Canada: Court Of Appeal Of Québec Overturns Approval Of BCE Privatization And Puts A Canadian Spin on "Revlon Duties"

On May 22, 2008, in what can only be described as a stunning setback to the largest proposed leveraged buyout (LBO) in Canadian history, a five judge panel of the Court of Appeal of Québec unanimously overturned the Superior Court of Québec's approval of the $51.7 billion buyout of BCE Inc. (BCE) by the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan and others (Teachers). In doing so, the appellate court has seemingly rejected the well recognized American jurisprudence outlining what has become known as the "Revlon Duties" of directors to maximize shareholder value in change of control transactions (even at the expense of non-shareholder interests, if necessary). Now, according to the Court of Appeal of Québec, even securityholders of a target's subsidiary must be considered by a board in order for the directors to fully discharge their duties in the context of a change of control transaction.

The facts in the BCE case were as follows:

  • On April 9, 2007, in response to a public announcement by its largest shareholder that it was no longer a "passive" investor and was reserving the right to "encourage extraordinary transactions or changes to BCE's capitalization," BCE's Board set up an independent strategic oversight committee (SOC) to evaluate alternatives and to consider and review any proposed transaction.
  • BCE's wholly-owned subsidiary, Bell Canada, had approximately $5 billion worth of debentures outstanding, which were guaranteed by BCE.
  • Several such debentureholders wrote to BCE and sought assurances from BCE that their best interests were being considered. The debentureholders also offered to meet with BCE to discuss their ideas as to how the debentureholders could be treated fairly without jeopardizing some of the value-enhancing alternatives being considered by the SOC.
  • Rather than meeting with the debentureholders or discussing their ideas, BCE's Board simply replied with a standard letter that BCE intended to respect the terms of applicable trust indentures governing the debentures.
  • An auction process for BCE ensued. All offers contemplated new debt for Bell Canada (either as borrower or as guarantor). The initial bid submitted by the ultimate victor provided for the amalgamation of BCE and Bell Canada: this would have triggered a requirement to seek the consent of the trustees under the Indentures governing the outstanding debentures. As instructed, the bidder revised the structure of its bid to eliminate the amalgamation. Ultimately, BCE entered into a Definitive Agreement to sell BCE for $42.75 per common share with various pre-acquisition and post-acquisition reorganization transactions (including the provision of $30 billion of guarantees by Bell Canada for the acquisition debt). Under the proposed plan, the existing debentures of Bell Canada (which are currently unsecured) would be secured equally with some of this new debt and certain of the new debt would be subordinated to the debentures.
  • The Definitive Agreement was unanimously recommended by the BCE Board and later approved by 97.03% of the BCE shares voted at a shareholders' meeting.
  • In March 2008, a single judge of the Superior Court of Québec provided final approval of the proposed buyout under section 192 of the CBCA (the "plan of arrangement" provisions whereby the Court must consider whether the plan is "fair and reasonable"). Debentureholders representing approximately 27% of the debentures issued by Bell Canada appealed.

As indicated above, the Court of Appeal of Québec allowed the appeal and set aside the Court approval of the BCE buyout. In doing so, the appellate court seemed to rely heavily on the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Peoples Department Store Inc. v. Wise where the Supreme Court of Canada recognized that the directors' "duty of care" extends to the corporation's creditors. In deciding to allow the debentureholders' appeal in the BCE case, the Court of Appeal of Québec determined that there were at least two weaknesses in BCE's position. These were

  1. The failure of the SOC to even consider the impact of the proposed transaction on the debentureholders constituted a breach of the duty of care that the Board of BCE owed to the debentureholders. Ordinarily, a court will not interfere with the determinations of a Board of Directors. This deference, the so-called "business judgment rule," protects the Board from "second guessing" by the courts. However, the "business judgment rule" will not apply if the process by which the Board has reached its decision is flawed in a fundamental way. In this case, the Court of Appeal found that the Board construed its duties too narrowly, relying on the "Revlon Duties" standard.

These "Revlon Duties" require a board, in a change of control transition, to focus on maximizing value for the corporation's shareholders. In this case, the Court of Appeal of Québec determined the Board's focus on their "Revlon Duties" caused them to disregard their duty to the debentureholders. The appellate court found that "the transaction was structured to avoid dealing with them or their interests" and that "the SOC did not take into consideration the adverse financial impact of the potential transaction on the debentureholders. No detailed analysis was made of the costs and benefits of the LBO insofar as it [affected] the securityholders other than the shareholders. From that point on, the process was fatally vitiated."

As the process was "fatally vitiated," the Board's decision was not entitled to the deference of the Court under the "business judgment rule."
  1. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Court of Appeal found that it was open to the Court to conclude that the proposed buyout was fair and reasonable provided that the applicant (BCE) could prove it was. However, the Court found that BCE had made no attempt to "justify the fairness and reasonableness of an arrangement that resulted in a significant adverse economic impact on the debentureholders" (i.e., the downgrading of the debentures and heightened risk of default) while according a "substantial premium to the shareholders." In the absence of such proof, the Court determined that it could not approve the Plan.

The reasoning of the Court of Appeal of Québec is, to many legal minds, curious. It has long been accepted both in the United States and Canada that, in the context of change of control transactions where a corporation has been "put in play," the board of directors' paramount duty is to maximize shareholder value. In fact, in some cases it has been held that if a board considers non-shareholder interests in these circumstances, the board will be in breach of its duties to the shareholders. In the BCE case, however, the appellate court seems to have extended the duties of directors to consider a broad range of non-shareholder interests.

While an appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada is under way, a board seeking court approval of a change of control transaction by way of a plan of arrangement would be well advised (until the Supreme Court of Canada provides further guidance in this area) to demonstrate that serious consideration was given to the impact of the proposed transaction on securityholders other than shareholders (even securityholders of subsidiaries). Further, they should demonstrate that consideration had been given as to whether the transaction could possibly be structured so as to minimize any adverse impact on those securityholders while still maximizing benefits for the corporation's shareholders. To the extent that, after such consideration, a board comes to the conclusion that the transaction cannot be structured so as to minimize the adverse effect on other constituencies, the process by which it reached this determination must be made clear in the materials when court approval of the transaction is sought.

In the meantime, the US "Revlon Duties" now have a Canadian spin: while a Canadian board must seek to maximize shareholder value in the context of a change of control transaction, it must also give due consideration to non-shareholder interests.

This is a task that is easier said than done. The purpose of the "Revlon Duties" is to reduce or eliminate the inherent conflict of interest that the board of a target company has in the case of a proposed change of control transaction. By narrowing the scope of the board's duty to "maximize shareholder value," the Delaware courts sought to prevent boards from resisting proposals that would deliver value to the shareholders for reasons that may advantage other constituencies (i.e., the board and senior management) at the expense of shareholders. If, however, the boards of Canadian companies are now permitted (required?) to take the interests of a broad range of constituencies into account, the opportunities for mischief are clear. A board could "cloak" its opposition to a change of control transaction by citing its adverse effects on the corporation's creditors or its subsidiaries and thereby deprive the shareholders of a significant opportunity for value creation. Moreover, even if a board is proceeding in good faith, the specific weighting that is to be given the competing interests of the various constituencies is unclear. The Court of Appeal concedes that the interests of various securityholders are "not necessarily of the same weight" and that "the advantages do not have to be equally distributed." However, the Court gives no guidelines as to how a board is to assess which weighting of the competing interests will survive judicial review.

The decision introduces tremendous uncertainty into the deliberative process that boards must undertake in considering change of control transactions. The Court has substituted a vague standard for what was previously a fairly clear set of duties and procedures that favoured open and transparent auctions. The ruling creates incentives for arbitragers and similar parties to intervene in transactions and divert value that would have otherwise gone to shareholders.

If the ruling stands, it will likely have a profound effect on the equity value of Canadian companies, as market prices adjust to reflect the fact that any change of control premium that would otherwise have accrued to the benefit of shareholders will now have to be shared with a broader constituency. Furthermore, the completion risk associated with any change of control transaction has increased due to the increased likelihood of judicial review of the board's process and ultimate determination. This increased risk will, no doubt, be reflected in the pricing of deals and the willingness of buyers to take the risk of initiating a transaction.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

http://www.casselsbrock.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions