Canada: The Law Of Unintended Tax Consequences

Last Updated: July 31 2017
Article by John Tobin

Increasing complexity in business structures, the speed at which transactions are conceived and closed, and rapidly changing tax laws, particularly surrounding base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) can result in unintended material tax consequences.

Managing the tax remediation process through proactive strategies can achieve better outcomes than waiting for a Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) audit and losing control over the process. Early and appropriate disclosure may also stave off market criticism. Three recent developments in tax remediation impact the ability to rectify a completed transaction, the ability to correct a transaction without prosecution or penalty through voluntary disclosure, and the consequences of insufficient disclosure of tax consequences. The changes surrounding rectification and voluntary disclosure further restrict available tax remediation and increase the incentives to dispute potential non-compliance rather than use other methods. The Silver Wheaton case in the U.S. regarding public disclosure of material tax non-compliance demonstrates the importance of understanding the tax at risk and having a strategy of appropriately disclosing it.

Rectification

One remediation strategy has been to resort to the Superior Courts for declaratory relief usually to "rectify" a contract or arrangement to correct an error or in some cases to substitute different steps or legal consequences that achieved the same commercial goals while avoiding unintended consequences. If a legal instrument fails to accurately reflect the true agreement between parties, the rectification remedy allows for a court to exercise its equitable jurisdiction to alter the instrument. In Canada (Attorney General) v. Fairmont Hotels Inc., and its partner decision for Quebec, Jean Coutu Group (PJC) Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), the Supreme Court of Canada narrowed the availability of the remedy of rectification commenting that "[r]ectification is not equity's version of a mulligan." Instead, it is a remedy that allows for a correction of a contract that did not reflect the agreed upon intentions of the parties when it was formed.

Prior to these decisions, the availability of the rectification remedy was considered in some cases as very broad relying on a "common continuing intention" between the parties usually relating to a general intention not to pay more tax in a transaction. The Supreme Court held that evidence of a mere common intention was insufficient, because this did not coincide with the purpose of rectification, which is focused on the incorrect recording of an agreement. The party seeking rectification must be able to point to the putative error and articulate the way in which the instrument should be rectified in order to correctly record what the parties intended to do—"rectification aligns the instrument with what the parties agreed to do, and not what, with the benefit of hindsight, they should have agreed to do."

The Supreme Court held that to meet the new test for rectification in cases of common mistake, the party must show on a balance of probabilities that:

  1. there was a prior agreement whose terms are definite and ascertainable;
  2. that the agreement was still in effect at the time the instrument was executed;
  3. that the instrument fails to accurately record the agreement; and
  4. that the instrument, if rectified, would carry out the parties' prior agreement.

The Supreme Court also held that rectification is the same under the common law and civil law—a result that was not obvious and was contentious. In previous cases, the Crown had argued that rectification did not exist as a doctrine in civil law.

With these clarifications, rectification remains a potentially important tool in tax remediation. Many mistakes do involve an intention regarding the tax consequences of an agreement at the time when the contract was formed and a mistake in recording that intention. Future cases may benefit from amending agreements created at the time the error surfaces that specify the terms that the parties intended and which, had they been included, would have carried out that intention.

The Superior Courts have other inherent powers. The next frontier of equitable remedies for tax remediation is rescission. The B.C. Court of Appeal in Re Pallen Trust applied the remedy of rescission when tax planning went awry due to changing interpretations of the relevant tax provisions. It remains unclear how this doctrine will evolve, whether consistency between civil and common law systems will be achieved and how (if at all) it intersects with the "common intention" analysis in rectification.

Voluntary Disclosure

Another remediation strategy has been resorting to a voluntary disclosure under the CRA Voluntary Disclosure Program (VDP). The purpose of the VDP is to promote compliance with Canada's tax laws by encouraging taxpayers to voluntarily come forward and correct previous omissions in their dealings with CRA. Taxpayers who make a valid disclosure have to pay the taxes or charges plus interest, but without penalty or prosecution that the taxpayer would otherwise have been subject to. Voluntary disclosure is available for income tax and GST/HST matters. Proposed changes to the VDP, released June 9, 2017 for a 60-day public comment period, will restrict its current availability. These proposed changes stem from the October 2016, House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance report to the Government that recommended that CRA undertake a comprehensive review of the VDP.1 CRA's proposed changes will:

  1. exclude applications from corporations with gross revenue in excess of $250 million from VDP relief—such corporations should follow normal procedures to amend their tax filings;
  2. exclude applications relating to transfer pricing adjustments or a penalty for incorrect transfer pricing;
  3. exclude applications relating to an advance pricing arrangement (an agreement with a taxpayer that confirms the appropriate transfer pricing methodology);
  4. exclude applications that depend on an agreement being made at the discretion of the Canadian competent authority under a provision of a tax treaty;
  5. in the case of GST/HST, exclude applications where a registrant is attempting to increase the amount of input tax credits, other credit adjustments or rebates without any corresponding increase in tax liability in the application period; and
  6. require the payment of the estimated taxes owing as a condition of qualifying for the program.

The OCAC implied that sophisticated larger taxpayers should not have to resort to the voluntary disclosure program and that is borne out in the CRA proposals. Affected companies should consider making submissions about the proposals.

Mistakes do happen, even in large enterprises with sophisticated advisors and risk mitigation strategies.

It is not clear how CRA intends to address these exclusions. The reference to large taxpayers following normal procedures to amend tax returns seems to suggest that in such a process the Minister of Revenue's discretion to "waive or cancel all or any portion of any penalty or interest otherwise payable under this Act" could be exercised in the normal audit process. Consequently, a taxpayer who is affected by the proposals may want to consider requesting administrative relief outside the context of a voluntary disclosure. It is not clear whether CRA could rely on the proposal as justification for an outright denial of relief of such requests for entire classes of taxpayers without being subject to judicial review framed in accordance with the Federal Court of Appeal's guidance in Canada (National Revenue) v. JP Morgan Asset Management (Canada) Inc. for fettering the discretion of the Minister.

Mistakes do happen, even in large enterprises with sophisticated advisors and risk mitigation strategies. In the past, voluntary disclosure was an effective means of resolving potential disputes. If it is eliminated for large taxpayers and most international matters it will make tax remediation for large sophisticated businesses more challenging, and taxpayers will need to consider its limitations and the availability of other remediation strategies.

Managing Disclosure

Another case last year highlighted the importance of managing the disclosure of potential tax issues. The 2016 U.S. decision In re Silver Wheaton Corp. Securities Litigation is notable for its recognition that an audit conducted by CRA can constitute a material change that, if insufficiently disclosed, could lead to a class action claim of misrepresentation.

In 2009, CRA began its audit of Silver Wheaton (SW), which culminated in 2015 with a proposed transfer pricing adjustment for 2005-2010 of approximately C$715 million.

In 2015, SW issued a press release describing the proposed reassessment, which estimated that if this became a reality, SW would be subject to approximately US$150 million in federal and provincial tax. The press release also stated that SW believed it was in compliance with Canadian tax law and that it intended to vigorously defend its tax filing positions. Following publication of the press release, SW's share price fell approximately 12%.

A class action was brought claiming that SW had failed to disclose its tax liability on the basis that SW was obligated to record any tax liability it was "more likely than not" to incur. The plaintiffs also alleged in the alternative that the defendants were required to disclose it as a "contingent" tax liability. These arguments were tied to GAAP and IFRS standards. While SW did disclose the existence of the audit and the potential for an adverse result, the plaintiffs argued that SW consistently downplayed its potential results.

SW brought a motion for dismissal of the class action based on the absence of a material misrepresentation or omission. As it was a motion to dismiss, the plaintiffs' pleadings were assumed to be true.

SW argued that CRA's reassessment was being disputed and that the Canadian tax courts would ultimately vindicate their tax position. The Court held that this argument was misplaced because the question relating to disclosure in the financial statements was whether it was "probable" that SW would eventually be required to pay unpaid income taxes and applicable penalties, relying on case law that held that the legal standard in the U.S. was the failure to disclose the "potential" that SW would be subject to an enhanced tax liability. The court commented that disclosure of the probability that CRA would assess upon audit should have been disclosed under IFRS.

These recent developments suggest that future tax remediation will be more difficult and more complex. But since unintended tax consequences generally do not get better being left alone, businesses faced with tax mistakes will require a tax remediation risk mitigation strategy rooted in a thorough understanding of the facts, law and administrative practice surrounding the suspected non-compliance, good identification of risks and benefits of particular remediation strategies and sound judgment.

Footnote

1 These hearings were triggered by the favourable settlements made by CRA involving an Isle of Man promoted tax scheme. On December 5, 2016, the Offshore Compliance Advisory Committee (OCAC), an independent committee composed of tax experts, presented its Report on the VDP to the Minister of National Revenue, with recommendations on how to "improve" the VDP so that it could be made more effective and more fair. The OCAC recommended the continuation of the VDP but proposed to tighten the criteria for acceptance into the program.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions