Canada: Enforceability Of A Security Deposit Against A Trustee In The Event Of The Bankruptcy Of A Commercial Tenant

When negotiating a commercial lease, it is in the landlord's best interest to require that securities be provided by the prospective tenant in order to protect the landlord against the tenant's failure to perform its obligations under the lease. A frequent cause of a tenant's inability to perform its obligations is its insolvency or financial difficulties. It is important for landlords to know that the tenant's bankruptcy, or the filing by the tenant of a notice of intention or a proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (the "BIA") can have the effect of negating the protection afforded by certain forms of security.

This article concerns in particular a security frequently required by landlords, namely the remittance by the tenant of a sum of money that may be equivalent to one or more monthly instalments of rent, which is sometimes referred to in leases either as a "security deposit", or as "prepaid rent". We will see that in the event of the tenant's bankruptcy, notice of intention or proposal under the BIA, depending on the wording of the clause in the lease dealing with the deposit, the landlord may be obliged to remit the amount of the deposit to the trustee, even if the tenant is indebted towards the landlord.

The problem stems from the fact that in the case of a bankruptcy, a notice of intention or a proposal under the BIA, the hypothecs granted by the tenant in favour of a commercial landlord are not enforceable against the trustee.

Indeed, the Court of Appeal of Quebec in the Ocean Drive1 decision concluded that a landlord, who is granted a preferred creditor status by Section 136(1)(f) of the BIA, must necessarily be collocated at the rank provided by said section, and cannot benefit from the priority provided in the Civil Code of Québec ("CCQ") because of the doctrine of paramountcy which establishes that federal law prevails over provincial law when there is a conflict between them:

[TRANSLATION] "It must be concluded that the status of secured creditor claimed by the landlord on account of its conventional movable hypothec would change the order of priority assigned to landlords by Section 136(1)(f) of the BIA, by improving the priority of rank of the preferred claim expressly covered by that section. Consequently, the provisions of the Civil Code on prior claims and hypothecs that would otherwise affect the order of priority under the BIA by giving the landlord the status of a "secured creditor" are inapplicable in a bankruptcy situation."2

Consequently, in the event of a tenant's bankruptcy, notice of intention or proposal under the BIA, the landlord cannot enforce any hypothec it holds on the insolvent tenant's assets, and must content itself with the priority of rank provided by Section 136(1)(f) of the BIA, which priority is nevertheless subject to the rights of secured creditors and is limited to the amount realized from the assets in the leased premises.

In the province of Quebec, a deposit granted by a tenant to guarantee the performance of its obligations under the lease constitutes a movable hypothec with delivery, also known as a "pledge".

In order to be enforceable against third parties, a pledge does not need to be published in the Register of Personal and Movable Real Rights. A pledge is constituted by physical delivery of the property or title to the creditor or, if the property is already under the detention of the creditor, by the latter continuing such detention, with the grantor's consent, in order to secure the creditor's claim3. Thus, the physical delivery of movable property to the creditor and the continued detention of said property by the latter are sufficient to ensure the publicity of the pledge and its enforceability to third parties4.

We note, however, that some uncertainty exists with regard to a pledge granted on incorporeal (intangible) property as it applies under Article 2702 CCQ since its amendment in 2009. Article 2702 CCQ now requires the "physical" delivery of the property charged by a movable hypothec with delivery. If a claim is incorporeal (intangible), can it be physically delivered? The Court of Appeal addressed this uncertainty in the Basille5 case in 2014, noting that some authors are of the view that since the 2009 amendment of Article 2702 CCQ, pledging a sum of money is no longer possible because of the incorporeal (intangible) nature of money6. However, the Court went on to apply the decision in the Brouillette-Paradis7 case, which concerned the substitution of a legal hypothec, in which the Court of Appeal accepted that [TRANSLATION] "the judicial offer to assign, as security, the claim on monies deposited in substitution for a legal hypothec implies the constitution of a movable hypothec with delivery in favor of the holder of the legal hypothec"8.

In light of the foregoing, if a deposit remitted to a landlord constitutes a pledge, it is unenforceable against the trustee of a tenant who placed itself under the protection of the BIA. This is what the Court of Appeal decided in Expleo Global9, where the landlord sued the trustee for occupation rent. In its defence, the trustee admitted to owing the occupation rent, but was requesting the reimbursement of the deposit that the landlord received from the tenant and which the trustee maintained was a pledge. In its analysis on the characterization of the amount remitted to the landlord, the Court took into account that:

  • a certified cheque had been given to the landlord as a replacement for the irrevocable and unconditional letter of credit provided for in the lease as security for the performance of the tenant's obligations;
  • several of the exhibits, some of which were filed by the landlord, referred to this amount as a "security deposit";
  • as at the date of the bankruptcy, the landlord had not yet applied the deposit to the amounts owing by the tenant; and
  • no prior notice had been served by the landlord of its intent to realize upon its security before the bankruptcy.

Considering this evidence, the Court was of the opinion that the amount deposited with the landlord could only be considered as a movable hypothec with delivery, even if such security is of lesser value than a letter of credit. The Court added that the deposit in this case could not be considered prepaid rent. Therefore, the security constituted by the deposit was unenforceable against the trustee since the landlord had not availed itself of its right to realize said security before the bankruptcy. The Court therefore concluded that the deposit must be returned to the trustee, for the benefit of the mass of creditors.

However, if the deposit is considered as prepaid rent, it would then be enforceable against the trustee and the landlord would have the right to keep such deposit.

To determine the nature of the deposit provided, the Court must ascertain the intention of the parties to the commercial lease, taking into account the circumstances under which it was concluded, the interpretation the parties have already given it, as well as the other clauses of the lease10. Thus, particular attention must be paid to the wording of the deposit clause, to the other clauses of the lease that refer to this deposit clause, as well as to the behavior of the parties, as the case may be.

In the case of Ébénisterie Renouveau11, the Superior Court, Bankruptcy Division, had to interpret a "security deposit" clause, where the landlord was claiming rent from the trustee for its occupation of the leased premises following the tenant's bankruptcy. The trustee was contesting the claim, alleging compensation (set-off) of the occupation rent against the amount of the deposit which, the trustee argued, should be paid to it for the benefit of the mass of creditors.

The Court concluded that the parties to the lease had intended that the deposit be non-refundable and that it be applied to future rent or any other amount owing by the tenant in default, despite the fact that the said clause was entitled "security deposit". The main criterion on which the Court based its decision was the non-refundable nature of the deposit. It was actually a partial prepayment of rent which had become the property of the landlord upon payment in May 2005, well before the bankruptcy.

More recently, in the Alignvest case12, the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta had to decide whether the landlord had to pay to the trustee the amount of the deposit which had been remitted to it by the now bankrupt tenant, further to a request by a secured creditor, Alignvest. The clause for the deposit was entitled "Security Deposit/Rent Credit" and provided that the deposit was to be applied towards future rent payments, but only if the tenant was not then in default. Although the clause contained some indication of the parties' intention to consider the deposit as prepaid rent, the Court rather concluded that the deposit constituted a security deposit, as the clause provided that the amount was to be held by the landlord as security for the tenant's performance of its obligations under the lease. The Alberta Court of Appeal confirmed the decision rendered in first instance by the Court of Queen's Bench on the nature of the deposit. It also took into account the fact that the lease provided that the tenant must renew the deposit in the event that the landlord used the deposit to remedy a default by the tenant during the term, which, according to the Court, is incompatible with the notion of prepaid rent.

Considering the above decisions and in order to ensure that the amount remitted to the landlord upon the execution of a commercial lease not be considered as a movable hypothec with delivery and to ensure that it be enforceable against the trustee in the event of a bankruptcy, notice of intention or proposal under the BIA by the tenant, the lease should, in general, provide the following:

  • that the amount of the deposit constitutes prepaid rent that becomes the property of the landlord upon disbursement to the landlord at the time of execution of the lease; and
  • that the deposit is non-refundable;
  • the term "security deposit" should not be used in the lease, nor should the deposit be referred to therein as security for the performance of the tenant's obligations under the lease.

In conclusion, there are two opposing concepts: the security deposit and the prepaid rent. In the event of a dispute, the whole will be a matter of interpretation of the lease and the clause in question, taking into account the intention of the parties.


1 Restaurant Ocean Drive inc. v. Sam Levy & associés inc., 1997 CanLII 10235 (QC CA)

2 Ibid.

3 Article 2702 CCQ

4 Article 2703 CCQ

5 Basille v. 9159-1503 Québec Inc., 2014 QCCA 1653.

6 Louis Payette, Les sûretés réelles dans le Code civil du Québec, 5th edition, Cowansville, Yvon Blais, 2015, par. 965

7 Brouillette-Paradis (Paysages Paradis) v. Boisvert, 2009 QCCA 1615.

8 Ibid., par. 28.

9 Expleo Global Inc. (Trustee of), 2003 CanLII 7303 (QC CS).

10 Articles 1425 to 1432 CCQ

11 Ébénisterie Renouveau inc. (143301 Canada inc.) (Syndic de), 2009 QCCS 1454

12 Alignvest Private Debt Ltd. v. Surefire Industries Ltd, 2015 ABQB 148 (the characterization of the deposit by the Court of Queen's Bench was confirmed by the Alberta Court of Appeal in York Realty Inc v. Alignvest Private Debt Ltd, 2015 ABCA 355).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions