Canada: Singing The Passport Blues: Perfect Harmony Eludes Provincial Securities Harmonization Efforts

Last Updated: March 28 2008

Edited by D'Arcy Doherty, Paul Fornazzari, Brett Kagetsu, Pierre Lissoir and J. Jason McCormick


In 2003 provincial and territorial Ministers responsible for securities regulation across Canada acknowledged the need to streamline access to Canada's capital markets.1 A policy level solution was proposed: establish a European-type "passport system" where an issuer would only have to comply with the rules of its home jurisdiction in order to gain access to investors across the country.2 Five years later the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) have released rules and policies that implement this concept on March 17, 2008, in all provinces and territories except Ontario.

The passport system streamlines the review of prospectuses and exemptive relief applications, as well as the registration of securities professionals across Canada. However, the goal of avoiding overlapping review by provincial and territorial securities regulators will remain elusive as Ontario has opted out of the system. Ontario continues to support the creation of a single, national securities regulator and has taken the view that opting into the passport system would conflict with this objective. In the commentary at the end of this article, we discuss how the implementation of the passport system and Ontario's opting out may just be a significant step towards a single national regulator.

The passport system comes online at the same time as do new uniform rules for prospectuses. Proposed new rules for registration of securities professionals are also expected to become effective next year. On a technical level, all the members of the CSA, including Ontario, have also revised and improved the multiple jurisdiction coordinated review process, which will continue to apply in those instances where the passport system is not applicable.

Prospectuses In Passport Jurisdictions

Generally, the securities regulator of the province in which an issuer's head office is located will be the issuer's principal passport regulator. The clearance of a prospectus by the principal regulator will automatically trigger clearance in all other jurisdictions where the prospectus is filed, except Ontario. Under the passport system, a regulator in another jurisdiction cannot opt out and conduct its own review. The new passport prospectus process will provide a procedural improvement over the old system, in the sense that non-principal passport regulators will no longer conduct separate prospectus reviews.

Issuers will continue to file their prospectus in each desired jurisdiction through SEDAR and will still be required to confirm, calculate and pay filing fees to each jurisdiction in which the prospectus is filed. As such, the new system will not result in any fee reductions or efficiencies in fee calculation and payment. There is also a requirement for issuers to confirm with their prospectus filing that they have "delivered all documents required to be delivered under the securities legislation of each jurisdiction in which the filer filed the materials". This rather innocuous provision may well buttress a continuation of the Canadian practice of requiring issuers to obtain legal opinions in each jurisdiction in which the prospectus is filed, thereby off-setting some of the promised cost savings of the passport system.

If a non-Ontario issuer files a prospectus in Ontario, the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) will continue to engage in a separate review before clearing the prospectus, as under the current system. Furthermore, Ontario can go as far as opting out of the coordinated review process at any time before the passport regulator clears the prospectus. If the passport regulator is able to resolve the OSC's issues, the OSC may opt back into the coordinated review process. If the OSC opts out, the issuer will have to deal directly with the OSC to resolve the outstanding issues.

Prospectuses Filed In Ontario Under The Passport System

Although the OSC is not participating in the system, the multi-lateral instrument implementing the passport system recognizes the OSC as the "principal regulator" for prospectuses filed in Ontario, just as if Ontario had joined the system. This gives market participants in Ontario access to investors across the country by dealing only with the OSC. If an Ontario issuer files its prospectus in other jurisdictions concurrently with its Ontario filing, only the OSC will review the prospectus and its decision will automatically apply in the other jurisdictions. Therefore, Ontario issuers are not prejudiced in any way by Ontario's decision not to opt in. In fact, the passport system places Ontario issuers in a more advantageous position than issuers with head offices in other jurisdictions. Ontario issuers need only deal with the OSC whereas issuers in other provinces must deal with their principal regulator and with the OSC.

The Particularities Of Quebec

In Quebec, the passport system will not modify the current requirements governing the use of the French language in public disclosure documents. The obligation to produce documents in French will continue to apply to issuers wishing to distribute their securities in Quebec. Such documents include the prospectus itself and any documents incorporated by reference into the prospectus, such as annual and interim financial statements and MD&A, the issuer's annual information form, material change reports (including attached news releases) and information circulars. It can be expected that translation opinions from legal counsel and the issuer's auditors will continue to be required.

Principal Regulator Rules

In the past, issuers may have selected a principal regulator other than the regulator in their head office jurisdiction under previously more flexible rules or exemptive relief. For example, the technical "head office" may have been in one province but the chief executive office in another. The passport system does not "grandfather" these situations in the passport provinces. In Ontario, there is no change in law so if the OSC has become principal regulator for whatever reason the OSC will continue to consider itself as the principal regulator. Issuers in this situation wishing to avail themselves of the passport system will be required to make an application with the "legal" principal regulator for a change of principal regulator, and make a case as to why the head office jurisdiction should cede its regulatory authority. We understand based on discussions with one passport province regulator that the case would have to be made on the basis of the new rules and a "grandfathering" argument alone would not be sufficient.

Applications For Exemptions From Securities Legislation

Applications for exemptive relief are an important and costly aspect of securities regulation and compliance. Because securities legislation is very technical and prescriptive, issuers are often required to apply for exemption from a particular rule or provision that would frustrate or unduly complicate a transaction. Typically in such cases, the requirement serves no important purpose in the particular circumstances and the exemption is granted on a routine basis. Nevertheless, applications for exemptions are very paper intensive and hence expensive.

Under the passport system, an issuer will only have to file an application with, and pay fees to, its principal regulator. The principal regulator's decision to grant relief will result in an automatic exemption from the equivalent provisions in every other passport jurisdiction that was included in the application, except Ontario. Where exemptive relief is required in Ontario, an Ontario application will continue to be required from out-of-province issuers. Ontario issuers, by contrast, will be able to obtain cross-Canada relief by filing only with the OSC.

Despite these improvements, there is a noteworthy deficiency in the system. There are cases where terms and conditions imposed by the principal regulator may affect an issuer more adversely in another jurisdiction, such as where the cost of complying in the other jurisdiction are significant, but the issue requiring the terms and conditions is insignificant in that non-principal jurisdiction and could likely be exempted without terms and conditions. The one size fits all approach of the passport system does not address this likely scenario, as there is no specific mechanism in the passport rules for an issuer to obtain different relief in different jurisdictions. This problem is likely to arise for both exemptive relief applications and registration matters involving securities firms and professionals. Along these lines, it should also be noted that the passport system does not address the review and appeal mechanisms under the various securities acts that an aggrieved applicant is still entitled to use despite whatever decision the principal regulator has made. In other words, the principal regulator makes an adverse decision and the issuer appeals and the issuer appeals that decision in another jurisdiction where the issuer is more adversely affected, or where the proposal can be carried out without reference to the principal jurisdiction.

It is also noteworthy that certain types of exemptive relief applications are not covered by the passport system, most notably applications for a "reporting issuer" designation. Applications for such exemptions must still be filed with (and fees paid to) the regulator of each jurisdiction in which relief is sought. As such, the coordinated review rules will continue to apply to these applications. Under co-ordinated review, each jurisdiction may review the application and the principal regulator must consider the comments received from the other jurisdictions. The principal regulator's decision to grant relief on such an application is only made once each other jurisdiction has provided its comments and confirmed its agreement. If a jurisdiction disagrees with the proposed decision of the principal regulator, the issuer must deal directly with that jurisdiction to obtain the exemptive relief sought, on whatever conditions that jurisdiction may require.

New Passport Registration Regime For The Securities Industry

The passport system will also apply to the registration of securities firms and professionals. The CSA is working towards implementing new uniform registration requirements for the securities industry, but in the meantime the existing rules continue to apply.

The passport system for registration will generally apply in the same way as it does for prospectuses. The principal regulator will be the only regulatory authority that considers the application and makes a decision regarding the application, including any terms, conditions or requirements it may impose on a registrant. Its decision will apply automatically in other non-principal jurisdictions. Registrants whose principal jurisdiction is not Ontario and who wish to carry on business in Ontario will have to file a separate Ontario applications. The OSC will conduct its own review of the application, although it is anticipated that it will coordinate its review with the principal regulator. Also, since Ontario will be adopting the uniform registration requirements, the OSC's substantive review is not likely to significantly differ from that of other jurisdictions.

Registrants whose principal jurisdiction is Ontario will benefit from one-stop cross-Canada registration since a decision made by the OSC regarding registration will automatically apply in each non-principal jurisdiction designated by the applicant, under that jurisdiction's passport rules.

As regards enforcement proceedings involving registrants, a decision made by the principal regulator to suspend or cancel a registration will apply in each non-principal jurisdiction except Ontario. In Ontario, the OSC will retain jurisdiction (and will be required) to take its own enforcement proceedings to deal with the registrant's Ontario registration.

Passport registration should save applicants time and professional expenses over the current system where applicants are required to file their application in each of the 13 Canadian jurisdictions to be registered across Canada, and address each non-principal regulator's questions or concerns. The system will also eliminate the need for the principal regulator to coordinate with and obtain decisions from the other non-principal regulators.

What Does This All Really Mean For Securities Regulation In Canada?

The passport system provides a fairly significant improvement in efficiency for Ontario-based market participants, who will henceforth have to deal only with the OSC. In large measure Ontario issuers and registrants will obtain many of the benefits of a single-regulator system. For everyone else, the passport system provides a theoretical improvement, in that they will only have to deal with their principal regulator plus the OSC. From a practical standpoint, this is very close to the status quo, since local securities regulators (other than the OSC) typically don't become substantively involved in a matter where they are not the principal regulator.

Unfortunately, the need to calculate and pay fees in each jurisdiction, the need for translation opinions, and in particular the need to verify and obtain legal opinions as to documents required to be filed in each jurisdiction will all continue to add substantial costs and complexity to the prospectus filing process, thereby off-setting the improvements in regulatory efficiency promised by the passport system.

The introduction of the passport system may ultimately have more significant impacts on securities legislative harmonization, regulation and on the single regulator debate than on streamlining procedures.

It is no coincidence that the passport system is only coming into force after much of the rules harmonization effort has been completed. Past harmonization efforts have required extensive negotiations and inevitable compromises to obtain unanimity for "national" instruments (or failing that, near unanimity for "multi-lateral instruments"). The automatic approval provisions of the passport system for non-principal jurisdictions, with no ability to opt-out in a particular case, will likely make harmonization efforts even more difficult going forward. Multi-lateral instruments to which Ontario does not subscribe will have little useful impact from a practical standpoint because of the need for most market participants to continue to comply with Ontario requirements. This does not create an environment that is conducive to further legislative harmonization.

The passport system is one of the first issuer-focused securities law developments in a long time, most recent changes having been investor-focused. It adds nothing to investor protection, and in fact it delegates to securities regulators in the principal jurisdiction the power to make decisions that directly impact investor protection in the other provinces (except Ontario). In this respect the passport system only addresses the "efficiency" concerns about the fragmented Canadian system. The enforcement challenge remains to be tackled. This, along with Ontario's decision to opt out, suggest that additional substantial reforms will be required before the "single regulator" debate is settled.


1. Provincial/Territorial Securities Initiative Action Plan to Improve Canada's Securities Regulatory Framework, page 1, online

2. Ibid.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
8 Nov 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

The prospect of an internal investigation raises many thorny issues. This presentation will canvass some of the potential triggering events, and discuss how to structure an investigation, retain forensic assistance and manage the inevitable ethical issues that will arise.

22 Nov 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

From the boardroom to the shop floor, effective organizations recognize the value of having a diverse workplace. This presentation will explore effective strategies to promote diversity, defeat bias and encourage a broader community outlook.

7 Dec 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

Staying local but going global presents its challenges. Gowling WLG lawyers offer an international roundtable on doing business in the U.K., France, Germany, China and Russia. This three-hour session will videoconference in lawyers from around the world to discuss business and intellectual property hurdles.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.