Canada: Agricultural Law Netletter - Issue 391 - Wednesday, March 7, 2018


* A Justice of the Quebec Superior Court has granted a Quebec beekeeper the authority to commence a class action on behalf of Quebec beekeepers against Bayer CropScience Inc., Syngenta Canada Inc., and related corporations for damages resulting from honeybee deaths, arising from the alleged negligent manufacture and sale of neonicotinoid pesticides in Quebec. It was acknowledged during the Court proceedings that neonicotinoids may be toxic to bees. (Martineau v. Bayer CropScience Inc., CALN/2018-007, [2018] Q.J. No. 1148, Quebec Superior Court)

* A Justice of the Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench has dismissed an application by two farmers for permission to continue to use seized farm equipment for the purpose of seeding their crops during the 2018 seeding season. The Court considers case law with respect to the Court's discretion under s. 53 of the Saskatchewan Farm Security Act to make any order the "court considers just" involving the postponement of the return of seized equipment to a secured party. Following an analysis of the farmers' proposals, the Court concluded that none of their proposals presented a realistic plan for the payment of debts claimed by the lessor of a seized seed drill and cart. (Petryshyn v. National Leasing Group Inc., CALN/2018-008, [2018] S.J. No. 5, Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench)


Martineau v. Bayer CropScience Inc.;


Full text: [2018] Q.J. No. 1148;

2018 QCCS 634,

Quebec Superior Court,

The Honourable Thomas M. Davis J.S.C.,

February20, 2018.

Class Actions -- Pesticides -- Damages for Death Loss in Honeybees.

Steve Martineau ("Martineau") a Quebec bee breeder, applied to the Quebec Superior Court for an Order authorizing a class action against Bayer CropScience Inc., Bayer Inc., Bayer CropScience AG ("Bayer") and Sygenta Canada Inc. and Syngenta International Inc. ("Syngenta").

Martineau alleged that Bayer and Syngenta were negligent in the manufacture and sale of neonicotinoids in Quebec, were responsible for damages that he and other class members suffered under Article 1457 of the Quebec Civil Code.

Neonicotinoids are also known as imidacloprid, clothianidin and thiamethoxam, and are members of the neonicotinoids class of broad spectrum insecticides.

Martineau alleged significant losses in his bee population beginning in 2006, most significantly in the month of June.

Martineau had samples of water and dead bees from his hives analyzed and found that they contained neonicotinoids. He alleged he had suffered losses of up to $20,000.00 per year from neonicotinoids from 2006 to present.

Martineau proposed a class consisting of all persons in Quebec who owned bees in the affected area after 2006.

It was acknowledged that neonicotinoids may be toxic to bees [para. 24 to 30], however Bayer and Syngenta challenged the application on a number of grounds including the assumption that they had manufactured the neonicotinoids which killed Martineau's bees.

Decision: Davis, JSC granted Martineau's application for authorization the bringing of a class action on behalf of all persons in Quebec who own or owned bees in the affected area during the class [at para. 90 to 92] and identified several principle questions of fact and law for the proceeding [at para. 93] including the following:

(a) Can any neonicotinoid based pest control products researched, designed, developed, manufactured, marketed, distributed and sold by Bayer CropScience AG and/or Bayer CropScience Inc. and/or Bayer Inc. in Quebec during the class period (i.e. imidacloprid, clothianidin and their related end- use products approved for agricultural use) cause honeybee colony loss resulting in financial damages or losses to beekeepers?

(b) Can any neonicotinoid based pest control product researched, designed, developed, manufactured, marketed, distributed and sold by Syngenta International AG and/or Syngenta Canada Inc. in Quebec during the class period (i.e. thiamethoxam and its related end-use products approved for agricultural use) cause honeybee colony loss resulting in financial damages or losses to beekeepers.

Davis, JSC considered a number of issues with respect to whether or not a class action could be authorized under Article 575(1) to (4) at para. 21 to 75 of his decision.

Petryshyn v. National Leasing Group Inc.;


Full text: [2018] S.J. No. 5;

2018 SKQB 5,

Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench,

R.W. Elson J.,

January 3, 2018.

Seizure of Farm Equipment -- Saskatchewan Farm Security Act -- Application for Postponement of Removal.

Greg Petryshyn and Pearl Petryshyn ("Petryshyns"), who were Saskatchewan farmers, applied to the Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench for a hearing pursuant to s. 50 of the Saskatchewan Farm Security Act, SS 1988-89, c S-17.1 (the "Act") after the National Leasing Group Inc. ("National Leasing") served notice on the Petryshyns of its intent to take possession of the following farm implements which National Leasing had leased to the Petryshyns:

  1. A 2014 Brent grain cart on which there were lease payment arrears of $39,950.40 and a total amount outstanding of $168,741.00, having a value estimated by National Leasing of $110,000.00.
  2. A 2016 Seed Hawk air drill and a 2016 Seed Hawk cart, on which there were lease arrears of $33,640.00 and a total amount outstanding of $488,474.00, having a value estimated by National Leasing of $100,000.00.

The Petryshyns did not oppose National Leasing's claim for the return of the Brent grain cart, but did oppose the application for the return of the Seed Hawk air drill and cart pursuant to s. 50 of the Act, and in accordance with the provisions of s. 53 of the Act, which provides, in part, as follows:

53(1) On the hearing of an application made pursuant to section 50, the court may make any orders that it considers just.

(2) Without limiting the generality of subsection (1), the court may:

  1. order delivery of the implement to the secured party, subject to any conditions that the court considers just; or
  2. order delivery of the implement to the secured party and postpone the operation of the order:
  1. on condition that the farmer pays to the secured party any amount that the court considers just; or
  2. subject to fulfillment of any conditions by the farmer, other than that described in subclause (i), that the court considers just.

The Petryshyns opposed the return of the Seed Hawk air drill and cart because they required this equipment at least to the summer of 2018 so that they could seed their crop for 2018.

The Petryshyns farmed one quarter of land and indicated that if they were able to use the air drill and cart, they hoped they would be able to rent additional farmland. They challenged National Leasing's valuation of the Seed Hawk air drill and cart, and proposed that the value was closer to $390,000.00. They also indicated that they believed they would be able to sell the equipment by auction for more than $100,000.00 in the hope of avoiding responsibility for a significant shortfall.

The Petryshyns' Affidavits indicated they were involved in two legal proceedings in which they claimed and hoped to recover funds from third parties.

Decision: Elson, J dismissed the Petryshyns' application and directed that they deliver the Seed Hawk air drill and cart to National Leasing, but postponed the operation of the Order to April 30, 2018 to give them an opportunity to make their best efforts to find a purchaser for the equipment [at para. 33].

Elson, J quoted [at para. 22] the frequently cited decision of Lanal Farms Ltd. v Bank of Montreal (1989), [1989] S.J. No. 622 (SK QB), 81 Sask R 162 (WL) (Sask QB) in which Hrabinsky J discussed the scope of s. 53. Elson, J then summarized the factors Courts may consider in determining its discretion to make orders "it considers just" [at para. 23], stating as follows:

[23] As reflected in s. 53(1), the court has broad discretion to "make any orders that it considers just". As Mills J. observed in Bartko v Odnokon Holdings Ltd., [2012] S.J. No. 408,2012 SKQB 262, 400 Sask R 200 [Bartko] the practical significance of this is that the court must compare the equities of the parties and then exercise its discretion either to: 1) order the farmer to deliver the farm equipment to the secured party immediately; or 2) postpone delivery for a specified period of time on conditions involving payment or other conditions that the court deems just. Mills J. went on to identify, at paras. 3 and 4, the equitable considerations a court typically considers in deciding the appropriate order under s. 53(2):

3 Equitable considerations that are normally examined include:

  1. the amount outstanding under the lease agreement;
  2. the amount of continuing payments required pursuant to the agreement;
  3. whether the lease agreement has expired;
  4. whether the lease agreement includes an option to purchase the equipment at a determinable price;
  5. the payment history of the farmer, including the date of and amount of the last payment made;
  6. the fair market value of the equipment;
  7. the time of year the application is made in relation to the nature of the equipment for which possession is sought (for example, equitable considerations are stronger in favour of a farmer who seeks to retain possession of a combine for the purpose of an immediate harvest as opposed to retaining possession after harvest is completed);
  8. the time of year for which sales of the farm equipment would normally be held;
  9. the prospects the farmer has for becoming current under the lease agreement; and/or
  10. factors outside of the control of the farmer that may have led to the default occurring (for example, serious personal injury or death of a principal member of the farming operation, or catastrophes impacting upon the profitability of the farm).

4 There are likely other considerations that will arise. The point of the previous comment is to emphasize the wide type of considerations the Court is entitled to view in coming to a just determination.

Elson, J also referred to the decision of MFI Ag Services Ltd. v Farm Credit Canada, [2015] S.J. No. 643, 2015 SKQB 379 before concluding, at para. 27 to 29 as follows:

[27]The authorities cited above illustrate that a "just" order under s. 53 is one that strikes a fair balance between the interest of farmers, who seek temporary relief from their default on secured debts, and the interests of the creditors who hold the security on those debts. While s. 53 permits courts to make orders that depart from the formal arrangements between farmers and creditors, it does not demand that relief be granted whenever requested.Moreover, the court's power under s. 53 does not extend to making orders that are manifestly unfair to the interests of secured creditors.

[28] The relief available under s. 53 is, at most, temporary. Where relief is granted, it is designed to serve as a stopgap measure to accommodate a short term hardship or inability to pay. The indebtedness, as well as the interest that secures it, continues. With it there continues the expectation that, with or without relief, the debt will be paid or the secured creditor will act on its security. In my view, this analysis is consistent with the non-exhaustive list of equitable considerations enumerated in Bartko. Where an application has been made, the court inquires into these considerations, determine the circumstances that led to the default and then assesses whether the evidence presents a fair and realistic plan for satisfaction of the debt without undue prejudice to the interests of the secured creditor.

[29] In my view, none of the applicants' proposals present a realistic plan for the payment of this debt. Dealing first with their farm operations, there is no meaningful evidence that, in 2018, the applications will be able to farm any more land than the single quarter section that they still possess. Despite their expression of hope in this respect, there is no evidence that this hope would be any more realizable in 2018 than the hope that went unrealized in 2017.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions