Canada: Retail Insolvencies In Canada Series, #2: Supplier Perspectives

This is the second instalment in a series examining large retail insolvencies in Canada from the perspective of various stakeholders. The Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) (CCAA) is the principal statute for the reorganization or sale of large corporate debtors in Canada and the functional equivalent to Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Chapter 11) in the United States. Accordingly, our series focuses on CCAA proceedings, with references to alternate insolvency proceedings where applicable.

This article discusses retail insolvencies from the perspective of third-party inventory suppliers and service providers, and follows the CCAA filing of Toys "R" Us (Canada) Ltd. (Toys Canada), a leading toy and baby products retailer. The first article in this series, focusing on the landlord perspective on retail insolvencies, was published shortly after Sears Canada's June 22, 2017 CCAA filing.

On September 19, 2017, Toys Canada obtained Chapter 11 protection from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, together with its U.S. parent (Toys US) and various affiliated entities. Later that same day, Toys Canada also filed for CCAA protection before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List). Although Toys US was facing significant fiscal challenges, Toys Canada had strong financial metrics. Nonetheless, Toys Canada was facing a liquidity crisis due to the loss of access to its operating facility following the event of default that was triggered under its credit facilities by the Chapter 11 filing. In its court materials, Toys Canada acknowledged the need to modernize its stores and significantly improve its online sales platform in order to remain competitive in its market sector. Attempts by the Toys "R" Us corporate group to secure the necessary financing outside an insolvency process had failed. Lenders were only prepared to provide the needed funding in connection with a court-supervised process. The Toys Canada filing and the rationale behind it is further evidence that Canada's retail landscape will continue to reshape as traditional brick-and-mortar stores face increasing pressure in the ever-evolving digital marketplace.

OVERVIEW

In most CCAA proceedings involving a distressed retailer, the vast number of creditors will be composed of suppliers (exceptions include cases where the Canadian subsidiary is solely supplied by its U.S. parent, such as the recent insolvency proceedings of Payless Shoes Canada, Express Canada and American Apparel).

However, suppliers often exert less influence on the outcome of CCAA proceedings than lenders or landlord creditors because suppliers are generally more dispersed and less coordinated. A single large landlord, for example, may have distressed tenants in multiple locations and thus a significant economic stake in the outcome of the proceedings. Accordingly, the impact of an individual supplier in any particular insolvency will likely be more limited than the impact of a mobilized landlord creditor. Suppliers as a group, though, are critical stakeholders who can amplify their collective voice through informed decision-making and coordinated action.

CREDITOR COMMITTEES

In Canada, there have been instances of suppliers acting in unison through a committee; however, such committees have been formed on an ad hoc basis because they are not expressly provided for by statute as is the case under Chapter 11.

In the recent Target Canada CCAA proceeding, the court — with the support of Target Canada and the court-appointed monitor — appointed a consultative committee of senior insolvency practitioners (including Blakes lawyers), who represented a cross-section of various stakeholders, including inventory suppliers. The consultative committee acted as a "sounding board" and consulted with the monitor and the Target Canada entities on various aspects of the case, including the treatment of intercompany claims and the formulation of a plan for distribution of the proceeds of liquidation. The plan ultimately received unanimous support and the consultative committee played a key role in achieving that outcome. Notably, the consultative committee was funded by Target Canada. It was viewed by Target Canada and the monitor as an efficient means of achieving a consensual resolution of the outstanding issues in the case.

OBLIGATION TO SUPPLY

As a result of the standard CCAA stay granted in the Initial Order commencing CCAA proceedings, suppliers cannot discontinue, fail to honour, alter, interfere with, repudiate, terminate or cease to perform their obligations under existing contracts with the retail debtor. This is even the case if the supply agreement provides that the obligation to supply terminates upon an insolvency filing. As is the case in Chapter 11, these "ipso facto" termination clauses are unenforceable in the face of a stay.

As a matter of practice, following a CCAA filing, the debtor or the court-appointed monitor will send letters to suppliers notifying them of the commencement of the CCAA proceedings and highlighting the existence of the stay in the Initial Order.

These stay provisions serve to preserve the status quo as at the filing date and only operate in circumstances where a supplier is under an existing contractual obligation to supply. Where a contractual obligation to supply only arises upon the acceptance of a purchase order or statement of work that is submitted by the debtor, the supplier is generally free to cease accepting purchase orders and supplying the retail debtor. However, caution should be exercised before a supplier ceases to supply in the presence of a stay, even in the absence of a written agreement to supply. A debtor may take the position that notwithstanding the absence of a written agreement, a contract to supply has arisen orally or through a course of conduct. If a contract is established on this basis, it would be subject to the stay of termination rights. In addition, suppliers without a contractual obligation to supply may be compelled to do so if they are designated by the court as critical suppliers (discussed below).

NO OBLIGATION TO EXTEND CREDIT

While the stay limits a supplier's ability to terminate a supply contract, the CCAA does grant suppliers certain protections in these circumstances. The CCAA provides that no party is required to continue to supply goods or services on credit, or otherwise advance credit to the debtor company (note that debtors often require confirmation from suppliers that any payments made to them post-filing will not be applied to, or set-off against, pre-filing obligations owed to such suppliers). The one exception to this rule is when a supplier is designated as a critical supplier.

Generally, there are five options available to a supplier that must continue to supply a retail debtor during a CCAA proceeding:

  1. No Change: A supplier may choose to supply without insisting on any changes to the existing supply relationship and continue to extend trade credit. Unlike administrative expense claims under Chapter 11 for post-filing supply, the supplier is not automatically afforded any special protections under the CCAA. The supplier bears the risk that in the event of an unforeseen cessation of operations and bankruptcy (equivalent of Chapter 7) of the retail debtor, it does not receive payment in full for goods or services provided on credit on a post-filing basis. Some suppliers, however, are satisfied with the level of funding available to the retailer in the CCAA proceeding and wish to accommodate the retailer in order to secure future business.
  2. Expedited Payment Terms: A supplier and debtor can agree to shorten existing payment terms (e.g., going from net 60 days to net 15 days) so as to reduce the supplier's exposure. While this option reduces the risk that a supplier is not paid in full for goods or services provided following a filing, it does not eliminate such risk entirely. The supplier may pursue this option to reduce its risk profile while accommodating a retailer with whom it wishes to continue doing business.
  3. Cash-on-Delivery: A supplier may pursue cash-on-delivery to insulate itself from further exposure to the insolvent retailer. While this option fully protects suppliers for the post-filing supply of goods, the volume of shipments and/or back-office capabilities of either the debtor or supplier may prove cash-on-delivery challenging to implement.
  4. Advance Payment: When supplying on advance payment terms, the supplier receives payment in full for a particular post-filing order before shipping goods or providing services to the debtor pursuant to that order. Typically, these arrangements provide that when a purchase order or statement of work is received and accepted by the supplier, it is processed and the debtor is provided with an invoice or order acknowledgment, setting out the amount to be paid in advance before such goods or services are provided to the debtor. These arrangements are generally easier to implement than cash-on-delivery.
  5. Payment Assurance: A debtor may also provide a supplier with other forms of payment assurance (e.g., a cash deposit or letter of credit) to protect the supplier in the event of non-payment. Suppliers need to ensure that the deposit is sufficient to cover their exposure at any given point, for such payment assurance to mitigate exposure effectively.

    The CCAA proceedings of specialty fashion retailer Comark Inc. (Comark) provides an interesting variation to this approach. Comark obtained an order allowing it to enter into an Inventory Purchase Guarantee Facility because it needed inventory for the holiday season and its suppliers were uneasy about providing the inventory without advance payment or deposits. Comark did not view it as prudent to make advance payments to suppliers (including offshore suppliers) to which it already owed pre-filing payments and opted to obtain payment guarantees from a lender to backstop its post-filing purchase of inventory.

CRITICAL SUPPLIERS

Paying Pre-filing Claims

In certain CCAA cases, including the recent Sears Canada, Toys Canada and Express Canada proceedings, the courts allowed the distressed retailer to make payments of pre-filing debts to certain suppliers, in order to ensure the uninterrupted supply of goods to the retailer. For example, it may be difficult to enforce the Initial Order against offshore suppliers and the only practical means to ensure continued supply is to pay pre-filing arrears. Further, if certain logistics providers, custom brokers or sales agents fail to honour their supply or service commitments (notwithstanding the stay), there could be a material impact on the retailer's ability to obtain delivery of goods in a timely manner.

In these circumstances, it may be necessary to make pre-filing payments to a subset of suppliers to ensure continued supply. In the Toys Canada proceedings, the court noted that such payments would normally constitute a form of preference (discussed below), but ultimately provided the requested relief, while emphasizing that payment of pre-filing claims should be infrequent and carefully scrutinized by the monitor to ensure such payments are only made to preserve critical, uninterrupted supply of goods and services.

Critical Supplier Charge

In addition to the discretion that is sometimes afforded to retailers to pay pre-filing claims of suppliers, under the CCAA, a debtor company may bring a motion asking the court to declare a person as a critical supplier, whether or not there is an ongoing supply contract. The court must be satisfied that the person is a supplier of goods or services to the debtor company and such goods or services are critical to the company's continued operation.

If a supplier is declared by the court to be a critical supplier under the CCAA, the court may then require supply goods or services to the debtor company on any terms and conditions that are consistent with the pre-filing supply relationship or that the court considers appropriate. The court's ability to impose economic (i.e., pricing) terms that are different than those set out in a contract is a matter of significant debate in Canada and to date, no court has amended such terms in a supply agreement. Where a court deems a party a critical supplier, it must also declare that all or part of the property of the debtor is subject to a security or charge in favour of the critical supplier, in an amount equal to the value of the goods or services supplied under the terms of the court's order.

PREFERENCE PAYMENTS

The CCAA and BIA contain provisions for, among other things, the review and challenge of pre-filing payments by the debtor company on the basis that they amounted to a preference. Generally, unsecured creditor claims are to be treated rateably and an insolvent company should not pay one unsecured creditor while leaving others unpaid without a justifiable reason. To the extent this occurs, the payment may be subject to challenge. In the case of a supplier dealing at arm's length with the debtor, it must be established that the applicable payment took place within three months prior to the initial insolvency event (i.e., the CCAA filing) with a view to giving that creditor a preference over another creditor and that the debtor was insolvent at the time of the transaction.

Under Chapter 11, suppliers that have received a payment from a debtor within a period of 90 days of the insolvency filing will, as a matter of course, receive a letter from the debtor company or a claims administrator demanding the return of such payments. Canadian proceedings are much less litigious and the technical requirements to void such transactions are more onerous. Suppliers can take comfort that payments received by them in the normal course from a debtor prior to the commencement of CCAA proceedings are not likely to be challenged.

CLAIMS PROCESS

Unlike Chapter 11, in a CCAA case, there is no statutory requirement to file a proof of claim within a defined time period, following the commencement of the case.

Generally, the claims of suppliers in CCAA proceedings will be treated as unsecured claims that must be proven in a court-approved claims process (to the extent one is sought). If any distributions are made, payment of these unsecured claims is made on a pro-rata basis. However, in circumstances where there is a liquidation or sale of a business (rather than a restructuring) and the proceeds of such sale or liquidation are insufficient for there to be any distributions to unsecured creditors, a debtor may not seek the approval of a claims process to identify and quantify unsecured claims. For example, in the recent Golf Town CCAA proceedings, the business was sold as a going concern but the proceeds of sale were insufficient to pay out all secured creditors. No claims process was initiated and no distributions were made to unsecured creditors.

NO 30-DAY GOODS CLAIMS

In bankruptcy or receivership proceedings, suppliers have a limited right to recover inventory supplied to a debtor within a period of 30 days before the date of the bankruptcy or receivership. Such goods must be identifiable, in the same state as on delivery, in the possession of the trustee or receiver and not subject to a subsequent arm's-length sale. This repossession right does not exist under the CCAA and the CCAA contains no analogous provisions in respect of reclamation claims provided for under Chapter 11.

In the Target Canada CCAA proceedings, counsel to certain suppliers indicated an intention to bring a motion for priority to be afforded to claims relating to goods supplied to Target Canada in the 30 days leading up to the CCAA filing date. The operating theory was that from the outset, the Target Canada CCAA proceeding was a liquidating CCAA proceeding with no intention or prospect of a going concern solution and was thus akin to bankruptcy. Therefore, the argument was that the court should exercise its equitable jurisdiction to import the bankruptcy concept of 30-day goods claims into the CCAA case. Ultimately, the motion was not brought but had this motion proceeded, any remedy provided by the court would have been novel.

TITLE RETENTION CLAUSES AND INVENTORY SECURITY

Supply agreements will typically contain a standard title retention clause that provides that title to the goods supplied to the retailer remains the property of the supplier unless (and until) such property is paid for in full. Under personal property security legislation in all common law provinces of Canada (i.e., all provinces other than Quebec), the supplier's retention of title simply provides it with a security interest in the inventory supplied, in order to secure payment of the purchase price of such inventory. The supplied inventory itself is considered property of the retailer, notwithstanding the title retention clause. Unless the supplier has perfected its security interest by way of registration, it will have only an unsecured claim for the unpaid purchase price of the inventory and no property claim to the inventory itself.

If a security interest is registered, the supplier will not have priority over prior registered security interests unless the supplier satisfied the requirements that afford priority to holders of a purchase money security interest (PMSI) under applicable personal property security legislation. To achieve this priority, the inventory supplier must have registered its security interest in the applicable provincial personal property security registry, and provided notice in the prescribed form to all other secured parties with an interest in the retailer's inventory, prior to delivery of the inventory to the retailer. Even if the supplier has acquired PMSI priority in the inventory supplied, once the inventory has been sold, the supplier will not be able to assert any priority to such proceeds unless the proceeds of sale are traceable and identifiable as proceeds of sale of the relevant inventory. Although Quebec civil law does not use PMSI terminology, it has specific registration requirements for parties asserting a priority right to goods based on title retention provisions in a contract.

TAKEAWAY

Inventory suppliers are important stakeholders in any CCAA restructuring. Indeed, the driving purpose of a restructuring in this sector is to enable the distressed retailer to continue to deliver inventory to consumers in a more cost-efficient and consumer-friendly manner. The key for suppliers is to educate themselves on the insolvency process and harmonize their approach so that they can more effectively leverage their collective economic interests and act as a counterbalance to other significant commercial actors.

The next article in this series will examine retail insolvencies from the perspective of another important stakeholder group: corporate parents.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
25 Oct 2017, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Please join us for a discussion on business and legal issues for landlords and tenants to consider when entering, negotiating or terminating offers to lease.

27 Oct 2017, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Our partners will be joined by Tim Appleby of cyber-breach response experts Mandiant. Tim will share his insight on M&A security assessments, drawing on Mandiant’s experience in evaluating, assessing and reducing risk at every stage of the M&A process.

2 Nov 2017, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Please join members of the Blakes Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation group on Thursday, November 2, 2017, for discussions on recent updates and legal developments in pensions and employee benefits law.

 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.