Canada: Quebec Court Of Appeal’s BCE Decision May Affect Corporate Governance And Investor Communications

The Quebec Court of Appeal has decided that the proposed privatization of BCE Inc. is not fair and reasonable to Bell Canada bondholders. The Court's decision has potential implications for the process company directors must follow in making decisions about significant corporate transactions. The decision also underscores the need for officers and others speaking on behalf of public issuers to be cautious about the messages communicated to investors in all settings, including oral statements made during meetings with institutional investors and analysts' calls.

Background

In June 2007, BCE announced that it had entered into an agreement with an investor group led by Teachers' Private Capital, Providence Equity Partners Inc. and Madison Dearborn Partners Inc. The agreement was reached following a process led by a special committee of BCE's board that defined its objective as maximizing shareholder value while respecting bondholders' contractual rights.

Under the agreement between BCE and the investor group, the investors proposed to acquire all the outstanding shares of BCE at a price of C$42.75 per common share, a 40% premium for BCE's common shareholders. The parties agreed that the acquisition the largest leveraged buyout in Canadian history would proceed as a plan of arrangement under the Canada Business Corporations Act.

The agreement contemplates the addition of a substantial amount of new debt for which Bell Canada, BCE's wholly owned subsidiary, would be liable as guarantor. In anticipation of this transaction, the market value of Bell Canada's bonds fell about 20%, or C$1 billion. The Bell Canada bondholders opposed the transaction, asserting, among other things, that the proposed plan of arrangement should not be approved by the Court at the fairness hearing that was part of the arrangement process because the plan was not fair and reasonable in light of its adverse effect on their interests. The trial Court dismissed all of the bondholders' claims and approved the plan. The Court of Appeal reversed this decision, holding that BCE had failed to establish that the plan was fair and reasonable.

Key Elements Of The Decision

The decision in this case turned on the scope of the BCE directors' duties in the context of this LBO transaction in which the shareholders' interests obtaining the highest price possible for their shares conflicted with the bondholders' interests maintaining the credit rating and value of their bonds. Were the directors' duties limited to maximizing value for shareholders while respecting the contractual rights of the bondholders, as BCE submitted? Or were the directors required to consider the broader economic interests of the bondholders and to give those interests some weight, as the bondholders submitted?

The Court ruled in favour of the bondholders, finding that the approach taken by the BCE board to its duties was mistaken:

  • Even where the corporation is "in play," the directors' duties are not limited to maximizing value for shareholders. The directors are obliged to act with a view to the best interests of the corporation. The corporation's interests can never be equated with the interests of shareholders alone. The interests and reasonable expectations of all stakeholders, including creditors, must be considered.

  • In the case of debt issued by a public company, bondholders' reasonable expectations are primarily derived from their contract and the company's offering documents. However, reasonable expectations can also be derived from public statements of the company, including oral statements to institutional investors and analysts in informal settings. Accordingly, the reasonable expectations of bondholders may require more than merely respecting their contractual rights.

  • According to the Court of Appeal, the BCE board should have considered the economic interests of the bondholders –not merely their contractual rights–and should have examined whether it was possible to alleviate the adverse effects on bondholders of a transaction that created value for shareholders. In this connection, the Court considered it noteworthy that the BCE board declined requests from bondholders to meet to discuss bondholder suggestions as to how bondholder interests could be accommodated within a value-enhancing transaction.

  • The board's duty to consider the interests of all securityholders, including bondholders, does not mean that the interests of each constituency must be given the same weight or that the benefits of a change-of-control transaction must be equally distributed among them. In the Court's words, "It is up to the Board to consider the relative weight and importance of the various interests and in its best judgment to structure an arrangement that takes into account, and to the extent reasonably possible, satisfies the interests of the various securityholders."

  • In this case, according to the Court of Appeal, the BCE board did not consider whether it would be possible to structure an arrangement so that a satisfactory price could be obtained for the shares, while attenuating the adverse effect on the bondholders. Because of this failure and the absence of evidence as to whether such an arrangement could be structured, the Court held that BCE failed to discharge its burden of proving that the plan of arrangement was fair and reasonable.

Although the Court of Appeal was considering whether to approve BCE's plan of arrangement, these legal principles potentially apply to board decisions about other types of significant corporate transactions, including support agreements regarding takeover bids.

A Difficult Balance

The Court of Appeal's message is clear, but the practical implications of the decision are not. The message is that directors must ask themselves the right question: not "What is best for the shareholders?" but rather "What is best for the company?" To answer this question, the board must consider the interests of all of the company's stakeholders. However, where the interests of shareholders and bondholders conflict, as in an LBO transaction, the Court of Appeal provides no guidance to directors on how they are to reconcile those conflicting interests.

In practice, when required to find an appropriate balance between common and preferred shareholders, companies often offer to repurchase the preferred shares at fair market value, which is determined without regard to the proposed transaction. In a case like this BCE transaction, in which the company was careful to ensure that the transaction adhered to the bondholders' contractual rights, is the company required to offer to repurchase the bonds to establish that the transaction was fair and reasonable to the Bell Canada bondholders? Or is it sufficient for the board to meet with the bondholders and to consider their ideas, without necessarily alleviating the adverse economic effects for the bondholders? The latter approach leaves open the risk that a court might second-guess the board's decision. At the same time, as a result of the BCE decision, there may be less room for shareholders to challenge board decisions in the context of change-of-control transactions, when those decisions have been made after a careful consideration of all interests (including adverse economic effects) and reasonable alternatives.

Investor Communications

Finally, without analyzing BCE's oral statements to institutional investors and analysts and without discussing the jurisprudence on this topic that was canvassed by the trial judgment, the Court of Appeal stated that BCE's numerous representations had created a reasonable expectation that the board of directors would have concern for the bondholders' interests in the investment-grade quality of the credit ratings on the bonds. This aspect of the decision highlights the importance for a company to exercise caution in all of its statements (whether written or oral) to avoid unwittingly creating liability or reasonable expectations on which investors will be entitled to rely.

BCE has announced that it and the investor group intend to seek leave to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court of Canada.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions