Canada: Supreme Court Of Canada Clarifies The Remedy Of Rectification In Canadian Tax Cases

The Supreme Court's decisions in Fairmont and Jean Coutu (PJC)

On December 9, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada released two much-awaited decisions in Fairmont1 and in PJC2 that clarified the scope of the remedy of rectification in Canada, with broad implications for tax planning as well as commercial cases.

The equitable doctrine of rectification, like its equivalent in the civil law, is intended to address situations where parties have agreed on contractual terms, but through inadvertence,  their written contract does not reflect these terms. The doctrine of rectification originally applied only where there was clear evidence that the parties had agreed to specific terms that were not recorded in a written agreement.

In recent years, there has been a trend in Canadian tax cases towards a more flexible approach to rectification that gives effect to the continuing specific intention of the parties. In particular, rectification has been granted to remedy a situation where the parties' written agreement correctly recorded the intended terms of a transaction or series of transactions, but did not achieve the parties' desired tax result. Rectification was granted because the agreement as recorded did not carry out the parties' continuing intention to undertake a transaction on a particular tax basis, even though it correctly recorded the legal relationships that the parties intended.

In both Fairmont and PJC, the 7-2 majority of the Supreme Court found that rectification is limited to circumstances where the parties had a prior agreement that was not recorded correctly in the written
instrument(s) governing their legal relationships. The line of cases that suggested a broader approach to rectification was overruled.

Equitable doctrine of rectification

Historically, rectification in common law jurisdictions was granted in limited circumstances where the parties had reached a prior agreement, but the document(s) evidencing the contract did not reflect the terms of this agreement.3 In 1953, Lord Denning held that "in order to get rectification it is necessary to show that the parties were in complete agreement on the terms of their contract, but by an error wrote them down wrongly."4

By the year 2000, the requirements for obtaining rectification in the Canadian tax context were interpreted in a somewhat more flexible manner.

The Juliar approach

In Canadian tax law, tax consequences generally flow from the legal effect of the governing documents. Legal relationships are recharacterized for tax purposes only in certain situations.5 As a result, where there is an error in a legal document, that error may lead to unintended tax consequences even where it is contrary to the intention of the parties.

Taxpayers who faced an unexpected Canadian tax liability as a result of certain errors have turned to rectification as a potential remedy.

Juliar6 was the cornerstone of Canadian tax-related rectification decisions. The Ontario Superior Court in Juliar did not require that the party seeking rectification must have determined the precise mechanics or terms by which the party would realize its desired outcome.7 It was sufficient in Juliar that the parties had a common and continuing intention to carry out a transfer of property without creating a tax liability on the transfer of the property. After the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld this decision, the Supreme Court refused leave to appeal.

Following Juliar, some courts granted rectification in tax-related cases where the parties had created the legal relationships that they intended to create, but the tax result arising from the legal relationships was unexpected and clearly not intended by the parties.

Performance Industries and Shafron

Following its refusal to hear Juliar in 2000, the Supreme Court heard two rectification cases that arose in a non-tax context in common law provinces. In Performance Industries (2002) 8 and Shafron (2009),9 the Supreme Court focused on whether or not written agreements reflected the exact terms to which the parties had previously agreed.10

Fairmont resolves tension between the Performance Industries approach and the Juliar approach

The Juliar line of cases was not consistently followed, particularly outside of Ontario. While some commentators suggested that the Juliar concept of rectification (as applied in the lower courts' decision in Fairmont) cast too wide a net for rectification,11 others viewed the Juliar framework as correct, and argued that the criticisms levied against that approach were exaggerated or unfounded.12

Fairmont13 arose in this context. Upon hearing the applicant's request for  rectification, the Ontario Superior Court and the Ontario Court of Appeal followed the approach set out in Juliar, and granted rectification on the basis that the parties had a common and continuing intention to hedge currency risk on a tax neutral basis, and had originally determined that their intention would be frustrated if share redemptions took place. Share redemptions were, nevertheless, mistakenly carried out. The lower courts allowed the parties to substitute loans in place of the share redemptions in order to achieve Fairmont's tax-neutral hedging objective. In contrast, the Supreme Court allowed the Attorney General's appeal, and agreed that a mere general intention to carry out transactions on a "tax neutral" basis was not sufficient to entitle the parties to rectification. The majority of the Supreme Court agreed that the Ontario Court of Appeal erred in applying the Juliar threshold for rectification, and instead applied the higher threshold set out in the Performance Industries and Shafron decisions.

Takeaways from Fairmont

Rectification may still be available to remedy unexpected tax liabilities, provided the circumstances warrant rectification under the traditional equitable rectification doctrine. The majority in Fairmont provided the following guidance on when rectification may be granted:

Where the error is said to result from a mistake common to both or all parties to the agreement, rectification is available upon the court being satisfied that, on a balance of probabilities, there was a prior agreement whose terms are definite and ascertainable; that the agreement was still in effect at the time the instrument was executed; that the instrument fails to accurately record the agreement; and that the instrument, if rectified, would carry out the parties' prior agreement.14

On a go-forward basis, the Court's ruling underscores the importance of careful and considered legal drafting that documents the parties' intentions. The decision also underscores the importance of comprehensive tax planning that sets out not only the intended result, but also concrete legal steps and relationships required to obtain the result that are agreed to by the parties.

Furthermore, parties should consider creating records that memorialize their intentions, noting both what they intend to achieve and how they intend to achieve it. Such records would include adding more detailed recitals to key agreements, and otherwise creating contemporaneous documentation of what was intended at the time the agreement was entered into.

Civil law rectification – the decision in PJC

Fairmont's companion judgment, PJC, is a civil law case from Québec. Although the term "rectification" is used in Québec civil law, there is, strictly speaking, no doctrine of rectification in Québec. The Québec civil law remedy is provided by article 1425 of the Civil Code of Québec (CCQ), which requires that "The common intention of the parties rather than adherence to the literal meaning of the words shall be sought in interpreting a contract," thereby distinguishing between the actual agreement between two parties and the means by which they expressed that agreement.

Unlike Fairmont, which marked the first Supreme Court decision on rectification in the tax context, PJC came just three years after the Supreme Court decided a civil law tax rectification case: AES.15 The AES case dealt with two civil law applications for rectification. Both sought to correct mistakes made in the course of implementing structures that, absent those mistakes, would have been tax neutral. Justice LeBel upheld the taxpayers' corrections in a unanimous decision, relying solely on the CCQ rather than importing common law rectification. He noted that in civil law, consensualism is fundamental to the law of contracts and parties are free to correct documents to reflect their common intention, subject to third-party rights. However, he stated that "tax authorities do not have an acquired right to benefit from an error made by the parties to a contract after the parties have corrected the error by mutual consent."16 Conversely, Justice LeBel found that a common intention to reduce one's tax liability is not enough on its own to support rectification. Ultimately, the evidence supported a common intention in both cases to carry out the tax plans as set out in the rectified contracts, but Justice LeBel strictly limited the precedential value of his decision to the civil law context.

PJC involved a straightforward application of the principles previously set out in AES, though unlike AES the taxpayer in PJC was unsuccessful. The main implication of PJC is its confirmation, echoed in Fairmont, that common law and civil law rectification should generally produce consistent outcomes. Despite difference in the underlying law, that principle means that common law cases should have persuasive value in Québec, and vice versa. PJC also provides a useful example of a failed rectification, which combined with AES, helps to demonstrate where the line should — or at least henceforth will — be drawn.  

The full Fairmont decision is available at http://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16281/index.do.

The full PJC decision is available at http://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16280/index.do.

Footnotes

1 Canada (Attorney General) v. Fairmont Hotels Inc., 2016 SCC 56 (Fairmont).

2 Jean Coutu Group (PJC) Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2016 SCC 55 (PJC).

3 Dynamex Canada Inc. v. Miller (Dynamex), 78 A.C.W.S. (3d) 725, 1998 CarswellNfld 88 at para 23.

4 Frederick E. Rose (London) Ltd. v. William H Pim Jnr. & Co. C.A, as cited in Dynamex at para 17.

5 Shell Canada Ltd v. R., [1999] 3 S.C.R. 622, 1999 CarswellNat 1808 at para 39.

6 Juliar v. Canada (Attorney General), 1999 CarswellOnt 2970, aff'd by the Ontario Court of Appeal in 50 O.R. (3d) 728, 8 B.L.R. (3d) 167; leave to appeal to SCC refused, [2000] SCCA No 621.

7 Fairmont Hotels Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 ONCA 441, 2015 CarswellOnt 8955 at para 10.

8 Performance Industries Ltd. v. Sylvan Lake Golf & Tennis Club Ltd., 2002 SCC 19, [2002] 1 SCR 678 (Performance Industries).

9 Shafron v. KRG Insurance Brokers (Western) Inc., 2009 SCC 6, [2009] 1 SCR 157 (Shafron).

10 See, for example, Performance Industries, at para 40; Shafron at para 57.

11 See, for example, Bruce S. Russell and Karen D. Stilwell, "Aspects of Fixing Mistakes in Tax Context: Rectification and Due Diligence" 2009 Atlantic Provinces Tax Conference (Halifax:  Canadian Tax Foundation, 2009) at 6A:1-46.

12 See, for example, Jeff Oldewening, Rachel A. Gold, and Chris Sheridan, "Statutory Rectification" in Derek Alty et al, eds, Corporate Tax Planning (2016) 64:1 Canadian Tax Journal 293-325.

13 2014 ONSC 7302, 2014 CarswellOnt 17975.

14 Fairmont at para 38.

15 Quebec (Agence du revenu) v. Services Environnementaux AES inc., [2013] 3 SCR 838, 2013 SCC 65.

16 Ibid at para 52.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.