Canada: The Chips Are Down - Certification Denied In Key Price-Fixing Class Action Decision

In the first contested certification decision in a class action in British Columbia involving allegations of competition law violations, the British Columbia Supreme Court has dismissed a motion for certification brought against the manufacturers of silicon memory chips known as DRAM (Dynamic Random Access Memory).

In dismissing the plaintiff's request that the action be permitted to proceed as a class action, the British Columbia court has adopted an approach which confirms and extends the law in Ontario and Quebec, and has articulated several principles regarding certification which apply not only to Competition Act cases, but also to class actions generally. This has been a closely-watched case throughout Canada, of great significance to the development of class action jurisprudence in this country.

Stikeman Elliott represents Infineon Technologies AG and Infineon Technologies North America Corp. (together, "Infineon") in Canadian class actions commenced in British Columbia, Quebec and Ontario, with a team that includes Katherine Kay, Eliot Kolers, Yves Martineau and Mark Walli. Infineon, a manufacturer of DRAM, is a defendant in these price-fixing class actions, along with several other DRAM manufacturers. DRAM is an essential component in a wide variety of consumer and business electronics products, including computers, mainframes, servers, cellular phones, digital music players, cameras, automobile systems, and many others.

The B.C. plaintiff alleges that the defendant manufacturers of DRAM engaged in an international conspiracy to fix the price of DRAM for the period from April 1, 1999 to June 30, 2002, and that B.C. purchasers of DRAM and products containing DRAM suffered harm by way of overcharges for the DRAM contained in products the class members purchased. The plaintiff claims damages for violation of the conspiracy provisions of the Competition Act, common law conspiracy, and tortious interference with economic interest, and seeks restitution from the defendants on unjust enrichment, waiver of tort and constructive trust claims.

Although the proposed class was designed to include both direct purchasers (i.e., those who bought DRAM directly from the manufacturers) and indirect purchasers (i.e., those who bought DRAM or products containing DRAM from someone other than the DRAM manufacturers), the proposed British Columbia class consisted overwhelmingly of indirect purchasers and numbered in the millions of B.C. residents. The matter was further complicated by the wide range of electronic products that contain DRAM, and the numerous manufacturers and chains of distribution (most of which were outside of British Columbia) by which the allegedly price-fixed DRAM could have reached British Columbia residents.

A major issue considered by the British Columbia Supreme Court focused on the question of whether the fact of harm - not the quantum of harm, but the fact of harm - could be shown on a class-wide basis. The defendants argued that the plaintiff had failed to provide a workable method to demonstrate that there was an overcharge by reason of the alleged price-fixing agreement, and whether and in what amount any overcharge would have passed along the various chains of distribution. Canadian law does not recognize the so-called Illinois Brick doctrine, which exists in the United States and precludes (at the federal level) recovery by indirect purchasers of such damages (the result of the U.S. doctrine is that direct purchasers can sue federally, and defendants cannot rely on the overcharge having been "passed on" or "passed through" to others further along the chain of distribution to defeat liability). Absent such a doctrine in Canada, the B.C. court was left to consider how the fact of harm could be established on a class-wide basis for a class consisting of direct and indirect purchasers, all at different places in different chains of distribution. As the court characterized it, whether the alleged overcharge on DRAM could, on a class-wide basis, be "identified as having been passed through" from direct purchasers to indirect purchasers in B.C. was a "key aspect" of the plaintiff's certification application.

Denying certification, Justice Masuhara of the B.C. Supreme Court held that the plaintiff's application for certification did not provide any workable class-wide method for determining whether any overcharge was passed through to class members, which was essential for the plaintiff to demonstrate that the defendants' liability on the price-fixing (and other) claims was a common issue for the class. The result was that the proposed class proceeding would "dissolve[] into a series of individualized inquiries that would overwhelm the common aspects of the case". In reaching this conclusion, the court examined and reviewed at length the expert economic evidence on pass through tendered by the plaintiff, and found that it did not satisfy the plaintiff's burden of "establish[ing] that the proposed methodology has been developed with some vigour and will be sufficiently robust to accomplish the stated task." Justice Masuhara found that "scrutiny" of the evidence offered at the certification stage was required to avoid "the real risk of dysfunction which cannot be in the interest of the litigants or the judicial process".

Justice Masuhara held that the absence of a class-wide means of proving liability to the class members made the proposed class action unmanageable, that resolution of common issues (such as the existence of a conspiracy) would not move the litigation forward in a meaningful way, and that the individualized inquiries required to establish pass through "would not promote access to justice or judicial economy". The court also found that the prospect that individual litigation would not continue (or be brought) was insufficient to make a class action the "preferable procedure" for resolution of the plaintiff's price-fixing claims.

Justice Masuhara also rejected the plaintiff's assertions that the "clear trend" in B.C. is to certify actions as class proceedings and to permit any difficulties with the proceeding to be addressed "in the laboratory of the trial court". The court found that proposition to be "inconsistent with judicial economy or fairness in a case such as this". Similarly, Justice Masuhara rejected the use of statistical sampling or averaging methodologies which have recently been applied in non-Competition Act cases by courts in Canada, holding that "the plaintiff cannot circumvent the need to prove harm on a class-wide basis by resorting to the aggregation principles of the Act, which would be available only after such a pass through was already established on a class-wide basis."

The plaintiff has advised that there will be an appeal from the decision of the B.C. court. The Quebec motion for authorization (certification) has been argued in the Quebec court and is presently under reserve. These continuing developments will all be watched with great interest.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions