Canada: Unjust Dismissal In Federally Regulated Organizations – The Rift In The Case Law Has Been Healed

Last Updated: December 14 2016
Article by Charles Wagner and Mélanie Sauriol

The Supreme Court of Canada's recent decision in Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada1 ("Wilson") impacts more than 500,000 non-unionized employees, who work for organizations under federal jurisdiction (banks, telecommunications, interprovincial transportation enterprises and some Crown corporations). The decision puts an end to the controversy that had surrounded the remedy for unjust dismissal provided for in sections 240 to 246 of the Canada Labour Code2 (the "CLC"). It marks a major turning point for unjust dismissal hearings.

The regime created by sections 240 and following of the CLC grants non-unionized employees who have completed at least 12 months of continuous employment protection similar to that enjoyed by unionized employees covered by a collective agreement. For provincially regulated organizations in Quebec, a parallel can be drawn with the complaint for dismissal without good and sufficient cause under section 124 of An Act Respecting Labour Standards. An arbitrator called upon to decide the faith of a complaint for unjust dismissal has broad remedial powers, including the reinstatement of the employee.

The Wilson decision provides answers to a debate that has divided arbitral jurisprudence since section 240 was introduced into the CLC in 1978. Since then, the following two schools of thought have been followed in arbitrations involving claims for unjust dismissal:

(i) Federally regulated employers can legally dismiss a non-unionized employee without cause by providing said employee with a reasonable notice or pay in lieu thereof, and the employee is not entitled to contest his dismissal under section 240 of the CLC.

(ii) Federally regulated employers cannot legally dismiss a non-unionized employee without cause by providing the employee with a reasonable notice or pay in lieu thereof. The dismissed employee can file a complaint under section 240 CLC, and, if the employer is subsequently unable to demonstrate that the dismissal occurred for cause, the arbitrator can apply a variety of remedies, including the reinstatement of the employee.

It should be noted that the first school of thought was essentially followed in provinces other than Quebec.

I – The facts

Mr. Wilson had been employed by Atomic Energy of Canada for four and a half years. On November 16, 2009, he was dismissed without cause. The employer offered him a six months' indemnity in lieu of notice, which was very generous compared to the 18-day prior notice he was entitled to under the CLC. Mr. Wilson nevertheless filed a complaint for unjust dismissal under section 240(1) of the CLC, alleging that he was dismissed without cause.

II – The lower court decisions

Arbitrator's decision

The arbitrator acknowledged the two schools of thought canvassed above concerning unjust dismissal under the CLC. He stated that an employer could not avoid the application of the CLC by offering a severance package, no matter how generous. He found that the employer did not have a cause for dismissing the employee and concluded that the dismissal of an employee without cause automatically constitutes unjust dismissal for the purposes of section 240 of the CLC.

Decision of the Federal Court

According to the Federal Court, dismissal without cause is legal if it is not unjust. It concluded that the sections of the CLC providing for prior notice would not have been included in the statute if only dismissals for cause were authorized, and, that if such had been the case, the legislature would have clearly expressed its intention to create such a regime.

Decision of the Federal Court of Appeal

The Federal Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the Federal Court while acknowledging the existence of a divergence of opinion in the arbitral jurisprudence in this regard. The Court was of the view that the provisions of the CLC at issue did not create a right to employment comparable to that enjoyed by unionized workers. On the contrary, the sections dealing with prior notice allowed an employer to dismiss an employee without cause provided the employee was given a reasonable prior notice or pay in lieu thereof.

III – Decision of the Supreme Court

The country's highest court had to decide whether dismissal without cause coupled with the payment of a generous severance package was tantamount to a lawful dismissal under the CLC.

According to the Court, it is obvious that the "Parliament intended to expand the dismissal rights of non-unionized federal employees in a way that, if not identically, at least analogously matched those held by unionized employees"3. In this regard, it pointed out that "employees covered by collective agreements are protected from unjust dismissals and can only be dismissed for 'just cause'. This includes an onus on employers to give reasons  showing why the dismissal is justified, and carries with it a wide remedial package including reinstatement and progressive discipline"4.

The Court found that the arbitrator's decision was not unreasonable and reiterated that federally regulated employers cannot avoid the application of the CLC's provisions regarding unjust dismissal merely by offering the minimum severance package calculated pursuant to sections 230 and 235, or an even more generous severance package.

In such cases, employees can avail themselves of the remedy under section 240 to contest the legality of the dismissal, even where the employer has offered to pay the minimum severance package or an even greater amount. In other words, federally regulated employers must show that there was a cause for the dismissal.

According to the Court, this is a coherent interpretation of the provisions of the CLC that is anchored in parliamentary intention, arbitral jurisprudence and labour relations practice5. Moreover, it adds: "the alternative approach of severance pay in lieu falls outside the range of 'possible, acceptable outcomes which are defensible in respect of the facts and law' because it completely undermines this purpose by permitting employers, at their option, to deprive employees of the full remedial package Parliament created for them"6.

The Court also commented on the divergence of opinion in the arbitral jurisprudence acknowledged by the lower courts. It noted that the opinion it was repudiating had been followed in only 18 out of more than 1,700 cases over the last 20 years. It accordingly downplayed the importance of that line of cases, stating that they amounted to "a drop in the bucket which is being elevated to a jurisprudential parting of the waters"7.

IV – Comments

The Supreme Courts' decision reflects Quebec employment law, under which dismissal must be for a good and sufficient cause. In fact, Quebec law does not even recognize the possibility of dismissal without cause.

Federally regulated employers must now adjust their employment practices accordingly in light of this decision. In particular, they must be more vigilant during the 12 months following the hiring of new employees, as the latter are not entitled to the protection provided by section 240 of the CLC until the first anniversary of their hiring date. Consequently, an employee who has not reached that seniority threshold can be dismissed without cause, provided that he or she is given the requisite prior notice under the CLC or an indemnity in lieu thereof. However, once that threshold has been passed, the employee is protected from unjust dismissal by virtue of section 240. This means that employers will now have to weigh-in the legal and financial consequences should they intend to dismiss any employee who has more than 12 months' seniority.

It should be noted that the Supreme Court's decision has no impact on an employer's ability to dismiss an employee for cause. The employer and the employee in question can nevertheless come to an understanding regarding the termination of the employment relationship in a written agreement coupled with a release and discharge which may include financial compensation. That being said, the Wilson decision definitely gives employees with sufficient seniority an additional arrow in their quiver, as in the event negotiations on the termination of the employment relationship fails and the employee is dismissed, he or she can then pursue the remedies under sections 240 and following of the CLC.

Footnotes

1. 2016 SCC 29

2. RSC 1985, c L-2.

3. Supra, note 1 at par. 44

4. Ibid, at par. 51

5. Ibid, at par. 69

6. Ibid, at par. 39

7. Ibid, at par. 61

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Charles Wagner
Mélanie Sauriol
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.