The Ontario Court of Appeal has upheld a 24-month damage award to a long-service nurse in a doctor's office who believed that she had been fired during a hostile meeting with her employer.

The doctor for whom she worked wanted her to look into electronic medical records (EMR). She was overwhelmed with a heavy workload and did not get to it. The doctor angrily confronted her in a meeting, at which the doctor's wife was also present. The court found that the doctor, in his anger, said, "Go! Get out! I am so sick of coming into this office every day and looking at your ugly face." He also pointed at her, shouted at her, accused her of being resistant to change, and used profanity during that meeting. The employee, distraught, left the meeting and never returned to work. The employer treated her as having quit. The employee sued for wrongful dismissal.

The trial judge decided that although the doctor did not intend to dismiss the nurse, he did in fact fire her when he told her to "Go! Get out!"

Even if the doctor had not fired the employee, he had constructively dismissed her, the trial judge stated. Although the meeting was only one incident, it was sufficient to constitute a constructive dismissal. The trial judge wrote:

"An employer owes a duty to its employees to treat them fairly, with civility, decency, respect and dignity. An employer who subjects employees to treatment that renders competent performance of their work impossible, or continued employment intolerable, exposes itself to an action for constructive dismissal. Where the employer's treatment of the employee is of sufficient severity and effect, it will be characterized as an unjustified repudiation of the employment contract."

The trial judge found that the doctor's behaviour was condescending, aggressive, hostile and profane. His conduct diminished the nurse's stature and dignity in the office. When the doctor saw the emotional impact that his comments had on her at the meeting, he did nothing. He had made her continued employment intolerable, and effectively destroyed the employment relationship.

The trial judge awarded this 22-year employee 24 months' salary in damages for wrongful dismissal. The appeal court upheld this award.

The trial judge's decision can be read here, and the appeal court's decision here.

For more information, visit our Occupational Health & Safety Law blog at www.occupationalhealthandsafetylaw.com

About Dentons

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries. www.dentons.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. Specific Questions relating to this article should be addressed directly to the author.