Canada: Quebec Superior Court Refuses To Approve Bank Fee Class Action Settlements On Account Of Unjustified Class Counsel Fees

On January 23, 2017, Justice Claudine Roy of the Superior Court of Quebec rendered an important judgment on settlement approval motions in four related class actions. The actions involved unilateral credit limit increases, over limit fees, cash advance fees, and interest calculations, with the plaintiffs alleging various violations of Quebec's Consumer Protection Act (the "CPA"). Similar or related settlements against other banks had been approved for each cause of action involved.

Justice Roy's decision to refuse approval of the five settlements at issue was therefore somewhat unexpected.

After setting out the seven settlement approval criteria traditionally referred to by Quebec courts, Justice Roy explained that the seventh criterion, i.e., the "terms, conditions, and modalities of the settlement," prevented the court from approving any of the settlements. Her disapproval was largely based on the disproportion between the fees payable to class counsel and the compensation payable to members.

Justice Roy did mention that she was not questioning the parties' good faith or suggesting that they had colluded. However, she did find it significant that the plaintiff considered that it no longer had reasonable chances of success. She also noted that the defendants continue to charge the fees at issue, and that the amount payable to members (about $5 each) represented a small portion of said fees.

The settlement amounts ranged from $350,000 to $4,250,000 per bank, representing between 0.5% and 40% of the fees collected by the different institutions. In two actions, there was no distribution to members at all; they involved distributions pursuant to article 597 of the Code of Civil Procedure instead (these are akin to cy-près agreements in the common law). Justice Roy held that, in light of the evidence, it appeared that the parties had negotiated without knowing what was really at stake in each file. This is a harsh criticism of the experienced counsel on both sides.

The Court did explain, however, that the "poor result" was due to the defendants' view that they had done nothing wrong, and Option consommateurs' view that its chances of success had been compromised by the Supreme Court's judgment in Bank of Montreal v. Marcotte. Recall that in Marcotte, the Supreme Court held that conversion charges for purchases made in foreign currencies were not "credit fees" within the meaning of the CPA. Option consommateurs had pleaded that this could have a negative impact on its ability to characterize over limit fees and cash advance fees as "credit fees" within the meaning of the CPA.

Justice Roy also took issue with the parties' request to extend the class definitions to the date of the signature of each settlement agreement. She explained that there was no reason to do so because the parties had negotiated on the basis of figures available in 2010 that had not been updated. Moreover, Option consommateurs did not seek to add any amount to compensate so-called "new" class members. This may have been particularly objectionable given that there was a lengthy delay (13 to 22 months in each case) between the date on which the agreements-in-principle were concluded and the date of the signature of each agreement. Justice Roy explained that although the courts usually agree to extend class definitions to the date of the settlement, she could not do so in all cases here, because the parties negotiated without taking new members' interests into account at all.

Nevertheless, she did say that had the result been different, she would have extended the class in two of the files before her, given the following:

  • the poor chances of success of the actions,
  • many class members who paid fees after 2010 were likely also clients before 2010,
  • the amount payable to each member would not vary as a function of the amount of fees paid, and
  • the difficulty of finding members going back to 2001.

The court also took particular issue with the amount payable to class counsel. Justice Roy noted gradual inflation in the amount of the percentage typically payable pursuant to contingency agreements, which was once as low as 15% and is now regularly as high as 33%. She also noted that many of the agreements were signed long after the proceedings were filed, and that there had been very little information provided with respect to class counsel's expenses, applicable taxes, the levels of experience of lawyers who worked on the file, and their hourly rates. She seemed to question how class counsel, having already received $13,025,000 pursuant to six settlements approved separately in related matters, could possibly be seeking another $2,312,500 now, especially in light of the fact that their work had not caused any of the defendants to modify their behaviour. She also noted that the total of $15,337,500 in fees sought by class counsel amounted to some $2000 per hour of time actually logged.

The main source of Justice Roy's criticism lies in the very purpose of class proceedings, i.e., providing access to justice for members. As she aptly pointed out, "the courts must be vigilant in order to ensure that class actions do not become a mere source of enrichment for class counsel and a source of funding for non-profit organizations."[*]

Justice Roy concluded that an amount of 5% of the sums collected would be fair and reasonable as compensation for class counsel "in finishing their work." Whether she meant that this would be the amount payable to class counsel for all of their work or the final phase of the action only (and how that final phase might be delineated) is unclear.

What is clear is that counsel will have to go back to the drawing board and significantly re-work their settlement agreements in order to obtain the Court's approval (unless their clients decide to appeal the judgment). This would likely mean providing more compensation for the class members, and a lesser amount in fees for counsel. The next judgment in these matters should provide further guidance on the terms and conditions of class action settlements that will be acceptable to the courts.

In the meantime, it should be noted that Justice Roy's decision has already had an impact. On January 27, 2017, Justice Denis Jacques refused to approve a settlement in another class action involving a bank. This was due in large part to the fact that this other settlement was contingent on approval of the settlement that was before Justice Roy. Nevertheless, Justice Jacques did say that he agreed with Justice Roy's reasons and conclusions, and that her decision was in the interests of the class members.


[*] See paragraph 110. The quotation has been translated from the original French.

About BLG

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions