Canada: The Need For Forthright Consultation: First Nation Of Nacho Nyak Dun

Last Updated: December 6 2017
Article by Thomas Isaac and Arend J.A. Hoekstra

On December 1, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Nacho Nyak Dun,1 addressing the Yukon Government's decision to disregard the process set out in modern land settlement agreements and instead approve its own land use plan for non-settlement lands in the Peel Watershed.  While the decision addresses specific elements of the Yukon Umbrella Final Agreement,2 the Court also highlights the importance of clear and forthright communication of the Crown's interests and intentions during consultation.

Facts

In 1993, the Yukon Umbrella Final Agreement (the Agreement) was entered into between Canada, the Yukon Government, and Yukon First Nations, and established a collaborative regional land use planning process for Yukon Territory.3  The Agreement was the product of decades of negotiations between well-resourced and sophisticated parties and was incorporated into modern Yukon treaties.4

Process for Developing Land Use Plans

The Agreement includes a process for developing land use plans.  The Court noted that in signing onto the Agreement and accompanying treaties, First Nations accepted comparatively smaller settlement areas in exchange for important rights in both settlement and non-settlement lands, and particularly in their traditional territories.5

Under the Agreement, land use plans are developed by an independent Commission, with members nominated by the Yukon Government and the affected Yukon First Nations.  Land use plans are intended to apply to settlement and non-settlement lands and to encourage a consistent approach to resource development.6  The development of a land use plan under the Agreement includes a four-part process that applies to the Yukon Government:

  1. The independent Commission prepares and provides a recommended regional land use plan to the Yukon Government and the affected First Nations.
  2. After consultation with First Nations, the Yukon Government considers the recommended regional plan.  If the Yukon Government rejects or proposes to amend the recommendations, the Yukon Government must send written reasons, and proposed modifications if applicable, to the Commission.
  3. The Commission considers the written reasons and proposed modifications, if any, and makes a final recommendation for the regional land use plan. 
  4. After consultation with First Nations, the Yukon Government may approve, reject, or modify the proposed land use plan for non-settlement lands.

Under the Agreement, the affected First Nations must follow a similar process before rejecting, modifying, or adopting a land use plan for settlement lands.

Agreed Approach

In 2004, by voluntary agreement, the Yukon Government and the affected First Nations agreed to establish a regional Commission to develop a regional land use plan for the Peel Watershed.  In 2009, the Commission released its recommended plan,7 and in 2010 and again in 2011, the Yukon Government and the affected First Nations entered into joint letters of understanding to establish a coordinated approach to consultation and to seek to achieve consensus on the plan.8

Divergence of Yukon Government

Following the initial consultation effort, the Yukon Government provided the Commission with two vague statements expressing its goal of increasing options for resource access and development, including a request that the Commission "re-examine conservation values, non-consumptive resource use and resource development to achieve a more balanced plan."9  In July 2011, after determining that the Yukon Government's comments were simply expressions of general desires, and did not qualify as "proposed modifications," the Commission released its Final Recommended Plan,10 which protected 80% of the region while opening 20% for mineral exploration.11

Following the release of the Final Recommended Plan, and despite the protests of affected First Nations, the Yukon Government proposed to substantially modify the land use plan, and engaged in an independent consultation initiative rather than follow the previously agreed upon collaborative approach.12

In 2014, the Yukon Government approved its land use plan for non-settlement land in the Peel Watershed.13  The plan opened up 71% of the Peel Watershed to mineral exploration.14

Issues

The primary issue in Nacho Nyak Dun is whether the Yukon Government acted lawfully, and in accordance with the Agreement.  More relevant for those outside of Yukon Territory however, is the Court's focus on the importance of forthright communication during consultation efforts between the Crown and Indigenous peoples. 

Issue 1: Interpreting Modern Treaties

Consistent with the Court's previous review of the Yukon Territory's modern treaties in Beckman v. Little Salmon/Carmacks First Nation,15 the Court emphasizes that modern treaties have been meticulously negotiated by well-resourced parties, and that in reviewing actions under modern treaties, the reviewing court must pay close attention to their terms.16

The Court notes that the power to modify or reject a land use plan recommendation under the Agreement is subject to prior consultation,17 and requires the earlier provision of written reasons to the Commission in order to enable them to review and potentially amend their recommendations.18  The process must also meet the clear objective of ensuring that First Nations can meaningfully participate in land use management in their traditional territories.19

The Yukon Government's actions were inconsistent with the Agreement.  First, the Yukon Government did not provide meaningful feedback to the Commission for their review and instead provided "bald expressions of preference" which were not sufficiently detailed to permit the Commission to respond in a meaningful way.20  Not only did this breach the requirements of the Agreement, it removed the opportunity for the Commission to provide its expert response.21  Second, by not clearly proposing specific modifications after the initial report of the Commission, affected First Nations missed an opportunity to provide meaningful feedback, early on, to the proposed modifications.22  Third, while the Yukon Government was able to make modifications pursuant to the Agreement, those modifications could not be so significant as to effectively reject the recommendations, as was seen in this case.  Finally, when seeking to depart from positions it has taken in the past, the Crown must act in good faith and in accordance with the honour of the Crown.23  By failing to comply with the processes of the Agreement, failing to provide the Commission and First Nations with sufficient opportunity to provide feedback, and abandoning the approach to joint review and consultation that was previously agreed upon, the Court concluded that the conduct of the Yukon Government was not becoming of the honour of the Crown.24

Issue 2: The Importance of Forthright Communication

In conducting consultation, governments must be flexible and forthright in their approach.  In Mikisew Cree25 the Court noted that real consultation requires more than just an opportunity for Indigenous communities to "blow off steam before the Minister proceeds to do what she intended to do all along."26  For some governments, this has led to overly general consultation efforts where everything is left 'on the table.'  While the approach appears, at least superficially, to promote reconciliation, it can also undermine real consultation and constrain the Crown's later use of discretionary powers.

Nacho Nyak Dun highlights the risks and deficiencies of this approach.  By not engaging in a forthright manner and fully expressing its preferences early on, while (it appears) hoping the process would resolve itself favourably without the Crown needing to display its bias towards a particular outcome, Yukon Government undermined the effectiveness of its consultation effort.The importance of clearly communicating the Crown's goals was highlighted by the Court when it concluded that "Yukon must bear the consequences of its failure to diligently advance its interests and exercise its right [Emphasis added]."27 28

Yukon Government's breach of the Agreement was not necessary.  Had it clearly stated its objections following receipt of the draft recommendations of the Commission, Yukon could have engaged in meaningful consultation, and could have exercised its discretionary authority under the Agreement in good faith while upholding the honour of the Crown.  Instead, by vaguely suggesting its objectives, possibly with the hope of appearing open and flexible to the process and interests of the affected First Nations, the Yukon Government undermined effective consultation and forfeited a substantial portion of the discretionary authority provided under the Agreement.

Implications

Consultation does not require governments to start from a blank sheet.  It does not require all options to be on the table, and it does not require governments to act as independent arbitrators, disassociated from any particular public interest.  What consultation, particularly at the deepest levels, does require is an avenue for Indigenous groups to make submissions, be able to formally participate in the decision-making process, and for their concerns to be considered and addressed.29  Without clearly stating the goals and interests of the Crown, Indigenous peoples are unable to fully and meaningfully understand the potential impact to their interests and effectively disclose their interests to the Crown.

Much effort has been made recently to encourage cooperation between Crown governments and Indigenous communities.  The 10 Principles Respecting the Government of Canada's Relationship with Indigenous Peoples, in particular, highlights the importance of including Indigenous self-governments in a system of cooperative federalism.30  While encouraging an effective, respectful approach to Indigenous/Crown relationships is a worthwhile goal, the processes used to achieve the objective should be examined critically.

Whether in collaborative processes or in consultation generally, the Crown and Indigenous peoples do not come to the table as equals.  While holding substantial resources and legislative powers, the Crown is materially constrained by the honour of the Crown.  The honour of the Crown reflects the constrained powers of the Crown when dealing with Indigenous interests, while also reflecting the Crown's larger responsibility of balancing competing societal interests with Aboriginal and treaty rights.31  In contrast, effective consultation requires Indigenous groups to set out and advance their interests.32  There is no obligation for Indigenous groups to consider other parties or restrain the assertion or exercise of their rights.

For cooperative federalism to be effective, Crown governments must diligently communicate and advance the interests of those parties not represented at the table.  Such interests include economic interest, fiscal interests, community interests, and the interests of non-participating Indigenous peoples.  Pretending to come to the table unencumbered by interests and preferences undermines effective consultation, disadvantages the process, and undermines the honour of the Crown.

The honour of the Crown does not require self censorship.  In processes set out in modern treaties, it requires the Crown to "diligently advance its interests."33  In consultation efforts, it requires the Crown to listen to and consider the concerns of Indigenous peoples and, where warranted, to provide the form of accommodation which it deems appropriate, having consideration to the competing interests.34  To be effective, cooperative federalism and reconciliation generally does not require parties to blindly agree or pay lip service.  Rather, it requires all parties to diligently advance their interests within the context of Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982.35   

Footnotes

1 First Nation of Nacho Nyak Dun v. Yukon, 2017 SCC 58 [Nacho Nyak Dun].

2 Canada, Umbrella Final Agreement Between the Government of Canada, the Council for Yukon Indians and the Government of the Yukon (Canada, Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada, 1993) [Agreement].

3 Nacho Nyak Dun, supra note 1 at para 2.

4 Nacho Nyak Dun, supra note 1 at para 7.

5 Nacho Nyak Dun, supra note 1 at para 46.

6 Agreement, supra note 2 at paras 11.1.1.1 and 11.1.1.2.

7 Nacho Nyak Dun, supra note 1 at para 17.

8 Nacho Nyak Dun, supra note 1 at para 19.

9 Nacho Nyak Dun, supra note 1 at para 21.

10 Nacho Nyak Dun, supra note 1 at para 23.

11 Nacho Nyak Dun, supra note 1 at para 53.

12 Nacho Nyak Dun, supra note 1 at paras 23-24.

13 Nacho Nyak Dun, supra note 1 at para 25.

14 Nacho Nyak Dun, supra note 1 at para 53.

15 Beckman v. Little Salmon/Carmacks First Nation, 2010 SCC 53 [Beckman v. Little Salmon/Carmacks First Nation].

16 Nacho Nyak Dun, supra note 1 at para 36.

17 Nacho Nyak Dun, supra note 1 at para 40.

18 Nacho Nyak Dun, supra note 1 at para 43.

19 Nacho Nyak Dun, supra note 1 at para 47.

20 Nacho Nyak Dun, supra note 1 at para 54.

21 Nacho Nyak Dun, supra note 1 at para 55.

22 Ibid.

23 Nacho Nyak Dun, supra note 1 at para 52.

24 Nacho Nyak Dun, supra note 1 at para 57.

25 Mikisew Cree First Nation v. Canada (Minister of Canadian Heritage), 2005 SCC 69 [Mikisew Cree].

26 Mikisew Cree, supra note 25 at para 54.

27 Nacho Nyak Dun, supra note 1 at para 61.

28 Throughout Nacho Nyak Dun, supra note 1, the Court stressed that it has a limited role when reviewing activities under a modern treaty.  Rather than reviewing the overall conduct of the parties, the Court will limit its focus to whether a specific decision is legal, and otherwise generally leave space for the parties to govern together and work out their differences.  There are two consequences of greater forbearance.  First, governments are afforded greater deference in their overall conduct, so long as they are acting in accordance with the terms of the agreement and their actions are constitutionally compliant.  The second consequence is that governments must take advantage of those rights provided under the treaties rather than rely on an overall process. 

29 Chippewas of the Thames First Nation v. Enbridge Pipelines Inc., 2017 SCC 41 [Chippewas] at paras 47 & 63.

30 Canada, Department of Justice, Principles Respecting the Government of Canada's relationship with Indigenous peoples, (Canada, 2017).

31 Chippewas, supra note 29 at para 59.

32 Ktunaxa Nation v. British Columbia (Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations), 2017 SCC 54 [Ktunaxa Nation] at para 79.

33 Ibid.

34 In Ktunaxa Nation, supra note 32 at para 79, the Court stresses that the Crown's ultimate obligation when consulting and contemplating accommodation is that it act honourably.  "Section 35 guarantees a process, not a particular result."

35 Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11 [Constitution Act, 1982].

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Thomas Isaac
Arend J.A. Hoekstra
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:
  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.
  • Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.
    If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here
    If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here

    Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

    Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

    Use of www.mondaq.com

    You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

    Disclaimer

    Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

    The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

    Registration

    Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

    • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
    • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
    • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

    Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

    Information Collection and Use

    We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

    We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

    Mondaq News Alerts

    In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

    Cookies

    A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

    Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

    Log Files

    We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

    Links

    This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

    Surveys & Contests

    From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

    Mail-A-Friend

    If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

    Emails

    From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

    *** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .

    Security

    This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

    Correcting/Updating Personal Information

    If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

    Notification of Changes

    If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

    How to contact Mondaq

    You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

    If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.

    By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions