Canada: Protecting What Strict Laws Cannot: Supreme Court Uses Equitable Doctrine To Enforce A Promise Made Before The Promisor Obtained An Interest In The Property

Last Updated: February 19 2018
Article by Morgan Westgate

In what appears to be the last judgment written by Chief Justice McLachlin before her retirement this past weekend, the Supreme Court of Canada considered the scope of the doctrine of proprietary estoppel. The Cowper-Smith v. Morgan decision considers proprietary estoppel in the context of an acrimonious estate dispute, and may have significant implications in respect of equitable proprietary claims.

The Factual Context: As early as 1992 a couple, (Elizabeth and Arthur) made it clear that after their deaths their property would be divided equally among their three children (Max, Nathan and Gloria). After Arthur’s death, however, there was breakdown in relations among the children, and Elizabeth’s estate planning changed drastically. She transferred title to her home and all investments into joint ownership with Gloria, and executed a Declaration of Trust (the “Trust”) that Gloria would be entitled “absolutely” to those assets upon her death.

Nathan and Max did not know about the Trust, but eventually learned that Gloria’s name was on title to the home. Gloria told her brothers that the arrangement was solely to simplify Elizabeth’s estate administration, and that both Max and Nathan would still receive their one third share. Following their mother’s death, however, Gloria sought to rely on the Trust to put the house up for sale despite the fact that her brother was living there.

The litigation that ensued considered (among other things) whether the doctrine of proprietary estoppel bound Gloria to her word. The trial judge allowed the brothers’ claim. The British Columbia Court of Appeal overturned that decision, however, holding that proprietary estoppel could not arise because Gloria had no interest in the property when her promise was made (as the home still belonged to their mother). Max appealed.

Proprietary Estoppel Requires an Equity: To establish proprietary estoppel, one must first establish an equity of the kind proprietary estoppel protects. An equity arises when: (i) a representation or assurance is made to the claimant, on the basis of which the claimant expects that he will enjoy some right or benefit over property; (ii) the claimant reasonably relies on that expectation by doing or refraining from doing something; and (iii) the claimant suffers a detriment as a result of his reasonable reliance, such that it would be unfair or unjust for the party responsible for the representation or assurance to go back on her word.

What if the Promisor Does not have Interest in the Property at the Time of Promise? The Supreme Court held in Cowper-Smith that an equity arises when the claimant reasonably relies on the representation to his detriment that he will enjoy a right or benefit over property, whether or not the promisor owns an interest in the property at the time of the claimant’s reliance. Proprietary estoppel will then operate to make the representation binding (and thereby give effect to the equity) when the representing party obtains possession of an interest in the property sufficient to fulfill the claimant’s expectations.

In other words, proprietary estoppel need not arise at the same time as the underlying equity. Proprietary estoppel may not protect the equity immediately, or even for a significant period of time, but may take effect after the representation is made. Likewise, if the representing party never acquires an interest in the property, proprietary estoppel may not arise at all.

In this case, an equity arose in Max’s favour when he reasonably relied to his detriment on his sister’s assurance that he would receive his share in the home. That equity could not have been protected by proprietary estoppel at the time it arose (because Gloria did not then own an interest in the property), but the proprietary estoppel attached to Gloria’s interest in the house as soon as she received it from her mother’s estate.

Reliance can be Reasonable Even Where the Promisor Has No Interest in the Property: In making this determination, the Supreme Court rejected Gloria’s argument that reliance on a representation could never be reasonable where the person making the representation does not, at time of representation, own an interest in the property. Adopting such a bright line rule would, according to the Court, defeat a fundamental purpose of equity: to temper the harsh effect of strict legal rules.

Rather, reasonableness is circumstantial. The Court held that it may be that the representing party has such a speculative interest in the property that the claimant’s reliance could not have been reasonable; however, whether this is so will depend on the context.

The Remedy: Where a claimant has established proprietary estoppel, a court has “considerable discretion in crafting a remedy that suits the circumstances.” However, a claimant is entitled only to the “minimum relief necessary” to satisfy the equity, and the remedy must be proportional to the detriment actually suffered. A claimant can never obtain more than he originally expected.

Although unanimous in the proprietary estoppel decision in Cowper-Smith, the Court divided on the question of remedy. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice McLachlin ordered an in specie distribution of the estate entitling Max to purchase his sister’s interest in the house. Although a dissenting opinion expressed concern over making an award contrary to Elizabeth’s intent to vest in Gloria absolute discretion to administer the estate, the majority held that the Court was entitled to interfere with Gloria’s discretion given that her duties as executor were in conflict with her duties as beneficiary and that she had acted in bad faith (and would likely continue to do so in the future).

The Takeaway: Following the Cowper-Smith decision, it is now clear that proprietary estoppel may arise even where the promisor did not have an interest in the property at issue at the time of promise. But the decision leaves a number of questions unanswered: Can proprietary estoppel attach to an interest in property other than land? Must an equity justifying the operation of proprietary estoppel be proprietary (as opposed to personal) in nature? The majority declined to answer these questions.

Further, the Cowper-Smith decision exemplifies the tension between, on the one hand, flexible equitable relief to protect what strict application of rules cannot, and clarity of law on the other. Although the Court held that “flexibility must not come at the expense of clarity and predictability”, the Cowper-Smith decision illustrates the potential for just that: by protecting Max’s reasonable and detrimental reliance on Gloria’s assurances, the Court has cautioned that promisors may be held to their promises even where the subject-matter of such promises does not yet exist.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions