Canada: When Mitigation Isn't Mitigation The Court Of Appeal For Ontario Errs

Last Updated: November 14 2017
Article by Rhonda Cohen and Tim Allen

In a recent decision, the Court of Appeal for Ontario erred when it excluded from "mitigation income" all earnings by a dismissed employee during what the court referred to as the "statutory entitlement period"; a notional period, created by the court, equivalent to the number of weeks used to calculate the employee's entitlement to pay in lieu of notice and severance pay under the Employment Standards Act ("ESA") (Brake v. PJ-M2R Restaurant Inc., 2017 ONCA 402 (Gillese and Pepall, JJ.A.)).

Essentially, the court erred by confusing statutory payments (pay in lieu of notice and severance pay) with all other income earned during the notice period. Statutory payments are mandated, minimum sums, payable in any event. They are not "replacement" income and cannot be reduced by other mitigation income (Boland v. APV Canada Inc. (2005), 250 DLR (4th) 376 (Ont Div Ct)). By contrast, all other income earned during the notice period is replacement income1. The court's error appears to be based on a misreading or misunderstanding of Boland (addressed in this article).

Unfortunately, until this error is corrected, it is likely to be followed and perpetuated by other courts.

In a separate but concurring judgement, Justice Feldman also erred when she held "mitigation income" did not include earnings from a position so inferior to the original position the employee would not be in breach of the duty to mitigate if he or she had not taken the job. Justice Feldman's reasoning is rejected by the majority and not consistent with the law of mitigation.

Why did these errors occur? The familiar adage of 'bad facts make bad law' may be to blame. In this case, the employee's circumstances were sympathetic and the employer's behaviour less than exemplary. It is therefore possible the court made these rulings in an effort to help the plaintiff keep more money in her pocket. However, when the Court of Appeal speaks, other courts must listen, and the law of employment mitigation may now have changed, in error.

What happened in this case?

For more than 25 years Ms. Brake was a good employee for a large fast food chain, initially at an entry level and eventually in a managerial position. In the final years of her employment, Brake's performance slipped slightly. She also began supplementing her income with part-time work as a cashier with Sobey's. Ultimately, Brake was offered a demotion which she rejected, following which her employer took the position she had resigned.

The details of Brake's performance issues are not material for the purpose of the court's discussion of mitigation. However, suffice it to say, both the trial and appeal courts found Brake's treatment to have been less than fair. This includes her participation in a performance management program the courts found was applied unfairly and "set up" to ensure Brake would fail.

Against this backdrop, it is not surprising the court found the demotion to be a constructive dismissal. It awarded damages equivalent to 20 months' pay ($104,499.33), inclusive of common law entitlements and statutory entitlements (ESA pay in lieu of notice, and severance pay).

However, the court then erred by declining to deduct from the common law damage award any of Brake's earnings during the 20-month notice period, totalling about $40,000, because, said the court, that money was not "received in mitigation of loss".

How did the court make this error?

Typically, an employee's earnings during the notice period are considered "mitigation income" and deducted from any award of common law damages.

In the 20 months following Brake's dismissal, the court found she made reasonable efforts to find alternative employment and earned $40,000 by increasing her supplementary hours at Sobey's and working non-managerial positions at Tim Horton's and Home Depot.

In a surprising ruling, the trial judge and Court of Appeal held that none of that $40,000 was "received in mitigation of loss". The Court of Appeal's reasoning is essentially three-fold:

1. All earnings accrued during the "statutory entitlement period" are not "mitigation income": Here the court errs by excluding from mitigation income all post-dismissal income earned by Brake in the 34 weeks (about 8 months) following her dismissal, on the basis that income was earned during the "statutory entitlement period". There are several problems with this analysis:

First, a "statutory entitlement period" does not exist in fact or law. It is not an actual period of time nor could it be2. The statutory entitlement is to payment (termination pay and/or severance pay).

Second, the court appears to have confused a statutory payment with all other income earned during the notice period, based on a misreading or misunderstanding of Boland. In Boland, the employee claimed only the minimum statutory entitlement (ESA notice and severance pay). There was no claim for common law damages and the judge rightly declined to deduct the employee's post dismissal earnings from the statutory payment entitlement (the mandated, minimum entitlement).

Had there been a claim for common law damages in Boland, the court would have reduced that claim by the amount of the statutory termination and severance payments and any income earned during the notice period. This is consistent with Yanez v. Canac Kitchens [2004] OJ No 5238 (Sup Ct), in which Echlin J. deducted from the common law notice entitlement all earnings post dismissal, despite some earnings having accrued in what the Court of Appeal describes as the "statutory entitlement period".

It is therefore incorrect to rely on Boland as authority for the concept of a "statutory entitlement period" or the position that income earned during this notional period is not mitigation income. Those were not the facts in Boland, the decision does not stand for that proposition, nor is there any principled reason to reach this conclusion.

Third, and in any event, there is no basis in law to shelter income earned during the notice period, other than a statutory payment (and supplementary income, addressed below). Indeed, the court offers no substantive explanation for this part of its ruling, other than to misstate Boland:

Since the employment income that Ms. Brake earned during her statutory entitlement period is not deductible from the damages award, the trial judge ought to have determined her statutory entitlement period and identified which items of employment income were attributable to that period and which were attributable to the balance of the notice period.

[emphasis added]

2. "Supplementary income" earned during the period of common law notice is not "mitigation income": This part of the ruling is not controversial. If an employee works two jobs, and is dismissed without cause from one job, income earned during the common law notice period from the second job is not "mitigation (replacement) income" because the employee would have earned that income in any event. This is the basis on which the court excludes much of Brake's post dismissal earnings from Sobey's.

In obiter, the Court of Appeal declines to identify whether and in what circumstances an increase in supplementary income during the notice period would change the character of that income from supplementary income to replacement income (and therefore "mitigation income"). That, the court says, is "for another day".

3. Income earned from a non-comparable job during the period of common law notice may not be deducted: This is another error.

In a separate but concurring decision, Justice Feldman (expanding on comments of the trial judge) went even further, holding "mitigation income" does not include earnings from a position so inferior to the original position the employee would not be in breach of the duty to mitigate if he or she turned down the position. On this basis, Justice Feldman excludes all of Brake's income earned during the common law notice period.

However, in reaching this conclusion, Justice Feldman confuses an employee's right to not accept replacement work markedly inferior to the original job as a means of mitigation with income earned during the period of notice. That is, although an employee may not be obliged to accept an inferior position as a means of mitigating damage, once accepted, income earned should be treated as replacement/mitigation income. If not, the employee is unjustly enriched by benefitting twice – once from the replacement earnings and a second time from the damage award.

Although the majority did not directly reference Justice Feldman's reasons, they were clear to distance themselves from this narrow interpretation of mitigation income:

To the extent the trial judge was suggesting that the court did not need to consider whether income received from a job that was inferior to the one from which the employee was dismissed was mitigation income, I respectfully disagree. That approach does not accord with the principle that employment income earned during the notice period is generally to be treated as mitigation of loss.

Final thoughts

The court's error of excluding from "mitigation income" all income earned during the notional "statutory entitlement period" is disappointing and will need to be corrected by the Court of Appeal or Supreme Court of Canada. As of the writing of this article, neither party has sought leave to appeal.

Justice Feldman's decision, though neither accepted by the majority nor binding, is troubling to the extent it even suggests "mitigation income" does not include earnings from work not comparable to the original position. That proposition is simply inconsistent with the law of mitigation.

Finally, the decision stands as a reminder to employers of the importance of doing whatever can reasonably and appropriately be done to assist a dismissed employee find comparable replacement work. The sooner the employee gets back on his or her feet, the better for everyone.


1 An exception is "supplementary income" addressed below 

2 Severance pay must be paid out in a lump sum. While an employee may be provided notice of termination, where that does not occur (as in this case) the entitlement is to termination pay in a lump sum. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.