Canada: Design Services Ltd. v. Canada

Copyright 2008, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Procurement/Litigation, July 2008


In Design Services Ltd. v. Canada 2008 SCC 22, the Supreme Court of Canada considered whether an owner owes a duty of care to subcontractors in the tendering context, and found that this type of claim cannot be justified as a new category of negligence for reasons of proximity and indeterminate liability. In reaching this conclusion, the Supreme Court placed particular emphasis on what contracting options would have been available to the subcontractors under the owner's tender documentation, had the subcontractors chosen to utilize them.

This decision has a number of important implications relative to limitation of an owner's liability under the terms of its tender documentation and in relation to the need for subcontractors to secure adequate contractual protections for themselves.


Design Services Ltd. and other plaintiffs were subcontractors assembled by the general contractor Olympic Construction Limited, to submit a bid proposal for the construction of a naval reserve building, HMCS Cabot, at St. John's Newfoundland.

Olympic's bid was submitted pursuant to a design-build tender process, issued by the Department of Public Works and Government Services Canada. The tender documentation required Olympic to assemble a team of subcontractors for a design-build process each of whom had to be pre-approved by Public Works and could not be substituted without specific authorization. Stage one of the two-stage process involved a request for statement of qualifications (SOQ). Public Works required the SOQ to contain significant detail concerning the role, relationship and experience of each member of the design-build team. Public Works also required each team to attend a "partnering session" between its project manager and all constituents. Stage two involved a request for proposal (RFP), whereby prequalified applicants could reply to the RFP. The RFP provided that a reply could either be submitted by a single proponent (i.e., the general contractor) or by a joint venture consisting of the team pre-qualified under the SOQ process.

Members of Olympic's team, including Design Services and other subcontractors, entered into various agreements among each other, including confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements, but decided that Olympic would be the sole proponent in the response to the RFP. If Olympic was awarded the contract, it would then enter into subcontracts with members of its design-build team. Public Works was not involved in any of the negotiations between Olympic and the members of its design-build team.

Public Works approved Olympic's SOQ. Olympic submitted its reply to the RFP as the sole proponent. Public Works awarded the contract to a non-compliant bidder and litigation ensued. Olympic settled with Public Works. Design Services and other constituents of Olympic's design-build team (the "Design-Build Plaintiffs") continued to advance their own claims following the settlement. In doing so, they had to overcome the fact that they had no contractual relationship with Public Works.


The Design-Build Plaintiffs contended that Public Works invited not just a general contractor to participate in the design-build competition but also the constituents of its design-build team, each of whom spent a considerable amount of effort to prepare designs and plans and submit a price. Public Works stood to gain a great deal by this effort so that it would be unconscionable and contrary to the integrity of the bidding system to allow Public Works to limit its liability to Olympic alone, where it had breached a duty of fairness to the design-build team as a whole by awarding the construction contract to a non-compliant bidder.

Public Works did not dispute that it breached its duty of fairness to Olympic by awarding the contract to a non-compliant bidder or that if the contract had been properly awarded to Olympic, the Design-Build Plaintiffs would have been paid for their work on the project, including the cost of preparing the bid documents. However, Public Works contended that the Design-Build Plaintiffs had no legal status in the process because it was open to them to organize their affairs as joint venturers for purposes of the SOQ and reply to the RFP, but they had chosen not to do so. Further, it was argued, theirs were claims for pure economic loss that did not fall under any established duty of care and could not become a new category of negligence because, among other things, this would open the door to indeterminate liability by encouraging further claims from sub-subcontractors, suppliers, their employees and the like.

Background to Tendering: The Contract A and B Framework

The general framework for analyzing the construction tendering process was set out in Ontario v. Ron Engineering & Construction (Eastern) Ltd. [1981] S.C.J. No. 13 and recently reviewed by Binnie J. in Naylor Group Inc. v. Ellis-Don Construction Ltd., [2001] 2 S.C.R. 943. Upon the submission of a tender in response to an owner's call for tenders, a unilateral contract is formed between the bidder and the owner. This is known as "Contract A." Depending on its terms (expressed and implied), Contract A binds owners in several ways. Principally, owners must treat all bidders fairly and equally, and they can only accept compliant bids (Martel Building Ltd. v. Canada, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 860). The successful bidder is required, as a condition of Contract A, to enter into the construction contract with the owner (Contract B).

Supreme Court of Canada [2008] S.C.J. No. 22

The Supreme Court of Canada unanimously affirmed the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal (which overturned the trial judgment). Rothstein J., for the court, concluded that a new duty of care should not be recognized. The Design-Build Plaintiffs were claiming pure economic loss that did not fall within a pre-existing category of a duty of care. Although it was reasonably foreseeable to Public Works that the Design-Build Plaintiffs would suffer harm from a contract award to a non-compliant bidder, the second aspect of the test for establishing a new duty of care – sufficient proximity – could not be established. Public Works maintained a distance between itself and members of design-build teams that were not proponents through the terms of its tendering documents.

Furthermore, a new duty of care between an owner and a subcontractor in a tendering context was not justifiable. Contrary to the finding at trial, the issue of indeterminate liability was problematic. While it was true that the subcontractors were known to Public Works by reason of its prequalification SOQ process, the contractual context led to the indeterminacy of the class of plaintiffs that could readily be determined. The concern was that holding Public Works to a duty of care in respect of those subcontractors would actually open the door to a potentially indeterminate number of claims for economic loss by further suppliers and employees working under those subcontractors. The Design-Build Plaintiffs could have protected themselves by making themselves parties to Contract A, but chose not to do so. The Supreme Court concluded in this regard that tort law should not be used as an after-the-fact insurer.


Whether an owner could owe a duty of care to its subcontractors was a question left open in Martel Building Ltd. v. Canada, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 860. In Design Services, the issue was resolved. Thus, in the absence of damage to property (which may engage existing principles of relational economic loss), no duty of care exists. The position taken by the Supreme Court on indeterminate liability recognizes the reality that construction contracting typically involves a very long and complex supply chain, making it difficult or impossible to draw the line between claims of subcontractors versus their respective suppliers and employees. In the result, future cases claiming economic loss against owners in the construction context are more likely to focus on the terms of the owner's tender documentation, having regard to whether the subcontractors had reasonable opportunities to protect themselves by contract with the owner. Owners who have taken the time to carefully structure their tender documentation with regard to the involvement of subcontractors may realize a significant mitigation of risk in this regard.

For subcontractors, this decision should serve as a stark reminder of the importance of performing comprehensive due diligence independently of the general contractor, both to understand the owner's tender documentation and to obtain adequate legal protection. Simply working closely with a general contractor will not create legal contractual benefits for the subcontractor.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
16 Oct 2018, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join Blakes lawyers for our 10th annual overview of recent legal and regulatory developments and practical strategies to navigate the changing regulation of Canada’s payments industry.

26 Oct 2018, Other, Vancouver, Canada

Cybersecurity, including data privacy and security obligations, has become a critical chapter in every company’s risk management playbook.

30 Oct 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Please join us for discussions on recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits as well as employment law issues.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions