Canada: Top Canadian Insurance Rulings From 2017

Last Updated: December 27 2017
Article by Laurent Durocher-Dumais, Tahsin Najam and Samuel Robichon

In 2017, there were a number of Canadian court rulings that will have an impact on the landscape of insurance litigation in the years ahead. Here is a run through of some of those key decisions, and a few lessons insurers can draw from them.

1. Sabean v. Portage La Prairie Mutual Insurance Co., 2017 SCC 7

In this landmark case, the Supreme Court of Canada held that future Canada Pension Plan (CPP) benefits couldn't be deducted from the amount an insurer must pay out under a standard form contract that indemnifies insureds for any shortfall in the payment of a judgment for damages against an underinsured person who committed a tort. The insurer was arguing that its policy allowed amounts recoverable under "any policy of insurance providing disability benefits" to be deducted from any amount payable by the insurer. It took the position that CPP benefits constituted a "policy of insurance." But an insurer cannot rely on its specialized knowledge of jurisprudence to advance an interpretation that goes beyond the clear words of the policy, the Supreme Court ruled. An average person applying for additional insurance coverage would understand a "policy of insurance" to mean an optional, private insurance contract and not a mandatory statutory scheme such as the CPP.

2. Desjardins Financial Security Life Assurance Company v. Émond, 2017 SCC 19

A Supreme Court of Canada ruling in which the top court confirmed that the exclusion for participation of the insured to any indictable offence, in a life insurance policy, does not apply to hybrid offences – namely those the Crown may choose to prosecute either as a summary conviction offence or as an indictable offence. In Quebec, insurers may not draft a general exclusion stating that indemnity will be removed for violation by the insured of any law. However, insurers are allowed to assert broad exclusions for indictable offences. Here, the insured died while fleeing the police in a high-speed chase, which is a hybrid offence. The Supreme Court confirmed that the exclusion, as drafted, should be construed narrowly and applied only to more important offences that may be prosecuted only as indictable offences. The Quebec Court of Appeal had recognized that an insurer can exclude hybrid offences from coverage but must do so explicitly.

3.6916643 Canada inc. c. Intact, compagnie d'assurances, 2017 QCCA 660

The Quebec Court of Appeal refused to grant leave to appeal in a decision that denied indemnity to the insured of an all-risk policy. The insured was a company specialized in the sale of hessians and canopies. A client defrauded it by paying for its merchandise with a falsified certified cheque. Coverage was for "all risks of direct physical loss or damage to the property insured from any external cause". The Court of Appeal agreed with the trial court that fraud was not a covered risk under theft of merchandise considering. The insured voluntarily agreed to hand the merchandise over to the client, and so it wasn't the merchandise that was lost but rather the money that the insured received in exchange that could not be collected. Loss of money was specifically excluded from coverage.

4. Usanovic v. Penncorp Life Insurance Company, 2017 ONCA 395

The Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that an insurer's duty of good faith does not require it to notify the insured of the applicable limitation period when discontinuing insurance benefits. The insured in this case had bought disability insurance and received benefits for a 2007 accident until 2011. In 2012, he was told that he no longer qualified for benefits under the policy. He took legal action in April 2015, but the lawsuit was dismissed by summary judgment as being time-barred. The Court of Appeal declined to extend the duty of good faith to require an insurer to disclose the existence of a limitation period on grounds that such information was outside the parameters of an insurance policy. Worth noting is that both British Columbia and Alberta require insurers by law to give written notice of applicable statutory limitation periods when denying a claim. A similar requirement in Ontario would conflict with the Ontario Limitations Act by making the insurer's notice, as opposed to the discoverability of the underlying claim, the starting point of a limitation period. The case is pending determination of an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court.

5. Marsh Canada Ltd. v. Grafton Connor Property Inc., 2017 NSCA 54

In a case that involved a Halifax pub destroyed by fire, a Nova Scotia Court of Appeal ruled the property's owners couldn't claim insurance because they misrepresented that the building was made of stone and equipped with sprinklers. The insurer had voided the policy and denied coverage accordingly, and later the insured sued the broker for negligence. At trial, the court found the broker to be 50% contributorily negligent, but the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal allowed the broker's appeal on grounds that the Errors and Omissions endorsement did not discharge the insured's obligation to truthfully answer queries in the insurance application. It found that brokers are entitled to rely on the insured's ability to represent basic information correctly without further investigation.

6. Chubb Insurance Company of Canada c. Domtar inc., 2017 QCCA 1004

Do the insurer and the insured have the right to obtain privileged documents from each other to debate insurance coverage under an Executive Protection Policy. That was the central issue in this complex case. The insured, Domtar, bought shares from Weston. The deal included a penalty clause in Weston's favour, if ever Domtar were to be taken over by a third party. Eight years later, Domtar merged with Weyerhaeuser and a dispute arose between Domtar and Weston with respect to Weston's entitlement to the penalty. The dispute was settled for $50M and Domtar claimed this amount to its insurer, alleging that there had been a professional error in the merger that resulted in the additional payment to Weston. The insurer sought to have access to legal opinions Domtar had received pertaining to the merger. It also sought the settlement documents exchanged between Domtar and Weston. The Court of Appeal recognized that such documents were privileged but, by claiming against its insurer, the insured implicitly waived the attached privilege. What's more, the insurer has the right to know all circumstances surrounding the insured's loss to be able to assess whether the consequences of the merger were the result of an error or an informed business decision. As for Domtar's documentary discovery requests, the court allowed it to have access to generic documents from the insurer on the interpretation of coverage (i.e. unrelated to another insured's file) available under the policy.

7. Tanious v. Empire Life Insurance Co., 2017 BCSC 85

In deciding whether the plaintiff's disability was covered under the terms of the insurance policy, the British Columbia Supreme Court held that disability claims have unique characteristics that set them apart from other personal harm cases. Once coverage has been established and the court orders future benefits, these are paid out periodically instead of in a lump sum. This allows disability insureds to pay for their future care needs. The risk is that disability plaintiffs will see their future benefits terminated even after a court has reinstated them. This forces them to take legal action again, retain counsel, persevere in litigation, and proceed to trial to receive the undiscounted value of the future periodic benefits to which they are entitled. In this case, the court awarded the plaintiff special costs for her efforts in having to enforce the contract throughout litigation.

8. Soczek v. Allstate Insurance Co., 2017 ONSC 2262

Here, the defendant insurer sought to dismiss the insured's claim for property damage due to a house fire. The insurer cited the policy's exclusion clause for property damage caused by any intentional or criminal act by an insured person under the policy. The insured was the victim in an attempted murder in which her husband doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. The crime led to their home being destroyed. Though the Ontario Superior Court of Justice held that the exclusion clause applied, it slammed the insurer's corporate conduct as "less than admirable" and "unfair to its innocent customers." What's more, it noted, while other provinces had legislated to protect innocent co-insureds against the intentional act exclusion, Ontario insurers continued to capitalize on and compound the injuries suffered by victims of domestic violence in Ontario. Proposed amendments to the Ontario Insurance Act have since been introduced to limit the ability of insurance contracts to prevent an innocent co-insured's recovery for damage to property caused by another insured.

9. Gestion Ignièce inc. c. Les Souscripteurs du Lloyd's, 2017 QCCS 1410

A company running a seniors' residence made a claim against its broker and its insurers following a damaging fire. The policy limit was set to $1.8M for the replacement of the building. A chartered appraiser mandated by the broker, as a complimentary service, had determined the amount. After the fire reconstruction costs were pegged at $3.5M. The insured sought the difference between this amount and the insurance limit from the broker. The court held that the broker's role is not to appraise property and neither to guarantee an appraisal. Its duty is to inform and advise the insured and in this regard, the broker has an obligation of means and not one of results. Moreover, the court held that following a loss, the broker as a certain duty to assist the insured in its claim but is in no way responsible for the insurer's claim handling or for the claims adjuster's actions. It dismissed the claim against the broker. As for the insurer, the court held that the insured did not undertake to repair or reconstruct the building as required by the policy and the case law. Therefore it could not seek the full amount of the replacement cost but rather the depreciated value.

10. 9173-1521 Québec inc. c. Municipalité de Saint-Georges-de-Clarenceville, 2017 QCCS 4399

This case is an application of defence costs apportionment between an insurer and an insured in Quebec. A municipality filed a Wellington motion against its E&O insurer, MMQ, to force the insurerto take up its defense against a claim instituted by a real estate developer. The developer and the municipality collaborated on a construction project in which the latter represented that it would obtain a crucial parcel of land to advance the project. But the landowner refused to cede the necessary parcel of land. The developer sought compensatory damages against the municipality, claiming significant damages due to its inability to obtain the parcel of land. It also sought an order from the court declaring the municipality the true owner of the parcel. MMQ denied coverage and refused to defend the municipality in this action, which filed the Wellington motion. The Court determined that a portion of the claim ─ compensatory damages ─ might be potentially covered while the rest (namely the declaratory order) was not covered. Even though both claims had common factual elements, the work and evidence needed to defend the compensatory damages claim was clearly different from the work needed to defend the declaratory claim. Therefore, the court ruled that MMQ would only have to cover defence costs relating to the compensatory damages claim.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Laurent Durocher-Dumais
Samuel Robichon
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions