Canada: Dissent On The Standard Of Review: The SCC Splits On True Questions Of Jurisdiction

Last Updated: July 2 2018
Article by Margaret Robbins

To what extent can, or should, courts review decisions by government decision-makers? Administrative law is all about finding the right balance.

The Supreme Court of Canada announced this spring it has plans to revisit that balance and the standard of review for administrative decisions in a trilogy of cases to be heard by the Court in the fall of 2018. Its recent decision in West Fraser Mills Ltd v Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal and Workers' Compensation Board of British Columbia, released last week, might hint at how.

Since Dunsmuir, the Supreme Court has emphasized a categorical approach to determining the standard of review that includes a default that deference should be owed to administrative decision-makers. In Alberta Teacher's Association, it was suggested that, barring exceptional circumstances, when reviewing a Board or Tribunal's decision interpreting its home statute, the appropriate standard of review should be reasonableness. True questions of jurisdiction that would be reviewed on correctness, while theoretically possible, had been extremely rare since Dunsmuir.

In West Fraser Mills Ltd, in a 6-3 decision with three separate dissenting opinions, Justices Brown, Coté and Rowe made it clear that, in their view, true questions of jurisdiction reviewed on the standard of correctness are alive and well.

The case involved a judicial review of the Workers' Compensation Board of British Columbia's decision to fine West Fraser Mills $75,000 following the fatal accident of a tree faller in a forest area licensed by the company.

West Fraser Mills appealed the Board's decision to the Court on two grounds. First, it argued that s. 26.2(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation was ultra vires or outside the Board's authority to enact. Section 26.2(1) requires forestry operation owners to ensure that all activities conducted on the work site meet the Board's safe work practices. Second, it claimed that statutorily the $75,000 dollar fine could only be levied on "employers", not "owners". 

The first issue on whether s. 26.2(1) was ultra vires caused the four opinion split regarding the appropriate analytical approach.

Writing for the majority, Chief Justice McLachlin reviewed s. 26.2 on the standard of reasonableness and found that the Board acted reasonably in enacting the safety provision at issue. According to the majority, interpreting s. 26.2(1) was not a question of true jurisdiction. In addition, reasonableness review appropriately recognized the "degree of expertise or field sensitivity to the imperatives and nuances of the legislative regime" that administrative decision makers develop in their roles.

By contrast, all three justices in dissent framed the first issue as jurisdictional in nature. They began the analysis by interpreting whether the Board had the authority to enact s. 26.2(2) before looking at how it chose to do so.

Justice Coté highlighted the difference between when a Board acts in an adjudicative capacity and a legislative capacity. When a Board's decision involves the former, there may be a range of reasonable answers. This is the context in which the Dunsmuir framework and the default of deference was established.

However, when a Board acts in a legislative capacity, enacting legislation pursuant to a statutory grant of power, Justice Coté held that this must be assessed on a correctness standard. She found as follows: "Respect for legislative intent – a cornerstone of judicial review – requires that courts accurately police the boundaries of delegated power."

Justice Brown also framed the issue of the Board's authority to adopt s. 26.2(1) as an issue of vires or jurisdiction of an administrative decision maker to make law. The issue, he held, should be assessed on the standard of correctness as it "does not go to the reasonableness of the Board's decision to adopt s. 26.2(1), but rather its authority to do so."

Brown J emphasized the Court's role in judicial review to ensure that the Board does not overstep the authority the legislature granted it. A requirement of the rule of law, he held, is that "public power must always be authorized by law."

Finally, Rowe J also found that the judicial review of delegated authority is fundamental to upholding the rule of law. He agreed with the majority's analysis that s. 26.2(1) is intra vires but explicitly noted the two steps to this analysis: first, examining whether the Board had the authority to act; and second, a substantive inquiry into how the Board chose to exercise that authority.

With respect to the majority's conclusion that reasonableness recognizes administrative decision-makers' expertise, Rowe J held that such expertise does not give insight into statutory interpretation of the scope of a Board's authority, which remains a legal analysis.

What West Fraser Mills demonstrates is that while the Court has moved toward the default of deference, for Justices Brown, Coté and Rowe, there remain outstanding questions on which respect for legislative intent and the rule of law require a correctness standard of review.

How this will affect their views on the upcoming examination of the standard of review framework to be considered in a series of cases this December remains to be seen.

With notes from Mari Galloway.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions