Canada: How Much Is That Doggy In The Window? Canadian Court Comments On Animals As Property

A recent case decided by the Family Law Division of the Queen's Bench for Saskatchewan provides some candid insights of the Canadian judiciary on the legal status of animals in this country. As most readers are aware, there has been some significant debate about whether or not animals are "mere property" or if they hold some "special status"; the approach which is ultimately adopted could have significant impact on issues such as the quantum of damages for veterinary negligence, the costs for premiums for malpractice insurance and the obligations placed upon pet owners to seek out an obtain appropriate veterinary care. While the case ultimately does not provide a definitive legal finding about whether or not animals are property, the comments of the presiding judge are insightful as the jurisprudence on this topic evolves.

The Case – "Possession" vs. "Custody"

The decision in Henderson v. Henderson was decided on August 31, 2016 in Saskatoon before Justice R. W. Danyliuk; it involved a dispute between spouses over the ownership and possession of three dogs, Quill, Kenya and Willow. Mr. Henderson brought an application to the courts for interim "exclusive possession" of either Kenya or Willow; Ms. Henderson countered with her own application for "interim custody" of all three dogs and providing for reasonable access by Mr. Henderson to the dogs. At the outset, it is relevant to note that one application was based on the notion of the exclusive possession of property while the other was rooted in the "custody" of the dogs.

In his decision, Danyliuk, J, acknowledge the commonly-held notion that pet owners have a special relationship with their animals; he writes in the decision: "Dogs are wonderful creatures. They are often highly intelligent, sensitive and active, and are our constant and faithful companions. Many dogs are treated as members of the family with whom they live." While commenting upon the nature of the human/animal bond, he then goes on to candidly state: "But after all is said and done, a dog is a dog. At law it is property, a domesticated animal that is owned. At law it enjoys no familial rights." In finding that dogs are mere "property", and upon reliance on other Canadian cases, he says the following:

"The proposition at law that dogs are property and are to be treated as such, and not as children are treated, is borne out by a reasoned and dispassionate consideration of the differences in how we treat dogs and children. A few examples should suffice as illustration. In Canada, we tend not to purchase our children from breeders. In turn, we tend not to breed our children with other humans to ensure good bloodlines, nor do we charge for such services. When are children are seriously ill, we generally do not engage in an economic cost/benefit analysis to see whether the children are to receive medical treatment, receive nothing or even have their lives ended to prevent suffering. When are children act improperly, even seriously and violently so, we generally do not muzzle them or even put them to death for repeated transgressions.

The concepts of dealing humanely with pets while considering them to be property are not mutually exclusive. While as members of society we want to see ourselves as kind, gentle and civilized beings, and wish to cling to the notion that we treat our pets that way, ultimately pets are treated differently than are our children. An so it should be."

Based upon the foregoing reasoning, the court held that this type of dispute is not founded in the notion of an application for "custody" as would typically be the case for children in the midst of a matrimonial dispute:

"I say without reservation that the prospect of treating pets as children would be treated holds absolutely no attraction for me. I say this cognizant that many dog owners, perhaps most of them, choose to treat the family dog not as property but as family...But that choice does not alter the law that pets are property. My present task is not to act with emotion or to validate the personal perspective of pet owners within the legal context. Rather, it is to interpret and then apply the law. And for legal purposes, there can be no doubt: Dogs are property."

The learned Justice relied upon a previous Saskatchewan case, Ireland v. Ireland, which similarly decided that the possession of a dog is not a matter of a custody dispute but rather a matter of the distribution of property. In 2010, Justice Zarzeczny determined stated the following:

"Any application of principles that the court might normally apply to the determination of the custody of children are completely inapplicable to the disposition of a pet as family property. Any temptation to draw parallels between the court's approach in this case to the principles applied to settle child custody disputes must be rejected."

Having determined that possession of animals is not to be decided in the context of custody principles, Justice Danyliuk, determined that such disputes must be settled only on the basis of a division of property. Citing a 2008 Nova Scotia case, Gardiner-Simpson v. Cross, he referenced the following: "This case is not about the best interests of the dog; it is about who has the better claim to legal ownership. The analysis is no different than it would be if we were talking about a bicycle." He then stated: "Simply put, I am not about to make what amounts to a custody order pertaining to dogs. I will be more blunt than the court in Ireland, and state that this sort of application should not even be put before the court."

Judicial Intervention

In dismissing the application for interim possession of the dogs, the court in Henderson offered some particularly scathing comments about the use of public resources through the court system by litigants to resolve these types of issues. Danyliuk, J. states as follows:

"In a justice system that is incredibly busy, where delay has virtually become systemic, where there are cases involving child welfare and family matters that wait months for adjudication, these parties have chosen to throw this dispute into the mix....To consume scarce judicial resource with this matter is wasteful. In my view, such applications should be discouraged."

Those comments echoed the comments of Zarzeczny, J. in the Ireland decision when he said:

"It is an unacceptable waste of these parties' financial resources, the time and abilities of their two very experienced and capable legal counsel and most importantly the public resource of this Court that a dispute of this kind should occupy all in a one-day trial involving three witnesses, including an expert call by one of the parties. It is demeaning for the court and legal counsel to have these parties call upon these legal and court resources because they are unable to settle, what most would agree, is an issue unworthy of the expenditure of time, money and public resources."

In the Henderson case the applications were dismissed and the presiding Justice simply encourage the parties to maintain the status quo with respect to the possession of the dog and to move quickly to have all of the issues resolved through negotiations.

The Impact

While considered in a family law context, the decisions discussed are important for the veterinary community to take note of in that they represent the emerging views of the Canadian judiciary on the notion that animals are mere property. As a consequence, it would appear that claims for unhappy veterinary clients against their veterinarians for negligence will be decided on the basis of providing damage awards equal to the fair market value of the animals as opposed to granting damages for "loss of companionship" or "emotional distress". By a judicial limitation on the awards of damages, insurers can better establish premium rates based upon the potential value of claims being limited by such decisions. Of interest is that the decision in Henderson does acknowledge the special relationship that owners have with their animals; however, such an acknowledgement is not accompanied with a determination that a dog can be the subject matter of a custody application similar to children. If pets are to be considered legally as property, then perhaps, subject to other laws relating to animal neglect and abuse, an owner's obligation to seek out and obtain appropriate veterinary care is minimized contrary to that which would be considered for children.

About BLG

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.