Canada: Technical Explanation Offers No Relief For U.S. Residents With Interests In ULCs

Copyright 2008, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Tax, July 2008

The Technical Explanation (TE) offers welcome interpretation of the new rules in the Fifth Protocol (the Protocol) to the Canada-United States Income Tax Convention (the Treaty) relating to hybrids and fiscally transparent (flow-through) entities. However, the biggest disappointment is that it offers no relief from the anti-hybrid rules for unlimited liability companies (ULCs) paying dividends and other amounts to their U.S. shareholders.

Application of Anti-Hybrid Rules to ULCs

A ULC is a corporation for Canadian tax purposes but may be treated as a flow-through entity for U.S. tax purposes (i.e., as a branch if owned by a single U.S. shareholder) or a partnership if it has more than one shareholder. The discussion below assumes the ULC is such a "hybrid" entity. ULCs have been used as vehicles to carry on Canadian business or hold Canadian investments in structures that are not aggressive from a U.S. or Canadian tax perspective. For example, ULCs have been used by U.S. residents as the preferred entity through which to carry on a Canadian operating business, instead of operating through an actual Canadian branch of a U.S. resident entity or a Canadian subsidiary corporation that cannot be treated as a branch for U.S. tax purposes. ULCs have also been used as part of more aggressive cross-border tax planning, particularly as part of double-dip financing structures.

The Protocol contains anti-hybrid rules that apply to payments made by ULCs to their U.S. resident shareholders, regardless of whether the payments are deductible expenses, such as interest or royalties, or non-deductible distributions, such as dividends. The effect of the rules is to deny the benefits of Treaty-reduced rates of withholding tax or exemptions from withholding tax that would otherwise apply to the payments, so that the 25% Canadian withholding tax rate applies. From a tax policy perspective, it is perhaps understandable that treaty relief from withholding tax should not be available in a case where the recipient of the payment is not subject to tax on the payment in the recipient's country of residence and the payment is deductible in computing the income of the hybrid entity in the source country. A ULC does not have any special tax status in Canada and is subject to full corporate tax so that a Canadian limited company and a ULC pay exactly the same amount of tax in Canada. Yet where a ULC pays full corporate tax in Canada and then pays a dividend of the after-tax proceeds to its U.S. parent, the withholding rate applicable to such dividend will be 25%, even though the withholding rate would generally be 5% if the payer of the dividend was a Canadian limited company. This result is completely unwarranted from a tax policy perspective. Both U.S. and Canadian tax officials had indicated prior to the release of the TE that, as a policy matter, it might not be appropriate for this rule to apply to non-deductible dividend payments. However, since the wording in the Protocol clearly covers all payments, whether deductible or not, they apparently decided that it was not possible to offer relief by way of the TE. In fact, the TE contains examples that specifically contemplate that dividends and any other non-deductible payments by a ULC to its U.S. parent are caught by the anti-hybrid rules. The officials suggested that they have already started discussing yet another protocol, and hinted that some relief may be offered prior to the effective date of the anti-hybrid rules (January 1, 2010 if the Protocol is ratified in 2008).

The U.S. Joint Committee on Taxation's paper regarding the Protocol, presented for the hearing before the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations held onJuly 10, 2008, raised issues for the Senate Committee to consider in connection with the proposed ratification of the Protocol. The paper points out that the anti-hybrid rules in the Protocol do not attempt "to classify the use of hybrids as acceptable or unacceptable depending on the factual circumstances" and that "many taxpayers that have not organized their U.S.-Canada cross-border structures to obtain double deductions will have to restructure their legal entities in order to avoid double taxation. " The paper states that the Senate Committee may wish to consider whether a narrower anti-hybrid rule could have been negotiated in order to target abusive structures and cause less disturbance to non-abusive structures. However, it is not the role of the Senate Committee to make changes to the Protocol; the Senate Committee can only ratify it or refuse to ratify it.

Restructuring of Existing ULCs

If the Protocol is ratified and no relief is forthcoming (by way of an additional protocol or otherwise), U.S. residents with ULCs will have to look into possible restructuring alternatives. It will not normally be possible to wind-up a ULC to create a true Canadian branch of a U.S. parent company without adverse Canadian tax consequences because this would result in a deemed disposition of all of the assets of the ULC for Canadian tax purposes for fair market value proceeds. The use of a branch structure may be more feasible for a new Canadian business, but there are sometimes awkward Canadian tax consequences of operating in Canada through a non-resident entity. Depending on U.S. tax considerations, it may be feasible to convert a ULC into a corporation for U.S. tax purposes, and this would have no Canadian tax consequences. However, in some cases, this may trigger unacceptable U.S. tax liabilities based on our understanding that the conversion is considered an outbound transfer of the assets of the ULC from a U.S. taxpayer to a foreign corporation from the U.S. tax perspective.

Another restructuring alternative may be to insert a third-country holding company between the U.S. parent and the ULC; for example, the Canada-Luxembourg Tax Treaty does not have an anti-hybrid rule or a limitation on benefits article. Anti-avoidance issues and costs of establishing and maintaining the new holding company would have to be considered. For a U.S. resident shareholder of a ULC that is not, or may have difficulty establishing its status as, a "qualifying person" for purposes of the new limitation on benefits article contained in the Protocol (and discussed later in this bulletin), it may be important to transfer the shares of the ULC to the new holding company before the Protocol comes into force with respect to capital gains. This would be necessary if a gain would be triggered for Canadian tax purposes in connection with a transfer of the shares at fair market value from the U.S. shareholder to the new holding company, and the U.S. shareholder wishes to claim a Treaty exemption on the grounds that the shares do not derive their value principally from Canadian real property or resource property. Accordingly, such a U.S. resident shareholder should consider the restructuring alternatives now and be prepared to insert a new third-country holding company, if that is the chosen alternative, before the end of 2008.

Other Hybrid Structures

Other examples given in the TE of application of the anti-hybrid rules were not surprising. As expected, the said rules will have application to hybrid partnerships; for example, U.S. partnerships (treated for U.S. tax purposes as corporations) used by Canadian residents to carry on business in the U.S. or finance U.S. investments, and Canadian partnerships (treated for U.S. tax purposes as corporations) used by U.S. residents to finance Canadian investments and businesses. All affected hybrid structures will have to be reviewed, and potentially collapsed or restructured beforeJanuary 1, 2010 (assuming the Protocol is ratified in 2008). The comments above concerning the potential need to complete transfers of Canadian shares before the Protocol limitation on benefits article becomes effective should be taken into account in all cases. This will not be relevant if all U.S. resident entities are clearly "qualifying persons" entitled to full Treaty benefits.

Guidance on Relieving Rules for U.S. Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) and Other Fiscally Transparent Entities

The TE offers guidance regarding how the new relieving rules for fiscally transparent entities will be interpreted and administered. U.S. entities that will be treated as fiscally transparent, and therefore looked through to determine entitlement to Treaty benefits, include partnerships, certain common investment trusts, grantor trusts and LLCs (if they are treated for U.S. tax purposes as partnerships or disregarded entities rather than corporations). U.S. "S" corporations will be granted Treaty benefits by Canada as U.S. resident corporations in their own right (a long-standing Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) practice), although the new limitation on benefits article needs to be considered. Canadian entities that will be treated as fiscally transparent are partnerships (except where Canadian law imposes tax on the partnership; for example, a SIFT partnership) and "bare" trusts. Canadian revocable trusts that are not bare trusts are not included in the list of Canadian fiscally transparent entities, even if the settlor of the trust may be attributed income and gains of the trust for Canadian tax purposes.

The TE clarifies that because LLCs are still regarded as corporations for Canadian tax purposes, an LLC (not its members) will still file Canadian income tax returns reporting any relevant Canadian source income and gains. However, since the LLC itself is not entitled to Treaty benefits, the LLC will claim Treaty benefits that are available to its U.S. resident members as a result of the look-through treatment of fiscally transparent entities. Practical details regarding the information that will have to be provided by the LLC to establish the members' Treaty status were not included in the TE. The TE indicates that the CRA will provide guidance in this regard. Given that the Protocol has not extended Treaty benefits to LLCs themselves (but rather to U.S. qualifying members), it will continue to make sense in certain circumstances to consider the use of a "blocker" entity when making investments or carrying on business in Canada.

In the case of an LLC carrying on business in Canada, Canada will look only to the presence and activities in Canada of the LLC for purposes of determining whether the LLC earns income through a permanent establishment and will not look to those of the members acting in their own right.

The TE clarifies that Treaty benefits may be claimed by looking through a fiscally transparent entity in a third country. The example given was that of a U.S. resident owning a French entity that earns Canadian-source dividends. If the French entity is fiscally transparent for U.S. tax purposes, the U.S. resident can claim Treaty benefits with respect to the dividend, even if the French entity is not fiscally transparent for Canadian or French tax purposes. If the Canada-France Tax Treaty is also applicable, then the Canadian withholding tax rate would be the lesser of the Treaty rate and the Canada-France Tax Treaty rate. This result will be particularly useful in the case of related-party interest, as the Treaty is the first Canadian tax treaty to reduce the withholding tax rate (gradually) to nil for U.S. residents that qualify for Treaty benefits. Similar compliance issues as those described above with respect to LLCs would presumably apply to the third-country entity.

The Protocol will add language to the dividend article to allow access to the 5% withholding tax rate where shares are held through a fiscally transparent entity. The 5% rate applies only if the beneficial owner of the shares is a company that owns 10% or more of the voting stock of the dividend payer. Voting stock held indirectly through a fiscally transparent entity will generally be taken into account under the new language. The CRA has taken the position under the existing Treaty that the voting stock of a Canadian corporation must be directly held by a U.S. company in order to meet the requirements for the 5% rate. It is interesting that the TE states that the U.S. considers the new language to be "merely a clarification," suggesting they are not in agreement with the CRA's interpretation of the existing Treaty. A U.S. company that has recently suffered the 15% withholding tax rate on dividends paid by a Canadian corporation to a partnership, and that would have qualified for the 5% rate if indirect share ownership were counted, could consider whether to challenge the CRA's position by applying for a refund of the excess withholding tax.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
1 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

What is the emotional culture of your organization?

Every organization and workplace has an emotional culture that can have an impact on everything from employee performance to customer or client satisfaction.

3 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join leading lawyers from the Blakes Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation group as they discuss recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits law as well as strategies to identify and minimize common risks.

3 Nov 2016, Other, Vancouver, Canada

“Risk” is the new black. It’s on the lips of every CEO, CFO, GC and board member — as it should be. Can you spot it? How do you analyze it? Are you equipped to manage it?

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.