Canada: Top Canadian Insurance Rulings From 2017

Last Updated: December 27 2017
Article by Laurent Durocher-Dumais, Tahsin Najam and Samuel Robichon

In 2017, there were a number of Canadian court rulings that will have an impact on the landscape of insurance litigation in the years ahead. Here is a run through of some of those key decisions, and a few lessons insurers can draw from them.

1. Sabean v. Portage La Prairie Mutual Insurance Co., 2017 SCC 7

In this landmark case, the Supreme Court of Canada held that future Canada Pension Plan (CPP) benefits couldn't be deducted from the amount an insurer must pay out under a standard form contract that indemnifies insureds for any shortfall in the payment of a judgment for damages against an underinsured person who committed a tort. The insurer was arguing that its policy allowed amounts recoverable under "any policy of insurance providing disability benefits" to be deducted from any amount payable by the insurer. It took the position that CPP benefits constituted a "policy of insurance." But an insurer cannot rely on its specialized knowledge of jurisprudence to advance an interpretation that goes beyond the clear words of the policy, the Supreme Court ruled. An average person applying for additional insurance coverage would understand a "policy of insurance" to mean an optional, private insurance contract and not a mandatory statutory scheme such as the CPP.

2. Desjardins Financial Security Life Assurance Company v. Émond, 2017 SCC 19

A Supreme Court of Canada ruling in which the top court confirmed that the exclusion for participation of the insured to any indictable offence, in a life insurance policy, does not apply to hybrid offences – namely those the Crown may choose to prosecute either as a summary conviction offence or as an indictable offence. In Quebec, insurers may not draft a general exclusion stating that indemnity will be removed for violation by the insured of any law. However, insurers are allowed to assert broad exclusions for indictable offences. Here, the insured died while fleeing the police in a high-speed chase, which is a hybrid offence. The Supreme Court confirmed that the exclusion, as drafted, should be construed narrowly and applied only to more important offences that may be prosecuted only as indictable offences. The Quebec Court of Appeal had recognized that an insurer can exclude hybrid offences from coverage but must do so explicitly.

3.6916643 Canada inc. c. Intact, compagnie d'assurances, 2017 QCCA 660

The Quebec Court of Appeal refused to grant leave to appeal in a decision that denied indemnity to the insured of an all-risk policy. The insured was a company specialized in the sale of hessians and canopies. A client defrauded it by paying for its merchandise with a falsified certified cheque. Coverage was for "all risks of direct physical loss or damage to the property insured from any external cause". The Court of Appeal agreed with the trial court that fraud was not a covered risk under theft of merchandise considering. The insured voluntarily agreed to hand the merchandise over to the client, and so it wasn't the merchandise that was lost but rather the money that the insured received in exchange that could not be collected. Loss of money was specifically excluded from coverage.

4. Usanovic v. Penncorp Life Insurance Company, 2017 ONCA 395

The Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that an insurer's duty of good faith does not require it to notify the insured of the applicable limitation period when discontinuing insurance benefits. The insured in this case had bought disability insurance and received benefits for a 2007 accident until 2011. In 2012, he was told that he no longer qualified for benefits under the policy. He took legal action in April 2015, but the lawsuit was dismissed by summary judgment as being time-barred. The Court of Appeal declined to extend the duty of good faith to require an insurer to disclose the existence of a limitation period on grounds that such information was outside the parameters of an insurance policy. Worth noting is that both British Columbia and Alberta require insurers by law to give written notice of applicable statutory limitation periods when denying a claim. A similar requirement in Ontario would conflict with the Ontario Limitations Act by making the insurer's notice, as opposed to the discoverability of the underlying claim, the starting point of a limitation period. The case is pending determination of an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court.

5. Marsh Canada Ltd. v. Grafton Connor Property Inc., 2017 NSCA 54

In a case that involved a Halifax pub destroyed by fire, a Nova Scotia Court of Appeal ruled the property's owners couldn't claim insurance because they misrepresented that the building was made of stone and equipped with sprinklers. The insurer had voided the policy and denied coverage accordingly, and later the insured sued the broker for negligence. At trial, the court found the broker to be 50% contributorily negligent, but the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal allowed the broker's appeal on grounds that the Errors and Omissions endorsement did not discharge the insured's obligation to truthfully answer queries in the insurance application. It found that brokers are entitled to rely on the insured's ability to represent basic information correctly without further investigation.

6. Chubb Insurance Company of Canada c. Domtar inc., 2017 QCCA 1004

Do the insurer and the insured have the right to obtain privileged documents from each other to debate insurance coverage under an Executive Protection Policy. That was the central issue in this complex case. The insured, Domtar, bought shares from Weston. The deal included a penalty clause in Weston's favour, if ever Domtar were to be taken over by a third party. Eight years later, Domtar merged with Weyerhaeuser and a dispute arose between Domtar and Weston with respect to Weston's entitlement to the penalty. The dispute was settled for $50M and Domtar claimed this amount to its insurer, alleging that there had been a professional error in the merger that resulted in the additional payment to Weston. The insurer sought to have access to legal opinions Domtar had received pertaining to the merger. It also sought the settlement documents exchanged between Domtar and Weston. The Court of Appeal recognized that such documents were privileged but, by claiming against its insurer, the insured implicitly waived the attached privilege. What's more, the insurer has the right to know all circumstances surrounding the insured's loss to be able to assess whether the consequences of the merger were the result of an error or an informed business decision. As for Domtar's documentary discovery requests, the court allowed it to have access to generic documents from the insurer on the interpretation of coverage (i.e. unrelated to another insured's file) available under the policy.

7. Tanious v. Empire Life Insurance Co., 2017 BCSC 85

In deciding whether the plaintiff's disability was covered under the terms of the insurance policy, the British Columbia Supreme Court held that disability claims have unique characteristics that set them apart from other personal harm cases. Once coverage has been established and the court orders future benefits, these are paid out periodically instead of in a lump sum. This allows disability insureds to pay for their future care needs. The risk is that disability plaintiffs will see their future benefits terminated even after a court has reinstated them. This forces them to take legal action again, retain counsel, persevere in litigation, and proceed to trial to receive the undiscounted value of the future periodic benefits to which they are entitled. In this case, the court awarded the plaintiff special costs for her efforts in having to enforce the contract throughout litigation.

8. Soczek v. Allstate Insurance Co., 2017 ONSC 2262

Here, the defendant insurer sought to dismiss the insured's claim for property damage due to a house fire. The insurer cited the policy's exclusion clause for property damage caused by any intentional or criminal act by an insured person under the policy. The insured was the victim in an attempted murder in which her husband doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. The crime led to their home being destroyed. Though the Ontario Superior Court of Justice held that the exclusion clause applied, it slammed the insurer's corporate conduct as "less than admirable" and "unfair to its innocent customers." What's more, it noted, while other provinces had legislated to protect innocent co-insureds against the intentional act exclusion, Ontario insurers continued to capitalize on and compound the injuries suffered by victims of domestic violence in Ontario. Proposed amendments to the Ontario Insurance Act have since been introduced to limit the ability of insurance contracts to prevent an innocent co-insured's recovery for damage to property caused by another insured.

9. Gestion Ignièce inc. c. Les Souscripteurs du Lloyd's, 2017 QCCS 1410

A company running a seniors' residence made a claim against its broker and its insurers following a damaging fire. The policy limit was set to $1.8M for the replacement of the building. A chartered appraiser mandated by the broker, as a complimentary service, had determined the amount. After the fire reconstruction costs were pegged at $3.5M. The insured sought the difference between this amount and the insurance limit from the broker. The court held that the broker's role is not to appraise property and neither to guarantee an appraisal. Its duty is to inform and advise the insured and in this regard, the broker has an obligation of means and not one of results. Moreover, the court held that following a loss, the broker as a certain duty to assist the insured in its claim but is in no way responsible for the insurer's claim handling or for the claims adjuster's actions. It dismissed the claim against the broker. As for the insurer, the court held that the insured did not undertake to repair or reconstruct the building as required by the policy and the case law. Therefore it could not seek the full amount of the replacement cost but rather the depreciated value.

10. 9173-1521 Québec inc. c. Municipalité de Saint-Georges-de-Clarenceville, 2017 QCCS 4399

This case is an application of defence costs apportionment between an insurer and an insured in Quebec. A municipality filed a Wellington motion against its E&O insurer, MMQ, to force the insurerto take up its defense against a claim instituted by a real estate developer. The developer and the municipality collaborated on a construction project in which the latter represented that it would obtain a crucial parcel of land to advance the project. But the landowner refused to cede the necessary parcel of land. The developer sought compensatory damages against the municipality, claiming significant damages due to its inability to obtain the parcel of land. It also sought an order from the court declaring the municipality the true owner of the parcel. MMQ denied coverage and refused to defend the municipality in this action, which filed the Wellington motion. The Court determined that a portion of the claim ─ compensatory damages ─ might be potentially covered while the rest (namely the declaratory order) was not covered. Even though both claims had common factual elements, the work and evidence needed to defend the compensatory damages claim was clearly different from the work needed to defend the declaratory claim. Therefore, the court ruled that MMQ would only have to cover defence costs relating to the compensatory damages claim.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Laurent Durocher-Dumais
Samuel Robichon
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:
  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.
  • Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.
    If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here
    If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here

    Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

    Use of

    You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


    Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

    The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


    Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

    • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
    • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
    • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

    Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

    Information Collection and Use

    We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

    We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

    Mondaq News Alerts

    In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


    A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

    Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

    Log Files

    We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


    This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

    Surveys & Contests

    From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


    If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


    From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

    *** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


    This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

    Correcting/Updating Personal Information

    If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

    Notification of Changes

    If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

    How to contact Mondaq

    You can contact us with comments or queries at

    If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.

    By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions