Canada: Fact-Checking The Canadian Government's Claims Made In Support Of The Preclearance Act, 2016

Last Updated: January 16 2018
Article by Henry Chang

Introduction

For some time now, I have warned Canadians about the dangers of Bill C-23, also known as the Preclearance Act, 2016.  Many other Canadians have expressed their concerns to the Canadian Government as well.  Even the Privacy Commissioner of Canada objected to Bill C-23 due to the lack of restrictions placed on a United States Customs and Border Protection ("USCBP") officer's ability to conduct warrantless searches of a traveler's electronic device on Canadian soil. 

Unfortunately, our voices apparently fell on deaf ears because Bill C-23 received Royal Assent on December 12, 2017.  According to the recent Press Release from Public Safety Canada, once enabling regulations are in place, Canada and the United States will begin the expansion of preclearance operations.  In other words, USCBP officers working at preclearance operations in Canada ("Preclearance Officers") will soon be in a position to exercise greatly expanded powers on Canadian soil. 

Bill C-23 will give Preclearance Officers significantly greater powers than they previously possessed under the Preclearance Act, 1999.  These expanded powers include the following (among others):

  • Unless they choose to withdraw their application for admission, travelers have a positive obligation to truthfully answer any question that is asked by a Preclearance Officer (even those that would be considered inappropriate) [Paragraph 18(2)(a)].  Under the prior Preclearance Act, 1999, a traveler was only required to answer truthfully if he or she voluntarily chose to answer the question.
  • Unless they choose to withdraw their application for admission, travelers have a positive obligation to comply with any direction given by a Preclearance Officer, in accordance with Bill C-23 [Paragraph 18(2)(c)].  This could include a direction to provide the traveler's password for their laptop or smartphone.  Under the prior Preclearance Act, 1999, travelers did not have such an obligation.
  • Failure to answer any question may now result in the traveler being charged with resisting or willfully obstructing a Preclearance Officer, which can be punished by up to two years of imprisonment [Section 38].  Although a similar offense appeared in the Preclearance Act, 1999, it also made clear that the mere refusal to answer a question asked by a preclearance officer was not sufficient, on its own, to support such a charge; this language no longer appears in Bill C-23. 
  • Travelers who choose to withdraw their application for admission have a continuing obligation to truthfully answer any question asked by a Preclearance Officer, for the purpose of identifying the traveler or determining their reason for withdrawing [Subsection 30(a)].  Under the Preclearance Act, 1999, travelers were free to withdraw their application for admission and leave at any time.  However, Preclearance Officers may now detain travelers who have withdrawn their application for admission until they provide a satisfactory answer regarding the reason for their withdrawal. 
  • Preclearance Officers have the authority to conduct strip searches in the following limited circumstances: (a) where the Canada Border Services Agency ("CBSA") declines to perform the strip search; (b) CBSA informs them that they are not able to perform the search within a reasonable time; or (c) CBSA agrees to conduct the strip search within a specific period but no officer arrives within that period [Subsection 22(4)].

Given the controversy surrounding this new legislation, I have decided to fact-check some of the claims made by the Canadian Government in support of Bill C-23.

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms (and Other Canadian Laws) will Protect Canadians [FALSE]

As the media has reported, Prime Minister Trudeau personally defended Bill C-23 by claiming that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the "Charter") would protect Canadians.  He stated the following:

When you're doing preclearance in Canada, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and Canadian laws are in place, so there is extra protection when Canadians go through American customs in Canada because they are protected by the Charter on Canadian soil.

A similar statement appears on the website of Ralph Goodale, Minister of Public Safety.  To support his claim, specific reference is made to Subsection 11(1) of Bill C-23, which states the following:

A preclearance officer must exercise their powers and perform their duties and functions under this Act in accordance with Canadian law, including the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Canadian Bill of Rights and the Canadian Human Rights Act.

Clearly, the language of Subsection 11(1) suggests that Preclearance Officers located in Canada will be required to act in accordance with the Charter.  However, it is unlikely that Charter rights could ever be enforced against USCBP officers or the United States Government. 

The language of Subsection 39(2) makes clear that no action or civil proceeding may be brought against a Preclearance Officer in respect of anything that is done or omitted in the exercise of their powers or the performance of their duties and functions under Bill C-23.  Subsection 39(1) also makes clear that such actions or civil proceedings must instead be brought against the United States directly and only if the United States is not immune under the State Immunity Act

The State Immunity Act provides that, unless it consents, a foreign state is immune from the jurisdiction of any Canadian court except where the proceedings relate to: (a) any death or personal or bodily injury, or (b) any damage to or loss of property that occurs in Canada.  As a result, civil proceedings based on a preclearance officer's alleged violation of Canadian law will be severely limited.

Although Canadians would still be able to commence civil proceedings against the United States Government if the conduct of a Preclearance Officer resulted in death, personal/bodily injury, or damage/loss to property, there are many instances where the Charter could be violated and where no recourse would be available.  For example, the United States would be protected against a Charter violation involving a warrantless search of a traveler's electronic device or discrimination based on race, religion, country of origin, or sexual orientation. 

When the Privacy Commissioner of Canada testified before the Senate Standing Committee on National Security and Defence (the "Senate Committee") on Bill C-23, he said essentially the same thing:

Cabinet members, including the Prime Minister and the Minister of Public Safety, have sought to reassure Canadians by saying Canadian law, including the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, will apply to US officers as they perform their duties and exercise their powers in pre-clearance facilities (section 11 of Bill C-23).  However, the principle of state immunity as enacted by the State Immunity Act, 1985 would appear to make the protections of section 11 of Bill C-23 hollow, as these protections could not be enforced in a court of law, except in circumstances largely irrelevant to the present discussion.

Even criminal conduct by a Preclearance Officer may not be protected by Canadian law.  Section 62 amends the Canadian Criminal Code so that, if a Preclearance Officer is charged with a criminal offense (for example, sexually assaulting a traveller), the United States Government may give notice of its intention to exercise primary criminal jurisdiction over the matter.  If this occurs, any Canadian proceeding against the preclearance officer will be stayed and the alleged victim must rely on the U.S. criminal justice system for relief.

Bill C-23 Will Offer Better Protection [FALSE]

As the media has reported, Prime Minister Trudeau justified Bill C-23 by claiming that it would offer better protections to Canadians.  He stated the following:

If we didn't have preclearance in Canada, people would be passing customs in the United States, and in the United States American laws dominate and control the behaviour of people in border crossings

The Prime Minister is correct when he says that USCBP officers along the Canada-U.S. land border have greater powers to search, question, and detain travelers; this is true because they are located on U.S. soil.  However, this does not justify giving more of these same powers to Preclearance Officers in Canada.

The Prime Minister's claim would only make sense if Canada did not already have preclearance operations in Canada or if the Canadian Government's failure to pass Bill C-23 would result in the closure of all existing preclearance operations in Canada.  The fact is that U.S. preclearance already takes place in most major airports in Canada (Calgary, Edmonton, Halifax, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto, Vancouver, and Winnipeg) without Preclearance Officers possessing the expanded powers contemplated by Bill C-23.  The United States also did not indicate an intention to close its existing preclearance operations if Bill C-23 did not pass. 

The Preclearance Act, 1999 had already established a successful frame work for the preclearance of U.S.-bound travelers in Canada.  It gave Preclearance Officers sufficient authority to perform their duties while also protecting the rights of Canadians.  The enactment of Bill C-23 unnecessarily expands the powers of Preclearance Officers, which offers far worse (not better) protection to Canadians.

The New Powers Will Rarely Be Used [FALSE]

As the media has reported, when speaking to the Senate Committee, Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale claimed that the expanded powers granted to Preclearance Officers would rarely be used.  Unfortunately, based on what often occurs along the Canada-U.S. border, where USCBP officers already have these expanded powers, the risk of abuse is certainly a significant one. 

The media have reported on instances of Canadians being questioned more aggressively, or being detained/denied due to their country of origin or sexual orientation.  If Preclearance Officers in Canada are given greater powers approaching those that USCBP officers already possess at the land ports of entry, they are more likely to act in the same manner, especially if aggrieved travelers have no legal recourse against such conduct. 

It is true that some new powers, such as the authority to conduct strip searches in certain circumstances, may not be exercised frequently.  However, other powers such as the ability to detain a traveler who has already withdrawn his or her application for admission, until they answer questions regarding their reason for their withdrawal, could be frequently utilized.  Preclearance Officers could also frequently utilize the threat of criminal prosecution under Section 38 in order to compel travelers to respond to questions or to turn over their smartphone passwords. 

Why did the Canadian Government Make These Misleading Claims?

Clearly, the Canadian Government made the above claims because it wanted Bill C-23 to become law.  There is no doubt that Bill C-23 will result in the expansion of U.S. preclearance operations to additional Canadian Airports (such as Billy Bishop Airport in Toronto) and to other modes of travel (i.e. land, rail, and marine); this is clearly a significant benefit for Canada.  However, one wonders if the price that Canada paid was just too high. 

Originally published in Blaneys on Immigration: January 2018

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Henry Chang
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions