Canada: Mennillo V. Intramodal Inc. — Resigning As Director May Entail Forfeiting Shares

In last Friday's decision regarding shareholder disputes, the majority of the Supreme Court of Canada in Mennillo v. Intramodal Inc., 2016 SCC 51 dismissed the oppression remedy appeal of a former shareholder, denying that the shareholder had a right to reverse a share transfer which did not comply with the Canada Business Corporations Act ("CBCA"). In so doing, the Court distinguished a breach of the formalities of the CBCA by the corporation from a proper claim of oppression by a shareholder and found that a private agreement with another shareholder – separate and apart from the corporation – resulted in the loss of shares upon resignation as director. A strongly-worded dissent by Justice Côté found that the breaches of formalities of the CBCA by the corporation undermined important principles of corporate law.

The Shareholdings

Like many start-up ventures, the parties in this case were friends who decided to go into business together. Mennillo agreed to finance the business and Rosati would contribute the operating expertise. Intramodal Inc. was incorporated in 2004 under the CBCA, both parties being named as directors and officers. Shares were issued: 49% for Mennillo and 51% for Rosati. Both the notices of subscription and the directors' resolutions were signed by Rosati alone. Throughout their business relationship the parties rarely complied with the formal requirements of the CBCA. Even substantial monetary advances from Mennillo to Rosati lacked any written formalities.

In May of 2005, for reasons contradicted by each party, Mennillo resigned his position with the company and asked to be removed as a director and officer. The corporation proceeded to give effect to his resignation as director and officer and to transfer his shares to Rosati. At a later date, Mennillo discovered that the business was running successfully and that his shares had been transferred. He objected and, ultimately, sought relief from the court through the oppression remedy.

Intramodal, for its part, was of the view that Mennillo not only resigned as a director but also as a shareholder by virtue of an agreement between Rosati and Mennillo that Mennillo's shares would continue to be held by him as long as he guaranteed all the debts of Intramodal. Once he removed himself as guarantor, his shareholdings also transferred to Rosati.

The Courts Below

At trial, Justice Poirier of the Québec Superior Court was faced with a highly contested evidentiary record. The dealings between the parties were not well recorded in the corporation's books, nor were many of the formalities of the CBCA followed such as resolutions of the directors, signatures on share certificates, and due diligence by the corporation in meeting its share capital requirements. All of the relevant agreements were made verbally and all of the relevant financial transactions were made in cash.

Justice Poirier found that Mennillo was not a credible witness. He largely accepted the evidence of Intramodal and dismissed the action, finding that the shares issued to Mennillo were conditional upon his guaranteeing the company's debts. Therefore, Mennillo ceased to be a shareholder upon his resignation as director and officer in May of 2005 and was a mere creditor of Rosati and Intramodal.

Mennillo appealed. The majority of the Québec Court of Appeal sided with Intramodal and dismissed the appeal on the basis that the trial judge, whose decision was based on key findings of fact, did not make any palpable and overriding error. The majority found that Mennillo was a shareholder whose resignation, coupled with the understanding between the parties, resulted in the retroactive cancellation of the issuance of the shares to Mennillo. In dissenting reasons, Justice Gagnon focussed on the breach of formalities by Intramodal and concluded that since the requirements of section 76 of the CBCA had not been satisfied, there could not have been a valid transfer of the shares from Mennillo to Rosati.

Reasons of the Supreme Court

The reasons of the majority of the Supreme Court focussed on the reasonable expectations of the parties in determining whether the trial judge's dismissal of the oppression claim should be upheld. The majority reasons, written by Justice Cromwell (Abella, Karakatsanis, Wagner, Gascon and Brown JJ concurring) noted that the test for the oppression remedy (following BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders, 2008 SCC 69) requires two conditions to be met. First, the claimant must show the expectations that he or she claims have been violated and that they were reasonable. Second, the claimant must show that those reasonable expectations were violated by conduct that was oppressive, unfairly prejudicial to or unfairly disregarding of his interests as a security holder. 

The majority accepted the trial judge's findings of fact and concluded that no palpable or overriding error was made regarding the agreement between Mennillo and Rosati that Mennillo's shares would transfer to Rosati upon his resignation as director and guarantor. Chief Justice McLachlin (with Justice Moldaver) concurred with the majority and agreed that there was no reasonable expectation on the part of Mennillo to remain a shareholder, after he resigned and requested that his relationship with Intramodal cease. There was no evidence to establish that Mennillo had a reasonable expectation that his involvement with Intramodal would continue. For that reason, the claim in oppression must fail and, contrary to the majority, Chief Justice McLachlin and Justice Moldaver considered it unnecessary to go further and determine whether there was an effective transfer of shares.

In finding no violation of a reasonable expectation, Justice Cromwell's reasons distinguished a breach of formalities of the CBCA from a breach of reasonable expectations rising to level of a right to relief from oppression. The latter right requires conduct by the corporation that rises to the level of "oppressive, unfairly prejudicial to or unfairly disregarding of the interests of any security holder". A mere failure to follow statutory formalities is insufficient to grant access to the oppression remedy. In support of this conclusion was the finding of fact made at trial that the transfer of shares occurred between Mennillo and Rosati, without the corporation being a party to the agreement.

However, Justice Cromwell's reasons also corrected the Court of Appeal's notion that Mennillo's shares were retroactively cancelled as a result of his resignation as a director. Justice Cromwell noted that an issuance of shares under the CBCA can only be cancelled if the corporation's articles are amended or the corporation reaches a formal agreement to purchase the shares, requiring the directors to pass a resolution, the shareholder to consent, and the tests of solvency and liquidity to be met. None of these conditions for cancellation existed in the case and, therefore, the Court of Appeal conclusion on that point was corrected.

Dissenting reasons by Justice Côté focussed on the principles of corporate law that underlie the formalities for share transfer and cancellation in the CBCA: (i) the principle of the legal personality of the corporation distinct from the shareholder(s) and (ii) the principle of maintenance of capital of the corporation. The closely-held nature of the corporation in this case increased the importance of these principles, according to Justice Côté, and the failure of the corporation to observe the formalities of the CBCA was itself a form of oppression.

Notes for Shareholders

This decision is an important caution for shareholders who have collateral agreements, whether written or unwritten, regarding their obligations as shareholders. If those collateral agreements are not discharged, or are rescinded or breached, a resulting forfeiture of share ownership may be upheld by the courts even in the face of breached statutory formalities. Further, a blanket oppression claim may not be sufficient to gain compensation for the loss of shares even when the corporate statute and articles are breached by the corporation. However, this decision also reiterates the need for corporations to ensure compliance with statutory formalities and the reasons of the majority of the Supreme Court leave open the right of shareholders to challenge conduct that does not comply with formalities, but falls short of oppression. Activist shareholders and their legal advisers in future cases will be well-advised not to rely solely on the oppression remedy and to advance any available claims in regard to specific statutory formality breaches and lead specific evidence of reasonable expectations under a claim for relief from oppression.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
14 Sep 2017, Seminar, Birmingham, UK

Has Cloud replaced traditional outsourcing models? We will compare cloud to outsourcing, consider whether they have effectively become the same thing for many solutions and assess some of the advantages and disadvantages of each model.

18 Sep 2017, Seminar, London, UK

Our annual event as part of the London Design Festival is now in its fifth year. We would be delighted if you are able to join us again.

21 Sep 2017, Seminar, London, UK

Has Cloud replaced traditional outsourcing models? We will compare cloud to outsourcing, consider whether they have effectively become the same thing for many solutions and assess some of the advantages and disadvantages of each model.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.