Canada: Modern Treaties and the Duty to Consult: "Little Salmon" Revisited

Last Updated: September 29 2008
Article by Kevin O'Callaghan

On August 15, 2008 the Yukon Court of Appeal issued its decision in Little Salmon/Carmacks First Nation v. Yukon (Minister of Energy, Mines and Resources), 2008 YKCA 13. This is the first appellate level court to consider the duty to consult described by the Supreme Court of Canada in Haida and Mikisew in the context of a modern treaty. The Court's finding that the duty to consult applies in the context of modern treaties means that there is almost no place left in Canada where the Crown does not have the duty to consult – from Nova Scotia to British Columbia and north to Nunavut.

At issue was a decision to transfer lands located within Traditional Territory, but outside of the Settlement Lands under the treaty. The treaty did not provide for such decisions or set out the required level of consultation.

Little Salmon/Carmacks First Nation (the "Little Salmon") applied for judicial review of a decision by the Director of the Agriculture Branch (the "Director") to grant an agricultural land application in the Traditional Territory of the Little Salmon and the trapline of Johnny Sam, a member. The Little Salmon sought to set aside the Director's decision for failing to comply with the legal duty to consult and, where possible, to accommodate the Little Salmon, a duty based upon the honour of the Crown. The Little Salmon/Carmacks First Nation Final Agreement (the "Final Agreement") with Canada and Yukon was signed on July 21, 1997. The Supreme Court of the Yukon held that a duty to consult existed and was not met by Yukon, and so quashed the decision.

Madam Justice Kirkpatrick, for the Court of Appeal, held that although a duty to consult did survive the execution of a modern treaty, that duty was met by Yukon in the course of the process that led to the decision to transfer these lands.


The Final Agreement is a modern comprehensive land claim agreement. The Little Salmon signed its Final Agreement and its Self-Government Agreement after an intensive ratification process. The 369-page Final Agreement is described as comprehensive because it is much more than a land and money exchange. The Final Agreement includes the following provisions:

Whereas Clauses

. . . the parties to this Agreement wish to achieve certainty with respect to the ownership and use of lands and other resources of the Little Salmon/Carmacks First Nation Traditional Territory;


2.5.0 . . . cede, release and surrender to Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, all their aboriginal claims, rights, titles, and interests in and to . . .

Harvesting Rights

16.4.2 Yukon Indian People shall have the right to harvest for Subsistence within their Traditional Territory, and with the consent of another Yukon First Nation in that Yukon First Nation's Traditional Territory, all species of Fish and Wildlife for themselves and their families at all seasons of the year and in any numbers on Settlement Land and on Crown Land to which they have a right of access pursuant to 6.2.0, subject only to limitations prescribed pursuant to Settlement Agreements.

The decision in question was made pursuant to the 1991 Yukon Agriculture Policy. Paulsen submitted an application to the Director for an agricultural land grant of some 65 hectares, about 40 km north of Carmacks, near McGregor Creek, between the North Klondike Highway and the Yukon River (the "Application").

An applicant must first prepare a Farm Development Plan, which is subjected to a technical review. Applications then proceed to the Land Application Review Committee ("LARC"). Its membership includes the Yukon government, Yukon First Nations, Municipal and Federal Government agencies. First Nation Governments participate as members of LARC when land applications may affect land management "within their respective traditional territories".

The Application was for land within Trapline #143 and the Little Salmon's Traditional Territory and amounts to one-half of one percent of the trapline area. It is adjacent to the trapline cabin of Sam and Little Salmon Settlement Lands are also located in the vicinity. The Traditional Territory of the Little Salmon is an area where the members of the First Nation continue to exercise subsistence harvesting rights.

The express policy of the Yukon government with respect to the obligation to consult is that "[i]n the case of dispositions of Crown land in the Traditional Territory of a First Nation with Final and Self-Government Agreements, there is no legal obligation to consult with the First Nation."1

The Director posted a Public Notice of the Application on March 26, 2004, inviting written comments within 20 days. On April 28, 2004, the Director also notified the Little Salmon directly of the application to LARC, provided an information package and invited comments within 30 days. The Little Salmon wrote to the Branch almost 90 days later, on July 27, 2004, stating that they opposed the application due to its effects on trapping, its impact on two parcels of the Settlement Lands, and the existence of heritage and archaeological sites in areas proposed for timber harvesting, including an historic Little Salmon trail.

The Court also noted that in 2004 the Little Salmon had met with the Yukon government and expressed the view that their interests were not being seriously considered in the context of agricultural land applications. Branch officials said that they consult on such applications through LARC, that they were not required to formally consult the Little Salmon on such matters under the Land Claims Agreement.

The Little Salmon, therefore, brought this judicial review.

The Decision

The Court held that the central issue in this appeal is whether a duty to consult and, where possible, accommodate First Nations' concerns and interests applies in the context of a modern comprehensive land claims agreement.

Yukon argued that there was no such duty, but that if such a duty existed, it was met by the process followed under the circumstances.

The Court reviewed the facts and the legal foundation for the duty to consult in Haida, Taku and Mikisew and then rejected the argument that some distinction could be drawn between modern and ancient treaties, concluding that: "The inescapable conclusion to be drawn from the reasons of [the SCC in Mikisew] is that the honour of the Crown and a duty to consult and accommodate applies in the interpretation of treaties and exists independent of treaties."2 The "modern nature" of more recent treaties, however, would be relevant to the determination of the extent of consultation required.3

Yukon and Canada argued that since the Final Agreement did not require consultation in the context of a transfer of lands, and did provide for consultation elsewhere, then no consultation was required in the context of such a transfer of lands. The Court rejected this argument, as the terms of the Final Agreement are silent on both the ability of Yukon to transfer land and on whether consultation is required.

The core of the Court's decision is well summed up in para. 90:

[90] ...the honour of the Crown and the correlative duty to consult are constitutional duties for the reasons expressed in Haida Nation, Taku River Tlingit, and Mikisew. They exist outside and infuse the treaty and govern Yukon's dealings with Yukon First Nations. In my opinion, the duty to consult does apply to the interpretation and implementation of the Final Agreement and is not precluded from application by the terms of the treaty. In my view, such a finding does not render the Final Agreement uncertain or open to unending renegotiation. It simply means that Yukon must be cognizant of potential adverse impacts on First Nations' treaty rights when Yukon proposes to dispose of Crown lands, and, when treaty rights may be affected, Yukon must seek consultation with First Nations. The degree of consultation will be a function of potential impact.

Finding that there was no language in the Final Agreement to preclude the duty to consult from applying to the decision to transfer the lands, the Court held that the duty applied as a result of the honour of the Crown.

The Court held that the submissions of Yukon and Canada suggested that the Final Agreement was the end to the process of reconciliation that consultation was meant to foster. The Court rejected this idea and held that reconciliation does not end with the signing of a treaty, adopting Mr. Justice Binnie's words from Mikisiew: "[t]reaty making is an important stage in the long process of reconciliation, but it is only a stage."4 Madam Justice Kirkpatrick added that, "Reconciliation will inevitably be a long and sometimes difficult process, which will require the good faith efforts of all levels of government – federal, territorial, and First Nations."5

After concluding that the duty to consult did apply to modern treaties, the Court examined whether that duty was met by Yukon in this case. Following Mikisew, the Court held that the duty to consult, in such a context where a treaty right might (not would) be affected, was at the low end of the spectrum.6 The Court reviewed the process undertaken by the LARC in the context of a general denial that there was a duty to consult, and held that: "LARC identified and considered Little Salmon/Carmacks' concerns and it cannot reasonably be said that the meeting was simply an exercise in allowing the First Nation to "blow off steam" while permitting Yukon to "run roughshod" over the First Nation's treaty rights."7 Given the low level of consultation required, the Court held that the duty to consult was met.

As a side-bar, the Court also dealt with the decision of the lower court that Sam as an individual was owed a duty to consult, finding that: "the duty to consult, as an adjunct to the implementation of the Final Agreement, can only apply between the parties to the agreement – Yukon and the First Nation – and not to individual members of the First Nation."8

In the result, the Yukon Court of Appeal set aside the order of the Supreme Court of the Yukon which had quashed the decision to transfer these lands.


Although many believed that the modern treaties, made after the Constitution Act, 1982 and in light of the multitude of cases from the Supreme Court of Canada dealing with the need for consultation, were drafted such that all processes of consultation and accommodation, were dealt with directly in the treaties, this case makes clear that the honour of the Crown and the duty to consult "exist outside and infuse" all modern treaties, unless they specifically say otherwise. Although leave to appeal from this decision is likely to be sought, this is very likely to become an issue at the treaty tables presently underway as the Crown seeks greater certainty.

The concept of the duty to consult originally was thought to apply only in areas without treaties, as was the case in the Haida decision. The Supreme Court of Canada clarified in Mikisew that the duty to consult also applied in the interpretation of ancient treaties. This decision clarifies that the duty to consult applies in respect of land subject to any treaty. As a result there is no part of Canada that is not subject to the duty to consult with, and were necessary accommodate, First Nations, Inuit or Métis.


1 at para 20

2 Little Salmon, YCA, para 67

3 Little Salmon, YCA, para 71

4 Mikisew SCC, para. 54

5 Little Salmon YCA, para 91

6 Little Salmon YCA, para. 101

7 Little Salmon YCA, para. 114

8 Little Salmon YCA, para. 116

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions