Copyright V. U-Compute. The decision in The Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency ("Access Copyright") v. U-Compute and Riaz A. Lari5 marks the end of a long legal saga between the copyright protection agency Access Copyright and the individual Riaz A. Lari who, for close to 10 years, was alleged to have operated a business of copying academic textbooks. The ruling in this case is notable because it imposes the most severe and rare sanction for copyright infringement: imprisonment.

Since 1999, Lari had run a business called U-Compute, located next to Concordia University. In addition to supplying computer equipment, the business offered textbook copying services to the students. In order to accelerate the copying process, Lari had created a database of the digitized pages of several of the volumes most in demand which he then printed using commercial photocopiers.

In 1999, Access Copyright initiated legal proceedings against U-Compute to force it to cease its illegal copying activities. On November 5, 1999, Lari agreed to cease the illegal copying, but resumed its activities several months later. Access Copyright then decided to take more serious measures by requesting an injunction from the Federal Court. The Federal Court ruled in favour of the Access Copyright and enjoined U-Compute and Lari to sell, distribute or advertise for sale the unauthorised textbook copies.

Despite the Federal Court ruling, Lari continued to operate his business which led to contempt proceedings and an Order for payment of a $2,500 fine with an additional $10,000 imposed for costs. As this still did not stop Lari, Access Copyright then obtained a subsequent order for payment of a $5,000 fine as well as legal costs. still the activities continued. In 2003, Access Copyright decided to change tactics, and an Anton Piller Order, which was soon expanded to cover additional locations. This Order led to the discovery of even more of Lari's operation.

Despite all of these proceedings, Lari continued to copy and sell pirated textbooks. Access Copyright therefore filed a motion for contempt of Court. In light of Lari's complete failure to comply with various Orders, the Federal Court sentenced him to six months' imprisonment, suspended on condition that he complete 400 hours of community service within a specified time limit. Of the 400 hours necessary to avoid imprisonment, Lari succeeded in completing only 64. This year, as a result of his actions, a warrant was issued to have Lari arrested and incarcerated for six months.

While this may seem extreme, it is a useful illustration of the capabilities of the Canadian judicial system to put a definitive end to copyright infringement and ensuring compliance with the Court orders issued by its judges.

Get To Know Your Neighbours – The Neighbouring Rights Collective Of Canada. Most retailers and businesses that use sound recordings for ambient music are aware of the requirement to pay royalties to SOCAN. However, since 2005, the Neighbouring Rights Collective of Canada ("NRCC") has been getting tariffs granted to it with retroactive effect to January 1, 2003. Due to the fact that NRCC has not been established for as long and has not been as high profile as SOCAN, many businesses remain unaware that they owe significant sums to this collective, in addition to the fees they have already paid to SOCAN.

What is the difference between SOCAN and NRCC? SOCAN and its predecessors have been representing the rights of musical composers and music publishers in Canada as a copyright collective since 1925, ensuring that artists and publishers are paid royalties, by collecting copyright licensing fees from individuals, businesses and organizations that play, broadcast or transmit music to the public, whether in public venues, on television or by telecommunication. On the other hand, NRCC was created in 1997, to represent the interests of musical performers and makers of published sound recordings embodying musical works and performers' performances of such works on behalf of five member collectives. NRCC is primarily engaged in the collection of licensing fees to pay royalties to the member collectives for the benefit of their constituent members.

Some of NRCC's most recent tariffs include Tariff No. 1.A, issued on February 23, 2008.6 This tariff grants both NRCC and SOCAN the right to collect royalties for the years 2003-2007, to be paid each month by commercial radio stations for their respective repertoires of music.

Another tariff that many businesses are currently not aware of, but are likely going to be within the next year or so, is Tariff No. 3, issued on October 20, 2006.7 This is an NRCC music supply and background music tariff for published sound recordings of musical works for the years 2003 to 2009. NRCC is aggressively seeking to collect the royalties owed under this tariff from all establishments that use background music in Canada. Tariff No. 3 is not only applicable to music played within an establishment, it also applies to music played when a customer is on "hold" on the telephone.

Tariff No. 3 is subject to some rather complex calculations, and a few exceptions. Depending on how the music is supplied, royalties may be based on a percentage of ticket sales, admissions or attendance, if these can be easily ascertained, or the royalty may be a multiplier based on square footage of the area to which the public has access, multiplied by the number of days of operation during which the music was played. These royalties based on square footage can result in a significant figure for big box stores and warehouse operations playing radio broadcasts in their stores, particularly as the levy is retroactive to 2003.8

Co-Editors: Mark D. Penner and Leanne Shaughnessy. Any questions or comments regarding this publication as well as requests for reproductions should be directed to the editors.


1 2008 FCA 6




5 2007 FCA 127




The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions