Canada: Gross Overriding Royalty Interests Not Interest In Land Absent Clear Language

Two recent decisions of Canadian courts have reiterated the critical requirement of clear language in contracts creating royalties where parties intend such royalties to be "interest in land," that is, real property. The Supreme Court of Canada had established in Bank of Montreal v. Dynex Petroleum Ltd. 2002 SCC 7 (Dynex) that gross overriding royalty interests (GORR) could constitute interest in land provided the parties so intended and that intention was sufficiently evidenced in an agreement. Based on Dynex, the status of GORR must be determined on a case-to-case basis. Both Walter Energy Canada Holdings Inc, (Re), 2016 BCSC 1746 (Walter Energy) and Third Eye Capital Corporation v Dianor Resources Inc, 2016 ONSC 6086 (Dianor), provide recent examples of how courts approach the exercise of determining whether a specific GORR constitutes an interest in land. The British Columbia Supreme Court and Ontario Superior Court of Justice considered the types of provisions that will fail court scrutiny, and emphasized the importance of including, in royalty agreements and agreements creating royalty interests, language which expressly creates and conveys an interest in land. Dianor also addresses a court's ability in insolvency proceedings to convey and vest assets free and clear of royalty interests.

Walter Energy

In 2000, three individuals (the royalty owners) assisted Western Canadian Coal Corporation (WCC) in acquiring and maintaining certain coal licenses pertaining to the Wolverine mine (the Licenses), and conveyed the mine and Licenses to WCC in exchange for 1% royalty (the Wolverine Royalties) pursuant to a royalty sharing agreement (RSA). Walter Energy Canada Holdings Inc. (WEC), following an acquisition, was the successor in interest of the Licenses. WEC subsequently was involved in insolvency proceedings under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act, RSC 1985, c C-36 (CCAA) and sought court approval of the transfer of its mining properties including the Licenses to Conuma Coal Resources (CCR). The proposed asset purchase agreement (APA) contemplated that the Wolverine Royalties would be excluded. One of the royalty owners challenged this exclusion, arguing that the RSA created an interest in land which encumbered the properties.

The British Columbia Supreme Court had to determine "whether, on a proper interpretation of the RSA, it can be said that the parties intended the royalty owner to have an interest in land, as opposed to a contractual right to the royalty stream from production under the Wolverine coal licenses." The RSA contemplated that WCC would pay a royalty of "one percent (1%) for all product tonnes produced from the ....Wolverine coal properties". The RSA also contemplated that WCC would be the beneficial owner of all of the coal licenses comprising the Properties, including the Wolverine Licenses, " and clear of all liens, charges and claims of others." The RSA contained the provision that it would "enure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties and their respective successors, heirs, executors, administrators and permitted assigns."

The Court held that the RSA was not intended to create an interest in the land, rather it simply represented a contractual right to payment as the consideration for which the royalty owner transferred his rights in the properties. The court found that the language creating the Wolverine Royalties in the RSA did not meet the Dynex requirements. To reach this conclusion, the Court found as follows:

  • WEC was stated to have "acquired" the Licenses and be the beneficial owner of them free of "any claims of others;"
  • The assignors had relinquished their direct rights to the Licenses, including any further aspect of control;
  • Neither the RSA nor the APA contained formal conveyancing language such as "grant, assign, transfer or convey" any right in the substances beneath the relevant properties;
  • The APA did not contain the language what the Wolverine Royalties would "run with the land" and the RSA did not contain restrictions on the ability of WEC to sell the Licences or contain a requirement of a purchase to assume obligations under the RSA; and
  • Reference to the payment of the Wolverine Royalties was to what was "produced" from – importantly, not a royalty "in" – the relevant properties.


Dianor Resources Inc. (DRI), was an insolvent company with interests in mining assets in Ontario (the Ontario Assets) and Quebec. DRI's receiver applied for an Order approving the sale of the Ontario Assets in which 2350614 Ontario Inc. (235Co) held GORRs. 235Co was controlled by Mr. John Leadbetter, and did not oppose the sale but argued that the Ontario Assets would be conveyed subject to 235Co's GORRs. While the GORRs were created under a Crown Land Agreement and Patented Land Agreement (the Agreements) by which DRI acquired the Ontario Assets from 3814793 Ontario Inc., another entity controlled by Mr. Leadbetter, it was unclear from the records how 235Co acquired the GORR. However, this fact was immaterial to the Court's findings.

The winning offer by Third Eye Capital Corporation (TECC) was conditional on the GORRs being terminated or significantly reduced. TECC's offer contemplated a payout of the GORRs in the amount of $250,000 which 235Co refused. TECC argued that the Court had jurisdiction to cancel the GORRs under a vesting order if fair compensation was paid for those rights. The central issue was whether 235Co'S GORRs constituted interest in land.

Ultimately, the Court approved the sale to TECC. As in Walter Energy, the Court applied Dynex to determine whether the Agreements created the GORRs in the Ontario Assets. The Agreements provided that once DRI became the owner of a 100% interest in the mining claims, the optionors (235Co) would "retain a [20% GORR] for diamonds and a [1.5% GORR] for all other metals and minerals" which was calculated on an appraised value of the contemplated substances in accordance with other provisions of the Agreements. The appraised value for diamonds was calculated after they had been recovered or produced, cleaned and sorted. The non-diamond GORR was payable on the basis of gross revenue derived from all product sold by Dianor.

The Court held that the GORRs are not interests in land, although the Agreements clearly set out the parties intentions as follows:

"It is the intent of the parties hereto that the [GORR] shall constitute a covenant and an interest in land running with the Property and the Mining Claims and all successions thereof or leases or other tenures which may replace them, whether created privately or through governmental action, and including, without limitation, any leasehold interest."

The Court noted that while this clause stated the intention of the parties it failed to convey an interest in land. The ultimate issue is whether that intent is carried out in the contract. The Court emphasized the importance of the parties creating provisions which have the effect of granting a right in real property. Without specific wording, such an agreement will only create a right to the percentage of minerals or petroleum substances derived from the extracted minerals, instead of conveying such a right. It is not sufficient to state the intentions of the parties.

The Court noted other instances where the words "covenants and agrees to pay" and "produced" have been interpreted, and the distinction drawn between the "granting" of royalties attached to or in the land or minerals in situ, and the "payment" of royalties derived from attaching to the minerals or revenues "produced" or "removed" from the land. The latter creates only contractual rights. Other relevant factors the Court considered include whether an owner is in control of the lands and if the royalty holder retains a right to enter upon the lands to explore for and extract minerals. In this case, the Court found that 235Co had no right to enter the property to explore and extract diamonds or minerals, and the GORR was calculated on post-production substances. Applying Dynex, the Court concluded that 235Co's GORR was not an interest in land.

The Court also addressed and confirmed the powers of courts to cancel the GORRs under a vesting order. The jurisdiction of the Courts to grant vesting orders derives from the common law, the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, RSC 1985, c B-3 (BIA) and the Ontario Courts of Justice Act (CJA). Further, the BIA and CJA give the Court jurisdiction to order the property be sold and on what terms. The Court found that TECC was entitled to be the purchaser of the assets as the successful bidder under the authorized bid process, and that the Court had the jurisdiction to grant a vesting order of the Ontario Assets to TECC on terms considered just. TECC was able to purchase the Ontario Assets free and clear of 235Co's GORRs upon payment of the $250,000 offered, which was considered a reasonable amount for 235Co's royalty rights. The court didn't decide TECC's argument that even if the royalty rights were an interest in land, a vesting order could be made vesting clear title in the assets being sold on the proviso that fair value be paid to the holder of the royalty rights. However, the Court saw no reason why its jurisdiction would not be the same whether the royalty rights were or were not an interest in land.


The status of royalty interests continues to spawn extensive litigation in Canadian courts. This determination impacts asset conveyance and whether a purchaser will acquire assets encumbered with or free of the royalty. This is particularly so with pre-Dynex royalty agreements that did not clearly specify the parties' intentions. However, Dianor and Walter Energy have confirmed that even specifying the parties' intention to create an interest in land by itself is not enough. The parties must carry that intention through in the agreement by creating the interest in land, using specific wording consonant with conveying real property interests.

The problem is compounded when profitable assets encumbered by royalties are being sold through court-supervised sales processes in insolvency proceedings. Insolvency statutes are paramount, give the courts broad powers and create different priorities over properties. As shown in Dianor, having royalty interest in land may not be a guarantee to retaining royalty assets in insolvency proceedings.

These cases provide a measure of certainty as to the requirements for making royalty interests real property. Real property rank higher in priority than personal property and in that sense, other than by vesting orders, should provide some form of security to royalty owners. Similarly, the guidance in determining which royalty interest is real property and the power of the courts to grant vesting orders provide monitors, receivers and insolvency professionals with additional tools in insolvency proceedings and sales processes.

About BLG

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions