Canada: New Private M&A Deal Points: Details You Need To Know!

The latest edition of the American Bar Association's (ABA) Private Target M&A Deal Points Study (US Study), based on deals signed in 2016 and the first half of 2017, was released in late December 2017. This article highlights some of the new topics reported by the US Study as well as some of the more traditional topics. Where relevant, this article also compares deal points to the prior edition of the US Study based on transaction completed in 2014 (Prior US Study) and the last Canadian version: the Canadian Private Target M&A Deal Points Study (Canadian Study), issued in December 2016 and based on deals signed in 2014 and 2015.

Unless otherwise expressed, this article does not purport to reflect the personal views or experiences of the authors in negotiating the highlighted deal points or, in any case, of other M&A practitioners at Stikeman Elliott.

New Topics

The US Study includes two new topics (i) buyer power, and (ii) representation and warranty insurance (RWI).

The Buyer's Power

The US Study reports on the buyer's power ratio (BPR) which is determined by dividing the market capitalization of the buyer by the purchase price. Last year, the ABA and SRS Acquiom released a study entitled Impact of "Buyer Power Ratio" on Selected M&A Deal Terms in Acquisitions of Privately Held Target Companies by Publicly Traded Buyers (BPR Study) which demonstrated that BPR levels correlate with the level of the buyer favorable deal points (and therefore, negotiation powers). For example, a BPR of less than 10 generally correlates will more seller-favorable terms.

For the sample included in the US Study the average BPR was 12.63 and the median was 8.72, leading to an expectation of more seller favorable trends in deal points. The US Study does not look how individual deal points are impacted by BPR. This data will become more relevant in future versions of the US Study when it can compared with new BPR numbers.

Representation and Warranty Insurance

While RWI has been available in the Canada and the U.S. since the 1990s, it has really gained momentum in the last 5 years and is now commonly seen in M&A transactions on both sides of the border. Indeed, depending on facts and circumstances, RWI can be a great tactical tool to break a stalemate in negotiations, distinguish a buyer in an auction process and ultimately conclude a transaction. The US Study notes that 29% of deals referenced RWI. Of note, the buyers in the US Study are public companies, meaning mostly strategic buyers, and our practice shows that the use of RWI is more prevalent in deals involving private equity players.

Deal Points Regarding the Policy

There are two types of RWI policies (i) buy-side policies which are purchased for the buyer with the buyer as the main insured and intended to reimburse a buyer for losses attributable to breaches of a seller's representations and warranties; and (ii) sell-side policies which are purchased for the seller with the seller as the main insured and intended to reimburse a seller for losses payable to a buyer for breaches of a seller's representations and warranties. In both types of policies, "known" breaches of representations and warranties, based on the actual knowledge of the deal team, are excluded from the coverage. Also buy-side policies will typically cover the seller's fraud if unknown to the deal team, while sell-side policies will not cover the seller's fraud. Not surprisingly, of the deals that included a reference to RWI, 93% used buy-side policies. Regardless, of the type of policy, it can be paid by any party. According to the US Study, the policy was most often paid by buyer (45%) or both parties (43%).

Another key aspect of RWI is the retention amount (or the deductible under the RWI policy). In Canada, the retention is usually 1% of the target's enterprise value. Not surprisingly, in 88% of the deals that included a reference to RWI, the size of retention was not determinable from the purchase agreement as this normally noted in the policy itself.

Finally, in deals with a delay between signing and closing, a RWI policy can be bound either at signing or at closing. If bound at signing, the policy typically covers breaches that are discovered between the signing and closing and, if bound at closing, it typically only covers breaches that are discovered after closing on the basis that the knowledge of breaches prior to the coming into force of the policy are not covered. In 48 % of the deals that included a reference to RWI, RWI was expressly bound at signing.

Impact of RWI on Deal Points Found in a Purchase Agreement

Covenants and Closing Conditions

RWI has an impact on covenants and closing conditions. If not bound at signing, the binding of a RWI policy at closing will typically be included as a condition to closing in favor of the buyer, this was the case in 50% of the deals that included a reference to RWI. In addition, 58% included some pre-closing covenants related to RWI.


The US study reports on how RWI impacts financial limitations on indemnification. Two common financial limitations on indemnification are indemnity baskets and caps. Indemnity baskets establish the minimum dollar amount of certain types of losses a party must suffer under the purchase agreement before the other party is obliged to indemnify it. Baskets can be (i) deductible: once a party's losses exceed the amount specified in the agreement, the other party has to indemnify only for losses exceeding the specified amount; or (ii) first dollar: once a party's losses exceed the specified amount, the other party has to indemnify for all losses starting from dollar one. A basket may also be a "combination" of a deductible and a first dollar. The US Study shows that RWI does not necessarily impact the type of basket, but does impact its size. In terms of size, the reference to RWI in an agreement generally seems to result in a smaller basket size.

US Study US Study - RWI Split Canadian Study
Deductible Basket 70% 48% without reference to RWI 22% with reference to RWI 41%
First Dollar Basket 26% 22% without reference to RWI 4% with reference to RWI 45%
Combination Basket 2% All without reference to RWI 5%
All Baskets (other than combination):
  • Mean as % of Transaction Value
0.79% 0.77% without reference to RWI 0.84% with reference to RWI 1.46% and, if outliers are excluded, 0.98%.
  • Median as % of Transaction Value
0.59% 0.66% without reference to RWI 0.50% with reference to RWI 0.80%
  • Mean as % of Transaction Value
0.59% 0.64% without reference to RWI 0.94% with reference to RWI 2.10 and, if outliers are excluded, 1.15%.
  • Median as % of Transaction Value
0.58% 0.63% without reference to RWI 0.50% with reference to RWI 1%
Dollar One:
  • Mean as % of Transaction Value
0.81% 1.02% without reference to RWI 0.36% with reference to RWI 0.81%
  • Median as % of Transaction Value
0.53 0.63% without reference to RWI 0.32% with reference to RWI 0.53%
Basket as % of Transaction Value:      
  • Greater than 1%:
10% 4% without reference to RWI 1% with reference to RWI 28%
  • 1% to 0.5%:
38% 42% without reference to RWI 8% with reference to RWI 39%
  • 0.5% or less:
52% 29% without reference to RWI 17% with reference to RWI 33%

Purchase agreements may also contain a cap on certain indemnification obligations which sets out the maximum amount a party can recover for losses. The US Study shows that caps are greatly impacted by RWI: the use of RWI correlates with lower caps. In fact, the mean cap with RWI was less than half of that without reference to RWI and the median cap with RWI was a tenth of that without RWI. Of note, in RWI-deals, a common risk-sharing construct with respect to breaches of representations and warranties which has been observed is to split the equivalent of the retention amount under the RWI between seller and buyer, with the basket being buyer's exposure and the cap, seller's exposure.

  US Study US Study - RWI Split Canadian Study
Mean Cap as a % of T.V. 13.2% 14.7% without reference to RWI 5.77% with reference to RWI 44%
Median Cap as % of T.V. 10% 10% without reference to RWI 1% with reference to RWI 30%

Notable Shifts in Traditional Topics

Escrows for Purchase Price Adjustments

The use of purchase price adjustments remains fairly comparable with that reported in the Prior US Study. There is a notable increase in the percentage of deals with a purchase price adjustment that have a separate escrow account for the adjustment (from 25% in the Prior US Study to 45% in the US Study). Furthermore, for the first time, the US Study reports on whether the escrow is the sole source of recovery for the adjustment: it is the sole source in only 11% of deals with a separate escrow for price adjustments.

  US Study Prior US Study Canadian Study
Deals with Post Closing Purchase Price Adjustments 86% 86% 72%
Separate Escrow Included 45% 25% 27%
If Separate Escrow, Sole Source for Adjustment Recovery 11% n/a n/a

Material Adverse Effect

Pervasive qualifiers, such as knowledge and material adverse effect (MAE), serve as a risk allocation tool. The use of MAE in the surveyed deals remains fairly comparable with that reported in the prior US Study and the Canadian Study. What has changed compared to the Prior US Study is the increase in the use of certain carve outs to MAE in and the US Study: namely, changes in political conditions, force majeure, acts of God and natural disasters as well as failure to meet projections.

  US Study Prior US Study Canadian Study
MAE Included 99% 99% 87%
Includes Carveouts 89% 91% 77%
If Includes Carveouts, Type of Carveout:      
  • Changes in Political Conditions
68% Unknown but below 50% n/a
  • Force Majeure, Acts of God, Natural Disasters
66% Unknown but below 50% n/a
  • Failure to Meet Projections
58% Unknown but below 50% n/a

Indemnification Escrow

Most deals in the US Study continue to include an indemnification escrow. However the size of the escrow as percentage of transaction value decreased with roughly a third of the deals with an escrow having an escrow of 3% or less of the transaction value (as opposed to roughly 10% of the deals in the Prior US Study). The shift, which may be at least in part attributable to the greater use of RWI, effectively lowered both the mean and median escrow as a percentage of transaction value.

  US Study Prior US Study Canadian study
No Escrow/Holdback 24% 21% 57%
Escrow as a Percentage of Transaction Value:      
  • 3% or Less
32% 11% 18%
  • Greater than 3% to 5%
12% 18% 18%
  • Greater than 5% but Less than 10%
28% 32% 51%
  • 10%
12% 9% 18%
  • Greater than 10% to 15%
15% 23% 3%
  • Greater than 15%
2% 8% 9%
Statistical Summary:      
  • Mean
6.66% 9.14% 8.3%
  • Median
7.00% 7.50% 7.3%

Concluding Remarks

The Studies also include interesting on other deal points. For further details on these and other deal points, please consult the Studies, which are all available to ABA members on the Markets Trends Subcommittee of the American Bar Association's Mergers and Acquisitions Committee website.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions