Canada: Recent Developments In Market Practice And The Law Governing Material Adverse Change Clauses

Copyright 2008, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Mergers & Acquisitions, April 2008

Material adverse change (MAC) (also referred to as material adverse effect) clauses are present in some fashion in virtually every merger or acquisition agreement. In an M&A transaction, a MAC clause allocates the risk of an unforeseen adverse event occurring during the time between signing and closing. Buyers typically want to ensure that they can get out of the deal if an event occurs prior to closing that is materially detrimental to the target. The recent downturn in credit markets has highlighted the significance of MAC clauses, particularly for debt-financed buyers. Not surprisingly, the law concerning MAC clauses is not static. This article considers recent U.S. case law developments regarding MAC clauses in M&A transactions that are likely to have implications in Canada and should be considered when negotiating and drafting a merger or acquisition agreement. For a discussion of MAC clauses in the context of other commercial agreements, please see "Litigation of Material Adverse Change Clauses in Derivatives Contracts" in Blakes Bulletin on Litigation, April 2008.

Case Law Relating To MAC Clauses

Notwithstanding the prevalence of MAC closing conditions in M&A agreements, there has been surprisingly little case law in Canada regarding MAC clauses. However, there are a number of important U.S. decisions that provide guidance on how MAC clauses may be interpreted by courts in Canada.

IBP v. Tyson Foods

The 2001 decision of the Delaware Court of Chancery in IBP, Inc. v. Tyson Foods Inc. is the leading U.S. decision addressing MAC clauses in the context of an M&A agreement. Tyson and IBP entered into a merger agreement whereby Tyson agreed to acquire IBP. While conducting its due diligence, Tyson learned of several potential issues relating to the IBP business, including a potential downward trend in IBP's beef processing business, as well as possible significant accounting issues with one of IBP's subsidiaries. Despite these findings, Tyson signed the merger agreement, which included a representation that IBP had not suffered a MAC since a specified date. A MAC was defined in the agreement as "any event, occurrence or development of a state of circumstances or facts which has had or reasonably could be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect...on the condition (financial or otherwise), business, assets, liabilities or results of operations of [IBP] and [its] subsidiaries taken as whole." Tyson later sought to terminate the merger agreement on the basis of a further downturn in the beef processing business and further accounting problems at the IBP subsidiary.

The Delaware court took a narrow view of the MAC clause and came to two important conclusions:

I. the party seeking to terminate the agreement has the burden of proving that the MAC has occurred; and

II. a MAC closing condition protects an acquiror from the occurrence of (a) unknown events that (b) substantially threaten the overall earning potential of the target (c) in a durationally significant manner.

The court indicated that "durationally significant" should be measured in years rather than months, and held that the short-term drop in earnings did not substantially threaten IBP's overall earnings potential in a durationally significant manner. The court concluded that since Tyson was aware of the accounting problems and the cyclical nature of the livestock industry, these were not unknown risks. The court ruled that Tyson had improperly terminated the merger agreement and Tyson was forced to acquire IBP on the original terms of the merger agreement.

Frontier Oil Corporation v. Holly Corporation

In 2005, the Delaware Court of Chancery revisited the issue of MAC clauses in the case of Frontier Oil Corporation v. Holly Corporation. Frontier and Holly were both mid-sized petroleum refiners and had entered into a merger pursuant to which Frontier would acquire Holly for US$450-million in cash. Prior to signing the merger agreement, Frontier delivered various due diligence materials to Holly's counsel, including a newspaper article describing plans by Erin Brockovich (of movie fame), and the law firm she was associated with, to bring a mass toxic tort suit against several defendants, including a subsidiary of Frontier.

The lawsuit alleged that drilling and processing activities at an oil rig located on the Beverly Hills High School campus had released air contaminants that caused a disproportionately high incidence of cancers suffered by students of the school. The subsidiary of Frontier previously held an interest in the site. Holly retained a prominent firm in Los Angeles to provide advice and guidance with respect to toxic tort litigation. Frontier argued that the potential litigation was merely a nuisance claim and, in any event, Frontier was insulated from liability because the claim was against a subsidiary and not against Frontier itself. Holly was sufficiently comfortable with the issue that it signed the merger agreement.

Shortly after the merger agreement was signed, the threatened litigation was in fact commenced and the parties learned that Frontier had guaranteed its subsidiary's obligations under the lease for the oil production site and would have direct liability under the toxic tort claim. The merger agreement included a representation from Frontier that there was no litigation other than litigation that would not have or reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect. There was also a closing condition that this representation remain true on closing. MAC was defined in the agreement as "a material adverse effect with respect to the business, assets and liabilities (taken together), results of operations, conditions (financial or otherwise) or prospects of a party and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis." Frontier attempted to terminate the deal on the basis of the litigation. The court concluded that the decision in IBP v. Tyson, which had applied New York law, accurately described the law of Delaware as well.

The court concluded that Holly had not shown that the toxic tort claims and the cost associated with them would have a material adverse effect on Frontier over a durationally significant period. The court noted that the outcome of the environmental litigation could be catastrophic for Frontier but that Holly had not demonstrated the likelihood of that outcome. Even though the estimated defence costs were in the range of US$15 to US$20-million, the court concluded that Holly had not demonstrated that Frontier would be unable to absorb the projected defence costs without experiencing a material adverse effect. The court also noted that, following the decision in IBP v. Tyson, a MAC clause helps to protect a purchaser from the existence of unknown (or undisclosed) factors, rather than factors known to the parties prior to signing the agreement.

Johnson & Johnson v. Guidant Corporation

In December 2004, Johnson & Johnson announced that it had agreed to acquire Guidant Corporation, the second-largest U.S. maker of implantable defibrillators and pacemakers, for approximately US$23-billion in cash and stock. After signing the agreement, but prior to closing, Guidant was forced to recall its heart defibrillators and was subject to a lawsuit commenced by New York Attorney General Elliot Spitzer, which alleged that there had been undisclosed design flaws in defibrillators manufactured by Guidant that could have fatal consequences.

As a result of the product recalls, regulatory investigations and the lawsuit, Johnson & Johnson announced that it was considering backing out of the agreement in reliance on the MAC clause in the agreement. Guidant notified Johnson & Johnson that it would sue if Johnson & Johnson backed away from the deal. Johnson & Johnson was able to negotiate a US$4-billion (or 15%) reduction in the purchase price as a result of invoking the MAC clause. Prior to the completion of the acquisition, however, Boston Scientific stepped in with a higher, and ultimately successful, offer to purchase Guidant.

Genesco v. Finish Line

A more recent dispute in the U.S. involved a MAC clause found in the merger agreement between Finish Line, Inc. and Genesco, Inc. In 2007, Finish Line agreed to acquire a footwear retailer, for US$1.5-billion in a highly leveraged transaction without any financing condition. Shortly after signing the merger agreement, Genesco announced quarterly earnings well short of projections. As a result, Finish Line and UBS (which provided the financing for the merger) refused to proceed, prompting Genesco to bring a lawsuit in Tennessee to compel the completion of the acquisition. Finish Line argued that the earnings shortfall constituted a MAC, while Genesco countered that the weak performance of the company was a short-term decline (a "blip") due to general economic conditions such as high gas prices, housing and mortgage issues, and other conditions that fell within the carve-outs of the MAC clause in the merger agreement.

The Tennessee trial court accepted Genesco's testimony that the decline was due to general economic conditions and also found that the decline was not disproportionate to declines suffered by its peers in the industry. The court held that the agreement contained a carve-out for general economic conditions and the MAC claim was therefore rejected. The court nonetheless proceeded to complete its MAC analysis (for "completeness") and held that, while noting the ruling in Tyson that a "blip" in earnings does not constitute a MAC, the language used in the merger agreement was an acknowledgement by the parties that, in the context of this merger, a MAC could occur in only three or four months. This part of the decision opens the door for an interpretation that the high threshold required for a MAC to be considered "durationally significant" as established in the Tyson and Frontier decisions can be lowered by careful drafting.

The parties subsequently reached an out-of-court settlement totalling nearly US$200-million to terminate the merger agreement and settle all other related lawsuits prior to the commencement of a separate action in New York by UBS to avoid proceeding with the financing. It is uncertain if the decision, the first U.S. court decision to consider MAC clauses since the commencement of the credit crunch, will have any precedential value going forward. However, the case does highlight the importance for sellers of having carefully-drafted and comprehensive MAC carve-outs.

The Genesco settlement is only one of a number of recent MAC disputes that have settled before courts have had the opportunity to provide further guidance on MAC clauses. Leveraged buyout transactions in the U.S. have increasingly been sidetracked by buyers or their financers seeking to use a MAC clause to back out of their commitment as a result of the reduced availability and the increased cost of buyout funding. Most of these cases, such as Sallie Mae, Harman International and Genesco have resulted in settlement payments from the buyer to the seller and an outright termination of the deal. Other cases, such as Accredited Home Lenders and Home Depot, have followed the Guidant example of a renegotiated purchase price and the consummation of the proposed acquisition. We may see more of these settlements and price renegotiations as the downturn in credit markets continues.

Drafting Considerations

U.S. case law and recent market experience demonstrates the need for close attention to drafting when parties are negotiating merger agreements. We highlight three considerations in particular:

  1. General vs. Specific

    Where a specific risk has been identified in due diligence prior to signing an agreement, the buyer should rely upon a specific, objective closing condition rather than relying on a general MAC closing condition. Where specific concerns relating to issues known to the parties are addressed by way of a representation or closing condition, a MAC closing condition nevertheless remains an important way of providing the buyer with some protection for unknown risks (those not identified prior to signing the agreement).
  2. Prospects

    Buyers and sellers often negotiate as to whether changes in "prospects" can constitute a MAC. Prospects refer to the opportunities for future success of the target company that are reasonably foreseeable at the time of signing the agreement. The buyer wants prospects included on the basis that the future of the business is a legitimate concern, while the seller wants it excluded on the basis that future operations are the seller's risk. If the buyer has specific concerns that might fall within the scope of prospects, they should be addressed specifically in representations or conditions as appropriate.
  3. Carve-Outs

    Recent deal dynamics have been such that sellers have been able to erode the limited comfort provided by MAC clauses by inserting numerous exclusions or carve-outs. Some of the more frequent carve-outs that we see include:
    • changes in general economic or financial market conditions
    • changes in industry conditions
    • changes resulting from the announcement of the transaction, including loss or threatened loss of customers or suppliers or financing sources
    • changes resulting from the parties' compliance with the terms of the agreement
    • changes in generally accepted accounting principles or requirements
    • changes in law or interpretation thereof
    • acts of terrorism or war
    • changes in the share price or the failure of the target to meet financial projections, although generally buyers will want to ensure that factors causing such changes or failures can be considered a material adverse change

Buyers will want to ensure that, where appropriate, changes having a disproportional effect on the target, in the context of the industry and geographical region in which it carries on business, are excluded from the carve-outs. Sellers will want to ensure that the loss of a carve-out is only to the extent of the disproportionate effect and not absolute upon the occurrence of any disproportionate effect.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
12 Sep 2017, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Please join us as we take an in-depth look at the legislation and the impact on the industry.

14 Sep 2017, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Change, stress and uncertainty are ever]present factors in todayfs legal environment, and specific aspects about the practice of law make it difficult to thrive in the profession long term. Luckily, there are specific research]based strategies that have been shown to help lawyers thrive and lead to more effective ways to manage stress and pressure.

5 Oct 2017, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Blakes is proud to host our New to In-House Series, designed to bring together junior and mid-level in-house counsel for a candid exchange of insights to highlight and address some of the challenges and opportunities facing in-house lawyers in their roles today.

 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.