Canada: Federal Court Of Appeal Reaffirms Government Discretion In Scoping Of Federal Environmental Assessments

Copyright 2008, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Environmental Law, July 2008

The June 13, 2008 Federal Court of Appeal decision in Miningwatch Canada. v. Canada (Minister of Fisheries & Oceans) (Miningwatch appeal decision) should be of great interest to aficionados of tennis and ping pong. It represents the latest in a series of alternating decisions involving the discretion vested in government authorities during the scoping of federal environmental assessments. For those keeping score, the Miningwatch appeal decision reverses the Miningwatch trial decision (rendered on September 25, 2007), which trial decision had essentially reversed the previous Federal Court of Appeal decision in Prairie Acid Rain Coalition v. Canada (Minister of Fisheries & Oceans) (hereafter referred to as "Truenorth").

The Miningwatch case involves an open pit gold and copper mine and milling operation located in British Columbia ("Red Chris mine proposal"), that is subject to a federal environmental assessment. The act governing federal environmental assessments is the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA).

There are four categories of assessments under CEAA: screenings; comprehensive studies; panel reviews; and mediations. The vast majority of projects undergo a screening, which is the most basic category. The next category is a comprehensive study. The main differences between the two are that a comprehensive study involves the review and analysis of additional factors and (since 2003) requires public consultation.

As a result of its involvement in the issuance of licences or approvals, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO), was determined to be a Responsible Authority (RA) under CEAA. The effect of being an RA is that an RA determines the scope of a project in relation to which an environmental assessment is to be conducted. The scope of the project has a direct correlation to the category of environmental assessment that a project undergoes.

The issue in the Miningwatch case centered around the category of assessment to which the Red Chris mine proposal was subject. The category initially selected by DFO was a comprehensive study, and was later converted into a screening. Opponents challenged the decision to convert the category of assessment. Their application included a request for a declaration that the Red Chris mine proposal was properly subject to a comprehensive study level of assessment. Such a declaration would necessarily result in increased public consultation.

Truenorth Trial And Appeal Decisions (The Law From September 2004 To September 2007)

To understand the context of the Miningwatch appeal decision, and the rationale for the change in the assessment category, requires an understanding of the earlier Truenorth decisions. Truenorth dealt with a proposed oil sands extraction mine located in Alberta. The mine involved the destruction of a stream and therefore required a prescribed CEAA authorization from DFO. As such, it was subject to a federal environmental assessment. Notwithstanding that the overall project involved the operation of an oil sands mine, DFO scoped the project as only involving the destruction of the stream and related activities, which meant that the project was only subject to a federal screening. That scoping decision was challenged by various groups as being improper and too narrow.

One of the arguments raised in opposition to the scoping decision was predicated upon the Comprehensive Study List Regulations (CSL Regulations) enacted under CEAA. If a scoped project meets the criteria as set out in the CSL Regulations, a project is required to undergo a comprehensive study. The proposed oil sands project met the description set out in the CSL Regulations and prima facie appeared to require a comprehensive study. The Applicants therefore argued that it was improper for the RA to scope the project in a manner that only resulted in a screening. The Applicants were unsuccessful in their argument. Rather, the court in Truenorth – both at trial and on appeal – held that notwithstanding that a project description met the CSL Regulations, an RA still had the discretion to scope the project in a manner differently and more narrowly than as set out in the project description, so as to include only those aspects of the project related to an RA's jurisdiction and responsibility.

The Truenorth decisions dramatically affected the Red Chris mine proposal. The Red Chris mine proposal was initially subject to a comprehensive study because it exceeded the ore production threshold set out in the CSL Regulations.

After the Truenorth trial decision was rendered, and in reliance on that decision, DFO re-scoped the project, indicating that it was no longer subject to a comprehensive study. Rather, the portion of the project pertaining to DFO's jurisdiction and responsibility under CEAA was only subject to a screening. The effect of the Truenorth decisions is that they upheld the discretion vested in an RA and enabled an RA to scope a project in a manner narrower than as set out in a project description.

Miningwatch Trial Decision (The Law From September 2007 To June 2008)

The Miningwatch trial decision was rendered after the Truenorth decisions. In an extensive judgement, the judge went to great pains to discuss and distinguish the Truenorth decisions. In so doing, the judge emphasized certain amendments that had been made to CEAA in 2003 (2003 amendments), which introduced the requirement of public consultation in a comprehensive study. The judge noted that the Truenorth decisions only dealt with the provisions of CEAA as they were prior to 2003 and concluded that due to the changes relating to required public consultation, the law after 2003 was different.

After reviewing all of the 2003 amendments, the judge concluded that they introduced the fundamental aspect of a duty to consult the public at an early stage. The judge subsequently held that where a project as set out in a proponent's project description meets the CSL Regulations, an RA must ensure public consultation and must ensure that the entire project undergoes a comprehensive study. In other words, although the RA has some discretion to scope a project, that discretion is constrained by the initial project description.

The Miningwatch trial decision severely restricted the ability of an RA to scope a project. The determining factor in scoping a project was the manner in which the project was described by the project proponent rather than the discretion vested in an RA. The practical effect of the decision was that after it was rendered, DFO, as the RA for the Red Chris mine proposal, re-scoped the mine as once-again requiring a comprehensive study. This was one of several projects that were re-scoped around that time, the basis for all of them being the Miningwatch trial decision.

Miningwatch Appeal Decision (The Law As Of June 13, 2008)

In its decision, the Appeal Court overturned the Miningwatch trial decision and, notwithstanding the 2003 CEAA amendments, held that its earlier decision in Truenorth prevailed. The Appeal Court confirmed that an RA has the discretion to scope a project, and that it is the project "as scoped" by the RA that determines whether or not the CSL Regulations are triggered. If the CSL Regulations are not triggered, then public consultation does not arise.

The Miningwatch appeal decision reaffirms the discretion vested in RAs in scoping a project as part of the federal environmental assessment process. The critical factor in determining if a project is subject to a comprehensive study is no longer predicated upon the project description as described by the proponent. Rather, it is predicated upon the project "as scoped" by the RA, after taking into account its jurisdiction and responsibility under CEAA. If the project "as scoped" by the RA falls within the CSL Regulations, then and only then is the project subject to a comprehensive study.


The Miningwatch appeal decision is the latest in a series of decisions involving the discretion vested in RAs during the scoping of a project under CEAA. At this time, it is unknown if an application will be made for leave to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court of Canada. However, in light of the fact that it is a reaffirmation of the court's earlier position in Truenorth and that the Supreme Court of Canada previously denied leave to appeal in Truenorth, it seems reasonable to assume that leave to appeal (if requested), will be similarly denied.

As of today, based on the Miningwatch appeal decision, an RA has full discretion to scope a project in a manner that is narrower than a project proponent's project description and consistent with an RA's jurisdiction and responsibility under CEAA. Project proponents and their advisors are well advised to remain aware of this discretion and not assume that a project, even if prima facie meeting the CSL Regulations, is automatically subject to a comprehensive study level of assessment and is automatically subject to public consultation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
26 Oct 2018, Other, Vancouver, Canada

Cybersecurity, including data privacy and security obligations, has become a critical chapter in every company’s risk management playbook.

30 Oct 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Please join us for discussions on recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits as well as employment law issues.

12 Nov 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Stories aren’t falsehoods. Stories are the root of all effective human communications: they motivate, animate and clarify. If you aren’t telling stories, you probably aren’t getting your point across.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions