Canada: Food Fight: Restaurants Can't Recover Lost Profits From Supplier When They Lose Business After A Meat Recall

  • The Ontario Court of Appeal decision in 1688782 Ontario Inc. v. Maple Leaf Foods Inc. is among the first rulings to apply the duty of care analysis from the Supreme Court of Canada's 2017 Livent ruling.
  • The plaintiffs in the class action, franchisees of the "Mr. Sub" fast-food chain, argued that they were entitled to compensation for economic loss that they claimed to have suffered as the result of a 2008 listeria outbreak at a Maple Leaf meat-processing facility.
  • The alleged economic loss was primarily reputational, resulting from the association of Mr. Sub and Maple Leaf in media reports relating to the outbreak and Maple Leaf's subsequent product recall. That recall was broad and included the Mr. Sub chain even though there was no evidence that they had ever received any of the tainted meat.
  • After the case was certified as a class action, Maple Leaf moved for summary judgment, arguing that it did not owe Mr. Sub franchisees a duty of care. The motion judge, in a ruling issued prior to Livent, disagreed. The Ontario Court of Appeal reversed that ruling, finding on the basis of the Livent analysis that any duty of care owed by Maple Leaf did not include within its "scope" a duty to protect the franchisees' reputations.
  • The decision highlights the need for a link between the duty of care alleged and the damages suffered.

Motion Judge's Decision

The motion judge determined that Maple Leaf's relationship with the franchisees fell within a recognized duty of care "to supply a product fit for human consumption". She also held that Maple Leaf was "under an obligation to be mindful of the [representative] plaintiff's legitimate interests in conducting its affairs."

She further held that Maple Leaf "owed a duty of care with respect to any representations made that the [ready-to-eat] meats were fit for human consumption and posed no risk of harm" and that Maple Leaf "ought reasonably to have foreseen that [the franchisees] would rely on their representations, and [that this] reliance was reasonable in the circumstances." Finally, she observed that "policy considerations weigh in favour of imposing a duty in these circumstances to heighten accountability."

Court of Appeal Decision

In a ruling issued on April 30, 2018, the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned the motion judge's decision, which had accepted the franchisees' claims based on (i) a breach of Maple Leaf's duty to supply a product fit for human consumption and (ii) negligent misrepresentation on the part of Maple Leaf.

Did Maple Leaf owe Mr. Sub franchisees a duty to supply untainted meat?

Did the franchisees establish that an existing duty of care existed?

Writing the unanimous judgment, Fairburn J.A. first considered whether Maple Leaf's relationship with the representative plaintiff fell within a recognized existing duty of care to supply a product fit for human consumption. She noted that in Livent, the Supreme Court had stated that courts should be cautious in finding proximity on the basis of a previously-established or analogous duty of care category. Rather than reasoning on the basis of a previous case that "all As automatically owe a duty of care to all Bs", courts should look back to the previous cases and determine whether the "particular factors" that characterized the A-B relationship in those cases (and which grounded the duty of care findings by those courts) are present in the current case. As the Livent court concluded:

A finding of proximity based upon a previously established or analogous category must be grounded not merely upon the identity of the parties, but upon examination of the particular relationship at issue in each case.

Adopting the Livent approach, the Court concluded that the relationship between Maple Leaf and the franchisees – in which damages were claimed for reputational harm as a result of a recall and public association with Maple Leaf – did not fit within a previously established or analogous duty of care category.

Does the Anns/Cooper analysis recognize such a duty?

The Court therefore applied the full Anns/Cooper analysis, as a result of which it held that the franchisees' pure economic loss did not fall within the scope of any duty that Maple Leaf may have had to supply meat fit for human consumption. In the view of Fairburn J.A., that duty was owed to the franchisees' customers, rather than to the franchisees:

To conclude that Maple Leaf owed a duty of care in tort to the franchisees to protect them against the kinds of damages at issue on this appeal would be to enlarge the duty to safeguard the health and safety of customers by supplying fit meat to include a quite different and added duty to franchisees to protect against reputational harm. In my view, to do so would constitute an unwarranted expansion of a duty owed to one class of plaintiffs and extend it to the fundamentally different claim advanced by the franchisees.

As the Court concluded, the Mr. Sub franchisees "cannot bootstrap their claim for damages for reputational loss to the different duty owed by Maple Leaf to their customers."

Is the defendant liable in negligent misrepresentation?

In respect of the franchisees' claim of negligent misrepresentation (i.e. that the meats were fit for human consumption and posed no risk of harm), the Court held that Maple Leaf's undertaking to supply meat safe for human consumption did not entail an undertaking to protect the franchisees' reputations. The Court again emphasized the importance of the "scope" of a duty of care, noting that, "the nature or purpose of such an undertaking was to ensure that Mr. Sub customers who ate [Maple Leaf's products] would not become ill or die as a result of eating the meats. The purpose of the undertaking was not, however, to protect the reputational interests of the franchisees." In other words, the reputational damage allegedly suffered by the franchisees fell outside the scope of Maple Leaf's undertaking to supply meat that is safe for human consumption to the franchisees' customers.

The public interest consideration

As for the motion judge's view that imposing a duty would heighten accountability, the Court questioned whether imposing a duty would achieve that end because "there is a strong public interest in encouraging manufacturers to act expeditiously in recalling products from the marketplace to avoid potential danger to consumers." What the Court appears to be saying here is that if a food products company had to worry about being sued for reputational damage by all retailers from whom it recalled its product, it would have an incentive to be less inclusive in the scope of its recalls, which might not be a good thing from a public health perspective.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions